Casio G-Shock GBD-200 Review: Perfectly Balanced

Casio G-Shock GBD-200 on the wrist, with hand in a pocket.

Casio G-Shock GBD-200 in the test: A perfectly balanced hybrid smartwatch

RRP $ 149.00

“The GBD-200 is a real hybrid smartwatch that protects the technology and goes overboard with a long service life. In combination with a slim case, a comfortable bracelet and without a battery for charging, it is ideal for all-day everyday life. "

advantages

  • All day comfort

  • Reliable, informative notifications

  • Very durable

disadvantage

  • Basic fitness tracking only

Casio has been making connected G-Shock watches with basic fitness tracking under the sporting nickname G-Squad for a while, and has been experimenting with smarter versions over the past year, complete with a permanent phone connection to enable notification assistance, and more recently, too a full Wear OS smartwatch. The new GBD-200 combines fitness tracking and permanent Bluetooth connection into a fully digital G-Shock hybrid smartwatch.

It's not the first G-Shock with this functionality, but it's the first to pack it all into a modest square case. It's a critical change and has been expertly combined with just the right amount of technology. We think this is how hybrid smartwatches should be, and here's why it works.

design

Casio has already added fitness tracking and full Bluetooth connectivity to several watches. Both the older GBD-100 and newer GBD-H1000 G Shock watches incorporate the functionality, but the design of both means they're not ideal for all-day everyday life. That's a problem because smartwatches, whether hybrid or full-touchscreen, offer the most benefits when you wear them all day.

The Casio G-Shock GBD-200 display.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The GBD-200 really is the first connected G-Shock you'll wear all day regardless of your wrist size. It is 58 grams and 15 mm thick, and for comparison: The 44 mm Apple Watch Series 6 weighs 36 grams without the strap and is 10.7 mm thick. It's modest in size for a G-Shock, won't stick to the cuff, can be worn snugly with no discomfort, and looks great in most situations. It's not too sporty and the different time slot options allow for a degree of personalization.

The square case is made of resin and is attached to a very soft and flexible urethane strap, complete with wrist guards attached to the eyelets to keep the watch centered on the wrist. The combination of all of these aspects makes the GBD-200 very portable indeed. I've been wearing it every day for over a week now and never once felt the need to take it off because it was annoying or too hot.

The case back of the Casio G-Shock GBD-200.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Casio is known for its square watch models, but the GBD-200 has adopted a design all of its own. The resin case has a central slot that runs around the side to highlight the color of the inner resin section, the start button is identified by its red stripe, and the light button has a light texture. Of course, it is shockproof and has a water resistance of 200 meters. Durability like this is important. The watch took some bumps and got pretty grubby while doing gardening so I washed it under the tap and now it looks like new.

I washed it off under running water and now it looks like new

I have a 6.5 inch wrist and the GBD-200 sits perfectly on it, at least to my eyes. It's not clumsy or weirdly large, and the square case means it fits a lot more wrist sizes than the GBA-900 or H1000 watches. People with narrower wrists might not appreciate the chunky look of the black GBD-200, but if you're used to large watches and can get past the design (alternative colors are available) then it's by far G-Shocks' best option current range of fitness watches and the bracelet is highly adjustable.

Casio G-Shock GBD-200 on the wrist.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The stealth black version seen here is complemented by a bright yellow model in the US, while a cool blue model is available in some other regions.

Screen and software

The GBD-200 does not have a touchscreen and you only interact with it using the buttons on the housing. There are a total of five, with the side buttons controlling the software and the front button for activating the backlight. All of them are easy to find but require a bit of force to push. However, this means that you don't accidentally do it.

As with most G-Shock watches, it takes a while to get used to using the watch as it doesn't always feel natural, especially if you are used to touch screens or no watch at all. The mode button scrolls through the menu and displays the interval training screen, stopwatch, activity data, and the notification window. A long press on the Adjust button opens a diverse settings menu, while a short press changes the layout of the main time display.

Casio G-Shock GBD-200 buttons.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The screen has a "negative" appearance, which means that it has a black background and gray color for text and numbers. It's small compared to smartwatches and there is no brightness adjustment. The size means it's not always easy to see notification details at a glance, especially if your eyesight isn't absolutely perfect like me. However, it's clear and legible even in sunlight, and if you're still having problems with the size, one of the alternative time layouts has very large numbers, making it easier to see.

I tested the watch connected to an iPhone 12 Pro which requires G-Shock's Move app to be installed. Notifications were very reliable, but don't expect them to be as eye-catching or actionable as they are on a touchscreen smartwatch. A notification consists of two stages. You will get a little warning showing the app and a few words of the message, which is enough to get an idea of ​​whether or not it requires your attention. To see more you will need to navigate through the menu to the notification page and then select the message you want to view in more detail.

It takes a lot of keystrokes to get to this point, and even more so to scroll through a single message, due to the screen's ability to display text alone, but you can see almost all of the information. You can't reply to or interact with messages on the watch, but it warns you of text messages and calls along with app messages. By default, the watch beeps when a message comes in, but it's pretty loud and irritating. It can be switched off in the menu or replaced by a vibration strong enough to be noticeable on the wrist.

It was really great to wear a G-Shock watch that shows notifications as well

The GBD-200 doesn't offer the same level of interaction or smartphone syncing as an Apple Watch or other full touchscreen smartwatch, but it is enough to be helpful. It was really great to wear a G-Shock watch that also shows notifications as it is exactly what you get from a fitness band, including a phone finder, without compromising on style.

Fitness tracking

While notifications and smartphone support come close to that of a simple fitness band, fitness tracking focuses on walking and running, and there are no options to track specific workouts or activities like golf, swimming, or yoga. Starting a run is as simple as pressing the Start button and the display will then show the elapsed time, distance and pace. Press the same button again to stop tracking.

That's it, apart from interval workout tracking. This requires some settings, but only needs to be done once. It can save up to 20 different intervals for a single workout and the time can be set individually for each phase. It's a shame that this can't be set up in the G-Shock Move app as it's lengthy on the watch. It's also easy to make a mistake, and since the operating system isn't very fast, the trial-and-error aspect can be frustrating.

The main screen of the G-Shock Move app.

Main screen of the G-Shock Move app Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

casio g shock gbd 200 Review Move App Log

G-Shock Move app activity log Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Activity screen of the Casio G-Shock GBD-200.

Activity screen Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The data is synced in the app when you open it. The Move app is highly customizable, right down to the order information is displayed on the screen. The number of steps can be viewed on the watch face or in the app, where you also get a breakdown of your workout with calories burned and distance. I really like the watch face, which shows the progress towards your goal for each day of the week, which helps you better understand your daily activities. The watch has neither a heart rate monitor nor its own GPS, but it can take data from your phone or another device. It's also linked to Apple Health, Google Fit, and Strava.

Combined with a smartwatch or a fitness band, fitness tracking on the GBD-200 is simple and not very informative. The accuracy is good and the watch matches the step count and distance tracked by other wearables. Whether the functionality is sufficient depends on your own needs. If you want a daily step count and a way to track a walk or run just to monitor your personal level of activity, this is perfectly acceptable. However, if you want deeper analysis, including data from a heart rate monitor, sleep tracking, or multiple exercise modes, this is not the watch for you.

Battery and charging

This will be a short section, as befits any hybrid smartwatch. The GBD-200 uses a single internal battery, which Casio says should last about a year before needing to be replaced if you use the Bluetooth connection all the time and record an hour of activity every day. Use it less and the lifespan can be up to two years.

The Casio G-Shock GBD-200 red and gray buttons.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Casio G-Shock GBD-200 gray keys.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The strap of the Casio G-Shock GBD-200.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Not having to charge the battery is a huge benefit. The need for regular charging has become commonplace even with hybrid smartwatches as they become more technically complex. Casio balances just enough fitness tracking and smartwatch functionality with really long battery life. Yes, it would have been great to see solar charge on the GBD-200, but that would affect the price.

Price and availability

The GBD-200 is priced at $ 149, or £ 139. It will be available in both the US and the UK through G-Shock's online store and boutique retail stores.

Our opinion

The G-Shock GBD-200 is exactly what a hybrid smartwatch should be. It looks just like a regular watch – in this case a distinctive and desirable square G-Shock – and since it was made by a skilled watchmaker with decades of experience, the convenience is spot on. It has basic smartwatch connectivity, but manages to fit in reliable and informative notifications, as well as decent fitness tracking, assuming you don't want anything too in-depth. It does all of this without the need to charge the battery, so it wears out completely.

You pay less for it than most full-touchscreen smartwatches, and the price is similar to its closest competitor, the Skagen Jorn Hybrid HR. I find it better looking, however, and it's certainly more watch-like than the Jorn, which leans more towards a full smartwatch. This is where Casio actually succeeds. Many companies have gone beyond the traditional hybrid smartwatch and got carried away with adding technology with limited utility. The GBD-200 doesn't do that, and that's all the better.

Instead, the GBD-200 remembers that it is a G-Shock watch, so it's very sturdy and has a long-lasting battery, and sensibly avoids the size-related drawbacks of its other newer hybrid models, and doesn't try much on the either technical side. It is enough for anyone who is not an athlete or a hardcore fitness fan and does not want a touchscreen watch to be charged every day. It creates the right balance between design and technology and makes it a real hybrid smartwatch.

Is there a better alternative?

There isn't necessarily a better alternative, but what if you want more tech and fitness tracking capabilities? In that case, you have the option of Casio's hybrid connected G-Shock, the more expensive 400-GBD-H1000 with solar power and a bigger screen, plus a heart rate monitor and GPS. However, it is a much larger and heavier watch and needs to be charged externally if you use the GPS regularly.

The $ 195 Skagen Jorn Hybrid HR, along with Fossil's other Hybrid HR watch models, also features a heart rate monitor, as well as a clever e-ink screen for showing notifications and other information. They're a step up from the GBD-200 in terms of fitness tracking, but battery life is around a week. What if you want a full touchscreen smartwatch or a fitness band with more activity tracking without spending more than $ 150? The Amazfit GTR 2e is our recommendation, or you can spend around $ 60 or less and get the Honor Band 6, Xiaomi Mi Band 6, or Samsung Galaxy Fit 2 fitness band.

How long it will take?

The GBD-200 meets the usual G-Shock hardness standards, so it is shock and vibration resistant and waterproof up to 200 meters. The resin body is very durable and the urethane tape is very securely attached to the case, besides, it is strong and flexible. The battery can either be replaced yourself if you have the tools and knowledge to ensure its water resistance, or by taking the watch to a professional. The G-Shock GBD-200 will last for years without any problems, even if you don't treat it very well.

Should you buy it?

Yes. It's a very durable, very distinctive designed Hybrid G-Shock watch with just the right amount of activity tracking and smartwatch functionality.

Editor's recommendations



How to Pistol Squat perfectly without getting injured?

Tired of doing traditional squats? Challenge yourself with pistol squats. We guarantee this exercise is worth your time. It burns the muscles in the leg far more effectively than a traditional squat, or we'd say the hardest of all squats.

Pistol squats have a number of requirements. It requires stability, flexibility and strength in the legs. Overall, you need strong legs.

Here is a complete guide to pistol squats.

Who Should Perform Pistol Squats?

If your focus is on having toned and strong legs for almost any sport, the pistol squat is your thing.

Benefits of Pistol Squats

Pistol squats are useful for building both lower body and core strength. This exercise helps you focus on the glutes, quadriceps, hamstrings, hip adductors, calves, and core muscles. This exercise will also help you improve the one-sided strength and balance of your legs as this is a squat where you crouch with all of your weight on one leg.

Notice

Always remember that a gun squat is harder than a traditional squat or any other squat you name. If you have weak leg muscles, we advise you not to jump straight into the exercise. Instead, try other squats (https://anytimestrength.com/types-of-squats/) or incorporate leg exercises (https://anytimestrength.com/muscular-legs/) into your day until you're sure your Legs ready for exercise.

This exercise involves a lot of muscle strain, so never forget to warm up your legs before training.

How do you do a pistol squat?

  1. Start with your feet shoulder width apart.
  2. Extend both arms straight forward.
  3. Bend your hips back while looking straight at a point. As you go down, bend one knee and keep your heel on the floor.
  4. Let the other leg reach straight forward.
  5. Squat as deeply as possible.
  6. Hold for 2 seconds.
  7. As you exhale, slowly return to the starting position.
  8. Repeat on the other side.

We recommend 3-4 repetitions per leg. As a beginner, take a 10-15 second break between each repetition.

How do you avoid injuries?

It is extremely important, and highly recommended, to avoid the below mentioned mistakes that people often make.

  • Performing the exercise without sufficient ankle strength.
  • absent when warming up
  • stop before the hips are at least in line with the knees
  • forces the muscles that keep the legs from crouching

Take that away

Pistol squats can be difficult to perform, but they are far more effective than other types of squat exercise. When you find it difficult, exercise is key. Progress with different types of squats.

Remember to avoid the most common mistakes people make to avoid injury and improve exercise effectiveness.

On the subject of matching items:

Types of squats

Muscular legs

Air Squats: Benefits, Procedure and More

sigma 35mm f12 art review dg dn 2

Sigma 35mm F1.2 Art Review: Perfectly Impractical

"The lens lens truck, you're going to buy it just to show it to your friends."

  • Exceptional sharpness

  • Nice bokeh

  • Aperture de-click switch

  • Virtually no chromatic aberration

  • Relatively affordable

  • Big, heavy

  • Heavy vignette at f / 1.2

The Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art is exceptional. I doubt you will find a better 35mm full frame. It is so spectacular that it raises a question I have asked some similar lenses in the past.

Does it have to be that good?

The lens is a technical marvel and one of the sharpest I've ever seen, with beautiful bokeh and practically no distortion. However, thanks to its size, it's also the most uncomfortable 35mm I've ever used.

Sigma is no stranger to delivering the best quality at all costs. I groaned at the size and weight of almost all of the Art lenses I tested, and all of them were visually excellent. However, where other type lenses for DSLRs have been built, this is part of Sigma's new DN product line, which is designed for (usually) smaller mirrorless cameras.

Sigma bends over. It knows it has the best lens, and at $ 1,500, undercuts the older and slower 35mm f / 1.4 lenses from other major manufacturers. It doesn't matter that it's hard enough to anchor a small ship. People will buy it just to show off.

Get ready for a bag upgrade

With a length of 5.5 inches and a diameter of 3.5 inches, the 35 mm F1.2 would be huge on any camera. Mounted on the tiny Sigma Fp that I had, it's ridiculous. This is the only 35mm image I have shot that I think should have its own tripod collar. If you want to replace an existing 35mm format with it, you may need a larger camera bag.

There are of course good reasons for this size, starting with the aperture of 1: 1.2. Full-frame 1: 1.2s are relatively rare, and this combination of a bright aperture and large sensor can result in a shallow depth of field, which is simply not possible with smaller formats. However, it does not differ significantly from the easily available 1: 1.4 lenses.

The sophisticated optical formula also contributes to this weight. There are 17 elements in 12 groups, including three aspherical elements. There is a lot of glass, an additional four elements above the 35mm F1.4 Art.

Like all Art lenses, this glass is in a stable, dust and splash-proof exterior. It feels incredibly well done. In addition to the usual automatic / manual focus switch, the lens barrel has a focus lock button and an iris release switch. The latter is aimed primarily at videographers who need to be able to smoothly increase or decrease exposure without noticeable steps. Given the number of people taking both still images and videos these days, this is a feature that I would like for every new lens.

Another proof of the hybrid nature of the lens are the 11 iris blades, a higher number than most still lenses, which are, however, a matter of course for the cinema. Thanks to these additional blades, the aperture remains almost circular when stopped, which results in a rounder, more natural blur.

This is a mirrorless lens that is available as either an L-mount or a Sony E-mount. Canon and Nikon shooters have long been Sigma's bread and butter, but they seem to stay here in the cold. Not only is it physically impossible to get this lens to work on the longer flange-to-back distance of a DSLR, but Sigma has shown no interest in producing RF or Z-mount versions for mirrorless systems from Canon or Nikon.

It doesn't get any sharper

The maximum resolution of an imaging system is a factor of three things. Sensor, lens and technology. According to Sigma, the 35mm F1.2 can resolve "over 50 million pixels," suggesting that it targets cameras like the 47-megapixel Panasonic Lumix S1R and the Sony A7R IV at 61 MP, the two cameras with the highest resolution in L-Mount or E-Mount.

Mine was mounted on the 24MP Sigma Fp. And all I can say is wow. It's insanely sharp. Three aspherical elements mean that chromatic aberration is simply not there, although higher pixel counts may reveal some. I rationally know that I don't need a 61MP camera. Still, I want to see what this can do on an A7R IV with a stable tripod.

The wide open sharpness in the real world is excellent, although it still improves when you stop. The peak sharpness reaches 1: 2.8, but there is hardly a real difference between this and 1: 1.2. This is impressive.

Sigma 35mm f12 art rating dg dn sample 3

sigma 35mm f12 art review dg dn probe 12 2

Maximizing sharpness depends on the technique. This lens is difficult to hold due to its weight, so a fast shutter speed is the difference between excellence and mediocrity. And although the temptation to shoot at 1: 1.2 is hard to resist, thanks to the additional depth of field you will see more focus if you stop, even up to 1: 2.

However, sharpness is not everything. With great looks and the 11-sheet iris, you get the softest and most pleasant bokeh I've ever seen, certainly for a wide angle. You can control the shape of the bokeh using the bezel, where 1: 1.2 gives a dreamy, swirling look, while 1: 2 gives a flatter, less distracting pattern.

I have a complaint. Wide open, vignetting is bad. It's not necessarily an unattractive look, especially for portraits, but it does mean that the light transmittance at 1: 1.2 is not that good. If you want to achieve all possible performance in low light conditions, you may be disappointed. Only the center of the picture benefits from increased brightness.

Even a 1/3 step setting to 1: 1.4 helps clear up the vignette, but I wonder if we really need 1: 1.2. The difference in depth of field is simply not noticeable. If the broadcast is not much better, what is it about?

Sigma 35mm F1.2 art sample picture with vignette at 1: 1.2 "class =" m carousel - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn1.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/sigma-35mm - f12-dg-dn-art-vignette-2-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP/ / / yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette at f / 1.2

Sigma 35mm F1.2 Art sample picture with reduced vignette at 1: 1.8 "class =" m carousel - picture dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/sigma- 35mm -f12-dg-dn-art-vignette-1-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP / // yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Vignette at 1: 1.8

But if it is necessary to use as much glass and start at 1: 1.2 to achieve perfection at 1: 2 and beyond, then so be it. You still won't find a better 35mm.

Our opinion

I can't blame a lens for being too good, but the Sigma 35mm F1.2 Art is the Tesla Cybertruck of lenses. It offers the performance you could want, but it's really about bragging rights. Nobody needs an aperture of 1: 1.2. It is a label that makes you feel special.

However, this is the result of Sigma, who went out of their way to make the best possible lens. And it worked. It won't be for everyone, and that's fine. If you want the best at all costs or just want to show off, this is definitely for you.

Are there any better alternatives?

No. However, if you are not shooting an L-mount or e-mount camera, the Sigma 35 mm F1.4 DG Art or Tamron 35 mm 1: 1.4 Di are good alternatives. These are available in Canon EF or Nikon F mounts, which can then be adapted to the mirrorless systems from Canon and Nikon.

How long it will take?

Designed to resolve the highest resolution sensors, you should get years of use out of them. Like any good lens, it will last longer than your camera.

Should you buy it

Yes, if you own an L-mount or e-mount camera and want to buy the best 35mm money you can buy.

Editor's recommendations