Pentax FA Star Series 85mm F/1.4 Review: Stellar Performer

Pentax-D FA Star-Series 85mm f / 1.4 in hand with lens hood attached

“Pentax fans have a winner. For everyone else, the Star Series 85mm is the best portrait lens you will never use. "

  • Very sharp

  • Excellent workmanship

  • Nice bokeh

  • Minimal vignetting

  • Minimal chromatic aberration

If you're a camera company that has made the decision to double up on DSLRs despite the surge in popularity of mirrorless cameras, you should at least have some lenses worth talking about. This is exactly what Ricoh, owned by Pentax, did with the slowly growing Star series, and the new HD Pentax-D FA Star series with 85mm f / 1.4 SDM AW is a shining example of optical excellence. This full-frame portrait lens can easily hold its own against the best 85mm lenses from other brands. In fact, it's a near-perfect lens – and at $ 1,900, it should be.

There is only one possible problem that is preventing most people from enjoying it: it requires a Pentax camera.

Mammoth size

The first thing you notice about the Sta-Series 85mm f / 1.4 is the world-eating size of the front panel. If you look into it for too long, you can get lost. This lens is a giant at 2.77 pounds – heavier than the already uncomfortably large Sigma 85mm f / 1.4 Art. Perhaps that's why it's called a star lens – it has enough mass to create its own gravitational field.

Daven Mathies / Digital Trends

With the lens hood attached, it looks like a much longer telephoto lens than just 85mm. Passers-by who saw me testing no doubt assumed that I wanted to watch birds.

But when you can handle the weight, you'll love how top-notch it all feels. The lens is completely weatherproof, the materials are luxurious, the focus ring is buttery soft, and even the lens hood feels redesigned, with a rubber collar on the front and a grippy inner surface. The hood snaps into place with a very short reach bayonet mount that is faster to use than most other hoods and is incredibly satisfying to do so. If ASMR were a lens, it would be the Pentax Star Series 85mm.

With 12 elements in 10 groups, the optical formula isn't really that complex, at least in terms of pure numbers. Despite the added weight, that's two elements less than the aforementioned Sigma 85mm Art. Numbers aren't everything, however, and Pentax has clearly made efficient use of the glass it contains, including three particularly low-dispersion Super ED elements and a single aspherical element.

Daven Mathies / Digital Trends

Pentax is also paying particular attention to its new autofocus system. The SDM motor has 1.3 times more torque than the 50 mm Star series lens, and the focus group contains, according to Pentax, a “greater number of optical elements than normal lenses”. I'm not exactly sure what that means, but the focus performance is certainly very fast.

The lens also uses an electronically controlled aperture which, according to Pentax, interestingly allows smooth exposure adjustments while recording video. By the way, almost every modern lens uses an electronically controlled iris, which tends to be more accurate than the older lever-driver style. Aside from smooth exposure changes in the video, this is helpful for consistency in things like time-lapse photography.

Daven Mathies / Digital Trends

The remaining specs include nine rounded bezel blades, a minimum focus distance of 33.5 inches, and a 0.12x magnification ratio. Spec sheet snoopers will find that these are all identical to the Sigma 85mm Art. It's almost as if Ricoh had some work to do in developing this lens (Sigma, which makes lenses for many different camera brands, stopped manufacturing Pentax K-mount lenses last year). Surprisingly, because of its additional weight, the Pentax “only” uses an 82 mm filter compared to the Sigma's 86 mm filter.

But the Sigma is $ 800 cheaper. So there is this.

Comparing these two lenses is, of course, nothing more than an academic exercise. One is available exclusively for Pentax, the other for every DSLR except Pentax.

Deep field

Aspherical elements and high torque focus motors are great, but I know that the only thing people really care about about an 85mm f / 1.4 is the bokeh. You want to see backgrounds that are forgotten, turning point lights into large, soft, gently overlapping circles. I assure you, dear reader, that the Star Series 85mm delivers all of this.

Environmental portrait shot with an 85mm f / 1.4 lens from the Pentax-D FA Star seriesDaven Mathies / Digital Trends

At 1: 1.4 wide open, your subject is brought to rest on a pillow-like bokeh cloud. The depth of field is so shallow that you can still achieve a decent separation of subject and background when the subject is relatively long. This is ideal for full body portraits or shots where you want to draw attention to a relatively small subject in a large setting.

As expected, there is vignetting at f / 1.4, but it's pretty mild. With f / 2.8 it's completely gone. The sharpness of the center is fantastic at any aperture, although the edges slope off a bit with larger apertures. I was impressed with how well a night sky was rendered at f / 1.4, and while an 85mm lens wouldn't be my first choice for astrophotography, this lens is sharp enough to handle it. It gets even sharper if you stop at 1: 5.6. However, in the real world, you should feel confident choosing an aperture for exactly the depth of field you want without having to worry about sharpness.

Vignette test at 1: 1.4 on Pentax-D FA Star-Series 85 mm 1: 1.4 "class =" m-Karussell - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/ image / digitaltrends /hd-pentax-d-fa-star-85mm-f14-sample-07-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/:/ / www. digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette test, f / 1.4

Vignette test at 1: 2 on Pentax-D FA Star-Series 85 mm 1: 1.4 "class =" m-Karussell - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/ digitaltrends /hd-pentax-d-fa-star-85mm-f14-sample-08-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www . digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette test, f / 2

Vignette test at 1: 2.8 on Pentax-D FA Star-Series 85 mm 1: 1.4 "class =" m-Karussell - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/ image / digitaltrends /hd-pentax-d-fa-star-85mm-f14-sample-09-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/:/ / www. digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette test, f / 2.8

Vignette test at 1: 4 on Pentax-D FA Star-Series 85 mm 1: 1.4 "class =" m-Karussell - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn5.digitaltrends.com/image/ digitaltrends /hd-pentax-d-fa-star-85mm-f14-sample-10-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www . digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette test, f / 4

The chromatic aberration is particularly well controlled. I noticed some color fringes in defocused areas, as is common with any lens, but only extremely small stripes in the focal plane and only with large apertures.

Oh, and there just isn't any distortion. At all.

I have to get really pedantic to find a bug with this lens, but let's go: while the blur circles aren't perfectly rounded 1: 2 in the center of the frame at f / 1.4, they extend in Rectangles. If you stop after f / 2.8, you can see the angular shape of the iris leaves in the blur circles. "Onion rings" also appeared in my test shots of LED string lights. It's all awful, I know.

Seriously, the Pentax 85mm f / 1.4 is a beautiful lens, and checking its little flaws is nothing but a waste of time. If you believe in the Pentax Belief and can win two grand, just step out and shoot, focus on your art, and trust this lens to keep making gold.

Astral plane

Products like these make being a reviewer great because I can try something new that I really enjoy, but that I would never actually buy for myself. I mean, did you think I would switch to Pentax?

And there is the problem. The Star Series 85mm feels like a dream, a utopian experience separated from reality. It could be the Pentax, not the Pentax.

I tested the lens on a Pentax K1 Mark II, which is a full-frame DSLR with an older but still excellent 36-megapixel sensor. I didn't want image quality – although I think this lens will go for even higher resolutions – but it's still not good enough for this lens. The 33-point viewfinder autofocus system lacks the flexibility and accuracy to actually use it. They are basically fixed to single point AF and the “focus and reformulate” shooting method. This is not the easiest way to get sharp results with an aperture of f / 1.4. During this test, as impressed as I was, I could only imagine how much better the lens would be with Sony's real-time eye AF or flawless subject tracking from Canon in the EOS R5.

The K1 Mark II has never been my favorite DSLR, but most of the flaws are simply that of format. DSLRs simply cannot offer the advanced focus features that mirrorless cameras take for granted. A couple of extraordinary lenses might have been enough to get people back to Pentax – if they didn't have to get people back to the DSLR first.

But the optimist would say that this lens is trend-setting. If Pentax can make such a great lens, maybe there will be an equally great DSLR soon. I think there is still room for innovation in DSLRs, but they have been moving away from the mainstream for years. Perhaps Pentax can be the one to rule this new niche realm?

After all, Ricoh is apparently good at working on the sidelines. The GR III is a neat little camera that was built for a select few street photographers. This Pentax lens is aimed at a similarly small group of customers. The brand may never be a high-volume competitor, but that doesn't mean the Star Series 85mm is any less of a triumph for those who can (and can afford) use it. Whatever your reasons for sticking to your Pentax DSLR, you have another big one right now.

Our opinion

Like the quiet, introverted kid in the back of the class who passes the test but doesn't say a word, Pentax continues to use some stunning lenses with little fanfare. Even the CameraVille, possibly the only Pentax-focused YouTuber, doesn't have a handy video at the time of publication. Compared to influencer-obsessed Sony and Canon, that's … kind of nice.

Of course, a lack of fanfare can simply signal a lack of fans. But for all of the confusing decisions Pentax has made with cameras (remember the Q?), I can still admire it when I make lenses like this. The Pentax-D FA Star Series 85mm f / 1.4 is as good as it gets – though most people will never get a chance to try.

Enjoy this moment, Pentax shooters. You finally have time to be happy.

Is there a better alternative?

No. The options for third-party Pentax photographers are slim these days. In many ways, this lens feels like a response to the lack of alternatives. However, in addition to being a great option, this is the only option. Vacuum or not, this is a brilliant portrait lens.

How long it will take?

Any professional lens will easily outlive the life of your camera, and this one is no different. I just hope the Pentax brand doesn't survive.

Should you buy it?

If you are ready to reiterate your commitment to Pentax and DSLRs, then yes. It may be gigantic and expensive, but the Star Series 85mm is a thank you to the Pentax believers who have kept it up for so long. Enjoy it; you deserve it.

Editor's recommendations




Sigma 20mm F1.4 Art Review: More Than a Landscape Lens

Sigma 20mm f14 art criticism 9

Sigma 20mm F1.4 Art criticism: More than a landscape lens

"Not everyone loves wide-angle lenses, but Sigma's 20mm art made me a fan."

  • Rare combination of focal length and aperture

  • Impressively sharp at 1: 1.4

  • Professional build quality

  • Good price

  • Strong vignetting

  • No filter support

Wide-angle lenses are not sufficiently recognized for their versatility. If you think they are only for landscapes, give me the opportunity to change your mind. Although it's a landscape and astrophotography lens, I enjoyed using the Sigma 20mm F1.4 Art for portraits and product photos, and it was the perfect lens for wedding party dance shots (don't worry, that was a couple of months ago before, before social distancing).

This is not a new product – Sigma released it in 2015 – but when I got one borrowed for my Nikon D780 review, I liked it so much that I thought I should write it down. At 5 years old, this $ 900 lens is still the current champion in fast wide-angle prime numbers for Nikon and Canon DSLRs. It is also available for mirrorless Leica L or Sony E mounts, although it is a little more difficult to recommend for such cameras.

The design of the 20mm artwork raises some usability concerns that I will discuss later. However, if you're looking for the ultimate in low-light performance, no other 20mm lens is comparable to this. Considering the price to compete with the two 20mm f / 1.8 first-party lenses, this is an excellent buy.

design

Every photographic lens is a compromise exercise. Price, size, image quality and functions must be balanced to achieve a goal. With the Sigma Art series, it has always been important to deliver the best quality at a price that exceeds, or at least does not exceed, that of equivalent first-party lenses – regardless of size.

Weighing over 2 pounds, the 20mm art is certainly not a lightweight, but that's the price you pay for a 1: 1.4 bright aperture and an excellent optical formula. The 15 elements in 11 groups, including two aspherical elements, two of the “F” dispersion elements from Sigma and five special low dispersion elements, ensure sharp, aberration-free images with minimal distortion.

The lens body measures 3.6 inches in diameter and 5.1 inches long, including a built-in petal-style lens hood. I thought it would go well with the Nikon D780, but I'm not sure how to use it with a mirrorless camera.

This is a DSLR first lens. The mirrorless version includes an integrated "adapter" to compensate for the difference in the distance between the flange and residue, which makes the lens longer. Perhaps this wouldn't feel too out of place with a powerful Panasonic S-series camera, but I don't know how comfortable it would be with a smaller, lighter Sony Alpha-series camera. Given that Sony recently launched the excellent FE 20mm f / 1.8G, there's a solid alternative for E-mount shooters.

The Sigma offers a minimalist exterior with a wide, knurled focus ring and a window removal scale that give it a first-class appearance. The AF / MF switch is the only other control point. There is neither a stabilizer to turn on or off – not that I would expect with a lens so wide and fast – nor an aperture click switch like the one we see on Sony's 20mm f / 1.8 and Sigma's own 35 mm saw F1. 2 Art.

The bulbous front element of the Sigma means that you cannot use a standard screw-on filter. This can be a problem for landscapes if you want a polarizer or neutral filter. Professionals and other seasoned shooters may not mind using a filter adapter with large drop-in filters, but for the rest of us, the lack of native filter support could be a reason to consider an alternative lens.

Autofocus

With the Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) from Sigma, the 20 mm F1.4 graphics can be quickly focused in the viewfinder as well as in the live view. If you switch from the foreground to the background, you can feel the torque of the motor when it is switched on. Still, it makes very little noise.

Continuous autofocus performance was also very good – no doubt supported by the intelligent focusing algorithm used in the D780 – and kept pace with a cyclist heading towards me. It was also decent in a dimly lit lobby, although the camera's focus sensor was probably the bigger limiter (the D780 is good for -3 EV with the viewfinder).

However, there is a big problem with autofocus, at least when shooting through an optical viewfinder. After unpacking, my copy of the lens was focused pretty dramatically. Customers have reported similar issues in user reviews. This isn't exactly new to Sigma – I also found the problem when reviewing the 105mm F1.4 art – but it seems to be something the company is using with newer lenses like the 40mm art, which I have now recorded seems to be under control on Canon and Nikon with no problems.

Fortunately, most modern DSLRs offer the ability to adjust the focus behavior of a lens (the Nikon D780 can do this automatically using the AF fine-tuning feature that uses focus information from live view to correct viewfinder performance). You can also purchase the Sigma USB lens dock to program focus settings directly into the lens firmware.

While this problem is easy to fix, the customer must know how to recognize it. I can imagine someone buying and returning this lens because they just thought it wasn't sharp. That couldn't be further from the truth.

picture quality

When I realized what was happening with the autofocus and figured out how to fix it, the Sigma 20mm Art thrilled me with incredibly detailed images and surprisingly rich bokeh (which is usually not the case with such wide lenses). There seems to be little to no sacrifice in sharpness when opened wide at 1: 1.4.

Distortions are certainly there, but they are fairly mild and can be easily corrected in the post without much harvest.

However, vignetting could be the real problem here, especially if you want to use this lens for astrophotography. Photography in the night sky usually requires a bright aperture and even focus and exposure across the frame. At 1: 1.4, the 20mm type vignettes are exactly what you would expect from a 20mm 1: 1.4 lens. It is serious.

I don't mind that with other types of photography, but with astrophotography, if you are already shooting at high ISO values, correcting the vignette in the post by lightening the corners only leads to more noise. Maybe it's not a big deal – I've seen fantastic astro shots from other photographers who used this lens – but it's something to watch out for.

Our opinion

The 20mm focal length may be of limited use to most photographers, but the Sigma 20mm F1.4 Art has made me a fan. I really enjoyed taking pictures with it, much more than I thought, especially for subjects that don't expect a lens as wide as portraits and products. Sometimes a new perspective is enough to refresh your creativity. Literally.

As an older model, the 20mm art has shown Sigma to improve auto focus accuracy on newer lenses. I would love to see a mirrorless redesign of this lens, as Sigma did for the 14-24mm f / 2.8 type. For Canon and Nikon DSLR shooters, however, this is still the wide-angle prime to beat.

Is there a better alternative?

Certainly not for Canon DSLRs. Nikon manufactures a 20mm f / 1.8 that is significantly lighter (12oz) and accepts 77mm filters. It's also quite a bit cheaper at the time of this writing, thanks to instant discounts that get it to just under $ 720. However, the sigma is sharper and brighter, and I expect the additional $ 180 to be worth it.

For Sony shooters, the FE 20 mm 1: 1.8 G is worth a look. It weighs just over 13 ounces, uses 67mm filters, and has an aperture ring with de-click controls. It is also visually excellent. At $ 900, however, you save no money and sacrifice the additional 2/3 blink collection that the f / 1.4 aperture of the Sigma offers you. For most people, however, this is a worthy trade for a lens that better fits Sony's smaller cameras.

How long it will take?

The 20mm art that was released in late 2015 is 5 years old and remains one of the best wide angles on the market. I wouldn't be surprised if Sigma introduces a mirrorless version in the not too distant future, but anyone who buys this lens for a DSLR today should have no problem working with it for many years.

Should you buy it

If you record a Canon or Nikon DSLR, absolutely. If you're shooting a mirrorless L-mount camera, maybe. If you're shooting a Sony E-mount camera, this is probably not the case – choose the FE 20mm f / 1.8 from Sony.

Editor's recommendations