Urbanista London Review: $149 AirPods Pro With A Fatal Flaw

Urbanista London ANC earphones

"Good ANC cannot compensate for subdued sound and poor controls at this price."

  • Well designed and comfortable

  • Very good ANC for the price

  • Bad sound quality

  • Mediocre call quality

  • Average battery life

  • No Bluetooth multipoint coupling

  • No skipping tracks

In terms of popularity, it is hard to beat Apple's AirPods when it comes to real wireless earbuds, which is why Amazon is littered with cheap wannabe AirPods. However, when it comes to true wireless earbuds that also have Active Noise Cancellation (ANC), Apple's AirPods Pro, worth $ 249, stole the limelight.

When the Swedish audio brand Urbanista launched their new London True Wireless ANC earbuds with a laundry list of features that connect them from head to toe with the AirPods Pro, but with a price tag that's $ 100 cheaper, this caught our attention.

Can the London True Wireless ANC really deliver AirPods Pro-like performance for just $ 149?

Let's find out.

design

Urbanista London ANC earphones and AirPods ProApple AirPods Pro (left) and Urbanista London Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

It may not be fair to compare a set of $ 149 real radio buds to a pair that costs almost twice as much, but Urbanista wants you to think of the London as AirPods Pro alternative.

They are among the most comfortable in-ear buds I've ever worn.

That is clear when you look at them. From the elongated stem that falls from the main earphone, to the gently rounded shape of the bud itself, to the placement of the silicone tip and in-ear detection sensors – practically all of Apple's design features are present in the London. This is especially true if you order them in the mother-of-pearl white color. However, the London are also available in the colors navy, black and rose gold.

As much as I would prefer Urbanista to pick up on the true formula for wireless earbuds, there's no denying that following in Apple's footsteps will produce good results. Londoners look and feel good too. In fact, they're among the most comfortable in-ear buds I've ever worn. As long as the main part of the earbud fits into the concha of your ear (the part that is on the outside of the ear canal), you should have no problem finding a comfortable fit by choosing from the four sizes of silicone earplugs that Urbanista contains. Speaking of earplugs, they are made of very high quality silicone, which I really appreciate. Too many earphone manufacturers are cheap for this important part.

Londoners have an IPX4 rating for water resistance. This is good enough for a very sweaty workout on a rainy day.

Charging case

Urbanista London ANC earphone caseSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The charging case differs from Apple's design, but that's usually a good thing. It has a noble shell shape with rounded corners and clearly visible LED indicators for the battery life under the front lip. The lid is easy to open and can be closed securely thanks to magnets that are perfectly balanced in their strength. With slightly larger overall dimensions, it's not quite as portable as the Apple charging case, but it's very narrow – and it's practically the same weight.

Plugging and unplugging the earphones into the recessed docks is easy and they stay seated.

The case uses a modern USB-C port for wired charging, but there's also wireless charging – just place the case on a Qi-compatible mat.

Battery life

The similarity to the AirPods Pro continues in terms of battery life. In this case, however, Urbanista should have set its own course.

With just five hours of play per full charge, Londoners are comparable to Apple buds, but that doesn't say much these days. Most new real wireless earbuds – even those that cost far less – exceed this number by two to six hours.

A 10-minute quick charge gives you an hour's play, and the charging case fully charges the London four times, for a total of 25 hours of unplugged action.

Noise cancellation

Urbanista London ANC earphonesSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

In the ANC spectrum, you'll find everything from the light touch of the Amazon Echo Buds, which use Bose's noise reduction technology to smoothly smooth out unwanted noise, to the AirPods Pro, which deliver an almost annoying cone of silence.

The Urbanista London fall somewhere in the middle, which means they actually block a lot of sound – particularly predictable, constant sounds like fans. To get significantly better ANC performance, you have to spend a lot more than the London price of $ 149.

I think it's good that you can choose between ANC on and off and that there is an ambient mode that lets in some outside noise – handy when talking on the phone and when walking or walking through an urban landscape. However, I wish there was a way to adjust the ANC level through an app, which has become a standard option for ANC earphones and headphones.

Sound quality

Urbanista London ANC earphonesSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

I wish I could praise London more, but unfortunately I bumped into a wall here. Saying that they sound average would mean setting a very low bar for the average set of real wireless earbuds, which is pretty good. No, the Londoners sound much worse. Imagine taking a really good set of earphones like the Sony WF-1000XM3 (hard to imagine if you haven't really heard it, but join in), but before you put it in your ears, plug it in Bundle of cotton balls first in front of the eardrum.

Saying that they sound average would mean setting a very low bar for the average set of real wireless earphones.

This risky-sounding combination is more or less what Londoners sound like. You can see that a full, rich sound can be heard somewhere deep in its components. Bass, mids, and possibly some decent high frequencies are there, but it's as if they're all trapped behind an invisible, wafer-thin layer of material that flattens everything into a dull, lifeless signal.

I literally pulled one of the earplugs off to see if there was a physical obstacle.

Unfortunately, Urbanista does not have an app for Londoners, so there is no way to optimize the EQ to compensate for this. Not that I think it would make a big difference.

Call quality

The Urbanista London can certainly be used for phone calls, but if the call quality is very important you may want to look elsewhere.

They tend to pick up background noise more than some other wireless earbuds I've tried, and the quality of your voice when speaking to callers is mediocre. The person who normally makes my earphone test calls said it sounded like I was very far from the microphone.

Control and ease of use

Urbanista London ANC earphonesSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Pairing the London is very easy – just open the case with the buds inside and find the device in your Bluetooth accessories list on your phone. Unfortunately, they are not equipped with Bluetooth multipoint, so you can only pair them with one device at a time.

There's also no way to use just a single earbud as the wear sensor automatically pauses the music when you remove an earbud – a feature that can't be disabled.

Surprisingly, there is no way to skip tracks, which I think is more important than volume control.

The only exception is making or receiving calls that can only be made with one of the earphones alone.

Londoners use a touch-sensitive control area on each earphone, which is identified by the Urbanista logo on the top of the stems. As with many touch controls, you have to be reasonably accurate when typing. Tap the stem too deep and it won't respond.

Londoners are more picky about touch than I would like them to be. Double knocking was often interpreted as single knocking, which became annoying after a while.

You get the standard set of controls, including play / pause, volume up / down, answer / end call, but surprisingly there's no way to skip tracks, which I think is more important than volume control when you do this A choice between these two functions.

You can turn ANC on and off and activate the environmental mode. For voice assistants, however, only Siri is fully supported.

Due to the lack of an app, it is not possible to reconfigure what the different typing sequences do or which earphones are assigned to them.

Our opinion

Feature by feature, the Urbanista London should be a blast given its relatively affordable price and the available ANC. You will surely do many things right, especially in terms of design, fit and comfort. Unfortunately, Londoners miss the mark in key areas such as sound quality, call quality, and non-customizable controls.

Is there a better alternative?

If active noise cancellation isn't a must, there are almost too many great real wireless earbuds to list. Most of them cost less than $ 100, and I think they all sound better than London.

If ANC is the key and you want to stay below the $ 200 mark, check out the Edifier TWS NB and Panasonic RZ-S500W. Both offer excellent sound quality, ANC and much more features than the Urbanista London for $ 200 or less.

How long will they last?

With a one-year limited warranty, the Urbanista London seems to be well built and made of high quality materials.

Their IPX4 protection class protects them from the effects of water. As long as you don't abuse them, they should last as long as most real wireless earbuds you can currently buy.

Should you buy them

No. As tempting as it is to buy a set of active noise canceling earbuds for just $ 149, I doubt you will be happy with their sound.

Editor's recommendations




sigma fp review front logo dm 26

Sigma Fp Review: A Miniature Marvel With a Fatal Flaw

"Mini but powerful, Sigmas Fp is not afraid to stand out."

  • Ultra compact design

  • Outstanding workmanship

  • RAW Video

  • 24MP full frame sensor

  • Relatively cheap

  • No mechanical lock

  • No built-in viewfinder or hot shoe

  • Auto focus only with contrast detection

  • Bad battery life

Sony. Canon. Nikon. Panasonic. Leica. Five companies made mirrorless full-frame cameras before Sigma got into the fray with the Fp. It is a highly competitive arena. So how can Sigma hope to get noticed?

Apparently by building a very strange camera.

The Sigma Fp is a different breed. Inside and outside, it does not meet the design standards of other manufacturers. Nevertheless, or precisely because of this, the Fp is one of the most fascinating cameras on the market. Depending on your point of view, it's either a miniature miracle or a frustrating flop. It will appeal to videographers the most, but for the purpose of this review, I will consider the Fp mainly as a still camera.

The Fp can't do many things that other cameras in the $ 2,000 price range can do. But it can also do things that others cannot. For example, it doesn't have a viewfinder or mechanical shutter, but it records RAW video and has a computationally low ISO of 6. Yes, ISO 6. This makes it a difficult camera to compare to its peers because it doesn't seem to to compete directly within its own price group.

Maybe it doesn't even have peers, but calling it "incomparable" seems to be a compliment too strong. It is certainly unique and it is exciting.

Design and specifications

Let me trace back a moment. It's not entirely fair to say that the Fp doesn't adhere to design standards, as it includes two that help it gain a foothold.

On the one hand, the Leica L-frame is used in contrast to the Sigma-owned SA-frame, so that in addition to the Sigma frame, it is also compatible with a range of lenses from Leica and Panasonic.

Second, a regular 24.6 megapixel Bayer sensor is used instead of the Foveon X3 chip from previous Sigma cameras such as the SD Quattro H. I hope that Foveon development will continue as it offers advantages for certain still image applications, but the change was necessary to give the Fp such powerful video functions.

Sigma fp visible with lens mount and sensor.

The Fp looks and feels like a small, matt black brick. Measuring 4.4 x 2.6 x 1.8 inches and weighing less than 15 ounces, it is the smallest and lightest full-frame camera. Sigma made sacrifices to achieve this size, but not in processing quality. The camera feels as if it could survive anything but a direct nuclear strike. Several different handles are available to improve ergonomics.

Between the body and the LCD screen sprouts a rib pattern that runs along the edge of the camera. This is not a design statement, but a heat sink. This keeps the camera in its optimal temperature range even with long RAW video recordings. Despite the exposed heat sink, the camera is completely weatherproof.

However, there is some bad news. The Sigma Fp lacks an electronic viewfinder, the touchscreen is fixed and the shoe holder is not built in, but a screw attachment that protrudes from the side of the camera.

Sigma fp Detailed shot of the trigger and trigger.

I found all of this to be forgivable, but one thing that Fp lacks that cannot be ignored: a mechanical lock. Without one, distortion from the electronic roller shutter is a constant threat when panning or picking up fast-moving subjects. Worse, it means the flash sync speed is limited to 1/30 second for JPEG and 1/15 for RAW. If you ever shoot with flash, whether on or off camera, the Fp won't work for you.

In fact, I doubt that, given the specs, Sigma intended the Fp to be some kind of still camera. Continuous shots can be taken at up to 18 frames per second, but only for 24 frames. It uses an autofocus system with only 49 point contrast detection and is not a "fancy" type of contrast detection like the depth from defocus technology in Panasonic L-mount cameras. Due to the ultra-compact design, it also has a small 1,200 mAh battery. Sigma does not report battery life, but after about 50 exposures the display dropped to 50%. I've probably checked photos more often than the average person, which could have led to a rapid decline – and the indicator is probably not 100% accurate – but I still wouldn't expect more than a few hundred shots per load.

Sigma fp Detailed view of power and cine / still switches.

However, the news is better on the video front. The camera records internal RAW videos in Adobe CinemaDNG format with up to 24 fps in 4K or 60 fps in Full HD. 4K RAW is internally limited to 8-bit, but 12-bit output via USB-C is directly supported on an SSD. Full HD can be recorded internally with up to 12 bits. In addition to RAW, the Fp can also record .MOV videos at 440 megabits per second in 4K at 24 or 30 fps or up to 100 fps in Full HD.

Some currently missing functions are planned for a future firmware update. This includes the playback of CinemaDNG files in the camera, RAW output via HDMI and a protocol profile to maintain a larger dynamic range when recording .MOV.

As a video camera, the Fp could very well be a game changer.

user experience

Taking pictures with the Sigma Fp is fun. Combined with the 45mm F2.8 pancake lens, it feels more like a point-and-shoot camera than a full-frame mirrorless camera. It's a refreshing experience, especially in the L-mount area, where other cameras are known for their mass (the Lumix S-series cameras weigh more than most DSLRs; the Leica SL2 is not far behind).

Sigma fp in hand with top plate and 45 mm f / 2.8 lens.

Of course, this changes when you mount a larger lens on the Fp. In addition to the 45 mm, I also tested the new 14-24 mm F2.8 type and 35 mm F1.2 type. While these are part of Sigma's new mirrorless "DN" line, they are significantly larger than the Fp. The 14-24 is impressively compact for what it is, much more than the older DSLR version, but it is still strong. The 35mm F1.2 is weirdly big.

Performance is reasonable, but not great. The autofocus works perfectly for portraits and other static subjects. Eye detection gave me a precise focus when I took pictures with the 35mm F1.2 wide open. It also works well in low light. Sigma says it's good for -5 EV, although it depends on the contrast in your subject.

Compared to phase detection autofocus in cameras from Sony, Canon and Nikon, however, the Fp is slow and inconsistent. Fast recordings are therefore difficult.

Sigma fp mounted on table with 35mm F1.2 Art lens.

Ergonomics and autofocus play less of a role in video production. Videographers will love how adaptable this camera is, both for different lenses and for different environments. With additional 1/4 inch threads on each side, you can attach the camera vertically to a tripod or attach additional accessories directly to it. It is well suited for aerial work, as its light frame is said to facilitate mounting on a drone. I can imagine that it will also be used as a crash cam. You could stick it anywhere on a car, and it could be just strong enough to survive the impact.

While Sigma sees that this camera is used by everyone from vloggers to Hollywood directors, I hesitate before recommending it to the former. Without a flip screen, there is no way to monitor yourself without an external monitor, and continuous autofocus is unreliable for everyone except the simplest of shots.

For every production that has a crew, including a small one, I think the Fp will be fantastic. You'll need a few accessories to take full advantage of it, including a fast SSD and an external power solution. However, the results are worth the extra work.

picture quality

The Fp delivers solid results for still images – with one unfortunate exception. The 24MP full frame sensor is predictably great when it comes to dynamic range and high ISO performance. ISO 6.400 is very usable, and even the maximum 25,600 showed an impressively low noise level. Under the right conditions, you can get stunning still images out of your Fp.

However, there is a problem that ruins the picture. The electronic shutter not only severely limits the possibilities of the flash, but also creates stripes when you work indoors under fluorescent or LED lighting (see photo below). For many photographers, this is simply a deal breaker. Photo-specific LEDs, such as the Lume Cube Panel, with which I have illuminated the above image, are flicker-free and work perfectly.

Indoor portrait shot with Sigma fp, showing visible exposure strips in the background.

On the positive side, Sigma continues to prove itself as a leader in lenses. The 45mm lens isn't the sharpest in the world, but as a compact lens, it's not the right thing. The 14-24mm and 35mm Art Lenses are excellent. I will save the in-depth analysis for their own review, but it is enough to say if you are worried about the availability of good glass on the L-bracket at all, do not.

As for videos, I'm not set up to process RAW 4K footage. I have neither computing power nor storage space. Even in 8-bit form, 4K CinemaDNG burns 128 GB in just 10 minutes. I recorded some short test clips in 1080p and wow, RAW video is really a game changer if you need exposure or color adjustments in the post. Nine times out of ten I would transfer the 12-bit full HD from Sigma Fp over the compressed 8-bit 4K from other cameras – but it does show some aliasing for sharp details like text where 4K would be an advantage.

Our opinion

I have to applaud Sigma for not being afraid to try something different. The Fp is far from perfect, but it's an impressive first step. RAW video in the camera, an ultra-compact housing, superior build quality and versatility in the L mount are all advantages. Many videographers will love it.

Still photographers will be less impressed. Without a shutter, viewfinder or other special features such as phase detection, auto focus and stabilization in the body, there are better and more user-friendly options. Should Sigma ever create a "Mark II" version of the Fp that addresses some of these issues, this could be a real competitor. We hope.

Is there a better alternative?

The Panasonic Lumix S1 is the closest competitor within the L-bracket. It costs you more, but it is also a ready-to-use camera that does not require any additional accessories. However, it is much larger and heavier and offers good 4K videos but no RAW videos.

In addition to the L bracket, the Sony A7 III is another good choice. It doesn't have the Fp's video chops, but still image functions are better, especially autofocus. Sigma also manufactures all DN lenses for the Sony E-Mount in addition to the L-Mount, so you don't miss anything.

How long it will take?

This is a solid machine and a plus without a mechanical lock is that it can break or wear very little. You should be able to use it easily for 5 years, if not more, and it looks like Sigma plans to keep it up to date with firmware updates.

Should you buy it

No, not for still pictures. Video is a different story, but the ideal use of the Sigma is a niche.

Updated January 14 with additional battery life comments.

Editor's recommendations