16 May
Blog

A Great Way To Increase Your Overall Body Strength!

Rack pulls are considered a variation on the classic deadlift that works your lower back muscles efficiently. They also target your hamstrings, quads, traps, and some upper back forces. It is considered a partial deadlift because its range of motion is shorter than that of the traditional deadlift.

T.They are full body exercises and help to increase your physical strength to a great extent. This exercise also strengthens your hips and builds more muscles in your back. In addition, this exercise will help you increase your grip strength and reduce the load on your lumbar spine.

Below is the ultimate guide on how to effectively perform rack pulls to promote overall body strength.

How to do rack pulls like a pro:

1. First you need to adjust your rack to a suitable height. If your holding position is below your knees, consider placing the rack directly below your knee. With your trap above your knees, you'll want to align the rack with the bottom of your quadriceps. Stand with your feet hip-width apart. This is your starting position.

2. Now support your back and bring the bar closer to your body.

3. Inhale and grab the floor with your feet by twisting your toes outwards a little.

4. As you ride your feet through the floor, push your hips forward to raise the barbell from your knees to level with your hips.

5. After raising the barbell to hip level, hold it down for a second.

Things to be aware of:

1. Always remember to add weight, not rack height, as you continue to pull the rack.

2. Your hips should be fully locked as you lift the barbell from your knees to hip height.

3. If you want to increase your grip strength, try holding the weight for a few seconds or as long as you want.

Variations of the rack pull:

If you're comfortable with the traditional rack pull, there are always some variations that you can try:

1. Fat bar rack pulls

This variant of the rack requires the use of a barbell or handles, which increases the diameter (thickness) of the barbell. This calls into question the strength of your palm's grip. This exercise is considered to be more rigid and therefore there cannot be any bending of the bar.

2. Isometric rack pull

With this variant, the lifter places the barbell under a pair of safety stoppers. Here the person lifts the barbell as tightly as possible. This exercise is also very useful for increasing physical strength and intensifying motor recruitment.

3. Reverse band rack pull

This variant of the rack pull proves to be beneficial for increasing your grip strength and getting used to lifting heavier weights. The resistance bands are stretched at the beginning of the lifting process in order to lift the weight upwards. The straps then reduce the amount of support as the person gets more acceleration while pulling the rack. This is done to increase the rate of force production in the upper half of the power.

Frequently asked Questions:

1. What is the point of rack pulls?

By practicing rack pulls regularly, you can increase overall body strength as it targets different muscle groups.

2. What is the significant difference between rack pulls and deadlifts?

The main difference between rack pulls and deadlifts is that rack pulls a shorter range of motion than deadlifts.

3. Are rack and pinion trains a great substitute for deadlifts?

Yes, rack and pinion hoists are considered a great substitute for deadlifts because you can achieve the same strength with a partial range of motion.

4. How many rack pulls should I do?

When you're ready to hone your skills, consider doing at least 3-4 sets of 4-6 reps. If you want to build your muscles, you should do 3-5 sets of 12-15 repetitions. When you're ready to gain strength, aim for 3-5 sets of 3-5 reps.

10 Apr
Blog

Wyze Home Monitoring Review: Great Savings, Gaps to Fill

Wyze Home Monitoring Components

Wyze Home Monitoring Review: Big Savings, Bridge the Gaps

"Wyze comes at a compelling price for home security, but it takes more work to catch up."

  • Very affordable home monitoring plan

  • Inexpensive hardware

  • Option for wired or wireless connection with hub

  • No cellular backup connection

  • Limited selection of accessories

When it comes to making noise in the smart home space, nobody is doing it better lately than Wyze. The company has tirelessly expanded its portfolio over the past year, which surprisingly now includes vacuum cleaners, headphones and fitness trackers. The latest offering is Wyze Home Monitoring, a 24-hour home improvement security system designed to protect your home when you are there or not.

After a series of hits with its surveillance cameras, the Wyze Home Monitoring is pursuing the same strategy of being extremely affordable. At $ 5 a month, it's without question the lowest priced subscription. However, are there any compromises with such low cost?

Cover basics

First, let me explain what comes with the Wyze Home Monitoring System. The Core Starter Kit ($ 110 MSRP) is exactly what you'd expect. It consists of a 5-piece kit that consists of a hub, a keyboard, a motion sensor and two input sensors. What's especially important here is that this starter kit is almost a fraction of the cost of its closest competitors – between $ 150 and $ 200 – for packages from Ring, SimpliSafe, and Blue from ADT.

Wyze Home Monitoring KeyboardJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

For the price, you get the same basic components as the other home security systems. So in that regard, it's more for the money. However, a comprehensive selection of accessories is always an advantage when it comes to fully covering your home. With its current portfolio, Wyze lacks the depth of accessories that its competitors offer. While you can have additional motion and entry sensors for the system at a much lower cost than the competition ($ 20 for three entry sensors and $ 8 for one motion sensor), it comes down to the breadth of accessories you have still not close gonna find anywhere else.

However, if you are concerned that someone might be intruding on your home, hitting additional sensors can provide more security. While external threats are paramount, Wyze needs to add other accessories like carbon monoxide detectors, flood sensors, and more to monitor other potential threats around the home.

Optimizations required with experience

Wyze's inexperience in this area will be exposed after I check out the app. The activation and deactivation of the alarm system can be done either physically via the keyboard or via the app. You can select a countdown to have enough time to activate / deactivate. There are three main arming modes: Home, Away and Disarmed.

This starter kit is almost a fraction of the cost of its closest competitors.

As you would expect when a system is armed, the hub will emit a loud siren when any of the sensors are triggered. If you have a Wyze surveillance camera, you can also set it up to automatically record when one of the sensors is triggered. For example, if the front door is opened while it is armed, you can have the Wyze Cam in your living room to automatically start recording. Oddly enough, cameras themselves do not trigger an alarm if movement is detected and the system is armed. Instead, you will receive an app notification.

While the basics are well covered here, some additional tweaking is needed before it can be compared to the major players in the field. In particular, the hub cannot emit any distinguishable noises each time a sensor is triggered – not even at home. Personally, I like being at home to hear a sound when the front door is opened. You don't have that option here.

What is even more puzzling is that the system continues to sound the alarm in home mode and also dispatches law enforcement agencies. Fortunately, I had it in test mode whenever it went off, but I would love to see a proper home mode where I can still have the sensors active but only send me notifications (or play a sound on the hub) when they are always activated. In disabled mode, everything is simply disabled so that there are no notifications or alarms.

24/7 surveillance with Noonlight

Wyze Home Monitoring offers 24-hour monitoring via Noonlight, which not only triggers alarms when sensors are triggered, but also emergency helpers who are on standby in emergency situations. When you consider that the service cost is $ 5 per month or $ 60 per year, it undercuts most other home security systems.

Wyze Home Monitoring HubJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

However, when it comes to protection, there are still some loopholes that need to be addressed in the future. Take the Wyze Hub, for example. I am happy to have the option of connecting it wired or wirelessly to my house's network and having my own emergency power supply in the event that the power fails. However, without an active internet connection at home, it will become unusable. Other systems, such as the base stations from SimpliSafe and Ring, have an integrated cellular connection as a backup. In Wyze's situation, no internet connection means there is a coverage gap.

Our opinion

It's a good start, but there is certainly still a lot of work to be done before Wyze Home Monitoring can deliver the same solid and complete home security service that its competitors offer. The accessories portfolio in particular does not make it quite as robust and experience requires additional optimizations and improvements. The cost is hard to miss, however, as you will not find anything that cheap remotely otherwise.

How long it will take?

All components of the system are made of plastic. It's enough, but the design and build quality is obviously a step behind what you get from names like SimpliSafe and Ring. There is a one-year limited warranty that covers the hardware components against defects.

Is there a better alternative?

SimpliSafe and Ring offer two of the most comprehensive home improvement safety systems on the market. Ring, in particular, has one of the deepest accessory rosters that can cover your home inside and out, while SimpliSafe offers impeccable service that goes above and beyond most – for example, the ability for a service dispatcher to access a camera, to review real threats.

Should you buy it?

Yes, but only if you are in need of cost. I expect it will get better over time as more accessories become available and the experience improves.

Editor's recommendations




12 Mar
Blog

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Review: Great Hardware Can’t Save Android

lenovo tab p11 pro review 5

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Tablet

"It's probably the best Android tablet in its price range, but the Tab P11 Pro seriously disappoints with a sub-par software experience."

  • Breathtaking design

  • Excellent accessories

  • Solid performance

  • Excellent battery

  • Below average software experience

  • Android apps on tablets are terrible

  • Medium camera

It's difficult to decide on Android tablets these days, especially when they cost more than a few hundred dollars. Sure, some companies make stylish tablets with beautiful displays and top-notch performance, but Android is still holding them back – which is fantastic on phones but not so great on tablets. However, Lenovo believes it cracked the code with the new Lenovo Tab P11 Pro.

It cannot be denied: The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is madness. It's thin, has a gorgeous edge-to-edge display, and offers solid performance thanks to the Snapdragon 730G. At first glance, it's a slightly cheaper alternative to the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7, which is our first choice for Android tablets.

Ultimately, however, the Android experience is best for the smartphone, and Lenovo cannot change that. Here are our thoughts on the device.

Design and display

Lenovo seems to have gotten to the heart of the design aspect of its tablets. The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is elegant and elegant, looks modern thanks to its borderless display and is made of high-quality materials. It reminds me a lot of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7, which is a good thing – I liked the general design and feel of the Tab S7, and while the Tab P11 Pro can reasonably be called a design copy, it still looks great.

As is the trend these days, the tablet has nicely rounded corners with a metal unibody structure. There is a slate gray color scheme on the back, reminiscent of Apple's Space Gray, with an antenna line at the top and a dual-sensor camera. The camera module sticks out quite a bit from the back of the tablet, but with the included back cover, it's no big deal. We'll go into the included accessories a little later.

When you hold the tablet in portrait orientation, the on / off switch (with integrated fingerprint sensor) is on the top right and the volume rocker right next to it on the right. There is a USB-C port at the bottom. There is no headphone jack on the Tab P11 Pro.

On the right there are also a number of sensors and cameras that can be used for face recognition. Unfortunately, in my experience, facial recognition doesn't work that well, and you should opt for the fingerprint sensor instead. The face recognition worked exactly. It only took a few seconds for the device to actually unlock. The fingerprint sensor worked quickly and accurately most of the time.

With a thickness of only 6.9 mm, the Tab P11 Pro fits comfortably in the hand. At just over a pound, it's not overly heavy and the bezels are the perfect size – they leave just enough room to hold the device without accidentally touching the screen. You don't want them to get tighter.

Speaking of the screen, it's a sucker. The Tab P11 Pro has an 11.5-inch OLED display with a resolution of 1,600 x 2,560 and a brightness of up to 500 nits. It is wonderful. The text is nice and sharp, the colors are vivid and bright, and the tablet is perfect for watching movies and games. But it's not perfect. As someone who regularly uses an iPad Pro, I would have liked a high refresh rate here, but it's hard to reckon that the tablet won't have a high refresh rate due to its price range.

Our first Tab P11 Pro immediately had a screen burn-in issue, and Lenovo quickly replaced the review unit. If you experience a similar problem, it should be under the manufacturer's limited warranty.

Power, battery and camera

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is slightly cheaper than the Galaxy Tab S7, and one way to cut costs is with a slightly cheaper processor. However, this does not mean that the tablet does not have enough power. Still, thanks to the Snapdragon 730G processor, which comes with 4GB or 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, it can do most of the tasks that you can.

In all honesty, it's more than powerful enough. No, the Snapdragon 730G isn't as powerful as the Snapdragon 865, but it can handle multitasking, gaming, and more. Playing Call of Duty: Mobile was a good experience with few jumps and good load times. The tablet generally handled multitasking well, including surfing the web, sending emails, using Microsoft Word, and so on.

That doesn't mean it's a performance beast. It still has its limits. If you want to use it as a replacement for a laptop, for example, you will reach these limits. We recommend the 6GB RAM model if you can afford it and if you don't want to use your tablet just for media consumption. It's only $ 50 more and makes for a smoother experience.

In all honesty, it's more than powerful enough. No, the Snapdragon 730G isn't as powerful as the Snapdragon 865, but it can still handle solid multitasking, gaming, and more.

The battery life of the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is excellent. The tablet comes with a massive 8,600 mAh battery that is more than enough to last for days of use. If you charge it and don't use it for a few days, you can expect over 90% of the battery remaining. If you use your tablet frequently, it should be a few days before you need to charge it.

Unlike a smartphone, the tablet's rear-facing camera isn't as important as the front-facing camera, as you will likely use your tablet more for video chatting than for taking photos. Unfortunately, none of the P11 Pro's cameras work great.

On the back of the device is a dual camera setup with a 13-megapixel main camera and a 5-megapixel ultrawide. There are two 8-megapixel cameras on the front, one for photos and one for face recognition. Both of them do their job in adequate lighting, but they add complexity to your photo or video and you are likely to run into problems.

software

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro has a stunning design, display and battery life. Ultimately, however, it doesn't matter how good the hardware is if the software isn't up to the task. Unfortunately, this is not the case in this case.

It's not all Lenovo's fault. Android is a great operating system, but it's not really tablet-friendly, and even the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7's software experience isn't the best. It really is a shame and frustrating that, despite its mature operating system, Android still isn't the productivity powerhouse it could be.

Not to mention the fact that Android apps aren't really optimized for use with tablets. Twitter on the tablet is basically just an expanded version of the smartphone app, and it looks terrible. In comparison, the iPad app is divided into columns that really take advantage of the large screen's footprint. That's Twitter's fault, of course, but it underscores the fact that Android tablets have really been forgotten – and Android tablet makers look bad because of it.

As you'd expect, Lenovo is building its own features into the Tab P11 Pro's software. The tablet can be used in two different modes – a normal Android tablet mode and a so-called “productivity mode”. Productivity mode is activated by default when you connect the device to the supplied keyboard. However, you can also turn it on without a keyboard.

Productivity mode is similar to Lenovo's in terms of Samsung DeX, but without years of refinement. Apps are displayed with windows instead of the full screen. A number of the latest multitasking apps are displayed at the bottom of the screen. It's a good approach, but it feels very unfinished. For example, apps don't snap to the edge of the screen and load in a tiny window the first time they are opened. It's really not very well implemented, and you might be more productive in normal mode.

But I wouldn't turn to the Tab P11 Pro primarily for productivity gains, or at least not for its primary purpose. The device works well for casual jobs and, given the solid keyboard, can also be useful for things like replying to emails or writing in a word processor without the need for multitasking. However, don't expect to be more productive and still keep your sanity.

All of this is made worse by the fact that the tablet ships with Android 10, which is now over a year old. Given Lenovo's track record with Android updates, it's entirely possible that the tablet will never get Android 11 or even Android 12. However, I would be happy if I turned out to be wrong.

Keyboard and pen

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro comes with a number of accessories that support different uses, and these accessories are really beautiful. That said, it's a shame the tablet's software wasn't really designed with productivity in mind.

To protect the tablet, there is a back cover and a keyboard that can be used separately. In the end, I just kept the back cover of the tablet the whole time. It has a nice textile appearance and the stand makes it easy to put a tablet on the table when needed. The stand is infinitely adjustable so you can adjust it to the angle you want. The only frustration I have with the back cover is that the hinge creates a bump in the middle, which means it can't lie flat on its back.

The keyboard corresponds to the design of the back cover and is magnetically attached to the underside of the tablet. Once attached, it works pretty well. It's not the keyboard with the best feel, but it's not bad for a free, included accessory. Keys could use a little more travel to see them, but that's a minor complaint and I still generally enjoyed typing on it … but only on a table. The kickstand design means this isn't the best device for your lap.

The tablet also comes with a pen. While it's not bad, I haven't used it much. In contrast to the Galaxy Tab S7, the pen is not magnetically attached to the tablet itself. Instead, a sleeve is supplied that you can attach to the device with an adhesive. However, this is a pretty permanent approach. Alternatively, you can attach the sleeve to a keychain. Neither is a good solution.

Price and availability

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro starts at $ 500. However, as mentioned earlier, if you want to use the tablet for any kind of productivity or multitasking, I recommend upgrading to the $ 550 6GB RAM model. It is available directly from the Lenovo website.

Our opinion

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is a tough sell. It's probably the best Android tablet in its price range thanks to its great hardware and the fact that there isn't a lot of competition – unless the Galaxy Tab S7 goes on sale. In this case, it's a better option. Unfortunately, the Tab P11 Pro is seriously disappointed with a sub-par software experience, making it difficult to recommend to anyone who wants to achieve more than just basic media usage and very basic productivity.

Is there a better alternative?

If you want to stay in the Android ecosystem, there are a few alternatives you should consider. Perhaps the most notable is the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7, which was available for $ 550 at the time of this writing. The Tab S7 software experience is still not perfect, but it is better than the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro and offers improved performance thanks to the Snapdragon 865+.

If you're not keen on Android, the iPad Air is our top pick for the best tablet out there – and for good reason. It also has a stunning modern design and great performance, as well as a premium software experience for work or leisure. It's a far better product in almost every way except you have to pay extra for accessories like a keyboard and pen. Even the entry-level iPad is worth considering, and while it doesn't look as premium, it still offers a better overall experience than the Tab P11 Pro.

How long it will take?

The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is made of metal and should be able to be used for at least two years without physical damage or major slowdowns. If you take good care of it, you might be able to use it for three or four years. Be aware, however, that the software slows down and the software feels pretty out of date.

Should you buy it?

Get an iPad Air or Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 instead.

Editor's recommendations




01 Mar
Blog

Apple Fitness+ Review: Gorgeous Workouts, Great Potential

Apple Fitness plus Rating Screenshot Trainer3

"Fitness + motivates you to close your activity rings, but is lacking in key areas."

  • Seamless integration with the Apple Watch

  • Diversity of likeable trainers

  • Variety of training types

  • New content every week

  • Requires an Apple Watch Series 3 or later and an iPhone

  • No live courses

  • Some exercises require special equipment

Because of gym restrictions and pandemic issues, many people are building their own gym instead of throwing away their hard-earned cash on gym membership. Services like Apple Fitness + fill that void as the move to home fitness is transforming the fitness industry. Can an online stream replace your personal Pilates class? We tested Apple Fitness + to find out.

Apple Watch is the killer feature

Apple Fitness + is available for the iPad, iPhone, and Apple TV, but was designed specifically for the Apple Watch. As soon as you open a workout on your iPhone, it is immediately displayed on the Apple Watch. Your watch will then send your health data to your connected device so that you can view it if you follow the trainer's lead.

I realized that I connected with the coaches and wanted to train with them.

As you exercise, you can watch your activity rings increase as you get closer to meeting your exercise goals. You can also see your heart rate, time and calories burned. It's a small feature, but incredibly motivating to see all of your stats on the big screen. Since it is displayed on your screen, there is no need to keep looking at your watch. This is huge for someone like me who is likely to stumble or lose rhythm looking at my wrist.

Can't make the mood

Apple Fitness + is great for beginners to advanced users, provided they have the right equipment. Most cardio workouts require a treadmill, bike, or step machine and are not interchangeable. Unlike iFit, which films landscape-related activities suitable for any machine, Fitness +, for example, requires a bike to complete the bike training.

You will also need dumbbells or kettlebells to complete many of the strength activities. You might be able to swap bodyweight exercises, but it's not the same. You can also skip workouts that require specific equipment, but eliminating so many exercises seriously affected my experience. Instead of having a "can-do" feeling, I often had a "can-do" feeling when browsing the training library. To be fair, Apple offers walking workouts and dance classes that don't require special equipment, but there are few. I would love to see more of this creative, equipment-free content.

This "can't" feeling was reinforced by a limited user interface. Fitness + divides the workouts into broad categories (intense interval training, yoga, core, strength, treadmill, cycling, rowing, dancing, and mindful cooldown) to help you find the right exercise. Once in a category, I found it difficult to find the right workout for my fitness level. There was no way to filter activities based on difficulty or equipment required. I had to choose a workout and then read the description to see if it was appropriate for me. This hunt-and-peck method of finding activity was tedious.

Diverse, enthusiastic trainers

Apple is the master of looks, so it's no surprise that the Fitness + videos are highly polished. The videos are recorded in a beautiful studio gym with great camera angles so you can see exactly how the trainer moves. The workouts feature happy music and personable coaches who encourage you to “close those rings”.

There's no way to filter activities, and the Hunt-and-Peck method of finding a workout was tedious.

Apple's trainers reflect a wide variety of races, ages, and body types that I really appreciate. Since these were normal and not particularly healthy top athletes, I found that I connected with the coaches and wanted to train with them. Their enthusiasm was contagious. Apple also adds content weekly so I keep coming back to find out what's new.

Moderate workouts but no live content

Fitness + is aimed at the large number of iPhone and Apple Watch owners. It is aimed at beginners to advanced and not advanced athletes. Established fitness fanatics could use Fitness + to add to their existing routine or do cross-training on a day off, but it won't replace their existing high-intensity routine.

Most workouts are easy to follow and some are even scalable. This is a function that other exercise programs should do. With these scalable strength training sessions, you can choose to complete the selected activities, improve them with more advanced activities, or downsize the exercises if you have an injury or just want to take it easy. This flexibility encourages you to keep going even when an injury or illness gets in the way.

As much as I've enjoyed Fitness +, the service has a big Achilles heel. Unfortunately, unlike Peloton or Mirror, which offer a plethora of live classes, Apple Fitness + consists entirely of recorded videos. On-demand workouts are convenient because you can work out anytime, but they lack the community feel of a live class. Hopefully Apple will hire a few trainers to teach live classes on a daily basis.

costs

Apple Fitness + requires an Apple Watch Series 3 or later, which gives you at least $ 199 back for a new watch. Also requires a monthly subscription of $ 10 or an annual subscription of $ 80. The service is also included in the Apple One Premier bundle, which costs $ 30 per month and includes Apple Music, Apple TV +, Apple Arcade, Cloud, and News +. When it comes to cost, it's significantly cheaper than the average $ 40 per month subscription that most affiliated home gyms like Mirror, Tempo Studio, and Tonal have.

Our opinion

Apple Fitness + is a great workout tool for beginners to advanced users who already own an Apple Watch. A growing collection of workouts from motivational coaches encourage you to exercise. It's a little rough around the edges, but it has potential. If Apple listens to its critics and improves the service, Fitness + Peloton could give a run for its money in the coming year.

Is there a better alternative?

Apple Fitness + shows promise, but it does require an Apple Watch. Not everyone owns an Apple Watch and doesn't want to buy one just to exercise. Fitness +’s strongest competitor is iFit, which has an extensive library of recorded studio and outdoor activities, as well as a growing number of live workouts and does not require a fitness watch. It's priced at $ 10 per month and runs on a tablet or smartphone.

How long it will take?

Apple has supported and updated the software on its older devices in the past, and we expect Apple Fitness + to receive the same treatment. The service will improve over time and its shortcomings (e.g. no live training) will be a thing of the past.

Should you buy it?

Yes, Apple Fitness + may be just what the doctor ordered for Apple Watch owners who want to get fit and stay fit.

Editor's recommendations




17 Feb
Blog

Citizen CZ Smart Review: Nearly a Great Citizen Smartwatch

Citizen cz smart smartwatch rating wrist shirt

"The Citizen CZ Smart is a good smartwatch with solid performance and battery life, but the design isn't quite what we'd expect from such a remarkable watchmaker."

  • High quality stainless steel case

  • Comfortable strap for a good fit

  • Decent battery life

  • Surprisingly good performance

  • Inaccurate number of steps

  • Not enough "citizen" design

Citizen has been making clocks for more than 100 years, manufacturing all of its components in-house, and pioneering a wide variety of technologies that focus on the use of light output and high precision. It's the newest watch the citizen CZ Smartis the company's first touchscreen smartwatch – and based on that legacy, we should be excited about it. As a fan of the brand's watches in general, I was keen to try them out.

The more watch brands are interested in smartwatches, the better the design, convenience and technology become. So it is important for companies like Citizen to get involved. Is the Citizen CZ Smart joining Tag Heuer's Connected (2020), Montblanc's Summit 2 and Alpina's AlpinerX as another example of the traditional watch industry getting smartwatches right?

I wore it to find out.

design

The only question that really needs to be answered here is whether the CZ Smart looks and feels like a Citizen watch. Yes, but not as much as some of the brand's more well-known models, and you probably need to be familiar with the Citizen line of diving watches to see the family connection. The shape and design of the bezel are reminiscent of the Promaster Diver range, as are the guards around the crown. However, to most casual watchers, it looks like any other smartwatch and may even be confused with the Fossil Garrett HR.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Here is the problem. I really like the style of the CZ Smart, but it's just not citizen enough and a problem that persists in the software. Citizen hasn't used its selection of incredibly recognizable watch face designs for various watch faces either, offering only a handful of more commonplace watch faces to choose from. Why is there no view of the eye-catching Skyhawk or the unusual satellite wave? Tag Heuer gets this aspect right, offering a wide range of dial designs that match the brand or are part of collections designed by ambassadors. There's really no reason Citizen couldn't have done the same.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It's unfortunate that the CZ Smart is no longer bourgeois as the watch looks great on the wrist. The bezel is thin, the blue color gives it character, the 46mm case is made of stainless steel and feels of very high quality. Gorilla glass is placed over the screen for protection. The 22 m long blue silicone strap is very comfortable and should also be very durable. It does have a plastic bottom, however, which is a little unfortunate. While very similar to the Fossil Garrett HR, it looks a lot more mature and feels better built too.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Citizen likely relied on partnering with Fossil to produce the CZ Smart. The couple announced some time ago that they would be working together on hybrid smartwatch technology. However, given the presence of the Fossil wellness app and the pre-installation of Spotify, this certainly seems to be a product of that partnership too. It's not a bad thing, Fossil is working on smartwatches with a lot of brands including Diesel, Micheal Kors, and Skagen. It knows what it is doing.

Citizen cz smart smartwatch review wrist dashboard face "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-wrist-dashboard - face-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAAABACitizen & # 39; s Dashboard Watch Face Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Citizen cz smart smartwatch review neo face "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-neo-face- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAACitizen & # 39; s Neo dial Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Citizen cz smart smartwatch review retro face "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-retro-face- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAACitizen & # 39; s retro dial Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Citizen CZ Smart looks great and is very comfortable, but it doesn't quite say "I'm wearing a Citizen Smartwatch" like it should, and it feels like a missed opportunity.

Screen and performance

The CZ Smart has a 1.28-inch AMOLED screen with a resolution of 416 x 416 pixels so it's very sharp, which makes me even sadder that there aren't many great standard Citizen watch faces to take advantage of . Inside is a Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor, not the newer Snapdragon Wear 4100 chip, which makes it technically out of date. Unfortunately, Citizen isn't the only one who is satisfied with the aging Snapdragon 3100 chip, as almost all other smartwatch manufacturers do.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Fortunately, it's not a performance disaster at all. Once you do the basics like tracking workouts, receiving notifications, and using apps, you can easily do the functions. It took a while, but the chip has been effectively optimized when it is tuned to 1GB of RAM along with the latest software and can be used perfectly every day. What it misses is the increased efficiency of the Snapdragon 4100. The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3's battery lasts at least three full days on a single charge, and the CZ Smart doesn't quite manage that.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

How does the battery compare? It's decent. With general daily use and just activity tracking with the wellness app, I got almost three work days by turning the clock off overnight. If you're following with Google Fit, streaming music, or using intense apps like Google Maps, it's just two business days. The watch charges quickly, with 80% charging in about 45 minutes and 100% charging in about 70 minutes.

While the CZ Smart isn't great, it has the power and battery life to do what I want a smartwatch to do every day.

Navigation and software

It's great to see that the CZ Smart already has the latest software update for Google Wear OS H-MR2 installed, which undoubtedly contributes to slightly better battery life and faster performance. It also introduces new features such as an adjustable time limit for the screen and a new weather tile.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

One of the most welcome features of the CZ Smart is the rotating crown, which makes it easy to navigate the Wear OS software. It should be a standard feature on all Wear OS smartwatches, but it isn't. Congratulations Citizen for adding it here. The guards around the crown make it less uncomfortable to turn your thumb as well. The buttons on either side of the crown activate Google Fit and the Citizen Watch Face app, but can be reconfigured.

Notifications for verification of the citizen smart watch "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn5.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-notifications-640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Citizen cz smart smartwatch review page wrist "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn6.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-side-wrist- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAAAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

Verification settings for Citizen Smart Smartwatch "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn7.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-settings-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Citizen cz smart smartwatch rating buckle "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn8.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/citizen-cz-smart-buckle-640x640.jpg " srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The CZ Smart delivers notifications from your phone with average reliability. This is what I expect from Wear OS in general, which is nowhere near as reliable in communicating with your phone as Apple's WatchOS. The CZ Smart has a speaker and microphone for making and receiving calls. This is always welcome. However, there is no 4G LTE connection so a connection to your phone is required. It's loud enough to have a conversation at home.

Fitness tracking

Fossil's wellness app is on board and promises to track basic activities – steps, sleep, calories, and exercise, without draining your battery too much. It suits the CZ Smart because I don't see it being worn by hardcore fitness fanatics, but by people who want to know how much (or how little) they are exercising. It's easy to use as everything is shown on one screen and only offers one indoor or outdoor exercise tracking option. It's quick and easy and suits my idea of ​​how the watch is worn. Google Fit is also available for anyone who wants more in-depth, data-intensive activity tracking.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

How is the CZ Smart when you are tracking activity? It is annoying that the software has to be optimized because the CZ Smart overestimates the number of steps many times over. After realizing that I was supposedly supposed to run a lot more than was possible when locked, I compared it to the Apple Watch Series 6. I found that the CZ Smart recorded 3,600 steps on a busy morning while the Apple Watch 2,500 steps counted.

While the heart rate monitor results have been consistent and I don't think anyone genuinely concerned about tracking fitness will look at this model, Citizen will have to fix the accuracy of the step count soon.

Price and availability

The Citizen CZ Smart costs and it is $ 395 available now from Amazon and via the Citizen online shop. There are three different models: The version shown here in blue and stainless steel, a stainless steel model with a black bracelet and a black / red bezel, and a black stainless steel version with a black metal link bracelet. All are at the same price.

Our opinion

The Citizen CZ Smart is a very good smartwatch for doing what I want every day. It's fast and the battery lasts longer than expected. It is also very well made and comfortable to wear. However, it comes to a crowded market with dozens of similar smartwatches that you can say the same about. So it's unfortunate that Citizen hasn't really used its brand name and watchmaking expertise to differentiate itself.

I wanted the CZ Smart to have the same draw as buying a Skyhawk A-T, but instead it's like buying another Wear OS smartwatch from the past few years and because of that, this is a missed opportunity. The citizen could really have taken control of the watchmaker / smartwatch area here.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. If you want a smartwatch for your Android phone, we recommend the Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3. It may not be the best looking watch you can buy, but it is the most technologically advanced Wear OS smartwatch right now. The Snapdragon 4100 chip goes well with Mobvoi's unusual dual-screen design to get the most out of the battery and provide plenty of performance.

If you own an iPhone and are looking for a smartwatch, the Apple Watch Series 6 or Apple Watch SE are for you. It's not often that an Apple product can be called a bargain, but when compared to the $ 395 Citizen CZ Smart, the $ 279 Apple Watch SE in particular offers great value. Relationship.

The other watch to consider is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3. The software is easier to use and more attractive than Google's Wear operating system. The rotating bezel simplifies navigation. Due to the citizen's high price for the CZ Smart, it directly competes with all of these smartwatches, with some being offered at much lower prices.

How long it will take?

Like all good smartwatches, the Citizen CZ Smart will last at least two years before you can replace it. The Snapdragon 3100 chip is already old, however, and when at some point more models with the Snapdragon 4100 hit the market, smartwatches that use the old platform will really feel their age. However, smartwatches do not have the same power requirements as smartphones. So, if you keep doing the same things with the watch as you always have, this makes a good companion.

Due to the stainless steel housing, the gorilla glass and the water resistance of 3ATM, the CZ Smart should be very durable. The 22mm armband is thick and sturdy and can also be easily replaced due to the 22mm size and quick release pins.

Should you buy it?

Sadly no. There are better, more up-to-date smartwatches available at lower prices. The unfortunate thing here is if the CZ Smart really looked and felt like a citizen watch, the verdict might have been different.

Editor's recommendations




05 Jan
Blog

Savant X2 Remote Control Review: Easy to Use, Great Looks

Savant x2 Remote Review Pro screen on

"There is no better remote control for the Savant Smart Home control."

  • Nice aluminum design

  • Big touch screen

  • Solid keys with a satisfactory click / feel

  • Faster response time

  • Two programmable buttons

  • Requires frequent charging

  • No DVR button

Smart home tech is everywhere. Once a thriving tech sector, there are now more brands, ecosystems. and A.I. Integrations than you can shake a stick. This is great news for home improvement, but bad news for large smart home integrators who now need to act quickly to ensure their systems are compatible with all of these new brands and devices while remaining relevant to consumers.

When you have decided on a professional, integrated smart home system, there are only three big brands to consider: Control4, which has the most third party partners in the field; Crestron, the old installer favorite that has proven very reliable but has less innovative third-party partners; and the new favorite, Savant, which is rapidly gaining popularity with installers as the focus is on beautiful interface and hardware design, as well as a growing list of third-party providers in the field.

A couple of years ago we decided to test two of these systems in some of Digital Trends' “test houses”, which included my personal home (as convenient as I know). I chose Savant because I loved the beauty and simplicity of the user interface and the sleek design of the hardware. With Savant you have the option of using your own tablet or phone to operate the Savant software or one of several Savant devices such as Savant Touch, wall keyboards or remote controls. You can even use the Google Assistant or Amazon Alexa to control basic scenes.

Savant x2 remote control review per page of 2

Savant x2 remote control review Savan Pro profile

Of all of these options, I personally prefer using a remote control to access the system. Unlike my phone, remote controls have dedicated buttons and are easier to use.

Compared to the larger remote controls from Control4 or Crestron, it was clear that I would forego the interface functionality for a more minimalist hardware design. I would have to use my tablet or phone to access more detailed settings and functions of the system. This is something to think about when choosing Savant. The system is easy to use, but if you want custom, detailed settings and access, it may not be for you.

In order to use Savant Pro Remote X2, I had to update my host software to Savant 9.3.2. If you have an older Savant operating system, you can spend even more money upgrading your system to take advantage of the latest hardware and software features.

Here is a list of the devices associated with this setup:

  • TiVo Bolt DVR with Comcast cable card access (I wouldn't recommend a TiVo setup as I wasn't happy with it)
  • Two TiVo Mini are connected to the primary screw
  • Apple TV
  • Roku TV
  • Sony PlayStation 4
  • Microsoft Xbox One X.
  • Two Sony Blu-ray players
  • Three Savant music servers
  • Two Savant door stations
  • Amazon Alexa Dots / Echo
  • Luma camera system with SNAP NVR servers

Welcome improvements

Savant made a decision to simplify its system interface as much as possible – that is its value proposition and why you might choose it over its competitors. The entire system is controlled by the beautiful hardware. The Savant Pro Remote X2 is the flagship user interface. From a design perspective, I find that both old and new remote controls are equally attractive to look at – both have large, beautiful color displays, and I like the way they stand in their “cradle” docking stations. I don't think one design is particularly attractive than the other, but they are vastly different.

What I like about the older, first generation remote control is its matte black rubber finish and unconventional design – it's wide at the base and narrower at the top – which gives it a more artistic feel that sets it apart from any other remote on the market. I also like the big screen size and that it works like a TV remote first and then like a smart home remote.

Ian Bell / Digital Trends

Unfortunately there is a laundry list with things that are not important to me with the old remote control. The squishy buttons don't have a tactile click and sometimes force you to press the buttons multiple times before the system registers the action. The rubber cover on the remote started peeling off twice, forcing me to use the warranty twice to have it replaced. The old flagship remote also felt very slow and often showed a delay in the devices you wanted to control (as I understand the base of the old remote is connected to the system and the remote needed to communicate with the base). which then communicates with the host – not at all efficiently). The remote control battery life was also poor. I was lucky enough to work for two days before I had to put it back in the charging cradle. Eventually, the remote would occasionally lose connection with the host and wait a long time before trying to reconnect.

Better design

The new remote feels a bit heavier because of its aluminum body, and that's a good thing. You can also get the new remote in three different colors to match your home decor: rose gold ($ 1,200, jet black ($ 1,200), or space gray ($ 850). The X2 base station is great heavy and solid and uses a magnetic docking station to hold the remote in place while standing, this gives the remote and dock a very impressive presence with a beautiful design that calls for visibility.

Features of the Savant X2 remote control

Savant set out to fix the issues with the previous remote with its new Savant Pro Remote X2 and as far as I can tell it has accomplished that mission. The X2 is longer and slimmer, has an aluminum design and still retains the same large display. The buttons now have a solid click / feel and the button layout now includes new PG + and PG- buttons for your device manuals. There are also two buttons that can be custom programmed, or you can use one of the buttons to quickly activate an already set up scene. What is missing, however, is the DVR button, which I used a lot on the old remote control. You'll need to program one of the unnamed buttons to have direct access to your DVR guide if that's as important to you as it is to me.

To keep up with other remotes on the market, the X2 has built-in Siri voice control with Apple TV. It works when you know how to use Siri, but it's a nuisance if you don't take the time to learn Siri. The same applies to Alexa or any other hardware or software controlled by A.I. Do yourself a favor and take the time to learn how to use this feature.

Setup and use

In my testing, I found that the new Savant Pro Remote X2 is significantly faster in accessing my TV and other devices. The delay I experienced earlier seems to have completely disappeared. I found that when setting up the new remote and inserting it into the system, I didn't need to connect the charging cradle to the system, but rather that the remote connected directly to the system via Wi-Fi setup is much easier – this probably explains too the lack of delay. The Savant REM-1000 (BLE) remote control that came with my host, for example, still has to be connected via the docking station and is noticeably slower.

Ian Bell / Digital Trends

Switching between different functions like controlling a camera system and accessing a music server is intuitive – I only got lost occasionally, usually when jumping back and forth between too many screens. I found the remote to really stand out from the previous remote by controlling devices with an IR repeater. With the previous generation remote control, the delay here was unbearable for me. Controlling my Apple TV or Roku TV is now very easy and intuitive, as buttons such as "Menu", "Info" and "Instructions" are perfectly assigned.

Some things to watch out for

Not everything is perfect with the Savant X2 remote. I'm using a TiVo DVR setup for my home and wish I had either stayed with Comcast or investigated other options. Sometimes it takes a while for my TiVo device to go out of sleep mode, which causes my Savant system to time out and for example the TV to go blank. The workaround is to restart the scene activation. The good news is that this only happens after I have stopped using TiVo for a while. Is it the remote's fault? Or the savant system? Or TiVo? I'm not sure, and every technician I ask answers this question differently. Update 12/30/2020: Savants representative said that I should be able to go into the Tivo settings and adjust the time of sleep so that this doesn't happen. You can also let your integrator set a user-defined “trigger” that triggers a number of menu commands to activate the device. Problem solved.

The battery life is still not fantastic. I'd say you're lucky enough to be able to use it for 2.5 days before you have to dock the remote to charge. If you're like me and have moved from a regular consumer system on two AA batteries that lasted six months to a fancy remote control like this one with a color screen, set your expectations accordingly. This remote control is basically a small PC with a display that draws battery juice. If you combine this with a battery icon that is not on the main display but on a sub screen and you quickly forget to check the X2's battery life, have your phone ready as a backup control unit. Among other things, you can adjust the settings for the alarm sensitivity and the time at which the display is switched off. Both of these settings should help you extend the battery life, although I still found the X2 to be too sensitive on the lowest setting. When the remote control sits on a sofa cushion and a dog jumps on the sofa, the screen comes back to life!

One remote control to control them all and anyone can control them

I'm a huge car fanatic and one of the things I've always found funny is how some people complain that a luxury car doesn't have memory presets saved for the passenger seats – but even if they're saved there, hardly anyone uses them. The same applies to remote controls such as the Savant Pro Remote X2. It supports several user profiles in which you can save your channels and favorite scenes and thus control several rooms. I've spent a lot of time creating profiles, scenes, etc. for the family, but the truth is, they hardly remember changing profiles. And if you don't have a family of engineers who will appreciate those extra features, I recommend making the primary profile (yours?) As compatible as possible with everyone else in your family. For example, when you add your partner and children's favorite channels to the remote control, you are probably good to go.

Ian Bell / Digital Trends

While controlling multiple rooms with a single remote is a cool idea, I would recommend either installing Lutron custom scene light switches or using a tablet or your phone for rooms that aren't being used much. Otherwise you will be walking around with a remote control in your pocket, which will frustrate the other users in your household. Savant recently released its own lighting solution that competes with Lutron. It offers a range of cool options like WRGB full color, adjustable LED and even a special daylight mode that syncs with your daily rhythm. I would recommend considering the Savant lighting product when planning your smart home design so that you can compare it to others on the market.

Our opinion

If you are purchasing a new Savant system for your home and are considering adding the Pro Remote X2 or using your phone / tablet for control, do yourself a favor and buy the remote control. It's not cheap, but it's easy to use and looks amazing.

On the other hand, if you have a previous generation Savant remote, you probably don't need to upgrade unless you have money to burn and are fed up with the slow lag – something I can't stand. Keep in mind that you will need to update your host software in order for the X2 to work and this will add even more to the cost.

Is there a better alternative?

For a Savant system, there really is no other option outside of your own phone and other Savant remotes.

How long it will take?

Given that it has been in use for a few months, I'd say the aluminum design is tough enough to ensure a long life. The buttons on the X2 remote are so general that they can be used universally for any new device you add to the system. At the same time, the remote doesn't have any super-specific buttons for Savant OS 9 – which means the developers intended to use this remote for a long time. Savant grants a two-year warranty on the Pro Remote X2, which is above the industry average for a product of this type.

Should you buy it?

You have already spent a lot of money on a savant system. If you don't, you are buying a Porsche without a real steering wheel – you need it to get top performance.

Editor's recommendations




07 Nov
Blog

Amazfit GTR 2 Review: Great Value Fitbit Challenger

amazfit gtr 2 evaluation bag

"The Amazfit GTR 2 smartwatch is nice and fast, but luckily not very expensive. It has the looks and the ability to take over more expensive activity trackers from the big names."

  • Nice design

  • Low price

  • Comfortable to wear day and night

  • Solid features for recreational activities and sleep tracking

  • Some software improvements are still needed

  • Battery life suffers when many functions are used

It would be difficult for any smartwatch to remove the top-of-the-line Apple Watch Series 6 from my wrist, but that's exactly what the Amazfit GTR 2 did, and it has stayed there for more than a week. It costs $ 179Half of what a Series 6 will set you back, which looks like great value, but the brand has a spotty history with their software that made me very wary.

My fears were unfounded as it turns out that the Amazfit GTR 2 could be one of the best budget smartwatch purchases of the year.

Design and screen

There are two new Amazfit smartwatches, the GTR 2 and the GTS 2. I wore the round GTR 2, which looks much better than the square, Apple Watch-like GTS 2. I assume that Amazfit has it in its range because it's smaller, the size might fit smaller wrists than the GTR 2, but I think the tiny style hurts both them and the Amazfit range. The GTR 2 is my choice of the couple.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The round, light aluminum housing of the GTR 2 was judged perfectly in terms of design and feel. It's only 10mm thick, the aluminum is attached to a plastic case back, and the glass above the screen has a subtle curve that blends into the case itself, making wiping convenient and quick. It's attached to a quick release silicone strap that is soft and won't get hot and sweaty. There are two buttons, the top of which is decorated with a sporty red stripe, which have a pleasant movement when pressed.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

I've worn the GTR 2 day and night and it didn't cause any discomfort. Back to the glass: The shape gives the GTR 2 a certain class, as the curve captures the light in such a way that it appears much more curved than it actually is. Under the glass is a 1.39-inch AMOLED screen with a resolution of 454 x 454 pixels. It's as sharp and colorful as the technical data suggests. It's pretty "deep" under the tempered glass, which means that in certain lighting conditions the bezel will be obvious.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Other than black, I'd like some alternative colors, but the GTR 2 is a brilliant looking, well-made, and comfortable smartwatch.

software

Here Amazfit has made the greatest progress. This is particularly evident when we compare the GTR 2 to the company's previous smartwatches. The rugged Amazfit T Rex and Amazfit GTS were awkward and tedious to set up, the user interface was inconsistent and often not intuitive, and I had issues with notifications and usability. The software has been a huge downside, and when a smartwatch is difficult or frustrating to use it is quickly forgotten.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It looks a lot better with the GTR 2. Amazfit has renamed its companion app, which is now called Zepp. It looks better, is more informative, and more reliable. It's available for iOS and Android, and I've used it on an Android phone. On the watch, things are pretty much the same as before, but with greater speed and ease of use due to some general UI improvements.

A good example of how things have been improved is the way you switch watch faces. These were previously synchronized via the associated app. This process could take a few minutes. Now it immediately runs like an Apple Watch or Wear OS watch, and many of the watch faces have customizable complications. There's a new screen that always appears, and software updates are much faster than before, too. Overall, the watch and app are solid improvements over previous efforts and are easy to live with every day.

amazfit gtr 2 verification activity face "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-activity-face-640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

amazfit gtr 2 rating dials "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-watch-faces-640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

amazfit gtr 2 verification settings "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-settings-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Unfortunately, the notifications haven't improved dramatically. While I've received more regular notifications on the GTR 2 than on the Amazfit T Rex I used earlier this year, you can't interact with any of them, and the text that appears is often jumbled and misaligned. It could be a lot better, but what's there is manageable provided your expectations are low. On the upside, the GTR 2's software is pleasantly responsive and reduces frustration, while the menus and options are clearly laid out and meaningful, making it easy to use on the wrist.

The Amazfit GTR 2 can also receive calls – the speaker is loud enough for callers to be easily heard indoors – and store music. The Amazfit software cannot challenge WatchOS 7 on the Apple Watch and does not look as mature or fluid as the Wear OS. However, it does mate with other portable platforms available such as Huawei and Honor software and Fitbit's platform. What I need from software on a wearable is reliability, clarity and ease of use, and the Amazfit GTR 2 delivers.

Activity tracking

The Amazfit GTR 2 is a relatively simple activity tracker. There are 12 training modes including indoor and outdoor cycling, climbing and swimming. Each provides a lot of data, with cadence measurement on the treadmill as well as train speed and distance when swimming. The watch also has GPS for on the go.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The latest activities are displayed on the watch and also in the Zepp app. There you get the usual data – time, distance and calorie consumption – as well as other information from the heart rate sensor. The breakdown shows the time it takes for fat burning, aerobics, and endurance zones. The watch also uses the Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) metric, which makes it easy to see if you are getting enough exercise.

The Amazfit GTR 2 has a heart rate sensor, a blood oxygen monitor (Sp02) and a stress measurement. The heart rate monitor matched the results from my Apple Watch Series 6, but the Sp02 results were always very different. This is not evidence that one is more accurate than the other, but rather a statement about the usefulness and accuracy of blood oxygen measurements on your wrist in general.

amazfit gtr 2 review training "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn5.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-training-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

amazfit gtr 2 verification exercise "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn6.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-exercise-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

amazfit gtr 2 review spo2 "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn7.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-spo2-640x640.jpg "srcset = "https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

amazfit gtr 2 assessment heart rate "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn8.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/amazfit-gtr-2-heart-rate-640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Sp02, heart rate and stress measurement (determined with the heart rate sensor) can be carried out automatically if necessary and is also used to track sleep. The GTR 2 is comfortable enough to be worn at night. The sleep data it contains is more comprehensive than that of the Apple Watch and is more closely related to the informative TruSleep system from Huawei.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Problems? Some things from the old model have not yet been fixed. The motion alerts do not pay attention to what you are doing. For example, I was often asked to stand up and move around while driving. And I've noticed that some localization still needs to be done, as scanning the screens occasionally revealed a Chinese language that was still there. I would have preferred a few more training modes instead of using the free yoga training mode, for example.

The workout modes have been made easier to use, with a clear display during the session and a swipe of the screen to exit. However, the live reporting of data is incorrect and significantly delayed compared to an Apple Watch Series 6. It also appears that the GTR 2's display isn't updating as often as it should. For my basic training and activity tracking needs, the GTR 2 worked very well, although it can't compete with hardcore fitness smartwatches like the Suunto 7.

battery

According to Amazfit, the 471 mAh battery usually lasts 14 days between charges, but when the heart rate and SpO2 measurement is automatic and the screen is always on, that value has dropped to just eight days for me. The workouts I tracked did not use GPS. So expect another hit when using this feature.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Charging from 10% to full took about two hours and is done via a magnetic plug attached to the back of the watch. It's pretty safe and shouldn't slip off accidentally.

Price and availability

The Amazfit GTR 2 is priced at $ 179 in the US.. In the UK it costs £ 159. It's available for pre-order now and is expected to be released on November 20th. The model tested here is the sport. A classic version with a stainless steel case and leather strap is also available for $ 199. Amazfit offers a one-year warranty as well as a 30-day satisfaction guarantee.

Our opinion

The price of the Amazfit GTR 2 at $ 179 is very tempting, and its design and functionality are far better than you can expect for the money. Amazfit has cured many of the software gremlins that made its older wearables unsustainable, giving us a smart, stylish, and well-made alternative to boring fitness bands and ugly smartwatches from Fitbit.

Is there a better alternative?

The price of the Amazfit GTR of $ 179 is very affordable. If the Fitbit name entices you, the Fitbit Versa 3 Watch costs $ 229, while a Fitbit Charge 4 fitness band starts at $ 149 and performs best when you buy Fitbit's premium monthly subscription for 10 Pay US dollars. A simple Garmin Vivomove 3S costs $ 199 and doesn't have a full touchscreen. The GTR 2 is cheaper than these examples.

We recommend spending a little more and getting a better all-round smartwatch experience. Apple is still selling the Apple Watch Series 3, which starts at $ 199, and it holds up admirably against the much more expensive Apple Watch SE. Right now there are some great deals on the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2, available for $ 179 and up. Both models are older models but the overall software and owner experience is better than the Amazfit GTR 2.

How long it will take?

This is not a sturdy watch, but the tempered glass should keep it safe if handled well. It is waterproof to 50 meters and is suitable for swimming. The 22mm bracelet has quick release pins so it can be easily changed if it breaks or gets dirty in the future.

The duration is mainly influenced by software updates on the watch as well as by the app itself. There is no reason to believe these are drying out, however, and my review watch has already received an update. Another is expected in the near future that will add Amazon Alexa support. Unless you get bored of the design, the GTR 2 should last at least a couple of years.

Should you buy it?

Yes it is way better than the low price and the previous Amazfit smartwatches would have you believe.

Editor's recommendations




06 Oct
Blog

Dell S2721QS Review: 4K Basics At A Great Price

Dell S2721QS

"The S2721QS from Dell is a simple, no-frills 4K monitor with excellent build quality and an excellent warranty."

  • Excellent workmanship

  • 3 year advance guarantee

  • Clear 4K picture

  • Accurate colors

  • Inconspicuous connectivity

  • Basic equipment

  • Not a lot of bandwidth for photo editors

Dell's 27-inch USB-C monitor is a good buy at around $ 400 – but what if you don't care about USB-C and want a sharper image? For this audience, Dell developed the S2721QS, which offers a 4K IPS panel and simple connectivity for practically the same price. In fact, it's currently reduced to just $ 340, making it one of the more budget-friendly 4K monitors out there. But is it good enough to make our list of best monitors?

design

The Dell S2721QS comes in a large, slim white box. As you unpack, you will be greeted as usual with one of Dell's excellent stands. This has a slightly different design than the P- and U-series monitors, with the back of the foot rounded and the sides angled inward. It's also lighter in color and the neck has a more slender profile than before.

The height, tilt, and rotation settings in portrait mode are valued by home office users as they enable healthy posture

You lose the swivel function on the stand, but that's not a huge loss at the price, and you keep the great height adjustment, tilt and rotation to portrait – the most important options. As the monitor is designed for use in the (home) office, these adjustments are particularly appreciated as they help you maintain a healthy posture.

The rest of the display is inconspicuous. Boring, but not bad. The back of the monitor is made of durable white plastic, which makes the monitor look like a giant piece of chiclet chewing gum. It looks professional, has slim bezels on the top and sides of the display, and fits in most homes and offices.

However, if you're looking for something a bit more stylish, then you must check out Dell's ultra-thin S2719DC instead.

Connections and controls

At that price, of course, concessions have to be made, and those are additional features. The Dell S2721QS is a monitor and little more. It has two HDMI inputs and a DisplayPort connection. You won't find any USB-C connectivity here, nor a built-in USB hub or any other luxury. The only extra is the inclusion of built-in speakers. They're nondescript and sound thin, but they make a sound loud enough to be heard. So this is a win.

The OSD in the Dell S2721QS offers a fair number of options for a monitor of this type, but some are missing. The OSD is unusually pixelated for a 4K monitor. It has brightness and contrast controls, PiP settings (picture-in-picture), RGB color adjustments, sharpness, response time settings and much more. What is missing? We found that there is no way to adjust the white point temperature, which by default deviates a little towards the cold side. This adjustment is common even with monitors at this price.

With the buttons below, the OSD is always within reach, although in practice you rarely, if ever, have to get involved.

picture quality

Since Dell's S2721QS doesn't score high on features, you can see how the image quality affects it.

With a 4K IPS panel (3840 x 2160 pixels), it offers an incredibly sharp picture, especially when you consider that it gives you that resolution at a diagonal size of only 27 inches. You'll have to rely heavily on Windows screen scaling, which doesn't work too well, but that's not the monitor's fault (macOS image scaling works better). 4K video, pictures, and general usage look extremely sharp, but older programs may look small or blurry. Even so, you'll only find a sharper image on Apple's 27-inch iMac 5K or a 24-inch 4K monitor.

Dell's numbers indicate a brightness of 350 nits and a static contrast ratio of 1300: 1. Our tests showed that the monitor is capable of exceeding these brightness levels and hitting almost 400 nits, in contrast, at 790: 1, it's a bit disappointing. After calibration, it improved to 940: 1.

Since the S2721QS from Dell offers 4K resolution on a 27-inch panel, the image is extremely sharp

Dell claims 99% coverage of sRGB storage space, which is what you should expect from most midrange monitors. Our tests confirmed this number, and we also measured 76% AdobeRGB coverage and 82% of DCI-P3 storage space. If you only use this monitor for internet browsing and basic office tasks, it will work just fine.

You need to look for a full color gamut monitor like the Acer ConceptD CM2 if you need anything for color grading in photography and video editing, or you risk cropping – a phenomenon where colors may appear correct to you when you are at the end of your monitor's gamut, but look more intense on someone else's display or in print.

Gaming performance

Why is there a segment here for gaming performance? This is not sold as a gaming monitor. However, Dell has equipped the S2721QS with Adaptive Sync technology, which is based on AMD's Freesync, and in our tests we also confirmed G-Sync support for Nvidia cards.

The 60Hz refresh rate won't make you the most competitive player on the online battlefields, but adaptive sync will take care of the tearing and some stuttering. Of course, the 4K resolution means you'll need a ton of GPU grunt to get anywhere near the 60Hz refresh rate. Due to the adaptive synchronization, frame rates between 30 and 60 frames per second should still appear fluid thanks to uniform image stimulation. In other words, you'll have a clearer and more consistent experience than without FreeSync or G-Sync support.

Of course, for a more playful monitor, check out 144Hz displays like the Razer Raptor 27. Note, however, that you will likely have to sacrifice resolution to get a higher refresh rate, as most monitors offer 1440p or 1080p resolution at around 60Hz. This Dell can be useful for gamers who prefer extreme image quality over high frame rates, as it delivers a razor-sharp and attractive image.

Our opinion

If you are looking for a solid 4K monitor at an affordable price, the Dell S2721QS is probably the one for you. Apart from the sharpness, it is not outstanding in any area, but more than sufficient for everyday use. It delivers a clean, crisp image with no major imperfections to distract you.

This monitor also has great build quality with a solid range of ergonomic options. Think of this as Dell's entry-level option for a 4K monitor while maintaining great materials quality and warranty and you are on the right track.

Are there alternatives?

Absolutely. If you're not interested in the elaborate stand or material quality, LG offers a 27-inch 4K IPS monitor with similar specs for significantly less. LG also has the 27BL85U, which comes similarly outfitted with an equally impressive stand for roughly the same price, and this one includes USB-C. If you're looking for something in this format and resolution, but with a wider color gamut for photo work, the Dell U2720Q may be better for you, albeit at a higher price.

How long it will take?

The Dell S2721QS should have a lifespan of at least five years, of which Dell covers three years with an advance replacement warranty. This means that in the event of a disaster, the company will send you a new (refurbished) monitor first and then let you return the old one after you are set up.

Should I buy it?

Yes. If you want a simple, no-frills 4K display, you can't go wrong with the Dell S2721QS.

Editor's recommendations




27 Sep
Blog

Blink Indoor Review: Can’t Handle the Great Indoors

Flashing indoor on the table

"Despite its name, the Blink Indoor just doesn't cut it to handle the interior of the home."

  • Battery life of up to two years

  • Live playback limited to 30 seconds

  • A wired power source is optional

  • Very simple motion detection trigger

At the beginning of this year, the surveillance camera manufacturer Blink released the Blink Mini to expand its portfolio. This is certainly a step in a new direction as it was the company's first indoor camera following the success of its Blink XT outdoor cameras.

Now we're getting another indoor camera with the aptly named Blink Indoor, which looks very similar to its sibling – the Blink Outdoor. Compared to the Mini, the Blink Indoor is priced higher at $ 80 and is billed as a wireless solution. When the Blink Mini sells for $ 35, are you ready to pay the premium?

Lots of similarities

Place the Blink Indoor and Blink Outdoor cameras side by side and it will be difficult to tell them apart. From their square plastic design to being powered by two AA lithium batteries, they have a lot in common. The only difference, however, is that the back cover on the Blink Indoor does not have the same weatherproof cover. And, oh yes, the indoor is available in white while the outdoor is available in black. You can also use the Blink outdoor camera indoors if you want. However, you cannot use the indoor camera outdoors as it is not weatherproof.

Flashing indoor on the counterJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

On the technical side, it's exactly like the Blink Outdoor, which in itself is similar to the previous Blink XT2 camera. It offers 1080p video recording, up to 30 frames per second, infrared night vision, and the same 110 degree field of view. The narrow field of view is still limited compared to the 140 degree range of the Ring Indoor Cam. However, if you want to monitor the entrances in the house, it is enough if you collect important information.

Since the Blink Outdoor has the same specs, its performance is no different. The 1080p video it produces is passable and clear enough to see scenes, but fine details are difficult to see. It suffers from its dynamic range and often blows out the highlights. Night vision holds up with its range of around 25 feet, but it's rather soft.

Limitations with live view

Due to its battery life, the Blink Indoor has a relatively brief live view when accessing the camera directly through the app – and that's a problem. If you access the live view, you will receive a smidgen over 30 seconds before the disconnection. I thought there was an option to customize, but there isn't. Once that 30 second mark is reached, a button will appear on the screen asking if you want to continue. Of course, you can press it after every 30 second mark, but that's a pain.

Interestingly, you can actually firmly connect the Blink Indoor to a power source because there is an exposed micro-USB port on the back. However, even with constant power supply, the live view is still limited to around 30 seconds. There are also controls for the sensitivity of the motion detection as well as the ability to set up motion zones to reduce false alarms. Speaking of which, it lacks advanced peer detection like person or pet detection, which will help reduce false positives.

Less of an indoor camera

As mentioned earlier, the Blink Mini was released as the company's first indoor camera solution earlier this year. However, the Blink Indoor Camera behaves more like an outdoor camera than an indoor camera, especially when it includes the same wall bracket as the Blink Outdoor. Because of this, when you put it on a table or countertop, you cannot articulate it for different angles.

Flash inside the cameraJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

Let's talk about the battery life. It's neat that the battery can last up to two years, but the app does a terrible job of showing you the remaining battery life. Instead of a percentage or a bar, the app only shows a vague "OK" after almost a week. Of course, battery life mainly depends on how often it is triggered. There is the option of plugging it into a power source, but making it more difficult that no cable is offered in the box.

Our opinion

There is only a $ 20 difference between Blink Outdoor and Indoor, with the main difference being the weatherproof construction of the former. At $ 80, the Blink Indoor is a tough sell as it has limited real-time streaming of video and lacks the advanced features of its contemporaries.

How long it will take?

The all-plastic construction makes it light, but still feels solid to withstand small drops. If it is defective, it is backed by a 1 year limited warranty.

Is there a better alternative?

While video quality is no different, given its $ 35 cost, the cheaper Blink Mini is a better buy. You're sure to save money and don't have to worry about live streaming restrictions.

Alternatively, the Eufy Indoor Cam 2K Pan and Tilt is an excellent offer. With tons of features, including 360-degree coverage. The Ring Indoor Cam is also a good choice at $ 60. It offers person recognition to reduce false alarms and integration into the ring ecosystem.

Should you buy it?

No. It lacks the need to turn it into a functional indoor camera and it is more expensive than much more powerful counterparts.

Editor's recommendations




25 Sep
Blog

Apple iPad 2020 (10.2-inch, 8th Gen) Review: Great for $329

Apple iPad 8th generation 2020 rating space gray 11

"When you need a tablet at a reasonable price, the iPad should be your first choice."

  • Exceptional software with long support

  • Great battery life

  • Colorful and clear display

  • Connects to a robust Apple ecosystem

  • 32 GB of basic memory is not enough

  • Single tinny speaker

  • Still flash, not USB-C

In the technology world, “iPad” is just as general a word as “Kleenex”. As Apple's iPad product range was expanded to include the Air and Pro models, a basic iPad was retained to anchor the group. It's just the iPad. No year, no generation, no name. It's for people who go online or go to a store and say, "I want to buy an iPad today." You can have one for just $ 329.

This is Apple's 2020 iPad – the 8th generation for those who count. It's the perfect tablet for people who just want a computing device.

Hardware, display and design

Apple introduced a brand new design with the iPad Pro line and brought this design along with a beautiful new color palette to the new iPad Air. It hasn't yet achieved the economies of scale that are supposed to be included in Apple's cheap iPad – this looks and feels the same as the last few iPads. What is there to say that hasn't been repeated in years? Apple has perfected this design.

The aluminum plate has a perfectly flat back, pleasantly curved sides and a small bevel that fits perfectly on the front glass. There is no such thing as thriving. It's simply a portal to iPadOS 14. It's an appliance no different from your toaster or Keurig.

The 10.2-inch display is a step down from the iPad Air, but not in its 2160 x 1620 resolution, which produces the same density as the Air. However, you will find that this is not a laminated display. There is a visible gap between the screen and the glass cover that is different from the iPad Air, iPad Pro and any modern smartphone.

Despite this shortcoming, the screen's colors and clarity are superb, and you will only see the gap at certain viewing angles. The maximum brightness is stated as 500 nits, which is sufficient – although I have always set the brightness to 100% outdoors. The lack of lamination can cause problems outdoors, which are more reflective in daylight than most tablets.

If you don't spend a lot of time outdoors, you'll love this display.

I don't really have anything against the old-school iPad's circular Touch ID sensor for functionality, but it feels dated compared to other alternatives like a built-in fingerprint sensor or the sensor built into the side of the iPad Air on the power button. I bet this will be the last iPad with the Touch ID button.

And I hope when the switch is made the screen bezels will shrink too because they look weird. Bezels are useful for holding the tablet without touching the screen, but they don't have to be that big.

The iPad sits comfortably at 1.08 pounds and the weight is well distributed. However, you will be reminded of the age of this design again as it is heavier than the iPad Air and iPad Pro, both of which offer dramatically more features and larger displays. Regardless, it's easy to hold up the tablet with one hand in portrait mode or with two hands while watching a long video.

However, when it comes to audio, video falls short. There is only one speaker on one side, which can be easily covered by your hand and is quite thin. The back is also slippery. If you'd like to help them for an expanded display or input, you'll need Apple's tri-fold Smart Cover – that will bring you back a cool $ 50.

Software, features and battery life

iOS 14 is the biggest change to iPhone software in years, but the same can't be said for iPadOS 14. The iPad benefits the most from moving to iOS 14, as notifications and warnings don't cover the entire screen and there's a new Spotlight -Search interface. That being said, it's effectively iPadOS 13.

Perhaps the biggest new feature is Scribble, which lets you use Apple Pencil to recognize handwriting to text through the user interface. This of course requires a $ 99 accessory and is a whole different discussion.

Unfortunately, iOS 14's app library isn't here, so you can no longer manually manage the pages of apps and folders, which now seems archaic. You also have nowhere to move widgets anywhere on the home screen, which I consider a massive oversight. However, you can pin the widget area to the left third of the main home screen in landscape orientation.

Multitasking remains complicated – there's a lot of power here, but it's hard to spot and seemingly impossible to master. There's an awkward dance of gestures to bring up apps, use the split screen, and trigger floating windows with no hints of detectability – all you have to do is try things out.

iPadOS 14 seems simple, but it hides a steep learning curve for multitasking.

Apple probably knows that the typical basic iPad customer will multitask far less than those who buy an Air or Pro. However, don't let that stop you from making the most of it.

With the A12 Bionic processor and plenty of screen, there is a lot you can do when you dig into the depths of gesture controls for multitasking. And the iPad never skips a beat – with two or three apps at the same time, even with other apps in the background, it never misses a step. The iPad is clearly packed with specs to handle the high features and capabilities of an upcoming iPadOS 17, not 14.

The only place not ready for the future is storage. The base of 32 GB is simply not enough. After a few days, I had already used 23 GB – but luckily I ordered a 128 GB model. I suggest everyone do the same. It's just a shame Apple is hollowing you out for another $ 100 or 30% more to get it.

As expected, the battery life is fantastic. The 32 watt hour cell offers a long service life. Apple advertises its usual "10 hours of surfing the Internet or watching videos", which of course is by no means representative of the use of iPads. I used it a few hours a day for a full work week, keeping up with a mix of any kind of light load from social media apps, email, and messaging, and YouTube and podcasts – and I didn't have to charge anything Once. The iPad is especially good at sitting idle for hours (or days) without using a noticeable amount of power. If you're not actively using it, the iPad won't go blank.

Unfortunately, along with the relics of design and the Touch ID sensor, the iPad continues to use Lightning for charging. Let's hope this is the last iPad to use the old port and that it will connect to every other iPad (and MacBook as well as Android phone) on USB-C. It's just so much better. At least the charger in the box is now USB-C on the wall side.

The iPad has a rear camera, but it might as well not. The 8 megapixel sensor is useful for taking photos of receipts or sending an explanatory message to a friend, but that's about it. The 1.2 megapixel front camera handles video calling tasks in the app of your choice (up to 720p). The quality is roughly equivalent to that of a laptop, but lags behind a modern telephone. The ease with which you can make a FaceTime call with loved ones is more important in many ways than the quality of the camera itself.

Our opinion

The 8th generation iPad isn't exciting, but it's an exceptional tablet for $ 329. Easy to learn and use, iPadOS 14 can be extremely powerful for multitasking and light productivity work if you spend time learning. The battery life is exceptional and the display is great for the money. The hardware looks and feels old, but it's incredibly effective – and most importantly, it's built to last a long time, both physically and in terms of internal specs.

To say that the iPad costs $ 329 is a misnomer, however. For that money, you only get 32GB of storage, which is not enough. You have to spend $ 429 to get 128GB. Ouch. Basically, you need a smart cover that every iPad needs. That's $ 50 more. So it's really a total package of $ 479.

But even at $ 429, it's impossible to find a better tablet experience. Yes, if you need a keyboard to turn an iPad into a work device, consider buying a Chromebook instead of a keyboard accessory for $ 159. If you are on a budget as a tablet, nothing better than the iPad can be done.

Are there any better alternatives?

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 is cheaper and of a similar size. But iPadOS is completely superior to Android on tablets, and the app selection is so far ahead that it deserves no comparison. The Tab A 10.1 is only a better choice if you are on a very tight budget and don't need the tablet other than just to surf and watch media.

If you need your iPad for work or school, there is a good argument why you shouldn't buy an iPad. Once you get the higher storage option and the Apple keyboard, you are well within the realm of buying a laptop. A Lenovo Chromebook Duet or an Asus Chromebook Flip are better choices, but then you have to miss out on the iPad app ecosystem.

How long it will take?

Apple has an exceptional track record of updating the software on its tablets. For example, iPadOS 14 will be available from 2017 through the 5th generation iPad. You are expected to receive at least three annual software updates for this iPad, and it is clear that there is enough internal hardware to run it.

The Lightning charging port and Touch ID sensor with a physical home button are areas that feel old faster. However, these are only a minimal part of the experience compared to being able to keep using the latest software and apps for years to come.

Should you buy it?

Yes. If you don't have the budget for an iPad Air and just need a basic tablet as a secondary device for casual use, there is no better choice than the iPad. Just be aware of the potential budget scare when looking to buy the 128GB model and a smart cover for it.

Editor's recommendations




1234