Battlefield 2042 Review: Battlefield Reaches A New Peak

A helicopter attacks players in Battlefield 2042.

Battlefield 2042

RRP $ 59.99

"Battlefield 2042 is packed with valuable multiplayer content and takes the long-running shooter franchise to new heights."

advantages

  • Captivating scale and spectacle

  • Develops and improves classic modes

  • Impressive variety of content

  • Specialists reinvent every battle

  • Portal has potential

disadvantage

  • Danger zone feels unbalanced

  • Stability problems

The easiest way to think of Battlefield 2042 is that it's Battlefield 3 or 4, but bigger. The game features massive 128-player matches on equally huge maps and offers players a choice of weapons and vehicles. The only place where 2042 loses some weight is in the single player mode that players can usually expect with Battlefield games.

Battlefield 2042 is a pure multiplayer game, and as such, its developers have gone out of their way to create a varied experience. In addition to playing some classic Battlefield modes that have been grouped under the cover of the All-Out Warfare game mode, Battlefield 2042 offers players two more options: Hazard Zone and Battlefield Portal. While additional modes always felt like dead weight in previous Battlefield games, the two new additions to 2042 shine in their own ways, making this year's entry a first-person shooter not to be missed.

Battlefield's next step

Battlefield 2042 is a multiplayer first person shooter that specializes in goal-based matches. The main Battlefield experience consists of the game's classic modes, including Conquest, Breakthrough, and Rush. Despite not being able to play Rush, I got into a few rounds of Conquest and Breakthrough and can attest that the heart and soul of Battlefield 2042 is not only present, it is being strengthened.

As I fought on the great, giant maps of Battlefield 2042, I felt like I was in the prime of Battlefield 3 or 4. With a wide variety of weapons and vehicles at my disposal, I could attack my enemies and their targets in any way I wanted. Specialists and the game's new open approach to loadouts have only doubled the degree of freedom of the game.

Soldiers jump off a building in Battlefield 2042.

Specialists are one of the most controversial new features of 2042, but one that I really enjoy. The special characters have their own passive and active abilities, from hacking vehicles to keep them from firing, to putting down watchtowers. They are another way for players to turn any card to their advantage or turn an encounter in their favor. And although not every specialist is made the same, they all have their moments to shine.

In keeping with the theme of giving players options, the Battlefield 2042 scale does just that. Regardless of what map I was playing on, I had a multitude of options for what I wanted to do at that moment. I could drive a tank to a target, pick up a helicopter, stand back and shoot, or delve into the details of one of the dozen of fights that are taking place at any moment. With 64 players competing against each other on each team, there is always a new conflict to plunge into. If a fight isn't going well, there is no need to adjust your class to suit the situation. Just go and fight somewhere else.

In each of those moments, I howled, had fun, and experienced something that can only be gotten in a Battlefield game.

The openness of All-Out Warfare, of course, leads to some of those practically protected Battlefield moments. In just two hours of play, I did things that I couldn't do in any other game. I shot down a helicopter with the main cannon of a tank, wrecked a car full of players with a repair tool, and forced another player to jump out of their tank by ramming them so hard with mine that they topple over. In each of those moments, I howled, had fun, and experienced something that can only be gotten in a Battlefield game.

Battlefield 2042's emulation of the heyday of Battlefield 3 and 4 even comes without the shortcomings of those games. During my stint at 2042, I didn't throw any vehicles or weapons off balance. Tanks are strong but can easily be taken out by other tanks or players. Attack helicopters, which were nearly indestructible in Battlefield 4, are slow and vulnerable. Fights, no matter how they are fought, are almost always balanced.

The multitude of options also applies to weapons. The arsenal of Battlefield 2042 is broad, varied and can be changed in the blink of an eye. While players cannot simply switch to a different loadout, the game's "plus menu" system is a game-changing addition that allows players to swap out their weapon attachments on the fly. As a DMR user, I was able to quickly equip my weapon for hand-to-hand combat after fighting from a distance.

Fight in a tank in Battlefield 2042.

Without a doubt, Battlefield 2042 should be played through conquest and breakthrough. Both modes make perfect use of the enormous size of the game. Battles rage across huge maps, vehicles transport players from destination to destination, and there are always new ways to approach a situation. Bottlenecks are no longer so pronounced thanks to larger maps, so that the action never stops. From start to finish, I was busy playing one of these modes.

Hazard allowance

The same cannot exactly be said of any of the new Battlefield 2042 modes, Hazard Zone. Instead of having two teams of 64 players compete against each other, eight squads of four players (on PC and next-gen consoles) are flown onto a map and have to fight against each other and AI-controlled enemies to secure data drives. With the drives in hand, players then have to get out of the map in a helicopter. The idea, however, is that only one squad can escape safely.

Hazard Zone is related to Escape From Tarkov for lack of a better comparison. By killing enemies or capturing drives, players make money that can be used to purchase new weapons, gear, and other gear. This new equipment can then be taken into the next Hazard Zone game, giving the winners an edge over the competition.

This leads to a potentially diabolical cycle in the later life of Battlefield 2042. The early adopters (and winners) of the game mode will always have a head start on other players thanks to a large war chest that provides them with good weapons and other equipment. The winners will continue to win while everyone else loses due to a serious imbalance in funds.

The Danger Zone setup screen in Battlefield 2042.

But this problem is far away, and I didn't have to deal with it during my review. In my experience, Hazard Zone is a fantastic addition to the Battlefield repertoire, albeit with a few flaws. After being thrown into a huge map and being asked to kill enemies and collect drives, players need to communicate. Hazard Zone is by far the most communication-dependent game mode in Battlefield 2042, and at launch the game will not have in-game voice chat. That means players have to join a roster with three other friends if they want a solid chance to win a match in Hazard Zone, a luxury not everyone has.

But if you have a squad and can communicate, Hazard Zone is a brilliant game mode that puts aside the destruction and scale of Battlefield as a franchise in favor of tactics. During my time with the game mode, my teammates and I figured out where to go before moving to make sure no one is ever left alone to be picked up. In combat, we worked together, marking targets that our rocket-wielding teammate could take out.

Hazard Zone is a successful experiment that needs few tweaks to shine as bright as All-Out Warfare.

This collaboration was supported by the specialists of 2042, which really made the game mode shine. The right specialist can turn the tide of a fight or end one before it even begins. I've spent most of my time playing as an Irishman who can break down little barriers wherever he wants. That meant that no matter where my team fought, we always had cover. Other specialists like Falck, Boris and Paik have been incredibly strong in the danger zone thanks to the support they provide to your squad.

A soldier stands next to a downed satellite in the danger zone of Battlefield 2042.

I admit that I had danger zone concerns when I first heard about it. I tried Battlefield's previous foray into the battle royale genre and I honestly hated it. But Hazard Zone is a successful experiment that only requires a few tweaks to shine as bright as All-Out Warfare. With no adequate way for teammates to communicate without being friends, and a gameplay loop that constantly favors winners, I just hope the developers can hone what should become an integral part of the Battlefield franchise.

A blast in the past

While All-Out Warfare is a refined version of the Battlefield experience and Hazard Zone is a successful experiment, Battlefield Portal presented itself as the weird during my time with the game. Portal is essentially the 2042 creation suite that allows players to create their own game modes with tons of options. There is even a rudimentary coding system in place.

In my limited experience with 2042, these options have been used to create simple game modes including a quick free-for-all mode and another where each player can fire a single missile and get another by just jumping five times. They weren't particularly fun to play but served as a successful proof of concept. Players who choose to spend enough time learning about the Battlefield Portal systems can create some fantastic game modes that can potentially rival those of the game's in-house developers. While I haven't seen anything like this during my time with the game, I'm more than excited to see what comes after it launches.

The highlight of the Battlefield Portal for me was when it was used to emulate old experiences rather than generate new ones. Game mode gives players access to a select amount of content from Battlefield 1942, Bad Company 2, and Battlefield 3, as well as everything from 2042. As such, I was able to play Rush on Bad Company 2's Arica Harbor. With a few tweaked settings, I couldn't punish while sprinting, aim a shotgun at the visor, or lie down, just like in this cult classic from the Battlefield franchise. Simply put, it was magical.

The same goes for Battlefield Portal's version of Battlefield 3's Caspian Border, which, like any other non-2042 map, has been redesigned in game mode with improved graphics. The map and its massive, collapsible tower now look even better for returning players and is a treat for newbies. Playing a game of Conquest on the map just struck me with another dose of nostalgia that leaves me hoping that other maps from previous Battlefield titles will get the same treatment.

The mode offers a wealth of tools and options for creators that are now only needed by creators.

I don't really feel like I saw the Battlefield Portal climax during my time with it. I had to play some half-baked custom game modes, but the star was a trip back in time with replicas of Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3. It doesn't seem like it. The Battlefield Portal is more geared towards player-created content than reliving old entries in the Battlefield franchise. If I really wanted to, I could only play Battlefield 3 at a time. But I'm optimistic that people will take advantage of the tools offered on the Battlefield Portal and create some stunning modes for others to use. The mode offers a wealth of tools and options for creators that are now only needed by creators.

Buyers beware

The Battlefield 2042 review process has generated some red flags that are worth knowing. EA only distributed PC codes for the game. Critics had to meet a minimum specification requirement to review. While this is a cross-platform game (with both current and last generation consoles), any Battlefield 2042 review you read will likely be from someone who played the game on a capable PC. We don't know how the game runs on consoles, including the PS4 and Xbox One.

Without the ability to play Battlefield 2042 on consoles, how well does the game run on platforms other than PC? Simply put, we don't know. The game runs reasonably well on PC, but I ran into problems. While reviewing the game, my PC crashed once and increased the system memory usage from 50% to a maximum of 98% several times. The PC used to test Battlefield 2042 has a total of 16GB of DDR4 3200 MHz RAM, the amount the game lists as recommended in the datasheet.

Our opinion

Since Battlefield 2042 is only online, it had to make up for its lack of any single player content with a variety of great online content. The game's developers have not only achieved success in this regard, but have gone beyond. All-Out Warfare is a fantastic evolution of the classic Battlefield experience and modernizes the franchise with more scope, spectacle and play options than ever before. The Battlefield Portal and Hazard Zone also shine in their own way, with the former proving that it can serve as a base for players to create their own unique experiences within 2042. If a future Battlefield title skips these two modes, I might think they are incomplete.

Still, Battlefield 2042 isn't perfect. The version of the game that I played, and which players will also have access to when it launches in Early Access on November 12th, has performance issues. 2042 is also in-game without voice chat, a feature that will be added after the game's official release on November 19th. With these issues aside, Battlefield 2042 is still one of the best first-person shooters I've played all year and it's becoming a highly visited part of my PC's library.

Is there a better alternative?

If you're looking for a different kind of shooter experience, Call of Duty: Vanguard is out now. However, nothing corresponds to the scale and quality of 2042.

How long does it take?

Since this is a pure multiplayer game, there is no "completion" of Battlefield 2042 in the traditional sense. That being said, it should be easy for gamers to get hours of entertainment out of the various modes.

Should you buy it?

Yes sir. Battlefield 2042 is the new highlight of the franchise and one that no Battlefield fan should miss.

Editor's recommendations



Dell G5 SE Gaming Laptop Review-In-Progress: Peak AMD

Dell G5 Se Gaming Laptop Review 02

Dell G5 SE gaming laptop in progress: Peak AMD

"The Dell G5 SE is an extremely competitive midrange gaming laptop."

  • Excellent CPU performance

  • Great gaming performance for the price

  • Solid value across configurations

  • Bulky

  • The benefits of AMD Smartshift are opaque

Nvidia does not manufacture PC processors. Intel doesn't make PC graphics cards – at least not yet. AMD is the only company that does both, and hopes that a more harmonious relationship between CPU and GPU can lead to additional performance.

The Dell G5 SE offers our first glimpse of this potential. It is equipped with both a Ryzen 7 4800H and the Radeon RX 5600M graphics card, the latest and greatest AMD it has to offer. Does it last?

performance

On the outside there is not much to say about the Dell G5. It looks like it used to – robust and armor-like. It's the opposite of slim in almost every way.

The "SE" refers to what happens under this conservative exterior. Thanks to the Ryzen 7 4800H, this laptop offers eight cores and 16 threads of computing power. It also has 36 processing units and GDDR6 memory in the RX 5600M GPU. My test device was also equipped with 16 GB RAM, a 512 GB SSD and a 144 Hz screen with 1080p – all for a cool $ 1,200. That is a very attractive price.

This is a gaming laptop, so I started with 3DMark. The results in Time Spy were very encouraging for AMD. It missed a midrange version of the Dell G7 that I tested in late 2019 and that was powered by a 9th generation Nvidia RTX 2060 and an Intel Core i7-9750H. A 5% gain isn't much in benchmarks, but a profit is a gain.

It's going crazy here. The G5 SE has managed to develop the best thin gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 2019, which we tested with the RTX 2070 Max-Q from Nvidia. This is impressive. The G5 SE is a chunky laptop by comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.

The processor performance is strong in itself, but who is surprised with eight cores and 16 threads? AMD's mobile Ryzen blows Intel's 6-core gaming chips in Cinebench R20 and Geekbench 5 out of the water. Here, too, the Razer Blade beats Cinebench Multi-Core by 49% and Handbrake by the same amount in video coding. I'm not surprised, especially after reviewing other Ryzen 4000 laptops like the ROG Zephyrus G14 or Acer Swift 3.

However, the actual story is not just about these components. The real magic comes from working together.

Gaming performance

Playing is a good place to start. Games strain the GPU more than the CPU, but it's a combined effort that requires a balance between the components.

I tested three games: Civilization VI, Fortnite and Assassins Creed Odyssey.

Civilization VI is a CPU-intensive game, and this is where a Ryzen 4000 laptop can shine. There were only a few FPS (frames per second) behind the Razer Blade with an Nvidia RTX 2070, which reached 79 FPS in ultra settings. Compared to the Nvidia RTX 2060 in the Dell G7 I tested, you still see 19% better frame rates.

This trend continued in Fortnite. The AMD-powered G5 delivers 85 FPS with Epic settings, slightly behind the RTX 2060 in the G7 and the Zephyrus G14. You should probably set the settings to "High" to take better advantage of the laptop's refresh rate of 144 Hz. There the G5 SE achieved an average of 105 FPS.

The final challenge was Assassin's Creed Odyssey, a game that brought even the most powerful gaming laptops to a standstill. The gameplay was pretty smooth with an average of 53 FPS. With high quality – the middle setting of the game. At Ultra High, you drop to 44 FPS, which is still playable but a bit choppy.

All games were of course played at 1080p as this is the native resolution for the Dell G5 SE. As you can see, the RX 5600M isn't the most powerful graphics card in the world and sits comfortably between the Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti and the Nvidia RTX 2060. Fortunately, you can purchase a basic configuration of the G5 SE for as low a price as $ 880 that always still comes with the same GPU. This is great value compared to what you get from Nvidia at this price.

SmartShift in action

In addition to the new GPU and CPU, the Dell G5 SE also introduces AMD technology, which connects the two. It's called SmartShift, a way of organically sharing the energy between the two components. Every laptop has an upper limit on the performance it can play with. SmartShift uses AMD's InfinityFabric on both ends to transfer more power to the CPU or GPU when the thermal headroom allows – even beyond standard performance. According to AMD, SmartShift can lead to an up to 10% improved frame rate in games.

The problem is that SmartShift cannot be turned off. So I can't prove it works. My last attempt to test SmartShift was video rendering in Adobe Premiere Pro. I loaded a 2 minute 4K video clip and exported it to the ProRes 422 codec, carefully observing the power distribution between the CPU and GPU. Rendering video in Premiere is a task best suited for a processor with a high number of cores. However, you can also tap the graphics card. This way you can see how smart SmartShift really is.

The Dell G5 SE didn't share as much power as I expected. The GPU was only occasionally tapped to keep the processor in the spotlight. The rendering time of the Dell G5 SE was good and the export was completed in just under 8 minutes. This happens fairly quickly and beats Intel laptops like the Razer Blade. More expensive options like the Dell XPS 15 or Microsoft Surface Book 3 surpass it by a few minutes.

SmartShift is said to work with an automated algorithm that determines the best performance allocation from moment to moment. However, according to Dell, AMD must also whitelist applications to better optimize their performance.

Battery life, display and more

There's more to tell about the G5 SE, including battery life and display quality. I will continue my in-depth testing and will update this review soon.

While the effects of SmartShift remain opaque, the Dell G5 SE is still an example of how dominant AMD processors have become in consumer hardware. While the company's top-end GPUs still can't compete with Nvidia, the Dell G5 SE is a competitive mid-range gaming laptop for its price.

The Dell G5 SE was available for sale on the Dell website on May 21, starting at $ 880. The start configuration has a Ryzen 5 4600H with six cores, 8 GB RAM, an SSD with 256 GB and the same RX 5600M graphics card as in my test device.

Editor's recommendations