2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid First Drive Review
2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid first ride review: fashionably late
"A solid hybrid powertrain makes Honda’s popular CR-V crossover even better."
-
Nice to drive
-
Punchy acceleration
-
Spacious interior
-
Regenerative brake paddle shifters
-
Competitors get better mileage
-
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are not standard
The Honda CR-V, introduced in 1997, was one of the first crossover commercial vehicles. This made Honda a trendsetter in the 1990s. However, the automaker has fallen back on another important trend: hybrid drives. The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid is now in its second generation, and Ford has brought the Escape Hybrid back for the 2020 model year, while the Honda option has only just arrived.
The Honda CR-V Hybrid 2020 tries to make up for lost time. It adapts the two-engine hybrid system previously used in the Accord Hybrid and Insight and marks the first use of this system with all-wheel drive, which is standard in all equipment variants.
The base LX model starts at $ 28,870 – a $ 2,320 premium over a gasoline CR-V. Our test car was a touring model with a range of $ 37,070 or $ 1,225 over a CR-V touring gasoline engine.
Design and interior
You need a keen eye to see the difference between a CR-V hybrid and a gasoline model. Changes in the exterior design are limited to the blue emblem, a model-specific rear bumper that hides the exhaust, and LED fog lights in higher trim levels.
Automakers generally take one of two approaches to the exterior design of their crossovers, and the CR-V falls somewhere in the middle. While crossovers are essentially jacked-up cars, the temptation is to make them look sturdy and truck-like, as Toyota did with the RAV4. In contrast, the latest Ford Escape looks more like a car, almost like a Ford Focus when viewed through a Funhouse mirror. The CR-V is based on both playbooks. The upright profile and the imposing front section are truck-like, the slim headlights and the curved surfaces are more like a car. The result won't turn your head, but it looks good and should age well.
Stephen Edelstein / Digital Trends
The interior of the CR-V Hybrid is inexpensive compared to its competitors. The Honda has more rear legroom than the Ford Escape Hybrid and the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. The Ford offers more front legroom, and the it and Honda are virtually tied to headroom.
The Honda also offers more cargo space than the Toyota with built-in rear seats and the Ford with the rear seats folded down (Toyota doesn't give an amount when the rear seats are folded down). The Escape Hybrid has a sliding seat in the second row, which gives it a space advantage over the CR-V if the rear seats are available (but at the expense of leg room in the second row). The CR-V Hybrid also has less cargo space than a petrol CR-V because the battery sits under the cargo floor. The Honda has a low loading floor height, which makes getting in and out easier.
Technology, infotainment and driver assistance
A 7.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto is available, but not in the LX basic configuration. The touring phone charges the phone, but the charging pad is too small for some phones.
A digital instrument cluster contains hybrid-specific displays, e.g. B. A power meter that indicates whether the car uses a gasoline engine or an electric motor. The graphics for the instrument cluster are of high quality and easy to read, which cannot be said of the cheap looking graphics on the main touchscreen of the CR-V.
Stephen Edelstein / Digital Trends
The CR-V Hybrid comes standard with the Honda Sensing line of driver aids, which include autonomous emergency braking, forward collision warning, downhill departure, lane departure warning, lane departure warning and adaptive cruise control. The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid has a comparable selection of standard driver aids. The Ford Escape Hybrid has a standard lane departure warning system and autonomous emergency braking. However, adaptive cruise control is optionally available.
Ford and Toyota have no equivalent of the downhill Honda, which automatically steers the car back onto the road when a wheel crosses an outer lane marking. However, the RAV4 Hybrid has standard traffic sign recognition, and the Escape Hybrid has post-collision braking to prevent a car from rolling against other objects after a collision.
Experience behind the wheel
The drive train of the CR-V Hybrid consists of a 2.0-liter four-cylinder petrol engine that works with Honda's two-engine hybrid system. One electric motor drives the wheels, while the other acts as a generator and gains energy from regenerative braking and from the petrol engine. The gas engine only drives the wheels directly if the system considers this to be the most efficient.
The total system performance is 212 horsepower and 232 pound-feet of torque. This is more than a conventional CR-V or a Ford Escape Hybrid. The RAV4 Hybrid has 219 hp; Toyota does not specify a torque number.
Since the petrol engine is not coupled to the wheels most of the time, the Honda system has a special feature. The engine speed does not always correspond to your acceleration or driving speed. Honda improved this with the CR-V Hybrid, and we found that the engine didn't seem to cry as much at low speeds as the Honda Insight. The transition between petrol and electrical energy feels even more linear with the Escape Hybrid and RAV4 Hybrid.
The CR-V Hybrid is simply beautiful to drive.
Apart from that, the CR-V Hybrid felt great. It's not fast, but the electric motor offers a helpful torque boost when starting stops. The ride is quieter than the competing CUVs from Ford and Toyota, and the interior is quiet. The shift paddles that control regenerative braking were helpful. We could slow the car down without touching the brake pedal, much like shifting down in a manual transmission car.
Like the standard CR-V, the hybrid uses a mechanical all-wheel drive system with a drive shaft that connects the front engine to the rear axle. Ford did the same with the Escape Hybrid, but the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid uses a second electric motor for the rear wheels, with no physical connection to the front wheels. Mechanical all-wheel drive is cheaper, Honda told Digital Trends, and it is unlikely that most drivers will notice the difference under normal conditions. But what about abnormal conditions?
Stephen Edelstein / Digital Trends
Honda and Toyota boast that their hybrid crossovers can be used off-road and claim that their respective all-wheel drive systems are key. At the start of the CR-V Hybrid, Honda let us drive around a sand pit in both the CR-V and the RAV4 Hybrid. Sure enough, the CR-V did better. The RAV4 Hybrid tumbled awkwardly on the track when its electronics clicked and buzzed in protest. The CR-V Hybrid also has more ground clearance and better approach and departure angles than the RAV4 Hybrid, making it less likely to hit obstacles.
However, we had no opportunity to test the CR-V Hybrid on a more traditional off-road trail, as we did when the RAV4 started. Of course, neither of them can keep up with the skills of real off-roaders like the Jeep Wrangler and the Toyota 4Runner. Crossovers like CR-V and RAV4 are not designed for serious off-roading. But if you are ever on the run from Tusken Raiders, the CR-V Hybrid has your back.
Fuel consumption and security
The real reason to buy a hybrid is mileage, and in this area the CR-V lags behind its rivals. The Honda is rated 38 mpg combined (35 mpg city, 40 mpg highway), while the RAV4 Hybrid is rated 40 mpg combined (41 mpg city, 38 mpg highway). While the CR-V surpasses the 37 mpg freeway drive rating of the four-wheel drive Escape Hybrid, the Ford is also available with front-wheel drive, which together it can achieve 41 mpg.
We managed to improve Honda Environmental Protection Agency ratings and hit 51 mpg in a short loop. However, the numbers fell quickly with less stingy driving.
The CR-V Hybrid lags behind its competitors in terms of mileage.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) gave the CR-V Hybrid a five-star overall rating. The hybrid model is delivered as standard with the headlights required to achieve a Top Safety Pick rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
Honda offers a three-year basic warranty of 36,000 miles and a five-year warranty of 60,000 miles for the drivetrain. This is the same coverage as for Ford and Toyota. Honda has a solid reliability record. While the hybrid powertrain is new, the CR-V itself has proven to be absolutely solid.
How DT would configure this car
Honda made this easy by making many key features standard. All equipment variants are equipped as standard with all-wheel drive and the Honda Sensing range of driver aids. The only thing missing is Apple CarPlay / Android auto compatibility, which requires an upgrade from the basic LX trim level to the EX. Another upgrade doesn't offer much of an advantage. The EX-L adds leather seats, and the Touring is equipped with a mobile phone charger, a hands-free tailgate and a heated steering wheel. However, this is a luxury and not a necessity.
Our opinion
Not surprisingly, the Honda CR-V Hybrid 2020 is a well-executed example of this breed. The standard CR-V was already one of the best small crossovers, and Honda's hybrid system has proven itself in the Accord Hybrid and Insight. However, the CR-V Hybrid is not only good in isolation, it can also hold its own against its two competitors.
Honda couldn't beat the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and Ford Escape Hybrid in terms of fuel consumption, but the CR-V Hybrid makes up for it in other areas, and the efficiency gap is small. The Honda is nicer to drive than its competitors, has more usable cargo space and offers many standard driver aids.
Should you get one?
Yes. Sometimes it's good to be fashionably late.
Editor's recommendations