The Symbiosis of Gyms and Online Training Post-Pandemic

In the midst of the reopening growing pain, most beginners will continue to participate or fumble around buying or researching online programs.

Personal trainers and / or coaches who are not sold in online coaching take note of this. This article will be a discussion of the win-win situation for the average gym user and online trainer.

What is online coaching?

At a time when the information superhighway is just a tap on the smartphone, jobs, including personal training, can be accessed online. However, this wealth of information comes at a price.

This price is called the paradox of choice. The more information about training, nutrition, rehabilitation is available, the less accessible it is and the less screening takes place, which leads us into the era of online coaching.

I start with what online coaching is not. It is not a random stranger with a CPT certificate that asks you for money and merely provides an unspecific, immeasurable, unreachable program and set of guidelines.

In fact, it's not a fad diet in conjunction with bro-science training programs. It is a legitimate business model and a way to make progress.

Selecting a trainer in certain circles defines exactly what this means. For example, an online bodybuilding coach will ask:

The trainer should be:

In Olympic weightlifting, trainers should have participated in this sport, received certification and successfully taught others.

Trainers should be actively involved in their communitieswhether it's within an association or an online community, not Instagram.

During the on-boarding process of online coaching, the coach then asks a number of questions to best meet the customer's needs. Programming should be a product of these questionnaires.

After the onboarding process, follow-up calls, check-ins and personal meetings follow. This combination of expertise, support and customization creates a useful online coaching experience.

Start online now?

COVID-19 has caused the closure of most fitness facilities worldwide, and as such, most people have refrained from eating a clean and sensible diet and, in some cases, from overall activities.

For those who have become passive and unmotivated, reopening the gym will not miraculously rejuvenate the glow of fitness. Instead, a schedule starts in her home to go back to the gym and continue a healthy lifestyle.

At home there are great tools that you can discuss with your weighted workout trainer such as: B. gallons or sofas. Home cooking is also becoming increasingly important when restaurants are closed.

It was not easier to learn how to count your macros, weigh foods, and understand nutrient levels. With a healthier plan, most dishes don't come from a can or box. They require spices, marinades and the cooking of raw materials. There is more time inside the house to spend with the family without worrying about the spread.

After social distancing?

Hybrid coaching. If a trainer stagnates and does not separate from pen and paper during this time, they are significantly disadvantaged. Zoom workouts, YouTube and seminars are becoming increasingly popular with young and old.

Coaches now have more work to do. They have to be accessible outside of the gym or office, scalable to their customers and offer an obsessively excellent service or lose face to IG models.

A face-to-face meeting may or may not be a reward, but should be as important as the online part, if not higher.

Companies like Starting Strength and Renaissance Periodization have taken this to another level. They offer seminars and camps, both in person and online, and offer certifications for ordinary people to learn the technique and implement it at home in the kitchen or in the gym.

Many customers and clients will not return to the fitness facilities immediately. With established guidelines, social distancing and cumbersome fitness etiquette are not too far away.

Online coaching offers the opportunity to regain control Learn to become more even regardless of your fitness environment and don't seem to get far when you return.

I hope this has been helpful and encourages you to regain control of your health and inspire you to support your local trainers. Lift with love, my friends.

Motorola Moto E (2020) Review: As Good As It Gets For $150

motorola moto e 2020 review 5

Motorola Moto E (2020) review: Great value at $ 150

"The Motorola Moto E isn't perfect, but it's the best option for $ 150."

  • Relatively modern design

  • Good value for the price

  • Clean software experience

  • Camera could be better

  • Ad is not great

Motorola has long been a point of contact for inexpensive phones. The Moto E was first launched in 2014 and quickly became a fan favorite for those looking for a decent phone for around $ 150. Six years later, the company continues the tradition with a new Moto E model that features a relatively modern design, mid-range specifications, and more.

While the Moto E has remained a great option over the years, a lot of competition has emerged. Is the new Moto E still competing with the best phones under $ 200?

Design and display

Edge-to-edge displays have found their way to some of the cheapest phones – and the Moto E jumps on that train. The device has a small chin at the bottom and a drop notch at the top, but still looks good for a phone in this price range.

The display is 6.2 inches and the bezels are relatively narrow. This is good news – it means the phone looks modern despite its price range.

The back of the phone also looks good. The phone is mostly made of plastic, and while it doesn't feel as high-quality as more expensive devices, it doesn't feel too cheap either. There is a fingerprint sensor under the Motorola logo and a vertically aligned camera array on the back of the phone.

On the edges of the phone you'll get a fairly normal setup, including a volume rocker and a power button on the right, and a SIM / MicroSD card slot on the right. There is also a headphone jack at the top. This is good news for those who still use wired headphones.

You can find a micro USB port below, which is a little frustrating. The Moto E is a budget phone, but it is 2020, and USB-C should be the standard for all phones by now.

The Moto E's display is roughly what you'd expect from a $ 150 phone in 2020. It has a resolution of 720p and an LCD display. So don't expect much. It also seems to be a little different than the display of the new Moto G Fast, as it can't get quite as bright. If you are outdoors and in direct sunlight, you may have trouble seeing the display clearly.

Performance and battery life

Under the hood, the Moto E offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor with 2 GB RAM. I have found that although it is not necessarily suitable for heavy multitasking or intensive mobile gaming, it definitely does the job for everyday use and clearly outperforms the competition in this price range.

In general, most users are more than satisfied with the performance of this device. If you switch between multiple apps at the same time, you may have to deal with slowdowns and jumps in the software. However, these usually resolved themselves quickly, and the device was still more than usable. The same applies to Chrome tabs. Simply surfing the web is perfectly fine, but anything that is heavier and you should consider a more powerful phone.

Basic mobile games are also possible on this phone, but don't expect much more than the basics. Call of Duty: Mobile was playable, although it wasn't the smoothest experience. The Moto G Fast or if possible the Moto G Power offers better performance.

If you are serious about mobile games, you want a phone with at least a Snapdragon 7xx series SoC or an iPhone. Budget phones are surpassed. This is not necessarily a problem that only occurs with the Moto E, but a compromise that all inexpensive phones make to get a lower price.

Benchmarks confirm decent performance for the price. The phone scored 118,004 points at AnTuTu, which is not a bad thing. For comparison: the Moto G7 Play scored 98,111 points last year, while the more powerful Google Pixel 3a scored 157,902 points. The Moto G Fast, which is $ 50 more expensive, reached 161,672.

The phone's battery capacity is 3,550 mAh, and we've found that it works just fine in everyday use. The battery should get you through a day of normal use, but heavy users may need to charge the device before the end of the day. Don't expect the next day to go too far. The phone does not offer wireless charging or fast charging. So you need to familiarize yourself with nightly charging or when you work at a desk while you are working.

camera

The 2020 Moto E offers a dual sensor camera, although one of these sensors is a 2 megapixel lens that is only used to capture depth information. The other sensor is a 13 megapixel lens with an aperture of 1: 2.0 and is generally fine. But only good.

In well-lit environments, the Moto E can take decent photos with monochrome rendering and depth of field. While photos weren't incredibly detailed, for most uses this won't be a big deal.

Of course, you are not always in a well-lit environment. If you are not, you are more or less unlucky. While more expensive phones take better and better photos in low light conditions, there is no significant night mode on this phone. As a result, poorly lit photos either look noisy or you cannot see the subject at all.

There is a 5 megapixel selfie camera on the front that does the job if need be. Like the rear-facing camera, it doesn't work in low light and is definitely prone to unnaturally bright colors in some situations. Nevertheless, it can be used for most social media posts.

The Moto E is a budget phone and has a budget camera. It works in most situations, but don't expect incredible photos and don't expect to be able to use it in low light.

software

The software experience on modern Motorola phones is great. With the Moto G Fast and Moto E, the company has renamed its Android skin to My UX. Other than a name change, nothing else is different – you still get the best experience with just a few small changes that frankly make the experience better.

Perhaps the best thing about My UX compared to standard Android are the moto actions, which allow you to control certain aspects of the phone software with gestures. For example, you can take a screenshot with three fingers or turn on the flashlight with a hacking motion. It's a nice touch.

My UX is based on Android 10, and Motorola was pretty good at providing software updates. Given that it's a budget phone, updates may not be updated as quickly as you want. The Moto G7, for example, only got Android 10 in May 2020.

Price, guarantee and availability

The Moto E is available directly on the Motorola website for $ 150. This is a great price for this phone. If you can stretch your budget a bit, it's worth considering the Moto G Fast, or if you can stretch the Moto G Power even more.

The Moto E comes with a one-year limited warranty that only covers manufacturer's defects. It is worth buying a protective case to protect the device

Our opinion

The Motorola Moto E is far from perfect, but the best option for $ 150. It offers a relatively modern design, solid performance, and more. When shopping on a budget, performance is one of the most important things to consider.

Is there a better alternative?

If you are willing to spend more money, there are definitely better options. The $ 200 Moto G Fast is a solid phone with better performance and much better battery life. If you can double your budget to $ 300, you should consider the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Google Pixel 3a. The Google Pixel 3a in particular is an excellent phone with an incredible camera.

How long it will take?

When used easily, the Moto E should last about two years. The performance of the phone will deteriorate over time. Therefore, do not expect smooth experience for the entire two-year period. In addition, the phone is not waterproof. Therefore, do not take it near the bath or pool.

Should you buy one?

Yes, if you need a phone for $ 150 or less. If you can stretch your budget a little, it is worth spending the extra money.

Editor's recommendations




CrossFit Is Not Going Anywhere

I think some other people have spoken and have given their opinion on the recent CrossFit problems on these pages. As someone who enjoyed CrossFit when I founded Breaking Muscle and someone who believes that you should be open to all training modalities, remain curious about all disciplines, and shouldn't try to take precedence in a supremacy, I need my perspective specify .

First, Breaking Muscle was never, and never should be, a training format. So we won't be able to avoid talking about CrossFit. I can understand that some of the conversations surrounding CrossFit are related to CrossFit's brand and business, but unfortunately there is no other way to relate to what CrossFitters is doing than to call it CrossFit.

The term CrossFit, no matter what happens to the people who run CrossFit, Inc., will not go away. There are too many people dedicated to training, competitions and the sense of belonging that they feel for training.

What is CrossFit? That's because of the CrossFit community. I don't want to speculate and I don't want to speak for them. I believe that most of the partners face enough challenges due to the recent ban and are now facing an existential threat to their core beliefs through the actions of CrossFit, the company.

What I can say is that there are many good trainers and trainers who have found their voice and sharpened their profile due to CrossFit. My family is very close to Mike Tromello at Precision CrossFit and has known Mike since he was a strength and conditioning trainer and before he became a successful partner.

Mike is probably one of the biggest CrossFit fans we know. We are sorry that he was able to deal with the effects of recent events. Despite all the hard work and years of advocacy that Mike has done in CrossFit, he shouldn't have been put in that position.

And Mike is one of the best strength and conditioning trainers we've had at Breaking Muscle. It wasn't like he was teaching CrossFit. It was his strength and conditioning skills.

There are many other people like Mike out there, affiliate owners with the same passion for CrossFit, who are also fitness professionals who are good at their work and would thrive as strength and conditioning trainers in any environment. Everyone has to deal with problems are not from what they do and for whom there is no easy answer.

We cannot write these coaches and coaches off. And we cannot realistically expect everyone to part with them.

There are also many great coaches that have emerged from the CrossFit world, Coach Rut and James Fitzgerald, to name but two, that have evolved over the years.

There are others who may not want to be named who were driven out of CrossFit because they were not as respectful as they could have been.

There are many war stories about CrossFit; If you read all of Pat McCarty's articles, you'll get a history lesson on how the company handled criticism. It seems like the bad stories come out more because of the opportunity to be heard, and there are undoubtedly good ones that will get lost in the noise.

However, the CrossFit issues are business issues. The social struggle against racism in its current form may only intensify, and most people will be on the right side of this struggle because most people can be trusted to do the right thing.

You want to do the right thing. I think most partners will have problems with what that means for them.

However you choose, CrossFit will still be CrossFit. It will be difficult to say what that really means for CrossFit in six months.

Sonos Move Review: A Great Speaker for the Great Outdoors

sonos move review 8

"The Sonos Move can be used anywhere, but is just as happy at home. It may be the only speaker you need."

  • Outstanding build quality

  • Integration with Sonos systems

  • Sounds particularly good outdoors

  • User replaceable battery

  • The Sonos app does not work via Bluetooth

  • Big size, big price

Sonos has been the leading brand for wireless home audio since the company effectively launched the category almost 20 years ago. All this time, however, it has decidedly refused to support Bluetooth wireless connections on its devices.

Only Sonos knows all the reasons why the company has held back, but this chapter is now closed. The company's first truly portable (and Bluetooth-enabled) $ 399 Move is here. The only remaining question is whether the move is worthwhile given the significant investment.

Big but balanced

Hold the Sonos Move by the handle

Sonos products are known for their excellent build quality. Regardless of whether it's a Sonos One SL (formerly Play: 1) or a Sonos Sub, every speaker feels solid and solid. The Sonos Move goes one step further. It weighs 6.6 pounds, making it more than two pounds heavier than a Sonos One and almost twice as heavy as the Ultimate Ears Megablast, a portable speaker with many of the same features.

Thanks to the well-designed integrated handle, you can still carry it from place to place without fear of accidentally dropping it. The included charging station essentially disappears with the move in position, which is ideal and offers additional stability.

Thanks to the handle, you can move the Move from place to place without fear of dropping it.

Not that the move needs it. Despite a rounded base that wants to roll the Move to the side at any time, a low center of gravity and a very grippy rubber floor lets the Move lean at surprisingly precarious angles without falling over. Even if that were the case (I didn't intentionally drop or roll the move), Sonos assures that the speaker will continue to work properly, although no promises have been made to dent the black metal grill. And unlike so many other speakers built for the elements, the Move's understated design still looks great on a coffee table or in a bookcase.

In June 2020, Sonos announced that a new matt white color would be added to the Move's matt black debut. This brings the Move in line with other black and white products from Sonos such as Sonos One SL, Sonos Five and the new Sonos Arc soundbar.

let it Rain

This robustness extends to the Move's ability to deal with the inherently variable outdoor conditions – in fact, this is a large part of the speaker's appeal. With IP56 protection, the Move should be able to withstand deserts and beaches alike, and if you take it to the snowboard terrain park, it should also work well there.

The Sonos move under a tap

I didn't do any of that with the move. Instead, I had a small meeting on the terrace, placed it next to our cats' dusty litter box for 24 hours, and then ran it under a tap to clean it. You would never do that with a normal Sonos speaker, but the Move did it all effortlessly.

Patio power

The ability to survive in the face of water, dust, and occasionally spilled beer is one thing, but a portable speaker must sound like it was built for one thing: great audio. Indoors, the Move is cheap compared to Sonos One or Play: 1. It creates a slightly wider sound stage and the bass is more pronounced, but there is also a corresponding clouding of the mid-range. You would only notice something like this if you place a move right next to one of these other models and then compulsorily switch between them while playing everything from The Offspring to Adele. Of course not that I did.

Take the movement outside and only one thought comes to mind: This thing rocks.

Take the train outside and all other thoughts but one melt away: this thing rocks. Even with a volume of less than 50%, I ran the risk of attracting unwanted attention from neighbors several doors away. The expanded sound stage, which made itself felt in the interior, magically expands further outdoors. We have a pair of Klipsch AWR-650-SM landscape speakers in our garden that are powered by a Sonos amp. You sound fantastic. But if the Move had been available, we could have bought two of them, saved ourselves considerable dough, and found a much more flexible solution for outdoor music. For many people, a single move is more than enough speaker for even the wildest pool parties.

A better battery

I've said it before, but it needs to be repeated: Sonos' decision to make the Move rechargeable lithium-ion battery user replaceable deserves praise. Sonos claims that the cell lasts three years or 900 charges. You can then replace the battery with a new one. The battery is suitable for an alleged duration of 10 hours at medium volume. I think that's pretty accurate, but I had a different experience when the Move was in standby. It was supposed to stay that way for up to 120 hours, but I found it heard an audible tone when I canceled it with a 40% charge remaining that it had to be plugged in after just 12 hours.

On June 16, 2020, with the announcement of the new white color option, Sonos announced that the battery life of the Move would be increased to 11 hours by a software update.

The Move can be charged via USB-C if you don't have the charging station at hand. However, please note the following: Not every USB-C charger works. The move requires a charger that can output one of these three voltage / current combinations: 12 V / 3 A, 15 V / 3 A, 20 V / 2.25 A, and it is highly unlikely to do so with your phone supplied charger is compatible. You don't want to make this discovery in the middle of a road trip. The Move's front LED flashes angry orange to let you know that she's not happy.

Hey google, can you say bluetooth, wifi and airplay 2?

The Sonos Move offers many options: a portable Bluetooth speaker with a battery life of 10 hours, a Wi-Fi speaker with AirPlay 2 and a smart speaker with Alex or Google Assistant on board. The move makes everyone right. Switching between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modes is as easy as pressing the dedicated mode button on the back of the speaker. Amazingly, Bluetooth sounds very similar to the quality of Wi-Fi, which proves that the biggest factor in the perceived sound quality of the speakers is not necessarily the source.

I still preferred to listen over Wi-Fi indoors, but frankly it's more than sufficient in places where Bluetooth is needed. Sonos claims that the Bluetooth wireless range is excellent on the go, and while this is true outside, it also had trouble staying connected to my phone indoors as I was in our multi-tier home, as in other BT products that I tested, say we didn't like being separated by more than one floor.

Sonos needs to find a way for the Sonos app to maintain operational control over the move in Bluetooth mode. It's not right to start a third-party app like Spotify, Apple Music or Tidal just because I'm not at home. I like the experience with the Sonos app and hope that one day it will be the only experience I need, regardless of the color of my wireless connection.

I had some difficulty installing the Google Assistant setup on the go, but I feel like I've already used GA for another Sonos product in my home. If you completely remove GA from the system and add it back in, everything will work properly. As soon as Google was operational, it ran perfectly and responded to all of my commands. "Hey Google, how do I make a mojito?" on the specific, "Hey Google, play Los Lobos in the living room", very quickly. The microphone array on the Move has so far proven to be more sensitive than that of the Sonos One. It picked up my orders in quiet speaking throughout the room and even whispered when it was only a few meters away.

Is it really trueplay?

The same microphone array is responsible for one of the more fascinating functions of the Move: Auto Trueplay or the ability to optimize your own EQ settings based on the location of the speaker. In last August's Sonos demo, a speaker moved the move from a wide-open living room to a tiny storage compartment, and in fact Auto Trueplay has adjusted to improve the sound.

I may not have made the move sound as extreme as I did in the demo, but I haven't noticed many EQ adjustments from place to place. I wondered if Auto Trueplay could only be as effective with its dependence on local acoustic feedback as Trueplay from a smartphone microphone outside the speaker. Unfortunately there is no way to test this. If you disable Auto Trueplay on the Move, you won't get manual Trueplay as an option.

Our opinion

At $ 399, the Sonos Move isn't as cheap as some would have liked for the company's first Bluetooth speaker. It lacks some Bluetooth gadgets like a speakerphone and Bluetooth stereo paring, and you can't use the Sonos app in Bluetooth mode. It only sounds a little better indoors than a Sonos One SL for $ 170.

With its ability to fill any garden or pool party with music, the easy switch between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and the practical integration of smart speakers, it is the ideal companion for some Sonos fans and possibly the only Sonos product that does so you need .

Is there a better alternative?

The number of portable, smart, weatherproof speakers that can work on both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi networks is gradually increasing. Many of them are cheaper than the Sonos Move for $ 399. Of these, the Bose portable home speaker for $ 349 is the closest in design and features. It's not quite as powerful as the Move, but it's a bit lighter and its handle makes it a better companion for longer hikes. Here's our head-to-head comparison of these two excellent portable devices. However, none of these competitors can connect to a Sonos system. This makes the Move unique for Sonos owners.

How long it will take?

All Sonos products come with a one-year warranty. However, this is not an indicator of longevity. Sonos speakers have always shown impressive build quality, and the company goes to great lengths to test its products for durability. We believe that the Sonos Move, with its user-replaceable battery and first-class construction, has an excellent lifespan.

Should you buy it

Yes. The Sonos Move delivers great portable sound in a package that survives almost anything you can throw at it.

Editor's recommendations




Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera Review: 3-in-One Awesomeness

Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera

“Don't waste your money by buying various security devices for your garden. This one has everything. "

  • 160 degree field of view

  • Bright floodlights

  • Smart A.I. for detection

  • Siren is on the quiet side

  • Some video distortion

The Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera ($ 250) combines three large security devices: a spotlight, a siren, and a surveillance camera in one elegant package. There are also a number of useful functions in this intelligent camera, which is only a little larger than the rearview mirror in your car.

installation

Installing this camera couldn't be easier. All you have to do is follow the steps in the app to connect the Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera to your WiFi, then attach the base to your house with three screws and then just snap the camera into place. The whole process took about 10 minutes. I don't think I could ask for more from a product when it comes to easy installation.

Install the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight cameraAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

However, you need an exercise. You probably won't be able to get the screws into what your house is made of without one, and you may need to drill pilot holes if you want to use the screw anchors. If you have no idea what this means, don't worry. The app guides you through everything step by step. Overall, it's very easy if you don't have to drill pilot holes, and a bit more advanced if you do, but almost anyone with a drill could do it.

The camera comes with a rechargeable battery. However, if you want something more permanent, you can purchase a solar charger for the Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera or a magnetic Arlo charging cable for outdoors. However, the camera cannot be permanently connected to the power supply of your house.

camera

I have very few complaints when it comes to the clarity of this camera. It has an incredible field of view of 160 degrees, which is much better than most of its competitors, including the Ring Floodlight Camera and the Eufy Smart Floodlight. It also has 2K 2560 x 1440 HDR video resolution and color night vision when the lights are on (when the lights are off, the footage is in black and white). You can also zoom in on people's objects and faces up to 12 times for a better view.

The camera is not only clear, but also intelligent. The A.I. allows him to know what he sees and to send you specific notifications depending on what he sees. It can tell the difference between a human, a package, animals and vehicles. I found that the A.I. does a pretty good job and differentiates one thing from the other and it seems to be learning. For a while I always thought that a blowing branch was a person, but after two notifications, I didn't get another notification about the branch, even though the wind was still blowing.

Security video of the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight cameraAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

Your videos are stored in the cloud at 4K or less for 30 days (videos can be saved in 2K, 1080p and 720p). The resolution in which your images are saved depends on the plan you choose through Arlo Smart Service, which costs between $ 3 and $ 5 a month for a camera. You can also save footage locally using the Arlo Pro Smart Hub ($ 100).

The only disadvantage of this camera is that it is slightly distorted at the edges of the picture. For example, the edge of my house looks like it curves inside in the videos. However, fishbowl lens distortion is quite common in surveillance cameras, and this distortion is nowhere near as severe as some others.

Headlights

The light from the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight camera is not only bright, but almost blinding. It shines with a whopping 2000 to 3000 lumens. I was a little taken aback when I found out that you need the Arlo Outdoor magnetic charging cable to bring the light up to 3000 lumens. This is a separately available accessory that costs around $ 50. Nevertheless, the 2000 lumens are very bright if you only use the battery as a power source.

I'm pretty sure an intruder will feel exposed when this light is triggered.

For comparison: your typical indoor light bulb shines with about 800 to 1600 lumens. I'm pretty sure an intruder will feel exposed when this light is triggered. I adjusted the light to illuminate my carport and the walkway to my front door. It illuminated this area and a few more. If you find that your light is just too bright, it can be fully adjusted from 5% to 100%.

Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera security video at nightAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

The light stays off during the day, but you can turn it on manually at any time. You can also set it to turn on when the camera detects motion.

siren

The only major disadvantage of the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight camera is the alarm. Compared to competitors such as the Ring Floodlight Camera or the Netatmo Smart Outdoor Camera, the 80 decibel siren is rather quiet.

Annoying, but it may not wake you up if you have a heavy sleep.

This does not mean that this alarm will not catch anyone's attention. Eighty decibels sound about as loud as a lawn mower. Annoying, but it may not wake you up if you have a heavy sleep. It also might not catch your neighbor's attention if there is a significant gap between the houses in your neighborhood.

As with light, you can choose to turn it on manually in an emergency or turn it on automatically when the camera detects motion.

Additional functions

The 2-way audio is a nice feature that not every other floodlight camera has. I think it's a clever addition that can be useful in many different situations. Suppose your family was outside and you had to ask a question. All you have to do is go to the app and start chatting. The microphone has noise and echo cancellation, so you can clearly hear who is in your garden.

Multi-user access is also a nice feature. You can give family members, roommates or house watchers access to the Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera via the app via an email address.

Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera app

As with most outdoor cameras, the Arlo app lets you choose where the camera should focus with activity zones. Once you've set up a zone, you'll only receive notifications when something happens in the zone. This can be especially helpful if you want to avoid warnings about a busy street or sidewalk in your home. You can also choose not to capture certain areas of your garden. To avoid these areas, the camera zooms in on the part of your yard that you want to capture. This makes the image a little bit blurred, since enlarging it affects the image quality.

One of the app features that I really loved is that you don't have to go to the Arlo app to view footage. You can see video clips on your phone's lock screen. When there's an emergency, every second counts, and playing with your phone can waste precious moments. Therefore, this function is really intelligent. You can also tap the E-911 service button to send emergency services to your home even when you're not there.

Unfortunately, most of these features require the aforementioned Arlo Smart Service subscriptions. However, it doesn't cost much, so I would say that the subscription is definitely worth it.

I found that while the battery was using the light to trigger when motion was detected and only at night and when triggered by motion, the battery lasted about a week plus a few days before it needed to be charged. That seems pretty short to me. Charging also takes up to 6.5 hours. So this is a little painful.

Our opinion

I'm not surprised that the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight camera is a great device. Arlo has a great track record when it comes to smart devices overall. The siren isn't as loud as it could be, but the rest of the features more than make up for it. At $ 250, it costs roughly the same as its competitors, but it performs better than most others.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes and no. It has a better field of vision and a brighter headlight than any other big brand. If you want a louder siren, the Ring Floodlight Camera is yours 110 dB alarm would be a good alternative in this case.

Will it take?

Everything will be needed. The Arlo Pro 3 floodlight camera is designed for dust, rain, sun, direct shots with your water hose and temperatures between -4 and 113 degrees Fahrenheit. It comes with a 1-year limited hardware warranty.

Should you buy it

Yes. It is inexpensive and has better properties than most of its competitors.

Editor's recommendations




The Symbiosis of Gyms and Online Training Post-Pandemic

In the midst of the reopening growing pain, most beginners will continue to participate or fumble around buying or researching online programs.

Personal trainers and / or coaches who are not sold in online coaching take note of this. This article will be a discussion of the win-win situation for the average gym user and online trainer.

What is online coaching?

At a time when the information superhighway is just a tap on the smartphone, jobs, including personal training, can be accessed online. However, this wealth of information comes at a price.

This price is called the paradox of choice. The more information about training, nutrition, rehabilitation is available, the less accessible it is and the less screening takes place, which leads us into the era of online coaching.

I start with what online coaching is not. It is not a random stranger with a CPT certificate that asks you for money and merely provides an unspecific, immeasurable, unreachable program and set of guidelines.

In fact, it's not a fad diet in conjunction with bro-science training programs. It is a legitimate business model and a way to make progress.

Selecting a trainer in certain circles defines exactly what this means. For example, an online bodybuilding coach will ask:

The trainer should be:

In Olympic weightlifting, trainers should have participated in this sport, received certification and successfully taught others.

Trainers should be actively involved in their communitieswhether it's within an association or an online community, not Instagram.

During the on-boarding process of online coaching, the coach then asks a number of questions to best meet the customer's needs. Programming should be a product of these questionnaires.

After the onboarding process, follow-up calls, check-ins and personal meetings follow. This combination of expertise, support and customization creates a useful online coaching experience.

Start online now?

COVID-19 has closed most fitness facilities worldwide, and as such, most people have refrained from eating a clean and sensible diet and, in some cases, from doing all activities.

For those who have become passive and unmotivated, reopening the gym will not miraculously rejuvenate the glow of fitness. Instead, a schedule starts in her home to go back to the gym and continue a healthy lifestyle.

At home there are great tools that you can discuss with your weighted workout trainer such as: B. gallons or sofas. Home cooking is also becoming increasingly important when restaurants are closed.

It was not easier to learn how to count your macros, weigh foods, and understand nutrient levels. With a healthier plan, most dishes don't come from a can or box. They require spices, marinades and the cooking of raw materials. There is more time inside the house to spend with the family without worrying about the spread.

After social distancing?

Hybrid coaching. If a trainer stagnates and does not separate from pen and paper during this time, they are considerably disadvantaged. Zoom workouts, YouTube and seminars are becoming increasingly popular with young and old.

Coaches now have more work to do. They have to be accessible outside of the gym or office, scalable to their customers and offer an obsessively excellent service or lose face to IG models.

A face-to-face meeting may or may not be a reward, but should be as important as the online part, if not higher.

Companies like Starting Strength and Renaissance Periodization have taken this to another level. They offer seminars and camps, both in person and online, and offer certifications for ordinary people to learn the technique and implement it at home in the kitchen or in the gym.

Many customers and clients will not return to the fitness facilities immediately. With established guidelines, social distancing and cumbersome fitness etiquette are not too far away.

Online coaching offers the opportunity to regain control Learn to be more steady regardless of your fitness environment and don't seem to get far when you return.

I hope this has been helpful and encourages you to regain control of your health and inspire you to support your local trainers. Lift with love, my friends.

Microsoft Surface Book 3 13 Review: Portable and Powerful

Microsoft Surface Book 3 13 review

Microsoft Surface Book 3 (13-inch) review: a portable powerhouse

"The Surface Book 3 13-inch does an excellent job of supporting its unique design."

  • Great job

  • Good battery life

  • Excellent input options

  • Sharp, high-contrast display

The Surface Book 3 is said to be the performance-oriented laptop from Microsoft. This can sometimes be a problem for the 15-inch model, which has to compete with powerhouses like the Dell XPS 15 and the Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch. These laptops use powerful eight-core Intel Core i9 processors that promise excellent performance.

However, a powerful 13-inch laptop is rarer. This smaller Surface Book 3 has the chance to shine here. My test configuration consisted of a 10th generation Intel Core i7 CPU, a discrete Nvidia GTX 1650 Ti graphics card and a whopping 32 GB of RAM.

The price of $ 2,500 is undoubtedly high, but based on the specs alone, this could be the most powerful 13-inch laptop ever made.

design

The surface book 3 is a contradiction. On the one hand, it remains the most futuristic laptop on the market today, despite a design that is identical to the Surface Book 2 released in late 2017. Pressing a button and tearing off the display is as satisfactory as ever – no other 2-in-1 is pretty cool.

The build quality is excellent and competes with the MacBook line for elegance and solidity. There is no creaking, bending or groaning of the laptop, no matter how you handle it, in the lid, in the keyboard deck or in the case bottom. The Surface line is generally well made, and the Surface Book 3 offers perhaps the most impressive build quality of all.

At the same time, the Surface Book 3 feels a bit old. The bezels are relatively large, and the same goes for the bulky case. While other laptops are squeezed into tiny frames thanks to tiny bezels, the Surface Book 3 feels like a relapse when the machines were thick and chunky.

Using it on the tray table of a commercial aircraft is not easy.

As a 13-inch laptop, it competes with the incredibly slim HP Specter x360 13 and the Dell XPS 13, both of which are significantly smaller (for example, more than 1.5 inches less deep). The Surface Book 3 is 0.59 inches thick at its thinnest point at the front, which seems to be thin enough, but then it flares up to a massive 0.91 inches at the back due to the rounded pivot hinge. The Specter x360 13 is 0.67 inches and the XPS 13 is 0.58 inches, and both feel a bit thinner. The Surface Book 3 also weighs 3.62 pounds compared to the HP at 2.88 pounds and the Dell at 2.65 pounds.

You won't find it easy to use the Surface Book 3, for example, on the tray table of a commercial aircraft, especially given the fact that the display is more recessed than most other models. Like the thickness, this is due to the pivot hinge, which balances the heavier display than usual. You can flip the display easily enough and use it in media mode, but the same goes for other 2-in-1 devices. And smaller laptops like the Specter x360 13 and the XPS 13 fit well in the same limited spaces.

An advantage of the design of the Surface Book 3 is that the keyboard base stays cool thanks to the heat-generating components in the display, unless you press the discrete GPU.

As a tablet, however, the Surface Book 3 is very comfortable and has only one major disadvantage. First of all, it's thin and light, surprisingly for its 13.5-inch size. Thanks to the 3: 2 aspect ratio, which is closer to a sheet of paper, and the excellent support for the active Surface Pen from Microsoft, it is ideal for coloring. It could be an older design, but it remains pretty functional.

The only problem with using the Surface Book 3 as a tablet is that, unlike the Surface Pro 7, there is no stand and it is therefore not easy to use it to watch media, for example. The best way to bend Netflix is ​​to flip the tablet around the pivot hinge and use the keyboard base to support things. It's not an easy solution, but it works well.

Connectivity is another area where Microsoft has not fully adopted modern computing. The Surface Book 3 has two USB-A 3.1 ports, an SD card reader, a USB-C 3.1 port and the Microsoft Surface Connect port, which enables quick charging and connection to the company's new Surface Dock 2. These ports are all on the keyboard dock, while the tablet has a Surface Connect port for charging.

Thunderbolt 3 is missing, which limits the number and performance of the connected devices. This also means that the Surface Book 3 cannot connect to external GPUs. According to internal reports, Thunderbolt 3 poses a security risk. For this reason, it has been excluded from Surface devices.

performance

Yes, the Surface Book 3 is big for a 13-inch laptop. There is a reason, however: most of the computer components, including the CPU and most of the electronics, are on the display. The discrete GPU (on the Core i7 models) and a number of battery capacities are located on the keyboard base. That's why the laptop is so thick overall and the tablet area is so bulky compared to a simple display.

During my tests, the Surface Book 3 was very fast in my test configuration with a 10th generation Intel Core i7-1065G7 and 32 GB RAM (unusual for 13-inch laptops). It has passed our benchmarks and performed better than many of its 13-inch competitors. In Geekbench 5, for example, the HP Specter x360 13 was surpassed and adapted to the Dell XPS 13. It was even faster than our test configuration of the Surface Book 3 15 with less memory.

The Surface Book 3 is a leading provider of 13-inch laptops.

In our real handbrake test, in which a 420 MB video was encoded as H.265, the Surface Book 3 was completed in one second over 3 minutes, which in turn corresponds almost exactly to the very fast Dell XPS 13 and the Specter x360 13 um surpasses almost a minute.

This makes the Surface Book 3 a leading provider of 13-inch laptops. The MacBook Pro is the only 13-inch laptop that outperforms the CPU thanks to its custom 25-watt processor.

When you use the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics, you have a laptop that becomes even more competitive for any creative application that the GPU can use. This isn't the fastest GPU, but it's a lot faster than the built-in Intel graphics that almost every 13-inch laptop relies on. The only other outlier is the Razer Blade Stealth 13, which uses the GTX 1650 Ti. This laptop doesn't have the unique design of the Surface Book, which doesn't force the GPU and CPU to share the same space.

Play

You may want to put the GTX 1650 Max-Q through its paces and use the Surface Book 3 13 as a gaming laptop for beginners. And for the most part, you can do that – as long as you alleviate your expectations. I guided the laptop through our gaming tests and was a little underwhelmed. The laptop isn't quite as fast as some other laptops with similar GPUs, although most of them are larger 15-inch laptops.

For example, the Surface Book 3 was far behind the previous Dell XPS 15 with the GTX 1650 and even further behind the latest XPS 15 with the GTX 1650 Ti in all of our benchmarks. This includes the synthetic 3DMark suite, in which the older XPS 15 more than 10% faster and the newer model was almost 20% faster. Civilization VI was a game in which the Surface Book 3 was a little more competitive, probably thanks to the strong CPU performance, at 68 frames per second (FPS) in 1080p and medium graphics compared to the older XPS 15 with 56 FPS and the newer 114 FPS model. In Assassins Creed: Odyssey, however, the Surface Book 3 only managed 25 FPS in 1080p and high settings, compared to the older XPS 15 with 42 FPS and the newer model with 47 FPS. The trend continued in Battlefield V: The Surface Book 3 reached 41 FPS compared to 54 FPS with the older XPS and 60 FPS with the newer model.

The Surface Book 3 couldn't reach 60 FPS in Fortnite, a lighter game that serves as a benchmark for starter games. The older XPS 15 achieved 67 FPS and the newer model reached 74 FPS. If you reject graphic details, you can get playable frame rates of 1080p with the Surface Book 3. This is great for a 13-inch laptop. Just don't expect it to replace a real gaming laptop anytime soon.

Of course, the discrete graphics are not standard. The base model starts at $ 1,600 and you'll have to pay $ 500 more to get this extra graphics performance. The larger 15-inch version offers the option for the more powerful GTX 1660 Ti.

display

The Surface Book 3 has an IPS display in a productivity-friendly 3: 2 aspect ratio and a high resolution of 3,000 x 2,000. It's not quite 4K, but both text and image details are sharp. As with all Surface devices, all configurations of the Surface Book 3 contain the same high-resolution display.

According to my colorimeter, the display has its advantages and disadvantages. First of all, it is bright with 422 nits and has an excellent contrast of 1,420: 1 (we like displays with 1000: 1 or higher). That is the good thing. However, the color gamut is not particularly large at 94% sRGB and 73% AdobeRGB, and at 2.10 they are not the most accurate (1.0 or less is considered excellent). You get better displays on 13-inch laptops like the OLED display of the HP Specter x360 13 and the excellent 4K display of the Dell XPS 13. Both offer wider and more accurate colors, as well as equivalent or better brightness and contrast.

The display of the Surface Book 3 is a real pleasure. The aspect ratio gives you more vertical space for a more expansive work area. Although this results in some letterboxing when watching videos, the images are sharp and bright.

However, audio is not that impressive. There are two front-facing speakers on the display that offer enough volume to watch YouTube videos occasionally. However, the bass is missing and you should have a pair of headphones at hand if you want high quality sound.

Battery life

One of the most famous claims of the Surface Book 2 was its battery life, as it is one of the longest-lasting 13-inch laptops ever. The Surface Book 3 takes a step back and offers a strong, but not quite class-leading longevity – this is another area in which the competition has overtaken and surpassed Microsoft's offer.

The Surface Book 3 took 5 hours in our demanding Basemark web benchmark test. This is a good result and surpasses the 15-inch Surface Book 3 and the Dell XPS 13 with a full HD display. In our web browser test, the Surface Book 3 managed almost 10 hours, a good but not great score that the XPS 13 beat by 100 minutes. In our video loop test, the Surface Book 3 lasted just over 13.5 hours, which was almost an hour less than the XPS 13. Of course, given the XPS 13's Full HD display, this is not a completely fair test. Compared to the HP Specter x360 13 with OLED display, the Surface Book 3 lasted for hours while surfing the Internet and watching videos. Note that the Surface Book 2 took 20.6 hours to go through our test video and 15.5 hours to surf the web.

However, most of the battery capacity is in the keyboard base. If you remove the display and use it as a tablet, the battery life will be significantly reduced. In this mode, the Surface Book 3 lasted just under 1.5 hours in the Basemark test, less than 2.5 hours when surfing the Internet and only 3.5 hours when playing our test video. This is disappointing, especially when compared to other tablets that last for hours, like the Surface Pro 7.

Keyboard and touchpad

The Surface Book 3 has always had one of the best keyboards. It has a lot of travel with a snappy feel that ensures a precise and comfortable typing experience. It's also pretty quiet, which is a plus for work without bothering anyone around you. I like the Magic keyboard better on the latest MacBooks, but the Surface Book 3 comes close to my second favorite, the Specter x360 13 keyboard.

The touchpad also works well. It is based on Microsoft Precision touchpad drivers and offers a smooth and consistent Windows 10 multi-touch experience. It's as good a touchpad as a Windows laptop, although it's smaller than it could be on the keyboard deck. However, the size did not hold me back.

The display is of course touch sensitive and reacts just as well as all surface displays. It supports Microsoft's superb Surface Pen, which offers tilt, 4,096 pressure sensitivity levels and one of the best Windows color experiences. As already mentioned, the display has an aspect ratio of 3: 2, which makes it look much more like a normal 8.5 x 11-sheet paper. It's just unfortunate that the $ 100 surface pen isn't included in such an expensive laptop.

Finally, the Surface Book 3 supports password-free Windows 10 Hello login via an infrared camera and face recognition. It's fast, reliable, and better than a fingerprint reader on the keyboard deck because it only works in tablet mode.

Our opinion

The Microsoft Surface Book 3 is a unique 13-inch laptop. It's a bit bigger than its competition, but it offsets this with a strong performance that you will find in few other machines of similar size. Compared to the Surface Book 2, the latest model is simply a faster iteration of a proven design.

It is also very expensive as my test configuration is $ 2,500. The unique design makes it difficult to compare it to other laptops, but it's only worth the cost if you're convinced of the usefulness of the tablet elements.

Are there alternatives?

You can choose from the other Surface devices if you're just excited about the brand. The Surface Pro 7 and X give you better tablet experiences, and the Surface Laptop 3 is a more traditional clamshell offering. However, none of them offer the same level of performance.

The only 13-inch laptop with similar graphics performance is the Razer Blade Stealth. The stealth is a little cheaper, and you can purchase the GTX 1650 Ti model with options for a 144Hz refresh rate display or a 4K touchscreen.

How long it will take?

The Surface Book 3 is built like a tank and uses current components (except for the lack of Thunderbolt 3). You get years of productive service. When you shop in a local Microsoft store, you also get the 60-day money back guarantee and the year of in-store technical support. This is a real plus. However, the 1 year warranty is standard and less impressive.

Should you buy it

Yes. The 2-in-1 design and powerful graphics make it a unique laptop.

Editor's recommendations




Grand Opening: Getting Back to Making Gains

The prospect of training in the gym again has become a reality for more and more people. Or maybe you will be back in a few weeks and consider how you can train and how you can optimize it in the future.

One thing that I think is important is that you shouldn't just go back in and continue where you left off. This can lead to frustration, disappointment and injury.

It would be even worse to go back and release the pent-up energy and excitement you have with a brutal training flash. From an objective point of view, that's probably pretty obvious But most of us strive to maintain an objective approach to training.

The change in your body is often controlled by strong emotions. Many of us went to the gym to:

  • Engage with inner demons
  • Build armor to protect us from childhood bullying
  • Other very emotional incentives

If there are emotions, the logic goes out the window. Do not do it Let the emotional desire to destroy yourself with insane workouts win. Doing this will most likely require you to take more time out of the gym due to burnout or injury.

Your return to the gym

If this bulleted list is not in the way, you should see some general trends and signposts as you approach your return to the gym.

I will cover each item in detail to give you a complete overview and to help you make your exact workout plan for opening the gym doors. I will also outline a sample program to illustrate how these principles can be implemented.

Get things in perspective

In my opinion, Even a genetically talented lifter takes at least five years to build a really impressive physique. For mere mortals, it's more of a decade plus.

The benefits of exercise last a lifetime. Although progress can be slow as you approach 15, 20, 25, or more years of exercise, there is still a good reason to exercise.

Today is a clear and visible reminder of the importance that exercise and nutrition can have for resistance to viruses. Given that you should consider training as a multi-year, probably multi-year effort, these past three months are just a drop in the bucket.

With crossed fingers, scientists, doctors, nurses and powers can take control of the pandemic and produce vaccines. Chances are that this will be a one-off event. It can be helpful if you recognize and use the resulting opportunities.

First of all, let me give you some positive news from scientific research about being released from training. This research will help confirm my advice, but hopefully it will reassure you that you haven't lost all of your lock gains and that any loss of strength or size is temporary and can be recovered quickly.

As I described in my article at the beginning of the lockdown, several studies have analyzed the effect of withdrawal on muscle mass and strength level. Several studies have shown that no muscle or strength loss occurs during three weeks of training. But what about three months?

Well, Blazevich et al., 2007 found that after three months of exercise, there was no significant difference in the reduction in muscle mass. The participants lost muscle, but not much. They also suffered some loss of strength. This loss of strength corresponded approximately to the five-week training.

The good news is that this can be quickly regained as an integral part of a skill's strength. For example, a study by Staron et al., 1991 found that participants regained strength only 30 weeks after 30 weeks of discharge.

Reduce fear

Remember that you've probably been injured or busy before and haven't lost all of your winnings.

  • The world never went under.
  • Your muscles didn't fall off.
  • Their value to humanity has not evaporated.
  • You didn't wake up and you look like your 11 year old me.

Instead, no one has likely noticed a difference in your body, and you rediscovered your best strength and muscle values ​​remarkably quickly when you got back to the gym. The same thing will happen now.

In short, both muscle mass and strength are quite resistant to decay, even if you do nothing. So I firmly believe that if you haven't done any exercises during a lockdown, You can get back to your baseline before locking relatively quickly, and very soon exceed these values.

That is when you have not done any training. If you've been able to do some weight, light weight, or resistance band workouts, the news is even better.

I summarize if you were able to do a few workouts a week and work with sets of 30 or fewer reps just before failure. Then there is a possibility that you have not lost any muscles. Any force you have lost is just the technical ability to handle and coordinate heavy loads and will return.

Panic over

Hopefully this will reduce the fear of all your difficulties before the lock is released. Once you know that you are not starting from scratch and have not lost too much ground, then; You can resist the urge to go inside with blazing weapons, hoping to get years of hard work back in a few weeks.

You just don't have to. What took years to build does not take weeks to destroy when it comes to size and strength.

With this in mind, I think it is important to meet your expectations. I'm not suggesting that you go back to the gym and hit the same numbers, do the same reps, or do the same volume as before the lockdown.

Strength is an ability

To master a skill well, you need to practice. To display this ability, you need to practice it frequently. Unfortunately, many of us haven't touched a barbell in the past few months.

As a result, squats, deadlifts and bench presses are not at their highest levels when you finally hold the bar in your hands again. These elevators are likely to feel a bit rusty. You won't feel in the groove like before. Don't worry – this is normal for any skill. I can think of many examples, but here is one from my youth.

As a child, I loved playing tennis in summer. Growing up in the UK, summer is not long and is often interrupted by gray skies and heavy rainfall. Therefore, the time window for playing was relatively small.

Every year I improved steadily throughout the summer, only to return the following year and feel like I was back at zero. Certainly much worse than where I left off. This is because I have not trained.

However, the rate of improvement in the first few weeks was dramatic. Relearning these movement patterns and skills was much faster and easier than the first time.

At the end of summer I was noticeably better than at the end of the previous summer, but this progress had not been linear. Each year:

  • The starting point was lower than my best one so far.
  • Then there was a quick climb up to my position.
  • Then a gradual improvement beyond how good I was last year.

The same applies to you and your lifting.

This ability factor is most evident in the more complex exercises in your program. Squats take longer to get back into the groove than squats that take a little longer than leg presses. Leg extensions, however, will probably feel normal again after just a few warm-up exercises.

The higher the ability component of a lift, the greater the waste you see in session 1. The good news is that this ability will be available again quickly.

Pull-ups can mean a greater drop in performance than pulldowns on your first session, as more stabilization and coordination are required. If you did not have access to a pull-up bar, it can be expected that it has rusted somewhat.

The low hanging fruit

A chance created by blocking is the ability to do more with less. If you are not in the gym, you will be sensitized again to the attraction of lifting.

Many of us never take time off or even have a delay occasionally. If you do the same thing continuously, adaptive resistance can be used. This is a by-product of the Repeat Combat Effect. Basically, the more you do something, the less adjustment you get back.

This is why progress slows down as we become more advanced and better educated. Going from good to great is much more difficult than going from good to good, which is more difficult than going from terrible to good.

When you return to the gym, you should do just enough to make progress. If you haven't done anything, just doing something is enough. What is an overload after a three-month break is much less than when you worked at full throttle for years.

For this reason, a larger time window has opened for overloading the training.

The gap between your initial minimum effective dose (MED) and the maximum achievable volume is now significantly larger than before the block. By gradually closing this gap, you can extend the length of a valid training block.

More effective training = more profits

Because of this increased susceptibility to the training stimulus, you should pick the low-hanging fruit. The threshold for winnings is now lower than it was before the ban.

This creates the potential to make new profits in the future. It also minimizes the risk of injury. By keeping the recovery capacity in reserve, you have a longer runway for effective training. This means that if you're smart, your profits can go up and go on in the long run.

Common sense

The problem with common sense is that it is not that common.

So far I've made a lot of points about:

  • Loss of size and strength
  • Recover lost profits
  • The bar is lower.
  • Build up gradually

All of this should make it fairly obvious that a gradual introduction to training with a methodical and gradual increase in workload will best serve you.

However, many of you will not be able to resist the temptation to do too much. Remember that blocking has created an opportunity for you in many ways. Don't waste it.

Do not put yourself down

If you work too hard too early, make adjustments. Chances are that this is the longest time you have been away from a serious workout since you started your serious workout.

So this is a completely new situation for you. When something is new, it is unrealistic to expect perfection. If you get carried away and do too much, don't beat yourself up. Learn the lesson. Course correct on the trip.

It is better to start too easily and leave room for progress than to be excessive and regress.

It is pretty obvious. If you went too hard too early, don't be stubborn. It is a mistake to let your pride get in the way. Admit your mistake and withdraw.

Come back in a routine

While it's tempting to sketch out a super complex routine six days a week from the comfort of your sofa, the reality of sticking to this plan may not be that easy. Before you optimize your time in the gym, you should primarily go to the gym.

It's an important first step to simply re-anchor the habit of training in the gym. If you scheduled the workout at 6 a.m. every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, repeat this.

Or if early morning workouts are a thing of the past with your new home work schedule, choose another appropriate time for the workout. Make training a priority again by planning it in your diary. Identify potential barriers to training. Pick a time that removes these barriers and the ring fence at that time. For example:

  • I usually prefer to train in the afternoon when life is normal. However, while working from home, I found that my motivation was lower and my energy was exhausted by trying to help the children do homeschooling. As a result, early morning training effectively helped me get a high quality, focused session.
  • If you are still working from home after the lockout and gyms are open, You may find that pulling off the sofa for an evening workout is much more difficult than leaving the office and going to the gym. In this case, the best option may be to do the training first.
  • On the other hand, When you first have the energy of a sloth in the morningIf you have to press Snooze five times and need three double espressos to feel human, it doesn't make sense to schedule an early morning workout.

There is no right or wrong here. Just find out what works for you and how to get your ass back to the gym.

Creating bad habits is too easy. Starting healthy can be a lot more difficult. If you've started developing serious Netflix addiction at night (I know I've seen it since the last dance), planning your workouts for the evening may not be a good idea.

The reputation of the sofa, the remote control and a tub of ice cream could win. Choose the path of least resistance when it comes to planning workouts – prepare for successs.

The DOMS will be epic

Let me make one thing clear: getting sore after training is not a good indicator of effectiveness. Under no circumstances should you chase or use sore muscles to determine the benefits of one workout over another.

DOMS is a natural result of hard training. If you train hard, muscle damage and disorders occur. Lifting weights hard often leads to DOMS. The best way to get DOMS is to expose the body to a new kind of stimulus – do a new exercise.

Since the incentive is new, the body has not adapted to it and therefore homeostasis is disturbed to a greater extent. Muscle damage and the subsequent repair processes (including DOMS) are started up.

Each time you repeat the same stimulus, the level of disorder is reduced and the DOMS are less severe. This is a long preamble to this main point.

If you haven't been to the gym for three months, you get sore, really sore. Every exercise is new. If you try to do the same workouts that you did before the lockdown, you are likely to be crippled.

It is important to be aware of this. This means that you can reduce your training to minimize the DOMS while accepting that there are DOMS. To give you an example from my personal experience, let me tell you when I did a super light squat workout and was in pain for a week.

The session consisted of 3 sets of 5 squats with 70% of my 1 = repetition max. 3 x 5 with 70% is not a special challenge. Especially when you consider that at the end of my previous training block, I trained legs twice a week and did eight sets of squats per session. The devil is in the details.

This debilitating DOMS was brought back to the gym in my first session after a two and a half week vacation break. What's more, even though I had done a fair amount of footwork before the vacation, I hadn't crouched back. Instead, I had a training block built around front squats and Bulgarian squats to develop a structural balance.

I thought I was very conservative with my 3×5 plan at 70%. The session felt like a no-brainer.

When I woke up the next morning, got out of bed and wiggled like a little giraffe when I tried to go to the bathroom, I realized that I had underestimated things.

A two-week break and six weeks without this particular exercise were enough for a relatively light workout to cause outrageous DOMS.

When returning to training, note the following:

  1. What could you do in the lock?
  2. What is your goal?
  3. How can you bridge the gap between what you did and what you need to achieve your goal?

When choosing your starting point, use what you did so as not to base it on what you did. Then use common sense to close that gap. There is no point in planning your workout the way you did before locking it. It makes a lot more sense to plan your workout so that it systematically returns to what you did before the lockout.

Hopefully you can take things to the next level and analyze what you did before locking to find bugs, uncover the unnecessary or sub-optimal, and remove or replace them to refine your approach. This way you can achieve your goals more efficiently.

Do not use previous maxes

Use the early stages of your return to the gym to learn the perfect technique. Your weights don't matter much at this point. Having only weights in hand is an incentive enough at first. You shouldn't be bound to hit certain numbers so you can focus on:

Think of this as a priming phase. Use the quality of your technique and the execution of elevators as a method to overload and gradually build up the volume tolerance.

Treat each rep as an opportunity to grow and try to maximize muscle tension. You then created the platform to make progress with the volume.

It's a bad idea to try to base your training weights on the percentages of previous maximums. As I said, your technique is probably wrong. What was 70% of your 1 RM might feel more like 85% at your first session.

This, of course, limits the repetitions that you can get, or requires that you train very close not to hit the repetitions you have planned. The fatigue generated will go through the roof.

While your intensity thresholds are now lower and your strength is slightly lower, You are not a beginner again. You can probably handle much heavier loads than a beginner, so you can do a lot of muscle damage as a beginner. Leave enough reps in the tank at the beginning. It is a luxury to be able to make progress so far from failure. Enjoy it as long as you can.

Use relative intensity instead of measuring intensity as a percentage of 1 rpm. Relative intensity is a measure of how difficult a sentence is due to its proximity to failure. It is tracked by recording (RIR) at the end of a sentence. With 4 RIR you can gain strength and muscle mass. This is especially true as a beginner.

For a short time you are closer to the beginner phases than for a long time. Take advantage of this. Use RIR as an important metric and progress tool to control your training. Start in the first week by ending the sentences at 4 RIR. Especially with higher quality compound lifts. Over a number of weeks, you can increase your intensity by leaving fewer repetitions in reserve.

With RIR, you can gradually increase the intensity of your training and adapt your training efforts exactly to your body's ability to tolerate training. When you get used to the training again, you need to push the training harder to get an effective workout. With RIR you can do this. For example:

  • Week 1 – 4 RIR
  • Week 2 – 3 RIR
  • Week 3 – 2 RIR
  • Week 4 – 1 RIR
  • Week 5 – 0 RIR

In reality, once you regain the ability to lift, you can increase the load without increasing your relative intensity.

In the first week, a set of 8 with 200 pounds on squats could be 4 RIR. The following week you find your groove again could mean that 205 lbs is still a 4 RIR. It's possible that you can add 5 pounds a week for several weeks without changing the RIR. This is most likely the case with lifts with higher capabilities. With stupid exercises such as machine-based isolation work, this effect is unlikely to occur.

I would suggest that you start with 4 RIR loads for compound lifts and gradually add the load every week until you are 1 RIR. For insulation elevators, I would start at 3 RIR and add the load until you reach 0 RIR.

Don't think it over – I did that for you. This article is proof of that 🙂

I find a practical example useful to give you a frame of reference for your return to training. Below I sketched a plan based on an avatar. Let's call him Bobby. Bobby is in his early thirties and has been lifting steadily for a decade.

He started strength training to improve athletic performance, but has worked throughout his career as a bodybuilder and CrossFit. For about a year now he has been training four days a week with an upper and lower split and hits each muscle group twice a week.

During the lockdown, he stayed active 3 times a week and trained body weight. He has managed to keep his body weight fairly stable – only gaining 2-3 pounds. He usually does:

  • 5-8 sets per workout (10-16 sets per week) for main muscle groups (chest, back, quads, hamstrings)
  • 3-6 sets per workout (6-12 sets per week) for smaller muscles (biceps, triceps, calves, delts).

To optimize Bobby's return to the gym, I would suggest the following:

week 1

In three training units, you train each muscle group once with your legs, push, pull, split. This allows for a long recovery time for the DOMS, which follows even relatively simple workouts (the legs are exercised first because they are likely to take the longest recovery time).

  • volume – 50% of normal value per workout (2-4 sets per workout muscle group)
  • frequency – 3 sessions per week, but 1 x week per muscle group
  • intensity – 4 RIR for compound elevators, 3 RIR for insulation elevators

E.g .:

  • Monday – Legs
  • Wednesday – To press
  • Friday – Pull

Week 2

In three training sessions, train each muscle group twice with a whole body, a whole push and a whole train.

  • volume – 50% of normal value per workout, 2-4 sets per workout per muscle group
  • frequency – 3 sessions per week, but twice per muscle group
  • intensity – 4 RIR for compound elevators, 2-3 RIR for insulation elevators

E.g .:

  • Monday – Hole body
  • Wednesday – Press your upper and lower body
  • Friday – Pull upper and lower body

*Include quads in Wednesday push and hamstrings in Friday pull session

Weeks 3-6

Exercise each muscle twice with an upper / lower split in four workouts.

  • volume – 75% of normal per workout, 3-6 sets per workout per muscle group
  • frequency – 4 sessions per week, but 2 x week per muscle group
  • intensity – 2-3 RIR for compound lifts, 1-2 RIR for insulation lifts

E.g .:

  • Monday – Upper, higher
  • Tuesday – Lower
  • Thursday – Upper, higher
  • Friday – Lower

Weeks 6-10

Exercise each muscle twice with an upper / lower split in four workouts.

  • volume – 90% of normal per workout, 4-7 sets per session for large muscle groups and 2-5 sets per session for small muscles
  • frequency – 4 sessions per week, but 2 x week per muscle group
  • intensity – 1-2 RIR for compound elevators, 0-1 RIR for insulation elevators

E.g .:

  • Monday – Upper, higher
  • Tuesday – Lower
  • Thursday – Upper, higher
  • Friday – Lower

Motorola Moto G Fast Review: A Great Phone For $200

motorola moto g quick evaluation 2

Motorola Moto G Quick evaluation: Fast, but not expensive

"If your budget is a maximum of $ 200, the Moto G Fast is the best choice."

  • Modern design

  • Feels durable

  • Great performance for the price

  • Good battery life

  • Camera is just fine

  • Ad is not great

The Moto G Seires have weathered ups and downs. The device has long been considered one of the best budget options, but competition from Samsung companies has intensified in recent years. However, as so often, Motorola has launched a number of new Moto G models, including the extremely affordable Moto G Fast.

The Moto G Fast hopes to bring premium features and a thoroughly modern look at a price of $ 200. There are other phones in this price range, but not many – especially from well-known brands such as Motorola, Samsung and LG.

Is the Moto G Almost the Best Cell Phone Under $ 200?

Design and display

Two or three years ago, it would be difficult for you to find a phone with a modern, borderless display design in the price range below $ 250. Now they are becoming more and more common – and we are happy to see that.

On the front of the Moto G Fast is a nice large 6.4-inch display from edge to edge, which has a hole cutout in the upper left corner of the device. The neckline is slightly larger than some other devices, like the Galaxy A51 or the OnePlus 8 series, but it's still pretty remote, though you'll get used to it quickly.

The bezel is relatively narrow around the display, except at the bottom where there is a chin. It's not a big deal, and such design decisions are still expected in this price range. Here, too, you will get used to it.

The buttons and connectors on the edges of the phone are pretty standard. On the right side there is an on / off switch and a volume rocker, on the left a SIM and MicroSD card slot and below a USB-C port. There is also a headphone jack at the top, which is very nice in a world where higher-quality wired consumer audio disappears.

The back of the phone is also pretty sleek and stylish. At the top left you get a vertically aligned triple lens camera and at the top a fingerprint sensor. I have relatively large hands, but the sensor felt comfortable to me and appeared to be well positioned to naturally unlock the device.

The back of the device is mostly plastic, but generally felt solid. It definitely doesn't feel as premium as much more expensive phones like the iPhone 11 Pro or OnePlus 8, but this is also expected for a price-range phone, and the phone is still in my hand. The device is currently only available in one color – pear white. It doesn't look bad, but more color options would have been nice.

The display on the phone does the job, but isn't great. The 6.4-inch display is an LCD display with a resolution of 720p, and you can definitely see slightly jagged edges on fonts and surface elements when you search for them. The slightly more expensive Moto G Power has a 1,080p display, which makes the 720p panel of the G Fast a bit rough – but again, it does the job as long as you don't expect much. It can get bright enough for most purposes and is brighter than the $ 150 Moto E.

Performance and battery life

The Moto G Fast is equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 processor, 3 GB RAM and 32 GB memory. Fortunately, a microSD card slot is also integrated in the phone, so you can expand this memory if you wish. The fact that it has the same processor as the Moto G Power is good news – and it helps the device outperform its weight.

The performance of the phone is great in everyday use. The phone can easily multitask easily without slowing down too much, and it can also handle basic games. It certainly won't charge as fast as more expensive phones, but Call of Duty: Mobile and Asphalt 9 worked pretty well.

Here is a brief overview of some of the benchmark results we have achieved:

  • AnTuTu: 161,627
  • GeekBench 5 single core: 312
  • GeekBench 5 multi-core: 1,391

Generally, these are good results for a phone in this price range. In fact, these values ​​correspond to the Samsung Galaxy A51, which is twice the price of the Moto G Fast.

The Moto G Fast offers a 4,000 mAh battery and is solid. I was easily able to survive a whole day of normal use, and at the end of the day I had 43% left. If you use your phone conservatively, you may be able to use it for two days.

camera

The Moto G Fast is equipped with a triple lens rear view camera that has a 16 megapixel main sensor, an 8 megapixel ultra-wide sensor and a 2 megapixel macro sensor. There is an 8 megapixel camera on the front.

The rear-facing camera can take decent photos in well-lit environments with relatively bright colors and solid details. The ultra-wide camera isn't the best on the market, but it definitely offers more versatility for the phone's camera and is a feature you don't normally get on phones in this price range.

However, without good lighting you are a bit unlucky. The phone can take better photos than the new Moto E, but that's not a high bar – and if you don't have enough light, you don't expect quality.

The phone also has a 2 megapixel macro lens and is pretty lackluster. There seems to be a trend these days to include macro lenses in phones of all price ranges. The problem, however, is that the macro lenses are of poor quality most of the time. This is especially true here. If you take a close-up of a small object, which I almost never do, you will likely get something of relatively poor quality.

The phone's front-facing camera is fine, but the colors aren't as deep as they could be, and the details aren't great. It will do the work for standard selfies, but don't expect much more.

In general, this is not a phone that you should buy for the camera. However, the camera is not bad for a phone in this price range – and it is much better than what you would have gotten just a few years ago.

software

The Motorola Moto G Fast comes with Motorola’s new Android skin, My UX. Fortunately, My UX is based on Android 10 and is very close to Android, with just a few minor changes to allow for some adjustments and gestures.

For example, you get Moto promotions with which you can easily access certain functions. These are pretty handy. You can take a screenshot by tapping the screen with three fingers, or you can lift the handset to turn off the ringtone. Some of these actions are enabled by default, while others must be enabled, and it's worth taking a look at.

While My UX is based on standard Android, it is possible that Motorola will deviate somewhat more over time – and it is currently unclear whether and when the device will get Android 11. Motorola has been doing Android updates well in the past, so we'll do it. I have to wait and see if it stays that way now, as the mix includes a new skin label.

Price, guarantee and availability

The Moto G Fast costs $ 200. This is an excellent price for a phone with these features. Sure, it doesn't compare to more expensive devices, but if you have a budget of $ 200, the Moto G Fast is the way to go. If you can stretch a little, the Moto G Power with its better display and bigger battery might be worth considering. However, if you are not interested in these features or do not have the money, you will be satisfied with the Moto G Fast.

The one-year warranty from Motorola, which covers practically only manufacturer defects, applies to the phone. You should make sure that you take care of this phone.

The Moto G Fast is available directly from the Motorola website.

Our opinion

The Motorola Moto G Fast isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's the best thing you'll get in this price range. It has a modern design and great performance in this price range, as well as a solid battery – and the latter two are extremely important when you buy an inexpensive phone.

Is there a better alternative?

There are better options if you can spend more money, but if your budget is a maximum of $ 200, the Moto G Fast is your best bet. If you can add another $ 200 to your budget, consider the iPhone SE, which is the most powerful phone for $ 400 or less. If you're more of an Android fan, consider the Google Pixel 3a or the Samsung Galaxy A51, which you might find for $ 300 if you're looking for it. Alternatively, you can wait for Google Pixel 4a, which may be released soon.

How long it will take?

The Moto G Fast is made of plastic, which means that it is likely to survive falls better than a glass device. That means it is not waterproof. So keep it away from the bath or pool.

Motorola has a decent track record of software updates, but given the price range here, no one can guess how many updates you will receive or when you will receive them. With normal use, you should be able to get two years out of the phone.

Should you buy one?

Yes, but only if your budget is $ 200 or less. If you can afford to spend a little more, it is worth doing so.

Editor's recommendations




CrossFit Is Not Going Anywhere

I think some other people have spoken and have given their opinion on CrossFit's recent problems on these pages. As someone who enjoyed CrossFit when I founded Breaking Muscle and someone who believes that you should be open to all training modalities, remain curious about all disciplines and shouldn't try to take precedence in a supremacy position, I need my perspective specify .

First, Breaking Muscle was never, and never should be, a training format. So we're not going to be able to avoid talking about CrossFit. I can understand that some of the conversations surrounding CrossFit are related to CrossFit's brand and business, but unfortunately there is no other way to relate to what CrossFitters is doing than to call it CrossFit.

The term CrossFit, no matter what happens to the people who run CrossFit, Inc., will not go away. There are too many people dedicated to training, competitions and the sense of belonging that they feel for training.

What is CrossFit? That's because of the CrossFit community. I don't want to speculate and I don't want to speak for them. I believe that most of the partners face enough challenges due to the recent ban and are now facing an existential threat to their core beliefs through the actions of CrossFit, the company.

What I can say is that there are many good trainers and trainers who have found their voice and sharpened their profile due to CrossFit. My family is very close to Mike Tromello at Precision CrossFit and has known Mike since he was a strength and conditioning trainer and before he became a successful partner.

Mike is probably one of the biggest CrossFit fans we know. We are sorry that he was able to deal with the effects of recent events. Despite all the hard work and years of advocacy that Mike has done in CrossFit, he shouldn't have been put in that position.

And Mike is one of the best strength and conditioning trainers we've had at Breaking Muscle. It wasn't like he was teaching CrossFit. It was his strength and conditioning skills.

There are many other people like Mike out there, affiliate owners with the same passion for CrossFit, who are also fitness professionals who are good at their work, who would thrive in any environment as strength and conditioning trainers and who all struggle with problems are not of their doing and for which there is no easy answer.

We cannot write these coaches and coaches off. And we cannot realistically expect everyone to part with them.

There are also many great coaches that have emerged from the CrossFit world, Coach Rut and James Fitzgerald, to name but two, that have evolved over the years.

There are others who may not want to be named who were driven out of CrossFit because they were not as respectful as they could have been.

There are many war stories about CrossFit; If you read all of Pat McCarty's articles, you'll get a history lesson on how the company handled criticism. It seems like the bad stories come out more because of the opportunity to be heard, and there are undoubtedly good ones that will get lost in the noise.

However, the CrossFit issues are business issues. The social struggle against racism in its current form may only intensify, and most people will be on the right side of this struggle because most people can be trusted to do the right thing.

You want to do the right thing. I think most partners will have problems with what that means for them.

However you choose, CrossFit will still be CrossFit. It will be difficult to say what that really means for CrossFit in six months.