4-Week Ladder Template to Gain Strength

I have been writing programs for myself and others for over 20 years. I always learn something when I coach someone through a training program, but I also learn a lot when I do a plan myself.

These programs usually start as something, but evolve considerably until I graduate. I have never been one who followed a written program, mine or another, and only trust the process. Ironically, I give clients the opposite advice. Do what I say, not how I do it seems to apply well here.

Requirements for the power conductor equipment

As I write this, everyone is dealing with a crisis that is forcing adjustments from their regular training routine. Some people, including myself, have trained at home for many years and are not dealing with a lack of equipment. Others have managed to beg, borrow, and hopefully not steal their way to a simple home gym.

This program is designed for people who have at least access to a barbell and a significant amount of weight. A significant amount is relative to every person. If you have a squat rack, that's nice! A bench? Even better.

These simple pieces of equipment are what I base the program on for myself. You can only get by with a barbell, but the exercises need to be adjusted. You can't get by with two soup cans and a ball of laundry fluff. Any decent strength program requires considerable resistance, and a barbell is the most obvious way to do this.

Just as important as the basic equipment, you need a significant amount of another valuable good – time. Although the program is not complicated, the workouts can be quite long depending on how long you want to rest. If you are one of the many who have a little more time available, it seems like an excellent way to get stronger.

The last thing you need is a little patience. You will do four exercises throughout the program. No more. The program could be adjusted to do less, but I won't go into the numerous combinations of exercises, rest periods, and repetitions that are possible. I'm just going to present the basic template, and you can play as you like at your own risk.

The 4-week lead template

The exercises I chose are:

  1. Barbell squat
  2. Bench press
  3. Deadlifts
  4. pulling up

You can choose any variation of these exercises, e.g. B. a horizontal bar, a horizontal bar, an incline or a sumo. This is your call. You must choose your preference at the beginning and stick to it for the entire program.

Training days

You will only do two exercises a day. I refer to push and pull exercises. I do squats and bench presses on day 1 and deadlifts and pull-ups on day 2.

In the beginning, when I started playing around with it, it was just three exercises that were done three days a week. That was fine, but I like this separation better. You switch between day 1 and day 2 with a day off after you've both completed. Then you repeat. Simple.

The problem for people who think in blocks of seven days is that it takes eight days to go through a microcycle. I am sure that when we leave the traditional seven-day block, time will not collapse by itself – just one way to find out.

Sets and repetitions

As you may have derived from the title, the sentences and repetitions are done on a ladder. If you are unfamiliar with ladders, a full explanation is an article in itself.

One that has been written many times and a simple Google search by Pavel, Ladder, gives you all the information you could want. I will provide the Coles Notes version here. A ladder is when the repetitions increase with each set and the weight stays the same.

For example, a ladder is a 225 pound squat for a set of 2, rest, a set of 4, rest and a set of 6. This ladder can be repeated as many times as necessary. There are many variations on this topic, but we will stick to this basic requirement.

Instead of the conventional set and repetition schemes, a target number of total repetitions must be carried out for each training session. Let's take 36 as an example. If you stick to 2-4-6, you will get a total of 12 repetitions on each ladder. Simple math shows that you need three ladders to reach this number.

You can also choose different combinations to hit numbers that don't work together as well. If your total number is 38 reps, you can do two ladders with 2-4-6 for 24 repetitions, one ladder with 2-3-4 for 33 repetitions, and finish with 2-3.

The leaders don't have to be in progressive groups of three; They can be more or less long as long as you reach the total number of repetitions at the end.

Choose your working weight

The working weight will be different for everyone, depending on how high they let their ladders climb.

This is a strength program, so I would say limit your highest reps to 6. I prefer four myself. The weight you choose should allow at least two reps more than most top reps you have ever done in an entire program.

For myself, I work with weights that allow me to do at least six repetitions. Gun on my head, I can probably do eight. The point is that you should never grind or get repetitions. Every repetition you do on each set should be clear and well executed. Here comes your progress. Perfect practice.

Progress within the program

Common sense tells you that for too long the same will lead to physical and mental stagnation. If we do the same exercise and weight, how do we see progress and not die of boredom? There is a two-part answer to this:

  • First, swing the volume down for each exercise during each workout.
  • Second, increase the total volume from week to week.

You want to split your training volume into low, medium and high days. Since you do two exercises a day, you don't want to have a high volume for both on the same day. You probably don't want a small volume for either, but that's less of a problem in the big scheme of things.

If you set A as high volume, B as medium volume and C as low volume, you can easily split it.

I choose this schedule:

day 1 Squats A. Bank C.
day 2 Tot B. Pull-up A.
Day 3 OUT OUT
Day 4 Squats B. Bank A.
Day 5 Tot C. Chin-up B.
Day 6 OUT OUT
Day 7 Squats C. Bank B.
Day 8 Tot A. Chin-up C.

Now we have to decide where we want to start in terms of volume. This can be individual as long as the volume increases from week to week. Depending on your training history, you may have to start out fairly low while others can do more. As with the training weights, lean to the conservative side.

If your first week is hard, you won't have a good time. Here's how I resolved it for week 1. The numbers on each day and the sum are repetitions.

day 1 Squats 30 Bank 18
day 2 Dead 24th Chin-up 30
Day 3 OUT OUT
Day 4 Squats 24 Bank 30
Day 5 Dead 18th Chin-up 24
Day 6 OUT OUT
Day 7 Squats 18th Bank 24
Day 8 Dead 30 Chin-up 18
total Squats 72
Dead 72
Bank 72
Chin-up 72

These numbers can be very high for some and low for others. This is exactly what I used, so adjust it accordingly. Now we have to increase the volume every week. My preferred ladder sequence is 1-2-3 for squats and dead and 2-3-4 for bench and pull-ups.

This is very specific and I selected my weights based on around 6 RM. The easiest way to add volume is to add one ladder per week.

This additional ladder increases the total number of repetitions by 6 per week with squats and deadlifts and 9 per week with bench and pull-ups. I add these leaders to A day week 2, B day week 3 and C day week 4.

4 weeks in

I may have already let the cat out of my pocket, but I designed the program for four weeks. I think it's about how long you can keep your attention.

After four weeks, you can choose to continue for a week or two, especially if you were smart and started on the low side of the volume.

If not, you can take 3-5 days off and your max. This can be a training maximum or a repetition maximum. You can also simply take advantage of a deload week and start another program. The world is your oyster.

The program is not complicated, but it is effective because you have collected so many high quality exercises in the four weeks. I'll warn again, choose your weights wisely.

Think about what weight you want to use and then choose easier. Don't hurry with your rest periods either. I set mine to three minutes between sets, but I will extend it to five minutes if I feel I need them. If you are looking for a pump or metabolic training, this is not for you.

Strength is based on two things:

  1. Rest
  2. Work out

This program offers you many of both if you follow the instructions.

As you go through the program, you can develop your nuances for customizing the program. I know I did it. As long as you follow the basic requirement, this shouldn't be a problem.

I experimented with an exercise in the morning and once at night. I did both exercises together and only switched between the two. It works particularly well.

If you achieve your day and week total reps and gradually increase, you are on the right track.

Chex Quest HD Review: Only 90s Kids Will Understand

Chex Quest HD test: Only children from the 90s will understand it

"Chex Quest HD is a short but pleasant hit from the nostalgia of the 90s."

  • True to the original

  • Simple but fun shooting

  • Wonderfully nostalgic

  • Missing basic user interface

  • Very little repeat value

Let's get something out of the way right away: you already know if you will download Chex Quest HD.

That's because the free remake, which modernizes a 1996 staple from childhood packed with boxes of Chex cereal, is less of a game than a nostalgia journey of the 90s. Your enjoyment of this bizarre first-person shooter directly depends on how much time you spent as a child teasing Flemoide on your parents' PC. And if "zorching flemoids" already sounds like a foreign language, you shouldn't expect to get into the joke now. If you know, you know.

The quality of Chex Quest HD is inextricably linked to the context. For fans who grew up with the original, it is a loyal, if incomplete preservation that makes one of the strangest marketing stunts of games fun again. For everyone else, it's a minimalist doom clone that's about as deep as a bowl of chex.

Chex the right boxes

Chex Quest was originally developed as a trick to make Chex muesli more attractive for modern children. The game used id Software's doom engine to develop a healthy first person shooter that replaced chainsaws and shotguns with spoons and laser remotes. Instead of Doomguy, the players led the Chex Warrior on a mission to teleport snotty aliens back to their home dimension.

While the HD update swaps sprites for smooth 3D textures, the remake is still Doom at its core. In each level, players have to navigate through maze-like levels, find colored key cards and discover secret passages. A quarter of a century later, Chex Quest HD offers a double dose of enjoyable nostalgia: one for the game itself and one for a PC shooter style that dominated the 1990s.

This conservation is important because the time for the original game was not good. After finishing my pleasant hours of playing through the remake, I tried to revisit the 1996 version to see how much had really changed. I was surprised (well, maybe not too surprised) that it wasn't as fun as I remembered. The movement felt awkward and I couldn't put my head around the game's awkward keyboard.

Chex Quest HD offers a double dose of enjoyable nostalgia: one for the game itself and one for a PC shooter style that dominated the 90s.

In comparison, Chex Quest HD feels much closer to what I remember. This can be seen most clearly in the shooting (um, zorchen), which is easier to read thanks to revised animations. Zorchers feel more like radiation cannons and less like unwieldy TV remote controls. The improvements make a major contribution to making the game playable again without losing its goofball charm.

Mixed bag

While protecting my childhood memories, Chex Quest HD doesn't do much to overcome its nostalgic act. This is not because of not trying.

The big innovation is a multiplayer mode that can only be played with four friends on site or via Steam. This limitation suggests how it works best: sit down with a few close friends to laugh at the absurdity of a Chex Mix-themed death match. Separated from this context, it is little more than a novelty within a novelty.

Chex Quest HD

Along with the new mode, the game features several characters that can be unlocked by finding passwords on social media or in pockets with Chex Mix. It's a smart marketing trick, but the characters don't add much to the experience. They all play the same thing, with the main difference that they come with their own hackneyed language lines. Each character has their own alternate campaign end, but I'm not sure if someone is so confused by the Chex lore that they want to go through story mode six times.

The remake adds a few new features, but none of them transform the game into anything other than a short walk through the past.

Chex Quest HD also lacks some features of the original. The remake removes the five difficulty levels of the original and removes the main source for the replay value of the game. And strangely, there's no way to display a map or display the game's controls.

Perhaps it is not particularly easy to scold a game with Chex Mix branding on almost every door because of its interface deficiencies. But considering that the remake is about a generation that doesn't take the joke, it's not too difficult to convert new followers. Chex Quest became a cult because the idea of ​​a free video game for kids from the 90s was stunning. This idea just doesn't have the same effect in the Fortnite era.

Our opinion

Chex Quest HD is a no-brainer for anyone who wants to spend an afternoon in the 90s. Smoother recordings and optimized animations make for a more readable experience that matches the 1996 game, but the minimal package is unlikely to convince players who are not so enthusiastic about a "free" label in 2020. Missing user interface and flat extras make this strange oddity the embodiment of the meme "Only children from the 90s will understand it".

Is there a better alternative?

Dusk is a better balance between nostalgia and quality for those looking for a 90s-style shooter, but Chex Quest HD is the only Doom clone with a snack theme on the market.

How long it will take?

The five levels last about an hour, though secrets, unlockable characters, and local multiplayer are available to those who want to get an extra game session out of it.

Should you buy it

Yes. It's short, free, and just weird enough to deserve a curious look.

Editor's recommendations




4-Week Ladder Template to Gain Strength

I have been writing programs for myself and others for over 20 years. I always learn something when I coach someone through a training program, but I also learn a lot when I do a plan myself.

These programs usually start as something, but evolve considerably until I graduate. I have never been one who followed a written program, mine or another, and only trust the process. Ironically, I give clients the opposite advice. Do what I say, not how I do it seems to apply well here.

Requirements for the power conductor equipment

As I write this, everyone is dealing with a crisis that is forcing adjustments from their regular training routine. Some people, including myself, have trained at home for many years and are not dealing with a lack of equipment. Others have managed to beg, borrow, and hopefully not steal their way to a simple home gym.

This program is designed for people who have at least access to a barbell and a significant amount of weight. A significant amount is relative to every person. If you have a squat rack, that's nice! A bench? Even better.

These simple pieces of equipment are what I base the program on for myself. You can only get by with a barbell, but the exercises need to be adjusted. You can't get by with two soup cans and a ball of laundry fluff. Any decent strength program requires considerable resistance, and a barbell is the most obvious way to do this.

Just as important as the basic equipment, you need a significant amount of another valuable good – time. Although the program is not complicated, the workouts can be quite long depending on how long you want to rest. If you are one of the many who have a little more time available, it seems like an excellent way to get stronger.

The last thing you need is a little patience. You will do four exercises throughout the program. No more. The program could be adjusted to do less, but I won't go into the numerous combinations of exercises, rest periods, and repetitions that are possible. I'm just going to present the basic template, and you can play as you like at your own risk.

The 4-week lead template

The exercises I chose are:

  1. Barbell squat
  2. Bench press
  3. Deadlifts
  4. pulling up

You can choose any variation of these exercises, e.g. B. a horizontal bar, a horizontal bar, an incline or a sumo. This is your call. You have to choose your preference at the beginning and stick to it for the entire program.

Training days

You will only do two exercises a day. I refer to push and pull exercises. I do squats and bench presses on day 1 and deadlifts and pull-ups on day 2.

In the beginning, when I started playing around with it, it was just three exercises that were done three days a week. That was fine, but I like this separation better. You switch between day 1 and day 2 with a day off after you've both completed. Then you repeat. Simple.

The problem for people who think in blocks of seven days is that it takes eight days to go through a microcycle. I am sure that when we leave the traditional seven-day block, time will not collapse by itself – just one way to find out.

Sets and repetitions

As you may have derived from the title, the sentences and repetitions are done on a ladder. If you are unfamiliar with ladders, a full explanation is an article in itself.

One that has been written many times and a simple Google search by Pavel, Ladder, gives you all the information you could want. I will provide the Coles Notes version here. A ladder is when the repetitions increase with each set and the weight stays the same.

For example, a ladder is a 225 pound squat for a set of 2, rest, a set of 4, rest and a set of 6. This ladder can be repeated as many times as necessary. There are many variations on this topic, but we will stick to this basic requirement.

Instead of the conventional set and repetition schemes, a target number of total repetitions must be carried out for each training session. Let's take 36 as an example. If you stick to 2-4-6, you will get a total of 12 repetitions on each ladder. Simple math shows that you need three ladders to reach this number.

You can also choose different combinations to hit numbers that don't work together as well. If your total number is 38 reps, you can do two ladders with 2-4-6 for 24 repetitions, one ladder with 2-3-4 for 33 repetitions, and finish with 2-3.

The leaders don't have to be in progressive groups of three; They can be more or less long as long as you reach the total number of repetitions at the end.

Choose your working weight

The working weight will be different for everyone, depending on how high they let their ladders climb.

This is a strength program, so I would say limit your highest reps to 6. I prefer four myself. The weight you choose should allow at least two reps more than most top reps you have ever done in an entire program.

For myself, I work with weights that allow me to do at least six repetitions. Gun on my head, I can probably do eight. The point is that you should never grind or get repetitions. Every repetition you do on each set should be clear and well executed. Here comes your progress. Perfect practice.

Progress within the program

Common sense tells you that for too long the same will lead to physical and mental stagnation. If we do the same exercise and weight, how do we see progress and not die of boredom? There is a two-part answer to this:

  • First, swing the volume down for each exercise during each workout.
  • Second, increase the total volume from week to week.

You want to split your training volume into low, medium and high days. Since you do two exercises a day, you don't want to have a high volume for both on the same day. You probably don't want a small volume for either, but that's less of a problem in the big scheme of things.

If you set A as high volume, B as medium volume and C as low volume, you can easily split it.

I choose this schedule:

day 1 Squats A. Bank C.
day 2 Tot B. Pull-up A.
Day 3 OUT OUT
Day 4 Squats B. Bank A.
Day 5 Tot C. Chin-up B.
Day 6 OUT OUT
Day 7 Squats C. Bank B.
Day 8 Tot A. Chin-up C.

Now we have to decide where we want to start in terms of volume. This can be individual as long as the volume increases from week to week. Depending on your training history, you may have to start out fairly low while others can do more. As with the training weights, lean to the conservative side.

If your first week is hard, you won't have a good time. Here's how I resolved it for week 1. The numbers on each day and the sum are repetitions.

day 1 Squats 30 Bank 18
day 2 Dead 24th Chin-up 30
Day 3 OUT OUT
Day 4 Squats 24 Bank 30
Day 5 Dead 18th Chin-up 24
Day 6 OUT OUT
Day 7 Squats 18th Bank 24
Day 8 Dead 30 Chin-up 18
total Squats 72
Dead 72
Bank 72
Chin-up 72

These numbers can be very high for some and low for others. This is exactly what I used, so adjust it accordingly. Now we have to increase the volume every week. My preferred ladder sequence is 1-2-3 for squats and dead and 2-3-4 for bench and pull-ups.

This is very specific and I selected my weights based on around 6 RM. The easiest way to add volume is to add one ladder per week.

This additional ladder increases the total number of repetitions by 6 per week with squats and deadlifts and 9 per week with bench and pull-ups. I add these leaders to A day week 2, B day week 3 and C day week 4.

4 weeks in

I may have already let the cat out of my pocket, but I designed the program for four weeks. I think it's about how long you can keep your attention.

After four weeks, you can choose to continue for a week or two, especially if you were smart and started on the low side of the volume.

If not, you can take 3-5 days off and your max. This can be a training maximum or a repetition maximum. You can also simply take advantage of a deload week and start another program. The world is your oyster.

The program is not complicated, but it is effective because you have collected so many high quality exercises in the four weeks. I'll warn again, choose your weights wisely.

Think about what weight you want to use and then choose easier. Don't hurry with your rest periods either. I set mine to three minutes between sets, but I will extend it to five minutes if I feel I need them. If you are looking for a pump or metabolic training, this is not for you.

Strength is based on two things:

  1. Rest
  2. Work out

This program offers you many of both if you follow the instructions.

As you go through the program, you can develop your nuances for customizing the program. I know I did it. As long as you follow the basic requirement, this shouldn't be a problem.

I experimented with an exercise in the morning and once at night. I did both exercises together and only switched between the two. It works particularly well.

If you achieve your day and week total reps and gradually increase, you are on the right track.

Ecovacs Deebot Ozmo T8 AIVI Review: Features Over Cleaning

Ecovacs Deebot Ozmo T8 AIVI

"This robotic vacuum cleaner has almost all the functions you can imagine on its small body."

  • Has security camera function

  • Allocates rooms quickly

  • Avoids objects well

  • Doesn't wipe well

  • Carpet cannot be wiped and vacuumed at the same time

  • Missing spots and corners

  • App breakdowns out

The Ecovacs Deebot Ozmo T8 AIVI is an innovative robot vacuum cleaner that not only sucks in dust and fluff, but also wipes it. It also uses Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) to map multiple rooms, avoid obstacles, and ensure better cleaning. It is compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. Even more interesting is that the camera can even be used as a surveillance camera. At first glance, the T8 has a lot to offer. I found the following when I tried it.

DEEBOT T8 AIVI in a bedroomEcovacs

To install

After connecting the app to the bot, you need to let the bot map your entire house. TrueMapping technology is designed to map your home with a 2x range and 4x accuracy compared to the company's previous models. If you have a house with a second floor, the T8 can also create a separate map for each floor.

However, reaching the end of the mapping process can be difficult. If it gets caught on something and you move it, it has to start over. If the juice runs out before mapping, it has to start over. If it fails, it has to start over. Fortunately, I haven't encountered these problems more than once.

DEEBOT T8 AIVI tiresAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

In addition to using A.I. To avoid objects, the T8 has large wheels. You can drive over obstacles up to 20mm high, which means they won't get caught on door sills or small items and speed up the mapping process. Other robotic vacuum cleaners tend to get caught in these obstacles. So it's wonderful that their powerful wheels handle them like a champion – I didn't have to run to prevent them from getting stuck while mapping!

It was also mapped incredibly quickly. Within a minute it had two whole rooms and then some on the app. The catch is that it has to clean the entire house and scan the rooms and then return to its charging station, otherwise the mapping will not be saved. This is a problem I had when I tried the Deebot 960. So it seems that Ecovacs still hasn't found a solution to this problem.

DEEBOT T8 AIVI App

You can use the app to name different rooms. Then you can touch the card and the T8 will drive into the area to start cleaning. This is a super smart feature that gives you more control than other vacuum cleaner systems. However, the problem is that you have to switch the app to advanced mode and then reassign it. I'm not sure why the map I've already created cannot be used, but the reallocation is impractical.

Sweeping and wiping

According to Ecovacs, the improved AIVI technology (Artificial Intelligence and Visual Interpretation) of the T8 offers a 200% faster detection speed for objects and obstacles in the area, as well as a 60% reduction in the entanglement rate compared to other robot vacuum cleaners with LDS navigation technology. This basically means that it runs less often on and over objects. I found that true. It did a good job of avoiding objects and got stuck only once.

It also detects when your floors need more suction to get better cleaning and adjusts accordingly. Although it maps quickly and avoids most objects, I am not impressed with how well it vacuums. It seems to overlook many spots, runs in random patterns and doesn't get any edges or furniture very clean. It also does not notify you when the container is full. It runs around thinking about its cleaning, but it really isn't.

DEEBOT T8 AIVI container and power switchAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

After cleaning, the app shows where the bot has not cleaned because it has encountered obstacles. The app suggests that you move the objects so the T8 can go back and clean the area. This is great, but some of the objects that should be moved were furniture. That gave me a big Facepalm moment.

The T8 kills 99.26% of the bacteria on your floors.

The moping function is simply to attach a mop pad to the bottom of the bot and fill the reservoir with water. Yes, only water according to the instructions. Can you use cleaning solutions? Probably, but the manual doesn't say you can. Even so, a study by the Hygiene and Microbiology Research Center in Japan claims that the T8 kills 99.26% of the bacteria in your floors. How can this be possible? I'm not a scientist, so I guess I have to take your word for it.

DEEBOT T8 AIVI water tankAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

The T8 does not absorb a lot of water from its reservoir while wiping. However, it does not leave much moisture and the floors dry quickly with medium water flow. You can adjust the water setting with the app, but the higher setting didn't seem to leave much more water on the floor.

Overall, the moping function didn't do much on my floors. My kitchen floor was still dirty when the bot pointed it out to me, even after I tried again and increased the water flow to ultra high.

The T8 "sucks and wipes in one pass." I thought that was wrong.

The T8 can recognize carpets to avoid them and stick to surfaces such as linoleum and tiles. The T8 ran up to my carpet, but never let it touch the wiping pad.

The cleaning function that I was most happy about was that T8 AIVI can vacuum and wipe at the same time. According to the Ecovac website, the T8 sucks and wipes simultaneously in one pass. I somehow thought that was wrong. You have to remove the wiping pad so that the bot can suck according to the manual. It does sweep the floor before the mopping pad moves over the surface. However, since it doesn't approach the carpets while the mop pad is installed, you shouldn't expect it to vacuum up carpets or rugs.

Camera shots

DEEBOT T8 AIVI camera on security

In addition to vacuuming and wiping, you can use the T8's camera to take photos, record videos, talk to people in other rooms, and conduct a security patrol of your home. It has a remote control function that allows you to drive it around your home like a toy robot. That was actually pretty cool. I could drive it into my daughter's room and tell her to do her chores without leaving my home office. It is a lazy person's dream.

As a surveillance camera? It is not awesome. For starters, the view is like that of a toddler crawling on the floor, and the video isn't very clear. It can tell you if someone was in your house just because you could see their feet walking around. You can see faces as long as they are the perfect distance from the camera.

There is a patrol mode that you can either turn on manually or schedule when the T8 will patrol your home. If your T8 is not in patrol mode, you can control it with the remote control on the video manager screen of the app in your house. When not in active use, the camera is turned towards the charging station so that it cannot see anything unless you rotate it using the app or by hand.

This feature can be useful in so many ways other than just security. For example, you can use it to check your pets at work or to spy on your children while the babysitter is watching them to make sure they are not behaving.

Keys

The T8 is cleaning a carpet.Ecovacs

I don't like that this robotic vacuum cleaner has only one power switch on top. Sometimes you don't want to open your phone and search for an app. Pressing a button on the vacuum is simply easier. For example, the Eufy RoboVac G30 has a return button, an on / off switch and a stain removal button. I found it super helpful when I was doing other tasks. I could just tap a button and then do my other tasks.

App

The Ecovacs app is not great. It tends to be flawed. It also has a habit of disconnecting from the bot, which is particularly annoying as there is no button on the top to send back to the charger. So you either have to pick up the bot and carry it to the charger or try to reconnect the bot to the app. Restarting the app seemed to fix most of the problems, but it's an inconvenience.

Battery life

DEEBOT T8 AIVI on the chargerAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

Ecovacs claims that the T8 AIVI with its 5,200 mAh battery can clean more than 3 hours or up to 200 minutes on one charge. I found that this was not very accurate. It ran for about 119 minutes on one charge. Even though it missed the mark, it's still a much longer life than many Vac-Bots on the market. Of course, cleaning conditions can vary how long a bot can clean. When the battery is almost empty, it automatically returns to the charging station, but is not yet finished. Once charged, it continues and completes its cleaning routine exactly where it left off.

Our opinion

Partly spy, part mop, part vacuum – the Ecovacs Deebot Ozmo T8 AIVI is innovative, but in many areas it lacks tracking. I wish it was vacuumed better and the mop would inspire me a little more. The price of just under $ 800 would probably be worth it if these features were better, since the camera capabilities are fantastic.

Is there a better alternative?

There aren't many robotic vacuum cleaners that can wipe and have the surveillance camera, so probably not. The European Mayan robotic vacuum cleaner has similar features, a nicer app, and a longer warranty, but is not widely available.

The only other thing that fits exactly is the Roborock S6 MaxV, which is equipped with two cameras to avoid obstacles, vacuum cleaners and pugs at the same time. It offers better cleaning performance and costs a little less ($ 750). However, if you need a great mop, I recommend the iRobot Braava Jet 240 or the iRobot Braava Jet m6.

Will it take?

The T8 is well built and looks very robust. The metal door that covers the container is a good choice to protect the bot from falling objects. There is also a one year limited warranty.

Should you buy it

No. This is a difficult question as I would almost say that it is worth buying the T8 only for the security patrol and other camera skills. However, it's a lot of money for a cleaning bot that doesn't clean as well as it could. I have to say "passed".

Editor's recommendations




Microsoft Build 2020 News | Digital Trends

Microsoft Build, the company's developer conference, kicks off on May 19, but the popular event doesn't take place in Seattle. For the first time, the company is hosting a virtual event for its major developer, leaving Microsoft teams to collaborate and network to interview event attendees. At Build, the company will likely focus on Azure, its cool computing platform, addressing Windows, games, virtual computing (Hello, HoloLens!) And buzzwords like ambient computing, quantum programming, and AI at work.

Amazon Echo Show Review | New (2nd Gen) 2018 Model

Amazon Echo Show 2 review

Echo Show (2nd generation)

"With a bigger screen and a stronger sound, the new Amazon Echo Show is better in every way."

  • Impressive sound quality

  • Crystal clear display

  • Larger screen than the previous model

  • Built-in smart home hub

  • Expensive

  • No Z-Wave integration

We felt that the Amazon Echo Show was up for an update. Given the competition from Google Assistant over the beautiful Smart Display from Lenovo and the Link View from JBL, both of which offer better sound and display quality, Amazon had to catch up.

The company delivered the Amazon Echo Show (2nd generation), an Alexa speaker with a screen, when it was released in October 2018 for $ 229. We had some time with the new device and Amazon definitely delivered.

Alexa, show me film times

Like the previous Echo show, the new show looks a bit like a supported tablet. But the new show has a bigger, crystal-clear 10-inch display (the old one was seven inches tall). It serves as a smart hub, meaning it can use the ZigBee protocol to connect to smart home devices.

Another difference between old and new devices is the shape. The older version was similar to an old school blocky TV, while the new one is more streamlined and has a sandstone or charcoal back. It's ideal for a kitchen environment where you can ask Alexa to show you tutorials on how to make lasagna, for example.

Amazon increased the sound quality with two two-inch premium drivers, a passive bass heater and Dolby processing. In addition, you can adjust the treble and bass from anywhere in the room with just your voice. You can also use the show to set up Alexa's multi-room audio feature.

You can adjust the treble and bass from all over the room with just your voice.

The show offers better integration with ring security products (owned by Amazon), especially the video doorbells. When your doorbell rings, you can see who’s on the front door on the Show screen. With a Hulu subscription, you can also watch live TV on your device and make Skype calls soon.

In addition, the show does everything a normal echo speaker can do, e.g. B. Add items to your shopping list, set the timer or enter the square root of 52,000 (answer: 228.03508502). For those of you who can sneak into your home from devices with a screen, there is a way to turn off both the camera and speaker for privacy reasons.

Alexa, play Cardi B.

We had the opportunity to work on the new show and were impressed by the improved sound quality. We mean significantly improved. We placed the new Echo Show next to the old one to do sound tests side by side and were thrilled. It is clear that Amazon has moved the sound from the "good enough" category to the "good enough to play during a party" category.

We asked Alexa to play Cardi B's I Like It, which has a decent amount of bass. While our old Echo Show sounds a bit muffled with songs with fat bass, the new show has mastered the task well and offers an adult, clear, bold, space-filling version of the song. We had a similar experience when we asked Alexa to go one step further with The Beatles & # 39; Let it Be. The instrumentals and lyrics mixed well. And if you want more power, you can optionally pair the show with the new Echo Sub and other Echo speakers to double the sound.

We let both devices play uptown funk and found that the new show projected a bold, fuller sound across the room, creating a multi-dimensional version of the song that wasn't there before.

Amazon Echo Show 2 reviewRich Shibley / Digital Trends

The improvements are also great for the display. We watched a few minutes of an episode of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, and again the improvement in clarity of the display was strong. Sharp, clear images appeared on the screen, and the device can definitely be used as a television if you wish. While it doesn't quite match the clarity of Lenovo's smart display with Google Assistant, it was a huge improvement over the previous Echo Show.

Obviously, it would be a little difficult to gather around the device like a television, since it is supported at an angle. However, if you want to follow the game while cooking dinner, you will get a detailed overview of current events.

Alexa, turn on the lamp below

We were able to get the show up and running in our smart home without any problems. After connecting, we were asked for our Amazon Prime account information and our WiFi password and we were ready to go. We should note that we have already installed the Alexa app on our phone and connected the device to an existing network of Echo devices. If this is your first echo, you need to do other tasks in the front end, e.g. For example, setting up your preferred language, connecting music streaming services to your account, and adding smart home devices that you want your Echo to control. The Alexa app and show screen will walk you through the steps for a painless setup.

We connected the show to our Nest camera and watched footage of it in no time. The larger screen and clearer display of the new show made a big difference: we could see whether our son's eyes were open or closed in bed – something we couldn't do before. We also connected our Noon and Philips Hue lights and smart plugs and were able to easily switch any device on and off with just the sound of our voice.

Otherwise, the Alexa voice assistant is the same that you'll find in any Alexa device – it can solve math problems for you, tell you what your favorite superhero is, set multiple timers, make calls, and more. The advantage of a screen comes into play when you need to view video, play movies or cook videos, make video calls, or even use your voice to answer the ring of your ringtone. We test this new feature when we get a ringtone doorbell installed.

A couple of things: While we’re excited about integrating Zigbee, we’d like Amazon to add Z-Wave functionality to make the show compatible with a wider range of smart home devices. Many hubs, like Samsung's SmartThings Wi-Fi, offer both. If you want to use one of the more than 2,400 devices that use Z-Wave, you may have to invest in one.

The fabric back is definitely an improvement.

We also hoped for a price cut. While Amazon has invested in major upgrades for this 2.0 model, $ 230 is still a bit expensive, especially considering that the 8-inch Lenovo smart display costs $ 200 (although we should note that the 10-inch version of Lenovo actually costs more than the show at $ 250).

Overall, however, we were impressed with the improvements Amazon made to the Echo overhaul.

Warranty information

The Echo Show comes with a one-year warranty and service. You can purchase an extended one, two, or three year warranty separately.

Try these new features

Thanks to frequent updates that expand their toolkit, Alexa is getting smarter. While there are some basic features you should definitely know, there are new tricks available every month. You can try the following with the Amazon Echo Dot with watch.

Find out more about COVID-19

The pandemic has changed many things for us. Alexa is here to help you with updates and what to do if you suspect you have symptoms of COVID-19. Just say, "Alexa, what do I do if I think I have COVID-19?" She will ask you a number of questions, including your itinerary, to give you the correct CDC guide.

Get the latest weather alerts

Storms and other bad weather can occur immediately, which is useful for the latest warnings. The Echo Dot with clock can keep you up to date by saying, "Alexa, tell me if there's a storm alert."

Election updates

There will be a lot of news when the presidential elections are in full swing. So it is a good idea to know what is going on in politics. You can use the Echo Dot with clock to get the latest voting information, debate reviews, and more. All you have to do is say, "Alexa, what is my election update" or "Alexa, what happened in the last debate?"

Our opinion

Overall, the new Echo Show is better than the old one in every way. With powerful sound, a crystal-clear 10-inch display, an additional Smart Hub and an optimized, softer appearance, we are impressed that Amazon has taken so many steps to significantly improve the product.

Is there a better alternative?

Smart displays are still very competitive, and Google Assistant devices are the most competitive. The Google Nest Hub Max ($ 200) is an ultimate smart display that adds a key element that you won't find on our devices. It also serves as a surveillance camera. The Lenovo Smart Display 7 with Google Assistant is a device with a compact design and an affordable price ($ 100).

If you don't need the screen on Echo devices, you can get an intelligent speaker with built-in Alexa voice assistant with an Echo ($ 70) or Echo Dot ($ 30). However, you will miss the functionality of the ZigBee Smart Hub, and without the screen it would be more difficult to get a tutorial on how to bake cookies.

How long it will take?

Amazon Echo devices and Alexa are both here to stay. Alexa is getting better with firmware updates and additional skills. The Echo Show hardware feels robust enough to last for at least a few years, and support for the device should continue for a long time.

Should you buy it

If you're looking for an Alexa-based smart speaker with a screen, you should buy it. If you're not married to Alexa, check out the Google Nest Hub Max. In any case, you will get a great device.

Editor's recommendations




World War Z Review: The Next Best Thing to Left 4 Dead

A look back at the Second World War: the closest we come to is Left 4 Dead 3

"While it stands on the shoulders of giants, World War II does it proudly and with many merits of its own."

  • Exciting, global campaigns

  • Adds depth with character classes and upgrades

  • Zombie swarms create impressive action scenes

  • Sound design is not educational

  • PvP is a total afterthought

  • Introduces only one enemy type that is not seen in such games

Games have portrayed hordes of zombies and the survivors who may kill them more than any other scenario in the history of the medium, and while many have failed to attract attention, others have done well to keep a high bar or even reset it. World War II didn't raise the bar, but given the connections outside the left field to a dormant franchise, it's surprising how close it gets.

Just the term "zombie game" can instantly give some players a strong feeling of fatigue when you consider how common they are. But that's not the case with me, especially since it is exactly this type of zombie game that wants to revive a close co-op experience for four players in the face of massive hordes like Left 4 Dead that were delivered so brilliantly about a game Decade. World War II, now a year after the launch and release of the Game of the Year, is closer than ever to repeating its obvious inspiration from Valve as it borrowed from, and somewhat built on, predecessors.

Cross-global campaigns

The WWZ regularly brings up to four players to capitals and major cities on multiple continents, and no two campaigns look the same. The run through downtown Manhattan has nothing to do with a winter trip to Moscow, including pushing to the edge of Tokyo or the latest campaign in sun-drenched Marseille, France.

This diversity of settings compensates for what the game lacks in mission diversity. The tasks are familiar to fans of co-op shooters, since the goals include tropics, e.g. For example, hold out for a certain amount of time or look for certain items that are requested by NPCs. Each chapter pushes players from a safe room to a safe room, with swarms of common undead and special infected standing in the way. The level of play with these hordes is exciting at every level. But with the right team, it is best if the level of difficulty is greater than the standard. Success depends on how well your team works together. Some of the game's specially infected games are boldly pulled straight from other zombie games, e.g. For example, one that pounces on you and demands that a teammate come to your rescue, or one that grabs you and repeatedly bangs you on the floor.

There are half a dozen specially infected classes, but only one of them – a zombie that infects players and slowly affects health – has never been seen in this genre. Though the levels are linear, a rewarding sense of replayability remains thanks to non-scripted encounters, which means when and where you encounter hordes and special infected that change with each session. You will explore the same locations, but never survive the same attack twice.

While it stands on the shoulders of giants like Left 4 Dead and more recently the Warhammer: Vermintide series, World War Z does it proudly and with many of its own advantages. In front and in the middle is the swarm technology, with which hordes of unprecedented size and speed can descend on the players. These swarms pour out randomly over the rooftops and pile up into slimy meat pyramids, often in multiple locations at the same time, forcing players into a hectic struggle to maintain a sense of control over a desperate situation. Countless zombie games try to create excitement in the fight against overwhelming chances, but I haven't found any that provide the adrenaline rush of World War II highlights.

In Marseille, new targets require more teamwork, like a rocket launch sequence that requires all four players use the weapon to survive. This type of collaboration can be annoying when you play online with random players who may not be careful beyond the game's point-and-shoot elements. However, as long as you have competent allies, the new campaign is now the best part of the game. It adds an extra layer to the usual tariff of staying upright longer than the wave of monsters coming at you.

Count characters

There is also a depth of weapon and character classes that are not often found in the genre. Characters may have personality, but they run, shoot, heal, and everything else with the same skills. Who they are is at best a cosmetic detail. During World War II, players built their heroes from scratch with a deep skill tree and a regular stream of unlocked weapons and mods. There are different classes, such as healers, destroyers, tanks and more, and a coherent team can play the strengths and weaknesses of each other.

Skill trees are not new to games, but they feel fresh and do it in this genre. Therefore, future attempts to advance style must use these functions as a foundation. They feel like the missing ingredient for games that were before that rarely offered anything, and the few examples that did – I think of Vermintide – didn't do it that profoundly. I have spent countless hours in World War II and have not yet exhausted all of the classwork trees.

While it stands on the shoulders of the giants, World War II does so proudly and with many merits of its own.

Mediocre modes

There are Challenge and Horde modes, both of which have been added as post-launch additions. The challenge mode goes through gameplay modifiers such as scarce ammunition or demanding players who go to solo levels of high difficulty. These are a hit or miss, as the modifiers can remove some of the game's best features, such as: B. the cooperative game. Horde mode is a relentless wave defense mode. However, this one-note thrill is exacerbated without valleys making up for its constant climax. These are fleetingly entertaining options that don't have the staying power of the campaigns.

Still, the game's PvP mode suite is by far the most misguided addition. If you've played PvP on small teams in the past decade, you've already experienced most of what World War II offers in PvP gameplay. The only interesting fold that is not unique, but at least rare, is how A.I. Zombies roam the multiplayer maps as two human-controlled teams fight round by round.

It's an admirable try for the developer, deathmatch and other popular modes with the added element of undead A.I. Roam the cards. Still, World War II simply doesn't have the community or the staying power to earn time in PvP. Modes like Deathmatch and Free-for-All are ubiquitous and better designed in most other games that include them. During World War II, PvP maps never seem to be that detailed. and instead feel like parts of the campaign were quickly annexed and called PvP.

The best thing I can say about these modes is that they feel so out of date that they can be nostalgic for some players who yearn for the games of a decade played in PvP. It is a strange recording in 2020 and not one that I will revisit even though I will play the game for a long time. It feels like an afterthought to start playing the game at all, so it's easy to treat it as one.

Every atmospheric level uses environmental storytelling, such as the former military checkpoint, which is crowded with bodies, or a shopping mall littered with the undead like a Romero film. All of this is supported by a level of fidelity that I wasn't expecting, as licensed games aren't that sophisticated. The world and its characters look great, although the texture pop-in sometimes interferes with an otherwise fascinating view.

Hearing overload

Sound design in this genre is said to be educational, but World War II often shouts about its own attempts to do so. Specific infected arrivals are caused by their characteristic groans and chimes, but the game is usually too loud of hordes and its admittedly gripping soundtrack to be effective. This hampers every element of the strategy and does so in a way that implies that the developers at Saber Interactive understood the meaning but could still drown out their own intentions. Missed brushstrokes like this prevent World War II from becoming a masterpiece.

The past year has been good for the game as developers regularly add new modes, characters, cosmetics, and weapons. There's an entire PvP suite that can be ignored, and the game borrows generously from predecessors, but it also manages to build on some genre tropes. Trying to capture the essence of his idols, World War II unveiled a roadmap that followers can fall back on when trying to deliver a memorable co-op zombie apocalypse.

Our opinion

Is there a better alternative?

Left 4 Dead 2 is still the greatest the genre has ever given us, but as far as co-op zombie shooters are concerned, World War Z is the best attempt to modernize this classic. If you want a fantasy take, I recommend Warhammer: Vermintide 2, while Payday gives the formula a bank robbery. The youngest Zombie Army 4 is decent too, but World War II is better. In a way, it lags behind its role models, but in other cases it is innovative.

How long it will take?

Due to the nature of the highly repeatable multiplayer modes, World War II lasts as long as you want. I would recommend focusing your time on campaigns rather than PvP, but the depth of the upgrades to unlock makes it a tempting long-term game.

Should you buy it

You should, especially if you are a fan of the genre. While the game stumbles in a way, namely in an unforgettable PvP suite and an audio mix that comes up against itself, the list of aesthetically diverse and intense campaigns during World War II makes it a great game to play with friends . Given the way it is revived and sometimes even reinvented, what a co-op shooter like this can be, it's worth buying World War II.

Editor's recommendations




Asus ZenBook Duo Review: A Dual-Screen Laptop You Can Afford

Asus Zenbook Duo review 01

"The second screen of the Asus ZenBook Duo is a great addition."

  • Solid productivity performance

  • Good battery life

  • Secondary screen is useful

  • Attractive design

  • Tight keyboard and touchpad

  • The chassis is a bit chunky

Microsoft is on its way to a future with two screens. Asus started experimenting with its own dual-screen laptops in 2019. Regardless of whether the touchpad is replaced by a second screen or a second 4K screen is installed directly on the keyboard deck, Asus is a leader in the innovation of dual screens that you can buy today.

The ZenBook Duo is the latest attempt to make this technology accessible to the masses. It is a more portable and affordable version of the ZenBook Pro Duo with a 14-inch 1080p screen and a quad-core processor. However, a premium is required at $ 1,500.

Is the second screen a must? Let's take a look.

ScreenPad 2.0

The standout feature of the ZenBook Duo is clearly its second screen, a 12.6-inch IPS panel that is as wide as the primary display and about a third as high. That is what makes the ZenBook Duo so special.

The so-called ScreenPad 2.0 can be touched and touched. You can drag apps and app windows – such as the control panel for a photo editing app – onto the ScreenPad and treat them like any "external" display.

It's handy if you watch Netflix at work (as I've done more than once) or open a second browser instance for multitasking. I opened a Firefox tab with the specifications of this laptop on the ScreenPad 2.0 and made checking facts and figures child's play.

Asus has numerous proprietary utilities and features that make the ScreenPad more useful. You can launch a numeric keypad to make data entry easier, and you can use the launcher to access various apps on the ScreenPad. You can also expand your main display to the ScreenPad, giving you (strangely angled) access to more information in a productivity app.

The ScreenPad is far more useful than the touch bar on the MacBook.

The ScreenPad supports the active Asus pen and offers the same responsiveness and accuracy as the main display. It's a blessing to be able to tap and ink on both displays and switch seamlessly from one to the other depending on how it fits your creative workflow. There's even a working handwriting app that reads my sketches pretty closely. A second display for writing was an advantage.

Overall, I was impressed with the ScreenPad. It's an unusual feature outside of the ZenBook Pro Duo and far more useful than Apple's Touch Bar on the MacBook Pro, for example. The additional screen size makes the ScreenPad a really useful addition to the ZenBook Duo and is of particular interest to anyone who can benefit from access to controls or additional apps while working. If you are a creative professional or do multiple tasks regularly, the ScreenPad is probably a real asset. It is much more than just a party trick.

design

The aesthetics of the laptop is obviously Asus, for better and for worse. It's a refinement of ZenBook design that's both recognizable and striking in the line. You'll enjoy the ZenBook's usual concentric swirls on the lid, which is perhaps the most iconic Asus design feature. Here the eddies are not centered, but asymmetrical, a noticeable change. There is also a new Celestial Blue color that offers a touch of elegance.

Overall, the ZenBook Duo is an attractive laptop that manages to cross the line between fancy and conservative, but I wouldn't say it stands out.

Connectivity is acceptable, with one USB-C 3.1 port, two USB-A 3.1 ports (one Gen 1 and one Gen 2), a full-size HDMI port, and a microSD card reader. Unfortunately Asus skipped Thunderbolt 3 support again, just like with other current ZenBooks. To be honest, that's unforgivable for a $ 1,500 laptop. Thunderbolt 3 offers the best connectivity performance, including the ability to connect to an external GPU chassis. This would be a blessing for the creative types who might be interested in the ZenBook Duo.

Keyboard and touchpad

The most noticeable victim forced by the second ad is right below. While the keyboard has snappy keys with a fixed mechanism and a lot of travel, I found it too small for comfortable typing. The keys are small and the keyboard layout felt tight, which made typing a challenge. It cannot be compared to the excellent keyboards of the latest Apple MacBooks and the HP Specter x360 13. There's also no wrist, so your palms hover just behind it. It is a recipe for fatigue.

This Asus has an ErgoLift hinge with which the props are attached at an angle to the back of the laptop. This helps in the absence of a palm rest and improves airflow for better performance. On the other hand, the laptop gets thicker when placed on your lap or desk.

The touchpad is small, but it responds, and it's on the right of the keyboard. It has the same lack of a palm rest as the keyboard, and it's almost impossible to use left-handed. You want to take a mouse with you for use with the ZenBook Duo because the touchpad becomes a real task.

I liked the infrared camera that Windows 10 Hello supports without a password. It worked fine during my tests, and although I prefer to have a fingerprint reader (either in addition to or instead of face recognition), I appreciated its presence.

Display quality

The ScreenPad 2.0 is characterized by its additional utility. The 14-inch full HD main display remains important. I prefer 4K displays, but I also like displays with wide and precise colors, great brightness and a lot of contrast.

Unfortunately Asus has equipped the ZenBook Duo with a mediocre display. The color gamut is not wide at only 70% of AdobeRGB and 94% of sRGB, although its color accuracy is reasonable at an average DeltaE of 1.45 (less than 1.0 is considered excellent). The display only reaches 251 nits, far below our preferred 300 nits, and the contrast is low at 730: 1 (we want laptops to reach 1000: 1 or more).

The display quality prevents it from being ideal for content creation.

Subjectively, this is a pleasant indicator of productivity work and watching Netflix videos. However, creatives won't like the narrow range of colors, especially if you can buy great displays on other laptops, including the HP Specter x360 13 AMOLED panel, which has spectacular colors (100% of sRGB and 98% of AdobeRGB) and brightness (405 nits) offers) and contrast.

The ZenBook Pro Duo’s AMOLED display is just as great, which makes the ZenBook Duo’s main screen a little disappointing. I would have preferred to see a brighter display with better colors and contrast on a laptop designed for creative types. Ultimately, the display quality prevents it from being ideal for content creation.

performance

While the larger ZenBook Pro Duo has an eight-core Core i9 H series for serious performance, the ZenBook Duo is in the middle of the road. It uses a quad-core Comet Lake Core i7-10510U CPU that is good enough for productivity tasks, but not particularly suitable for demanding creative workflows. Overall, the ZenBook Duo is fast compared to other 14-inch laptops, but cannot compete with more powerful creative platforms.

In our real handbrake test, which converts a 420 MB file to H.265, the ZenBook Duo lasted exactly three and a half minutes. This is solid for a quad-core Intel Core i7. However, the ZenBook Pro Duo completed the same test in one minute and 16 seconds, while the Dell XPS 15 finished in one minute and 42 seconds – but still significantly faster than the ZenBook Duo. The Dell XPS 13 completed the test in three minutes and 13 seconds.

In terms of graphics performance, the ZenBook Duo is again far behind the larger ZenBook Pro Duo. The latter has a very fast Nvidia GeForce GTX 2060, which makes it a powerful tool for creative apps that support the GPU. The ZenBook Duo is limited to the Nvidia GeForce MX250. It's faster than built-in Intel graphics (and about as powerful as the new Intel Iris Plus graphics), but doesn't make much of a difference when rendering videos.

You will also find that the ZenBook Duo is a bit challenging to play with. Fortnite runs at just over 30 frames per second (fps) at 1080p and Epic settings and shifts down towards 60 fps with details. However, it is difficult for you to run more demanding titles with the same resolution and the same graphic details.

The ZenBook Duo is only available in the United States in a configuration that includes 16 GB of RAM and is sufficient for the vast majority of productivity users. It also has plenty of 1 TB of SSD storage.

Portability and battery life

Portability is also compromised on the Altar of the ScreenPad – the ZenBook Duo is pretty bulky at 0.78 inches thick. Thanks to the relatively small display bezels, it's not too big in width and depth, but at 3.3 pounds it's pretty heavy. Other 14-inch laptops are smaller than this, including the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon and the ZenBook 14 from Asus.

However, the battery life is solid. When the ScreenPad was turned on, the battery capacity of 70 watt hours kept the ZenBook Duo for a surprisingly long time, considering that the batteries supply two displays with power. In our web browser test, nine hours passed, which is good, if less than the 11.5 hours of the Dell XPS 13.

The ZenBook Duo looped our test video for almost 12 hours, again a good score, but less than the XPS 13 at 14.5 hours. And in our demanding Basemark test, the Asus managed almost five hours less than the XPS 13 with 10 minutes less.

Our opinion

At $ 1,500, the ZenBook Duo is more expensive than comparable laptops. That hurts when you look at the less-than-great screen, the chunkier design, and the lack of Thunderbolt 3.

The ScreenPad 2.0 is the salvation of this laptop. It goes beyond the cool factor (although it also has a lot of it). Even with compromises on the keyboard and touchpad, extreme multitaskers will be happy to access another panel directly on the device.

Are there alternatives?

You will find a variety of 14-inch (and 13.3-inch) laptops that can easily compete with the ZenBook Duo. None of them offer the second display, but all are thinner and lighter. Some of them offer better performance and durability, and most offer much better keyboards and touchpads.

One example is the Dell XPS 13 with an aspect ratio of 16:10, which has a positive impact on productivity and makes the display about as tall as the ZenBook Duo, if not as wide. The XPS 13 is significantly faster than the ZenBook Duo, even in terms of video editing, where the ZenBook Duo itself works fairly quickly. Depending on the configuration, you can spend less on the XPS 13 or a lot more, but it is a good alternative for anyone who is not interested in the ScreenPad 2.0.

Asus also makes several 14-inch models that deliver solid value. They lack the ScreenPad 2.0, which cuts hundreds off the price. This is the obvious step if you don't find ScreenPad attractive.

How long it will take?

The ZenBook Duo is well built and promises years of productive performance thanks to its modern components. You'll miss Thunderbolt 3, however, and the ultimate usefulness of ScreenPad 2.0 depends on developer support. The one-year warranty is industry standard and is shorter than desired. However, Asus offers one year of accident protection if you drop your ZenBook Duo or spill a cup of coffee on the keyboard.

Should you buy it

Yes. There is no other laptop like the ZenBook Duo except the larger and more expensive ZenBook Pro Duo, which makes this a uniquely useful option.

Editor's recommendations




Ultimately, It’s You and Simple Discipline

The basic mechanisms of weight loss are simple: calories have to be less than calories. You have to eat less than you spend. Yes, the foods you eat, metabolism, hormone status, stress, digestion and genetics also play a role. However, you will never find out if this is a problem at all unless you actually make an effort first. If you stick to the basics, you will likely see improvements.

Ultimately, it is you and simple discipline - fitness, nutrition, fitness, rest and relaxation, exercise, weight loss, hormones, responsibility, discipline, metabolic conditioning, digestion, calorie counting, lifestyle behavior

The problem with successful health change is not how it is done, but how it is done. If you show up every day and get the job done, you will get results. Unfortunately, there is often a lack of discipline, commitment and consistency to make these simple changes.

You may think it would be nice to make a change and become a healthier version of yourself (good for you). However, if you are not ready to go into work, absolutely no one can do anything to help you – no matter how much money you spend or how many different plans you try.

What can you do to commit yourself and apply the discipline required to achieve your goals? I'm glad you asked.

Increase your responsibility

Look closely in the mirror and decide if this person looking back at you is doing everything in their power to show up every day. Do you consistently take care of business?? Do you feel responsible for doing what you know you need to do? Or are you sleeping in there, halfway through your training and eating crap that isn't even considered food?

You are an adult:

  • You have to make a decision to make the next right decision.
  • You have to choose to provide your body with whole, nutritious food.
  • You have to choose to move your body instead of sitting on your ass.
  • Now you have to decide to make the changes that will enable you to live a long, healthy and independent life.

It is 100% up to you, not your trainer, not your spouse, not your doctor. You. People can give you the tools you need to succeed, but it's up to you to implement them.

Do you do everything to become the best version of yourself?

Time is a resource, not an excuse

"I have no time." How many times did you say it Be honest with yourself. What don't you have time for? Don't have time for social media? Doubtful. Don't you have time to watch TV again? However, when it comes to having time, eating well and staying active, the time continuum suddenly disappears and there is no additional second to be found.

It's never about having time. It's about saving time and making your health and life a priority. I guarantee that you will find time to eat (otherwise you would go hungry and we would not have this conversation). Why not make it nutritious?

Regarding movement, nowhere is it written that you have to perform any task that the seated man knows. Get up and move. It's incredible how much you can do by standing and walking – that alone will make a big difference in most people's lives. Workouts don't have to be long to be effective. You just have to take the time. You have to make it a priority.

What I'm up to here is that everyone is busy. Everyone has the same 24 hours a day. It is up to each of us to determine how we will spend this time. If you are committed to a healthy lifestyle, the things that promote that lifestyle are high on your list. You will find the time to do what needs to be done. Period.

Check your discipline

Finally, I want to talk about discipline, especially about self-discipline. The discipline you hold over yourself to do the right thing, even if it sucks.

Successful changes do not require magic. it takes discipline.

  • The discipline necessary to go to bed at a decent time so your body gets the rest and relaxation it needs to live another epic day.
  • The discipline needed to get your ass off the chair, throw a few weights around, or go for a walk, even if you don't feel like it.
  • The discipline to prefer lean protein and vegetables to fatty, cheesy pizza because you know you will feel good about this choice.
  • The discipline of saying no to something that doesn't help you achieve your goals, and the discipline of doing things that want you to.

If you don't have the discipline, you will have a hard time making these difficult decisions.

Ultimately, it depends on you and the decisions you make every day. You can choose where you are or you can choose to change. The strength lies in you, your honesty with yourself, your priorities and your discipline.

In the words of the wise little green man: "Don't do it, there is no attempt."

It's time to take responsibility for yourself and make it happen. You choose.

Eufy RoboVac G30 Edge Review: A Worthy Budget Contender

"The Eufy RoboVac G30 Edge is a wonderfully simple robotic vacuum cleaner."

  • Great app

  • Easy to use

  • Manual control option

  • Adjustable volume control

The Eufy RoboVac G30 Edge ($ 399) is a robotic vacuum cleaner with a great app and features that make it stress free and amazingly easy to use. Surprisingly, it's not the cheapest bot vac: it's at the bottom and can be a good option for those who don't want to pay a fortune for premium vac brands like iRobot or Ecovacs. There was very little that I didn't like about this cleaning bot, and that says a lot because I rarely find robotic vacuum cleaners useful or efficient. I learned that when I tested the G30 Edge.

App worship

G30 Edge app

The Eufy Home app is one of the best robot vacuum apps I've seen in a long time. It is easy to use and trouble-free and offers countless well thought-out options. For example, I think it's great that you can use the app to adjust the voice volume of the G30's robot voice. I have never seen this option on a robot vacuum and it is fantastic.

However, I think the manual control option is my favorite part of the G30 app. The manual control basically turns the G30 into a remote controlled car that cleans while the app is the control. This is a rare feature on most robotic vacuum cleaners and I'm glad that Eufy picked it up. I'm so frustrated when cleaning bots is not where I want it to be, and this option gives me complete control. You can also choose how much suction you think your floors need to get clean.

Do you want to set it and forget it? The planning function is refreshingly easy to use. If you are not there and are not sure whether the G30 has actually been cleaned on schedule, there is a cleaning report that you can access in the app that gives you all the details.

A button for easier cleaning

Another special feature of the RoboVac G30 Edge is the stain removal button. I don't know how many times I took a robot vacuum cleaner and put it in a place where quick cleaning was required to make it fly away and clean another area of ​​the room. Tapping the stain cleaning button on the top of the G30 tells him to be in a specific area. Spot Clean doesn't just keep the vacuum cleaner in one place. The cleaning begins in a small circle, which increases with each revolution.

Voice control

G30 edge on carpetAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

Although buttons and an app are great, nothing makes you feel like voice commands to the king or queen of your automated kingdom. The G30 can be controlled with Alexa or Google Assistant. You can say things like "Alexa, start cleaning" or "Hey Google, stop cleaning" to control the little bot. I find this option very useful when I am in the middle of a task and remember that I need to vacuum. One command and suddenly I suck while doing everything else I have to do. You can also ask the assistant to find your Bot Vac or send it to recharge.

Battery life

Eufy claims that the RoboVac G30 can run for up to 100 minutes. I thought that was pretty accurate, although the Bot Vac had to remove dog hair and a variety of crumbs, which is a big task for a robot Vac of any kind. This type of battery life is above average for the price range. For example, the Pure Clean Robot vacuum cleaner only runs for about 50 minutes and the first-class iRobot Roomba s9 Plus only for about 60 minutes.

This type of battery life is above average for the price range.

If many robot vacuum cleaners have a low battery, they will return to their charger and you will need to restart them. The G30 charges and starts cleaning where it left off. This is a particularly useful feature when you want to operate your robotic vacuum cleaner while you are away from home.

cleaning

When it started, I didn't think the G30 Edge would do very well when cleaned. For one thing, I didn't like the fact that the G30 Edge only has a cleaning brush for cleaning edges and corners. Other robotic vacuum cleaners such as the Ecovacs Deebot 901 have two edge brushes, which usually does not result in more thorough cleaning. However, the G30 surprised me. It seemed to get in there and do the work with just one brush.

My cats weren't even disturbed by the noise.

Second, it is quiet. While most robotic vacuum cleaners sound like a jet plane taking off, the G30 only has a quiet whir when it slips through the living room. My cats weren't even disturbed by the noise. Obviously, I didn't think it had the suction power to do much of anything. Amazingly, my carpet got very clean. I'm not sure if it got into the fibers and really absorbed the deep dirt, but the surface was clean. This is due to the BoostIQ system, with which the G30 automatically recognizes what type of suction your floor needs and can adjust it accordingly.

I also noticed that the G30 does not have as many small panes on top as many robot vacuum cleaners, such as the Neato Botvac D4 or the Ecovacs Deebot 960. This is because a laser navigation system is missing. It does a pretty good job of depicting your home without it, but it tends to bump furniture and walls a lot. It should map your rooms when cleaning and clean more efficiently the next time. I noticed that it works better every time. It is also said to clean in an "S" formation, but it seems a bit random. But I don't mind that.

G30 edge shelf and containerAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

Emptying the trash can in vacuum is my least preferred job, and I have to say that the G30's trash can has made things easier. It pulls out easily and opens effortlessly, unlike many other robotic vacuum cleaners I've tested.

Our opinion

The Eufy RoboVac G30 Edge costs $ 399 at the bottom when it comes to robotic vacuum cleaners, but it really impressed me. Everything about this bot is straightforward, and that's exactly what you want when it comes to an automated cleaning device. The app is also fantastic as it is packed with features, but has no glitches and is beautifully designed. Overall, this robot vacuum is a winner.

Are there any better alternatives?

You can find robotic vacuum cleaners that are cheaper, like this for less than $ 200, but I think you'll find it hard to find a vacuum cleaner that can clean with as few issues as the G30 Edge, especially if it does is a brand new model. However, if you're ready to pay more money, consider robot vacuum cleaners that can self-empty, have a laser tracking system, or can act as a robot mop. Here you can see our top offers.

Will it take?

I think so. It is well built and if you have any problems, Eufy has a 30 day return policy.

Should I buy it?

Yes. I really love this robot vacuum and I think you will too.

Editor's recommendations