KEF Mu3 True Wireless Earbuds Review: Beauty And The Beat

KEF Mu3 True Wireless Earbuds

"Despite the mediocre ANC, their slim design and great sound make for an appealing package."

  • Beautiful design

  • Comfortable fit

  • Fantastic sound

  • Very good battery life

  • IPX5 water resistance

  • No app for EQ or control tweaks

  • No wireless charging

  • Mediocre ANC and transparency

  • Mediocre call quality

KEF is one of the best-known names in hi-fi, thanks to speakers who have impressed reviewers and enthusiasts for years. The company's LS50 wireless bookshelf speakers are a great example of what happens when you combine classic acoustic expertise with cutting edge technology. I was excited to receive the company's first true wireless earbuds, the $ 230 KEF Mu3. Given the stiff competition from Sony, Bose, Jabra, Sennheiser and Grado, has KEF brought enough of its world-class audio technology to the Mu3? Let's take a look …

What's in the box?

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

In KEF's all-cardboard and easily recyclable box, you'll find the Mu3 in the charging case, a USB-C charging cable, three additional sizes of silicone earbuds (plus the standard media installed on the earbuds), and quick start documentation.

design

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Let's get one thing straight right away: The KEF Mu3 are stunningly beautiful. Both the earphones and the charging case look like sculptures made of highly polished aluminum. They are smooth and shiny. If you leave the charging case in a prominent place like a coffee table, desk, or kitchen counter, people are guaranteed to find themselves unable to resist picking it up just to feel it.

For those who like to get lost in the details of their favorite songs, the Mu3s are more than happy to do so.

The attention to detail continues right through to the hinge mechanism. Most charging cases have weak lids that could break if you aren't careful. If their magnets don't keep them in the closed position, they flutter about worryingly. The lid of the Mu3 feels luxurious by comparison, with a hinge that reminds me of a laptop screen – it stays in any position from open to fully closed. With its aluminum look, it's basically the MacBook Air for charging cases.

Unfortunately, the case is also a bit bulky, so despite its sensual curves, it's not very insertable. But that's fine – KEF seems to have used a hard transparent outer layer on the plastic, and I think it will withstand scratches caused by other objects.

These earbuds also have very acceptable IPX5 water resistance that should protect them from anything other than actual submersion in water.

Comfort and control

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The KEF Mu3 comes with four sizes of soft silicone ear tips, which should mean most people can get a good seal. And here is some valuable advice on the matter: If you feel the need to plug the earbud deep into your ears (which is possible due to its small size), you are probably using the wrong size earbuds.

They did not move at all and felt very comfortable even after several hours of continuous use.

Pushing them in too deep not only becomes uncomfortable, but also degrades the sound quality and the effectiveness of the noise cancellation. I discovered that the hard way. I also found that with the largest earbud I could insert the Mu3 carefully and they didn't move at all and were very comfortable even after several hours of continuous use.

KEF used physical buttons on the Mu3, and that's definitely a good thing. Touch controls can be tricky at best, and I prefer real buttons when they are available.

These buttons are easy to press, but strangely enough, the right button had a more pronounced click response than the left.

With a combination of single, double and long press you can control everything except to jump back a track. However, there is no way to customize these gestures through a smartphone app as KEF didn't create one for the Mu3.

There are also no wear sensors. So if you pull out an earbud, your tunes won't automatically pause.

Sound quality

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The KEF Mu3 are wonderful to hear. Their bright and clean highs, precise mid-tones, and expertly executed bass create surprises with every new track you start. There's no trace of mud that often obstructs smaller earbuds. Applying instrumental jazz standards like Dave Brubeck's Summertime or Duke Ellington's St. Louis Blues, you can appreciate the sheer musicality of KEF's mood, not to mention the soundstage, which is so tightly controlled it feels like the distance between instruments up to being able to measure the inches.

For those who like to get lost in the details of their favorite songs, the Mu3s are more than happy to do so.

When I played it for the first time, I was disappointed with the bass and feared that KEF had become too conservative with the low end in an effort to achieve this so-called “neutral” or balanced EQ. It turned out that I just wedged the earbuds too far in my ears.

When I found out my mistake, I found that not only is there a lot of bass on tap, but that the Mu3s can also use that bass selectively and only hit you with deep resonance when needed.

The transparency mode (ambient sound mode) doesn't let in as much noise as I want.

I think the Mu3 are near perfect in terms of EQ, but since listening experiences are the subjective things they are, you should know that the lack of an app means there is no way to rebalance the sound signature, if it doesn't suit your needs.

Noise cancellation and transparency

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) has become a standard feature of true high-end wireless earbuds, but there is still a huge difference in how each model performs. The Mu3 noticeably reduces the low frequency noise when the ANC is activated. However, it's a far cry from the silence offered by the Apple AirPods Pro, Bose QuietComfort Ear Buds, and Nuheara IQbuds2 Max.

Similarly, the transparency mode (ambient sound mode) doesn't let in as much sound as I would like. It certainly makes conversations easier and gives you greater situational awareness, but it's not the magical "hey, it's like I'm not wearing earbuds" that these other models convey.

Without an app there is no way to dial in one of the two functions and not to change the ANC trigger action. A single press of the left earbud controls noise cancellation, but forces you to toggle between three modes (ANC, Off, and Transparency) instead of being able to toggle between ANC and Transparency, which are actually the two most commonly used modes.

Battery life

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

KEF really surprised me here. Most true wireless earbuds – even the very expensive ones – typically have a battery life of five to seven hours on a single charge. But the Mu3 delivers nine hours – and that with the ANC switched on. This is by no means the longest time, but it doesn't have to be. After another 15 hours in the charging case, you have a whole day before you have to connect the USB-C charging cable.

Better still, they also have a five minute quick charge system that gives you an extra hour of playtime. My only real disappointment is the lack of wireless charging. When KEF first announced the Mu3, wireless charging was one of the features listed so it may be available again in a future version.

Call quality

I've found a strong correlation between an earbud's ANC / transparency performance and its call quality, and the Mu3s are no exception. You do a little effort not to lose your voice in front of competing background noise, and the sound that is recorded has a scratchy, thin quality to it.

They're probably much better indoors, but outdoors, where a lot of calls seem to be making through earbuds, the Mu3 should be used sparingly.

Our opinion

Although they lack some of the features we would expect from true wireless earbuds at this price point, the KEF Mu3s are beautifully finished, sound amazing, and have a generous battery life.

Is there a better alternative?

As good as the Mu3 is, you will find more features with comparable sound quality and prices in these competitors:

The $ 230 Sony WF-1000XM3 App-supported EQ, adjustable ANC and transparency, longer battery life, better call quality, support for Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa and customizable controls

The $ 230 Jabra Elite 85t App-assisted EQ, wireless charging, adjustable ANC and transparency, customizable controls, a feature to find my earbuds, and better call quality, but they don't sound quite as crystal clear as the Mu3.

The $ 230 Grado GT220 sound very similar to the Mu3 and charge wirelessly, but they don't have ANC or transparency mode and are considerably bulkier.

How long will they last?

The KEF Mu3 appears to be very well built with high quality materials. KEF gives them a two-year guarantee, which is better than many of its competitors. When you add their IPX5 rating, I think they will last for many years if properly cared for.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The Mu3 ignores a lot of the bells and whistles and instead focuses on a beautiful design, a comfortable fit, great sound, and great battery life. As long as you agree to this compromise, they will provide a great listening experience.

Editor's recommendations




Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Review: The Phone to Beat Under $700

Samsung Galaxy S20 Fe review 1

"Most of the great Galaxy S20 experience for hundreds of dollars less – it's a winning combination."

  • Colorful design

  • Great display with 120Hz refresh rate

  • Great camera

  • 5G connectivity (in the US)

  • Low price for the specs

  • Mediocre battery

  • Plastic back

There is no getting around it – phones are becoming very expensive. However, as flagship devices are becoming more and more expensive, a completely new market segment has emerged: the premium midrange. This is exactly where the Samsung Galaxy S20 Fan Edition lives. If you're looking for a premium Samsung experience without paying an arm and a leg, this is the way to go.

The name "Fan Edition" doesn't really describe what the phone really is. A better name would be the Galaxy S20 Lite. You don't really get all that the Galaxy S20 has to offer. But you get all the essentials with a few extra bonus features and a tempting price cut.

Hardware, design and display

It's clear that the Galaxy S20 FE is a derivative of the original Galaxy S20 – it looks just like the standard device. But it also consists of slightly different materials. Gone is the glass back in favor of the standard Galaxy Note 20's plastic back. Though it's not that high quality in theory, I like the soft-touch feel it offers and I didn't really miss the glass.

The device also differs from the standard Galaxy S20 in that it is available in a wider range of colors. I'm reviewing the Cloud Navy model, but it's also available in more interesting colors like Cloud Red, Cloud Lavender, and Cloud Orange. Safe to say there should be something for everyone.

The rest of the phone design is pretty normal. There is a USB-C port at the bottom, a volume rocker and a power switch on the right, and a rectangular camera module at the top left on the back of the phone. It's not as thick as the Galaxy S20 Ultra or the Note 20 Ultra, which is nice to see, but of course you don't get the same camera specs as the more expensive phone, either. We'll get into that later.

The Galaxy S20 FE is actually a bit larger than the standard Galaxy S20. While the original device has a 6.2-inch display, the S20 FE has a larger 6.5-inch display. Also in contrast to the Galaxy S20, this phone has a resolution of 1080p. It seems that the high resolution is a feature that Samsung wants to reserve for its more expensive devices.

It still looks good. It's a Super AMOLED display with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate, just like the other S20's. The result is an extremely smooth experience and a display that responds very well to touch. We hope to see more high refresh rate phones showing up in the next year, but by then it's pretty impressive to see a $ 700 phone running at 120Hz. It also beats competitors, if only marginally.

The most obvious competitor here is the OnePlus 8, which also has a resolution of 1080p but limits the refresh rate to 90 Hz. (The upcoming Google Pixel 5 will also have a 1080p 90Hz display.) To be clear, the difference between 60Hz and 90Hz is much more obvious than the difference between 90Hz and 120Hz. But for those who can notice a difference, 120Hz is estimated.

It should also be noted that the display is flat and not curved. I like the look of curved displays, but others disagree. With the flat panel display in mind, there is no way you should run into so many problems related to accidentally squeezing your palm.

Performance and specifications

Samsung has made clear compromises in design and display, but not really under the hood. You still get a Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor in the US 5G version, or an Exynos 990 outside of the US, coupled with 6GB or 8GB of RAM – and as a result, the phone can easily handle anything you can throw at it in 2020 and beyond. This includes productivity apps, mobile games, etc.

Predictably, the phone handled games like Call of Duty: Mobile with no problem, and multitasking with even four or five apps is no problem. The benchmark results confirm the excellent performance in daily use. Here is an overview of the results we have achieved.

  • AnTuTu: 550,800
  • GeekBench 5: 889 single-core, 3,101 multi-core

These results don't quite get as high as we got with the OnePlus 8, but they are close and in real life you won't really miss the extra 20 single-core points on GeekBench 5, check the 6GB RAM model in the lower price range. So, if you really care about this performance benefit, upgrading your RAM might be the way to go.

Cameras

Gone are the days when incredible cameras were reserved for the best of the best phones. With devices like the Google Pixel 4a, it is becoming increasingly clear to phone makers that those who spend $ 450 or more on a phone should be able to get a premium camera experience. While you don't get the same zoom quality as the Galaxy Note 20 or the same main resolution sensor as the Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Galaxy S20 FE still offers a versatile, high-quality camera experience.

The phone offers three camera sensors, including a 12-megapixel standard sensor, an 8-megapixel sensor with a telephoto lens, and a 12-megapixel sensor with an ultra-wide-angle lens. I really appreciate that, and while some might prefer either a telephoto or an ultra-wide device to the other, simply having both means the camera will be useful in all sorts of situations.

On paper, the specs don't quite match the standard Galaxy S20, but the photos seemed pretty good in everyday use. They're still colorful and crisp, with enough dynamism to create a punchy photo, but not so much that they wander into unnatural territory. These days, photo quality may have more to do with post-processing than sensor quality. So it makes sense that the slightly worse specs don't really result in worse photos than the Galaxy S20.

The photos are pretty good in low light. As you would expect, photos can get noisy in very low light. However, in general, the phone can capture enough detail to get decent shots. The same goes for really enlarged photos. The telephoto camera offers 3x optical zoom and up to 10x digital zoom – and the result is up to 30x hybrid zoom. Photos at this zoom level aren't that sharp, of course, but Samsung has invested seriously in cleaning up zoomed footage from its photos, and it shows. The 3-10x shots are solid, but you'll rarely want to use 30x.

samsung galaxy s20 fe review 20200928 144211 "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/20200928_144211-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https: //www.digitaltrends.com/data: image / gif; base64, https: //www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Dimmed light

samsung galaxy s20 fe review 20200926 140446 "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn8.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/20200926_140446-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https: //www.digitaltrends.com/data: image / gif; base64, https: //www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA730x hybrid zoom

samsung galaxy s20 fe review 20200926 140855 "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn1.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/20200926_140855-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https: //www.digitaltrends.com/data: image / gif; base64, https: //www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA73x optical zoom

The selfie cam looks pretty solid too. The front-facing camera is 32 MP and doesn't have the dual-phase detection autofocus of the original Galaxy S20, but it still captured colorful selfies with more than enough detail. The higher resolution selfie camera is here for a reason – if you're not using the wide angle sensor, the picture is really just being cropped, and therefore the photo is only at a lower resolution.

One feature that the Galaxy S20 FE lacks is the ability to record videos in 8K. This is because you will need a higher resolution camera to do this. Even so, the camera can record 4K video at 60 frames per second, which should be more than enough for most, and saves you the maximum storage capacity.

Battery life and charging

Power is supplied by a 4,500 mAh battery, which apparently can be used for a whole day without any problems. I ended a heavy use day with about 20% battery remaining, which is not a ton but is still okay. If you are used to charging your phone every night, you shouldn't have any problems.

Fortunately, the phone is easy to charge too. Unlike the OnePlus 8, this phone supports wireless charging. You also get 25W wired fast charging. At this point I was distributing wireless chargers around my house so it was nice to be able to use them while testing this phone.

software

As expected, the Galaxy S20 FE comes with the Samsung One UI 2.5 (Android 10). I'm not going to go into the specifics of the Android customizations – you can read extensive settings in our Galaxy S20 and Galaxy Note 20 reviews – but I'll say that the bloatware on this phone seems to have been reduced a bit compared to some others . This is mainly due to the fact that you can instantly choose which apps are installed on your device. While all of the additional Samsung apps and Microsoft apps are enabled by default, just take the extra moments to adjust the pre-installs when you set up your phone, it's worth it.

In general, the software was responsive and smooth. Love or hate One user interface, Samsung has done a great job of making the entire user interface coherent and easy to use with one hand. Samsung wins for customizability too. So if you really enjoy optimizing and thematizing, you will enjoy the experience here.

Our opinion

The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE offers the flagship cell phone in a $ 700 cell phone. You really don't miss much here. Sure, a screen resolution of 1440p is always good, and some of the camera specs don't reach the height of the standard Galaxy S20 or Note 20. But with a premium processor, still awesome display, premium feel, and great camera system, you are it can't do much better in the price range.

I would have liked Samsung to have brought out this phone along with the rest of the Galaxy S20 lineup, but it makes sense why it didn't in order to get those high sales first. However, if Samsung continues to bring out phones of this quality in this price range, companies like OnePlus should be very concerned.

Is there a better alternative?

It depends on what you are looking for. The OnePlus 8 is the main competitor here. While it's a great phone, it doesn't have the same camera quality, it doesn't hit the 120Hz refresh rate, and it doesn't charge wirelessly. However, OnePlus offers a cleaner and arguably better software experience.

If you are really on a budget then you should also consider the Pixel 4a or wait for the Pixel 4a 5G. They have amazing cameras and simpler software, although the specs and performance don't match the Galaxy S20 FE or the displays.

Of course, if you're not married to Android, then you should also consider the iPhone 11, which is available at a similar price, has even better performance, and a fantastic camera. However, you will not get the same ad. You also don't get 5G and have to deal with the iPhone notch.

How long it will take?

With Snapdragon 865 water resistance and IP68, the Galaxy S20 FE should easily survive a normal two year phone cycle and longer if you want or need it. Again, the plastic back helps here – while it doesn't feel premium, it helps keep the phone more likely to remain crack-free throughout its lifespan.

Should you buy it?

Yes. Sure, you could spend an additional $ 300 on a slightly better phone, but if you want flagship quality for $ 700 this is the phone to beat right now.

Editor's recommendations




Samsung Galaxy A51 Review: Can It Beat The Competition?

Samsung Galaxy A51 Main

Samsung Galaxy A51 review: everything about the display

"The Samsung Galaxy A51 offers the best display at this price."

  • Modern design

  • Excellent display

  • Good photos with enough light

  • Good battery life

  • A headphone jack

  • Poor performance

  • Slower fingerprint sensor

  • Doesn't get operating system updates quickly

Flagship phones are becoming increasingly expensive. While there was a time when you could get the best of the best for $ 600 to $ 700, today you have to pay at least $ 900. The result? Midrange phones also have to get better – and this is where the Samsung Galaxy A51 comes in.

The device is a continuation of the Samsung Galaxy A50 from last year. It offers a modern design and some high-end features, while sacrificing things like peak performance and some camera features. But at $ 400, the phone has a lot of competition. And it's serious competition – like the new iPhone SE, which many currently consider the best phone under $ 400.

Is the Samsung Galaxy A51 a good option? Let’s take a closer look.

design

The Galaxy A series has long been about offering premium features in a low-performing, low-cost package – and these premium features typically include a modern design. This also applies here, and this is one of the main ways that the phone is better than the iPhone SE, which shares an aging design with the iPhone 8.

On the front of the phone is a borderless display with a hole in the middle for the front-facing camera. The modern design trends continue to the rear, with the rectangular camera joint on the top left – similar to that of the Galaxy S20 series. The camera bump doesn't stick out much from the back of the phone at all, which ensures that it doesn't wobble too hard on the desk. It's a nice touch, and I hope manufacturers continue to rely on dishwashing cameras.

Samsung Galaxy A51 Back "class =" m carousel - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/samsung-galaxy-a51-1-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Samsung Galaxy A51 punch "class =" m-carousel - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/samsung-galaxy-a51-5-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

The SIM compartment is on the left, an on / off switch and a volume rocker are on the right. There is a USB-C port and a headphone jack on the bottom. This is an enticing option for audiophiles.

The edge-to-edge display ensures that the phone feels comfortable in the hand and can be easily inserted into the pocket. While there's a fairly large 6.5-inch display here – 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches – most people won't find it too big for everyday use. Sure, it's bigger than the iPhone SE, but at the same time, the iPhone SE is only equipped with a 4.7-inch display. It's also bigger than the Google Pixel 3a – but the Pixel 3a also retains an outdated design with a big forehead and a big chin.

Sure, it's not as high quality as the over $ 1,000 Galaxy S20 series, and the back of this phone is made of plastic instead of glass, but it has many of the same design elements, and despite the plastic, it doesn't really feel cheap at. There are some colors, including silver, black, and blue, and although they all look good, I particularly like the colorful blue model.

display

As already mentioned, the display of the Samsung Galaxy A51 is 6.5 inches tall and the quality is above average for a phone in this price range. There is more than enough display here for most, and only the most avid pixel keepers will have a problem with it.

The resolution of the display is 1,080 x 2,400, but what is perhaps more important is an AMOLED display that provides deep black levels and vivid colors. This puts the phone ahead of the iPhone SE when you consider that Apple only uses OLED technology in the most expensive and latest models. It also gives the device a leg against the Moto G stylus, which corresponds to the resolution, but is equipped with LCD technology.

It's nice to see better display technology moving into cheaper phones. In the coming year or two, we should also see cheaper phones with a resolution of 1,440p – but in my experience, an AMOLED display is more than a higher resolution.

There is an optical fingerprint sensor under the display. The sensor works fine and has recognized my printout most of the time. It was a little slow and it can get annoying, but it's rarely a real annoyance.

performance

While the Galaxy A51 has an overall design similar to that of more expensive phones, performance is one of the downsides. And unfortunately it is relatively important here.

Under the hood is a Samsung Exynos 9611 processor with 4 GB, 6 GB or 8 GB RAM, depending on which model you choose. I am reviewing the 4 GB model.

It's a bit of a shame that Samsung doesn't have a more powerful chipset installed. While the Exynos 9611 is being marketed as a new chip, it's actually just a recycled Exynos 9610 that enables the 48-megapixel main camera sensor. The Exynos 9610 was introduced in last year's Galaxy A50 and was already somewhat undersupplied at this point. In a world with the iPhone SE equipped with A13 and even the Google Pixel 3a equipped with Snapdragon 670, the Galaxy A51 is extremely slow.

That means daily use. The phone often skipped a beat or two while performing basic tasks, and the animations weren't as smooth as they could have been. Mobile gaming delivered similar results with regularly missing frames and slow loading times.

Benchmarks confirm the poor performance.

GeekBench 5: 315 single-core, 1,281 multi-core

For Samsung, it is unfortunate that Apple has launched the iPhone SE, which absolutely dominates the Galaxy A51 in terms of benchmarks and daily use. In fact, users are beginning to expect better performance from lower-end phones, and the Galaxy A51 doesn't perform.

software

Samsung's One user interface has gotten better and better over the years and the leagues better than in the old days of TouchWiz and Samsung Experience – but it's still quite far from standard Android. If you're looking for a stock experience, try the Pixel 3a instead.

That said, a user interface has its own aesthetic, and some like it. I personally prefer the cleaner look of standard Android, but luckily Samsung doesn't go too far in the area of ​​bloatware like LG UX.

In this phone, you get the second iteration of One UI, One UI 2.0, created over Android 10. It looks good and is easy to get used to if you are from another manufacturer.

As with other Samsung phones, the Galaxy A51 is unlikely to receive quick software updates. The flagship of the Galaxy S series is slow enough to receive updates and is a priority for Samsung. You will likely receive one or two updates for the A51, but don't expect them to be on time. You need to deal with Bixby on the Galaxy A51 as there is no native way to map the Bixby shortcut to another wizard.

Camera quality

Samsung Galaxy A51 camera

Flagship phones are pushing the boundaries of what we expected from a smartphone camera, mostly thanks to machine learning and the use of multiple lenses. The Samsung Galaxy A51 also jumps into the multiple lens train with a quad lens camera. You get a 48-megapixel main sensor as well as a 12-megapixel ultrawide sensor, a 5-megapixel macro sensor and a 5-megapixel depth sensor.

Of course, the number of sensors and megapixels doesn't ultimately determine the quality of the photos, but in the right situation, the photos are pretty good. The phone has some competition in the camera department. The iPhone SE uses Apple's A13 processor for better image processing and ultimately good photos, while the Google Pixel 3a has the same image quality that the Pixel series has become known for. Places the Pixel series on the front of the camera quality package.

Photos look great on the A51 with its 48-megapixel main sensor and in well-lit surroundings. You get a lot of details. Photos aren't as deep as those taken with the iPhone 11 Pro and Pixel 4, but they're still vivid. The ultra wide-angle lens is a big deal here too – it provides much better landscape shots and a generally more versatile camera experience.

However, if you get rid of the good lighting, you're out of luck. The Galaxy A51 just can't keep up with Apple and Google's machine learning skills. The Google Pixel 3a still takes excellent photos in low light conditions, although the iPhone SE is a little missing here too.

There's also a macro lens here, but it doesn't have its own autofocus. You can get some good results with some work, but it seems to be a feature that most people don't use.

Battery life

Samsung Galaxy A51 Below

The compromise between lower-performing chipsets and lower-resolution displays is usually longer battery life. Combined with the fact that the Galaxy A51 already has a 4,000 mAh battery, you get a day on which you are put under relatively high stress. I was able to get through part of the next day without any problems, and I suspect that most people will have a similar experience.

Unlike some other phones in this price range, the Samsung Galaxy A51 does not offer wireless charging. It has a 15 watt quick charge, which is rather slow for this technology.

Price, availability and guarantee

The Samsung Galaxy A51 costs $ 400 and is, as already mentioned, in the same price range as the iPhone SE, Google Pixel 3a and the Motorola Moto G Stylus. The device is available from the Samsung website, Verizon and Sprint. Verizon actually offers the phone for $ 10 a month for 24 months, which reduces the total to just $ 240.

The warranty on the phone is a fairly normal 1 year contract for manufacturing defects. So don't expect to return the phone if you drop it and the screen is cracked.

Our opinion

The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a solid phone, but it can compete with an even more solid competition. However, this doesn't make this a bad option. With a great display, modern design and decent camera performance under the right conditions, the Galaxy A51 has a lot to offer.

It's worth noting that while the Galaxy A51 has an official MSRP of $ 399, it's available from online retailers at a cheaper price. It becomes a more attractive option if you can pick it up for less than $ 300, which is sometimes possible.

Are there alternatives?

The Galaxy A51 has a lot to offer, but others offer more. When you're ready to switch to iOS, the iPhone SE offers much better performance. This is the best option for most. If you want to stay in the Android ecosystem, I recommend opting for the Pixel 3a or better and waiting for the Pixel 4a.

How long it will take?

The Galaxy A51 should last two years, but will likely feel slow towards the end of this term. It has no official IP rating. So if you drop it in the water, you may be out of luck. Thanks to the plastic back, it should survive if you drop it at the right angle. However, if you drop them on the screen, cracks can occur, as is the case with any modern smartphone.

Should you buy one?

No. Apple's iPhone SE and Google's Pixel 3a remain better options.

Editor's recommendations