04 Jan
Blog

Garmin Venu 2 Plus Review: Premium in All the Right Ways

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus is an excellent smartwatch.

Garmin Venu 2 Plus in the test: Premium in the right way

RRP $ 449.99

“The Garmin Venu 2 Plus is a premium smartwatch in every way, also in terms of price. But if you consider rock-solid connectivity, a lot of data and control by voice assistants, it deserves its price. "

benefits

  • Solid connectivity

  • Telephone calls and assistant

  • Battery life

  • Strong GPS

  • Lots of data

disadvantage

  • High price

  • Unintuitive user interface

  • Some services are missing

I think it is very important that we get this review right by saying that I am not the target audience for the Garmin Venu 2 Plus. I'm on the wrong side of 300 pounds and the wrong side of 40, although the former is more likely to disqualify me. My idea of ​​a great workout is to park down the block to go to the donut shop. When Garmin contacted me and asked if I would like to check out their latest smartwatch, of course I took the chance. Well I didn't jump because fat men don't jump, but you get the idea.

I've been using the Garmin Venu 2 Plus for two weeks and while I'm not the ideal Garmin wearer, I can see where this watch is the ideal smartwatch for me. For most of my trial period, I wore the Garmin smartwatch that was paired with a Pixel 6, and also wore an Apple Watch SE that was paired with an iPhone 13 Pro for comparison purposes.

Here are my thoughts.

Design and comfort

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus is an excellent smartwatch.Adam Doud / Digital Trends

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus has a bright and crisp 1.3-inch AMOLED screen that is bright and easy to read in all situations. It's comfortable to wear, even though it's a little thicker. The three buttons on the side are easy to press and provide correct feedback when pressed. Each button has its own function, from starting an activity to entering menus, but new to the Venu series are the microphone and speaker.

The Venu 2 Plus is the first Venu smartwatch that makes and receives calls and controls your phone's assistant.

The Venu 2 Plus is the first Venu smartwatch that makes and receives calls and controls your phone's assistant. This is actually the feature I was looking forward to the most as I use the Google Assistant a lot throughout the day. Also, especially since I picked up the Apple Watch SE, I've gotten used to leaving my phone on my desk when I'm moving around the house and answering calls on my watch.

Using the wizard is similar to most other smartwatches, except that they can be woken up with a command word. The Venu 2 Plus requires you to press and hold the center button for a few seconds to connect. It's a little slower than I'd like (about three seconds), but it's not terrible in any way. Verbal responses play through the watch, just as you would expect when accessing the Google Assistant through a watch or headphones. Overall, it's a seamless experience.

Software and connectivity

What I liked most about the watch is the absolutely solid connectivity. As mentioned earlier, I wore both the Apple Watch SE and Garmin Venu 2 Plus at the same time, and both watches rang simultaneously for notifications each time. I expect this type of connectivity from the Apple Watch. After all, Apple is Apple. But with so many smartwatches and fitness trackers, frequent disconnections can be problematic. It even happens when you wear a Samsung smartwatch with a Samsung phone. But the Garmin stayed connected all the time, even when my phone was a house away.

However, the software of the Venu 2 Plus takes some getting used to. Most smartwatches use gestures in each individual direction for different things. The Garmin mostly sticks up and down, with only occasional swiping movements. The buttons all have different functions and rely on a press or a long press for different functions. I understand that there is only a limited amount of programming possible for three buttons, but even at the end of my two-week trial period I was still not used to all of the functions.

Notifications are extensive and detailed. The only gripe I could make is that the notification icons are limited. Weather, Google Photos, and Vivint Home Security notifications are all shown with the message icon. In fact, the icons that work and don't work are very different. It can get a little confusing trying to find specific messages. Also, some options for responding to messages are not straightforward. For example, when you reply to an e-mail, the phone opens the reply window. Replying to a text message is limited to a few preprogrammed replies.

The Garmin App Store has a decent number of apps and watch faces that mingle with other app stores, including Samsung and Google Play, that far outshines most fitness trackers like Fitbit and Xiaomi. Supported music services include Spotify and Deezer, but it lacks YouTube Music. Unfortunately, that's the service I'm subscribing to. Of course, the app functionality pales in comparison to the Apple Watch, but that would assume that both devices want to serve the same customer, which they aren't.

Health and Fitness Tracking

Before we dive into the fitness tracking aspects of this watch, let's pause to talk about philosophies. Apple certainly puts a lot of emphasis on health tracking and data. However, Garmin did not set out to develop a smartwatch. It should first create a health tracker that happens to work with your smartphone. This can be seen in areas like the Garmin Connect app, which is designed to give you as much data as possible. The Garmin Venu 2 Plus also tracks your heartbeat multiple times per second instead of once per second or even every few minutes.

Sleep data in particular is great information, and unlike the Apple Watch, tracking sleep doesn't cut your battery life by half or more.

I don't have the professional equipment to reliably record some training data (e.g. chest strap, BMI scale, O2 sensors, etc.), but the data I got from the Garmin Smartwatch is valuable. Sleep data in particular is great information, and unlike the Apple Watch, tracking sleep doesn't cut your battery life by half or more. For those who really collect data, the watch can also process inputs for tracking water usage or women's health. These have to be entered manually, of course, but it's nice to have all of this information in one dashboard.

Exercising, which to me means walking around the block, gives you even more data, including a map of your route, speed, average heart rate, climbs, pace, and more. The Apple Watch gives you similar data, both in bed and on the go. Apple even adds other protections like AFib detection and fall detection, both of which are important from a day-to-day safety perspective. Garmin has a feature that detects high-G events (read: falls) while a measured activity is in progress, which notifies emergency contacts if you trip and fall while running. That's nice, but only during measured activities, not all the time.

Performance and battery

Simply put, the battery life is amazing. Garmin advertises with around nine days of battery life, with a full AMOLED display and heart tracking that measures several times per second. The battery is drained when you add GPS and music streaming, but for everyday use this watch just keeps going.

When testing alongside the Apple Watch SE, the difference in battery life was sobering. I had to replenish the SE almost every day. In contrast, I only charged the Garmin watch twice during my two-week trial period. Even before I set up the Apple Watch SE for sleep tracking, it was maxed out for two days before the charger was needed.

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus is an excellent smartwatch.Adam Doud / Digital Trends

When I talked to Garmin about my upcoming Disney trip, they asked me to start a hiking activity with full GPS at the beginning of a day in the park and to check the available data at the end of the day. The battery can handle constant GPS contact and aggressive health measurements for an entire day. While this review was being written prior to this vacation, I'll be testing this out.

When I first started using the Apple Watch, I was amazed at how Apple was able to create apps that were so fully featured compared to the rest of the industry. The Garmin Venu 2 Plus offers an equally enlightening experience when it comes to battery life. Even if you turn on the GPS and keep playing music, you still get eight hours. Nothing else I've tested before comes close.

Price and availability

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus will hit the market on January 4, 2022 and can be purchased from Garmin for a fairly high price of $ 450. Garmin is quick to point out that all health monitoring is done without a subscription, which is fine, but Garmin has a legacy of high-priced hardware and the Venu 2 Plus definitely continues that.

Our opinion

Overall, the biggest thing about the Garmin Venu 2 Plus is the price that makes me pause, but that too comes from a man who doesn't work. Still, the battery life is fantastic, the connectivity is hard to beat, and the additional ability to take calls and use a voice assistant really rounds off the package for me. There are cheaper alternatives, and just as the Apple Watch SE taught me that apps are important, the Garmin Venu 2 Plus taught me that battery life is also very important.

From a software standpoint, the Garmin has a steep learning curve, but once you get it, it's easy to use and surprisingly robust. Receiving notifications as soon as they touch and respond to your phone is often not as smooth on devices that are supposed to be a smartwatch first and then a fitness tracker. Garmin really offers a complete package here with very few compromises.

There is no doubt that this is a premium device after a niche clientele. Garmin is number one in the fitness world, even above the Apple Watch, and it's not hard to see why. Not only are you a device dedicated to monitoring your health, with a range of accessories to help you do so, but you also get a fully functional smartwatch that has those basics too. That makes the Venu 2 Plus a compelling product if you have the budget for it.

The Garmin Venu 2 Plus is an excellent smartwatch.Adam Doud / Digital Trends

Is there a better alternative?

If you fall into that category of customers Garmin is looking for, no. This is it, with the possible exception of other Garmin offerings. If you're a general smartwatch user, the answer becomes less clear. If you're using an iPhone, the Apple Watch Series 7 is better in many ways, with the notable exception of battery life. In the world of Android, the water is getting murky. The Samsung Watch 4 with Google and Samsung's new version of WearOS is very appealing. Regarding less expensive options, boy, hello, there are options. But none of them will keep up.

How long it will take?

Garmin products are known for their build quality, and I can confirm that with this smartwatch too. The watch has a Gorilla Glass 3 dial and can be worn for swimming up to 5 ATMs or about 50 meters. Garmin products also typically come with a one-year warranty.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The Venu 2 Plus is a fine smartwatch and shouldn't even be a smartwatch. PR talk aside, this is a really nice wearable that gives you a ton of health data and features in a single, admittedly expensive, package. If you are into sports (which some may refer to as something other than "fitness") this watch is a breeze. If you want a smartwatch that will last more than a weekend, you have it. If you're not sure that your next smartphone has the same operating system as your current one, this watch works both ways. Your bank account might not be a huge fan, but you can love a lot here.

Editor's recommendations



04 Dec
Blog

HP Chromebook x360 14c Review: Premium Chromebook For Cheap

The HP Chromebook x360 14c sits at an angle on a desk.

HP Chromebook x360 14c

RRP $ 690.00

"The HP Chromebook x360 14c has errors, but is supported by its low price."

advantages

  • Robust build quality

  • Conservative good looks

  • Good display

  • Excellent touchpad

  • Solid productivity performance

disadvantage

  • Disappointing battery life

  • Keyboard is a little too light

  • Pen is not included

Chromebooks have essentially caught up with Windows laptops in terms of form factors, and the Convertible 2-in-1 is well represented among Chrome OS devices. As an example, HP has its Chromebook x360 14c, which it has updated with an 11th generation Intel Core CPU for 2021.

It's still held back by a 16: 9 display as the rest of the world moves towards larger 16:10 or 3: 2 panels, but otherwise it's a representative example. There's nothing that really stands out other than, as we'll see in a moment, the price.

My test configuration of the HP Chromebook x360 14c with a Core i3-1125G4 and a 14-inch 16: 9 Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS display costs $ 690, but it's on offer since I've been rating this for a long time Time to write tastier $ 510. At this price point, the HP Chromebook x360 14c is an attractive 2-in-1 convertible for anyone looking for a Chrome OS laptop with some flexibility.

draft

HP Chromebook x360 14c tent stand.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The HP Chromebook x360 14c isn't cheap enough that you would accept poor build quality, especially for a Chrome OS computer. So it's good that the laptop is made of aluminum and cannot bend in the lid or bend in the keyboard deck and in the lower chassis. HP has made a solid machine that is almost as tough as laptops that cost twice or more than the Dell XPS 13, which sets the standard for premium laptops.

Some only give in when the lid is pressed down, which puts the HP Chromebook x360 14c in a different class. It's significantly stiffer than the Asus Chromebook Flip C536, another 14-inch Chrome OS convertible 2-in-1 that costs about the same and is probably HP's most relevant competitor.

If you want a laptop that stands out, the HP Chromebook x360 14c isn't for you.

The hinge is a bit tight and requires two hands to open the lid, but it holds the display firmly in place in any of the four modes – clamshell, tent, media or tablet. Strong magnets hold the lid tightly to the lower chassis, so you'll need to pry it open first.

Aesthetically, the HP Chromebook x360 14c is a very conservatively designed device in dark silver, with just a chrome-plated HP logo on the lid to break things up. The lines and angles are simple, with rounded corners and edges that make the laptop minimalistic but comfortable to hold.

The Asus Chromebook Flip C536 is a much more eye-catching laptop with its white outer case and black keyboard deck, as well as its more aggressive angles. Both are attractive laptops, but if you want one that stands out, the HP Chromebook x360 14c isn't for you.

On the right side of the HP Chromebook x360 14c there is a USB-C and a USB-A port suitable for a 3.5 mm audio jack and a microSD card reader.

There is a USB-C port on the left side of the HP Chromebook x360 14c.

The Chromebook x360 14c's display bezels are thin on the sides and reasonably large on the top, and the bottom chin is smaller than some other budget 2-in-1 convertibles. That makes the laptop just a little wider and deeper than average, while being 0.71 inches thin and weighing 3.35 pounds, also above average for the modern 14-inch class.

That said, the HP is smaller than the Asus Chromebook Flip C536, which is 0.73 inches thick and weighs 4.3 pounds. In addition, the Asus is more than an inch wider and deeper, which makes the Chromebook x360 14c appear tiny in comparison. You won't hate carrying around the Chromebook x360 14c, but it's not the smallest 14-inch laptop you can buy.

Connectivity is decent, with two USB-C ports and one USB-A port for a 3.5mm audio jack and a microSD card reader. Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 offer wireless connectivity.

power

Rear view of the HP Chromebook x360 14c.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

HP has equipped the Chromebook x360 14c with a dual-core Core i3-1125G4 CPU of the 11th generation, which should be sufficiently fast for Chrome OS. Add in 8 GB of RAM and a fast PCIe 256 GB solid state drive (SSD) and there is reason to be optimistic.

We can only run limited benchmarks in Chrome OS, so most of my performance metrics are subjective. I ran the Android Geekbench 5 benchmark and the Chromebook x360 14c overwhelmed with just 898 in the single-core test and 2,866 in the multi-core test. That is behind the Asus Chromebooks Spin C536 with the slower Core i3-1115G4 in the single-core test and equivalent in the multi-core test at 1209 and 2849 respectively. The Acer Chromebook Spin 713 with its quad-core Core i5-1135G7 achieved 1,237 in the single-core test and 5,114 in the multi-core test. It's a lot faster.

The HP Chromebook x360 14c is fast and efficient no matter how many Chrome tabs I open.

I also ran the Speedometer 2.0 web benchmark and the Chromebook x360 14c did well here, scoring 141. The Chromebook Flip C536 was slightly faster at 158. Most laptops, Chrome OS or Windows, score below 100 on this test, so these are good results.

Subjectively, I found the HP Chromebook x360 14c to be fast and efficient, no matter how many Chrome tabs I had open or Android apps were running in the background. These may not be the fastest benchmark results on our database, but the 2-in-1 kept up with everything I've given it, including running an Android game like Asphalt 9.

That's a pretty demanding title as far as Chrome OS games go, and the Chromebook x360 14c ran it without any stuttering or chopping. This is a 2-in-1 device that is fast enough for demanding productivity workflows, at least as far as Chrome OS is concerned.

advertisement

The display of the HP Chromebook x360 14c.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Chromebook x360 14c has a 14-inch Full HD IPS display that is touch and pen capable. I couldn't test the display with my colorimeter, but I would rate it as a good panel. It's bright enough for my usual work environment, but at a nominal output of 250 cd / m² it won't overcome very bright ambient lighting – in fact, you don't want to use it outside with sunlight.

The colors were pleasant and not oversaturated, so I suspect they are pretty accurate. Watching Netflix and viewing photos was fine. The contrast was acceptable, black text sticking out on a white background without looking grayish. My biggest complaint was that the display was the old school 16: 9 aspect ratio and its Full HD resolution was just bordering on sharpness.

Overall, this is a comfortable display for productivity and media frenzy. Creative guys who crave dynamic colors and deep contrasts won't like it, but that goes for most Chromebook displays.

Close-up of the speakers on the HP Chromebook x360 14c.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Two upward-facing speakers on each side of the keyboard produce the sound, and they provide crisp highs and mids with a hint of bass. That's the good part.

The volume was not so great, as it was low even when the volume was turned up all the way. That is unfortunate.

There was no distortion, however, meaning that if you're playing Netflix by yourself you are covered, but music will benefit from headphones, and a Bluetooth speaker is handy for entertaining groups.

Keyboard and touchpad

Close-up of the keyboard, trackpad, and pen on the HP Chromebook x360 14c.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

HP makes great keyboards, as evidenced by the version in its Specter range. Unfortunately, this keyboard didn't make it onto the Chromebook x360 14c. While the keyboard has plenty of room and large keycaps, the switches are too light. There's a lot of travel and snappy ground motion, but too little pressure is required to register a button press.

I like lighter keyboards, and so this one was just over the top. If you like a light touch on your keyboards, you'll be fine with this one, but too little pressure can be as tiresome during long tips sessions (like writing this review) as too much.

My test device came with a pen for testing, but this is an additional purchase.

The touchpad, on the other hand, is excellent. It's bigger than usual and has a soft tactile feel that is great for precise wiping. The buttons have a nice, quiet click that sounds good without waking your partner up when you use the laptop in bed at night. This is one of the better touchpads I've used on a Chromebook.

My test device came with a pen for testing, but this is an additional purchase. It worked well with Chrome OS's built-in pen tools so I can take notes and highlight with precision. The pen is magnetically attached to the case so it's easy to take with you, although the magnets aren't that strong, so be sure to keep an eye on it.

A switch on the left side that turns the webcam on and off provides additional security. There's also a fingerprint reader that allows you to log in without a password, which is convenient and unusual for devices in this price range.

Battery life

HP Chromebook x360 14c on a desk.Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

HP has packed a battery with 58 watt hours in the Chromebook x360 14c, which should be enough for a Chrome OS laptop with a 14-inch full HD display and an energy-saving CPU. In terms of battery life, I expected great things.

I don't have that. Surprisingly, the Chromebook x360 14c only lasted 7.75 hours in our web browser test, which is where Chrome OS computers typically get the best results. On the other hand, I shouldn't have been surprised, because the Asus Chromebook Flip C536 with the slower Core i3 and 57 Wh battery only lasted 6.75 hours. The Asus Chromebook Flip C436, the predecessor of the C536, had a 10th generation i3 and only 42 watt hours of battery and lasted 10.5 hours – a much better result.

Even the Acer Chromebook Spin 713 with its 1st Gen Full Power Core i5 CPU managed it to last 8.5 hours. In our video test, which repeats a local 1080p movie trailer, the Chromebook x360 14c only got eight hours, compared to the Chromebook Flip C536 with 10 hours and the C436 with 13 hours. The Acer Chromebook Spin 713 lasted 10 hours. Here, too, the HP lagged behind.

I was disappointed with these results. The Chromebook x360 14c probably won't even last a full work day even running the lightweight Chrome OS, which is usually the norm for the platform.

Our opinion

The HP Chromebook x360 14c is an attractive, well-built Chrome OS Convertible 2-in-1 that is great value for money at $ 510. At $ 690, it's a little less attractive.

It's fast enough for the demanding productivity user, but its battery life will let you down. The keyboard is a bit loose, but the touchpad is a winner and the pen support is a plus. If you can find it on sale then definitely add it to your list.

Are there alternatives?

The most natural competitor, the Asus Chromebook Flip C536 offers similar performance and slightly better battery life for the same price. It has a more distinctive look, so it's better for someone looking for a laptop that will stand out.

The Acer Chromebook Spin 713 is another competitor, similarly expensive but much faster and with better battery life. It also offers a sharper, more productivity-friendly 3: 2 display, which is a plus for getting the job done.

Finally, if it's not sold with a 2-in-1, Google's Pixelbook Go should be considered. It has better battery life, a better display, and superior audio quality, all in a smaller package. You'll spend more, but it's worth it.

How long it will take?

The Chromebook x360 14c is a relatively rugged 2-in-1 that feels like it will last for years. And its components should keep Chrome OS running for quite some time. The typical one-year guarantee is more palatable at such prices.

Should you buy it?

Yes sir. If you can get it on sale, it's value for money and a solid Chrome OS 2-in-1.

Editor's recommendations



25 Sep
Blog

Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR Review: Infinite Power

Sequent SuperCharger watch on your wrist with your hand in your pocket.

Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR Test: Infinite performance, limited technology

RRP $ 482.00

"The Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR Smartwatch never needs to be charged, but its intelligent functions do not make this desirable advantage optimal."

advantages

  • Innovative kinetic energy system

  • Doesn't need to be charged

  • Sapphire crystal

  • Great build quality and materials

disadvantage

  • Basic fitness tracking

  • Unreliable fitness data collection

  • Uncomfortable Eco Tide harness

The hybrid smartwatch is the alternative to a touchscreen smartwatch preferred by those who are unwilling to forego the traditional, analog watch look, but still want a certain level of connected capability. the Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR takes this concept one step further as not only does it not look like a smartwatch, but it also uses a power system that shares more with an automatic watch than it does with an Apple Watch.

That means you never have to charge this smartwatch as it is powered by the movement of your body. It's very tempting, but what about the smart bit? It's just as important on a hybrid as it is on a full smartwatch, and if anything, it's much more difficult to implement well since the watch usually doesn't have a screen. The Sequent Supercharger 2.1 has the power, but also the intelligence?

draft

I wear the Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR, the company's top model. It's made of 316L stainless steel with an aluminum ring around the 42mm case and sapphire crystal over the dial. It weighs around 77 grams with the bracelet and is a remarkable 14 mm thick. This version has a blue dial, but you can also get versions with a white or black dial. Flip the watch over and it has an open caseback showing the self-loading mechanism and its rotor, which I will come back to later, and in the middle is the heart rate sensor. The crown is quite large, has a rubber cover over the sides and the Sequent logo on the end.

Sequential SuperCharger clock.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Sequent attaches great importance to the fact that the watch is designed in Switzerland – the quality mark for traditional watches – but does not say that it is made in Switzerland, an important award. Nevertheless, it looks and feels very well made. The dial is pretty simple, with the brand name and markings, and the polished baton markers just mark the hour. The stick hands have unfilled middle parts, while the hand has a red arrowhead for the complication. It's all rather minimalistic and reminds me of countless watches from MVMT, Daniel Wellington and other fashion brands.

It definitely doesn't look like a normal smartwatch. First of all, there is no screen, and one complication doesn't immediately reveal its high-tech references. It is a multipurpose display that shows step count, power reserve and heart rate. However, you have to look carefully because the numbers are very small. There's also a similarly tiny LED indicator below the 12 o'clock marker that only works when the watch is syncing with your phone or when it is taking an action.

Sequential SuperCharger watch crown.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The watch looks and feels nice, and I like the open caseback with the rotor, which is not as beautiful as a mechanical movement but has a certain technical charm. I don't like the crown because it's too big, and the useless rubber part on the edge doesn't contribute to that either, as you don't have to turn the crown at all, which makes additional hold unnecessary. It's a thick watch too, and the tabs attached to the lower part of the case only emphasize the height.

I can live with the height of the SuperCharger 2.1 and the design is simple but pleasing, but the Eco Tide band is bad. It's made from plastic waste from the ocean, which is excellent, but it's incredibly unforgiving on your wrist. I've been wearing it for several weeks and I think it hasn't gone soft at all – it's just as uncomfortable now as it was the first day. Even an imprecise double-pin attachment doesn't help, so that the watch either interrupts the circulation or falls over the side of your wrist. It attaches with quick release pins and at 22mm it's not difficult to swap out for a different bracelet, but this should be based on a personal style preference, not because the one that comes with it is inconvenient.

Sequent SuperCharger watch on the wrist.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 is a very modern looking watch that will definitely appeal to those who are drawn to the minimalist watches that are frequently advertised on Instagram and by YouTube influencers. Just don't order it with the Eco Tide tape.

power

Before we talk about the smart features, let's talk about the way the Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 is powered as it is far more technically impressive than anything else. Automatic timepieces convert kinetic energy from the movement of your body into power for the clockwork. The SuperCharger does the same thing, but instead of gears and springs, it uses a tungsten rotor to power a micro-generator.

Sequent SuperCharger watch case back.Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It's a neat, high-tech, sustainable, and very practical approach to running a piece of wearable technology. Sequent says the SuperCharger has "infinite" power reserve, and I've worn it for several weeks with a few days off, and the available power hasn't fallen below 95% according to the app. When you are not wearing it, the watch will go to sleep to save energy. With regular use, I doubt the SuperCharger 2.1 will ever lose power.

If you are not going to wear the watch for a long time and the battery is completely empty, a charging pad is included so that you can get it going again. Unfortunately, this requires the inclusion of charging points on the case of the watch, which are on the left and ruin the otherwise clean lines.

What is unusual is that you can “feel” the rotor inside the SuperCharger while it is turning. It's not distracting or making an audible noise unless you put it to your ear, but it's not something you find in an automatic mechanical watch. I liked the feeling very much, as it made the SuperCharger feel like a living being, but I've gradually got used to it and rarely feel it anymore.

The Sequent SuperCharger is really a smartwatch that you don't need to charge, and that will be a significant benefit for anyone who is put off by smartwatches in general due to the need for daily charging.

Intelligent functions

The lack of a charge is the Sequent SuperCharger's first step in becoming a successful smartwatch, but the smart functionality has to be just as compelling. This is not a competitor to the Apple Watch and makes no secret of the fact, but unfortunately it is also not a competitor to any other hybrid watch as the technology feels years out of date.

Sequent SuperCharger watch app that shows the number of steps.

Daily step count Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Sequent SuperCharger Watch app with training data.

Training data Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Sequent SuperCharger Watch app with settings.

Settings page Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It has basic fitness tracking and doesn't provide notifications or have a haptic engine. That's not a bad thing in and of itself, but the operation of the watch and its app feels old and clunky compared to the competition. Don't expect anything like individual training plans, information like cadence or an in-depth analysis of the data collected.

To start a workout, the crown must be pressed for two seconds until the LED flashes blue, the hands rotate and the LED glows purple. To end the session, press the crown three times. It's a bit more complex than it needs to be, but what's worse is that it doesn't seem very accurate. Despite completing the steps, the SuperCharger was unable to record several training sessions, and since the promised display in the app does not work – it is supposed to show a point in training mode in the Sequent app when it is active – it is very difficult to say Whether your entries were successful.

The heart rate recording is also random, with some sessions showing heart rate data and others not, and so is the GPS. It doesn't have a built-in GPS, so it relies on your phone's GPS. Even when the app was open on my phone, it couldn't get location data while taking a walk. When a workout was recorded, the app showed distance, calories burned, time, pace and steps. There's a sleep mode in the app, but it's listed as "Beta" and I find the strap way too uncomfortable to wear overnight anyway.

From the point of view of fitness tracking, the Xiaomi Mi Band 6 offers significantly more options for $ 50.

The complication on the watch face shows the step count during the day and heart rate data during a workout. It seems to coincide with my Apple Watch Series 6 for the most part, but it's pretty hard to tell because of the tiny numbers and even more tiny intermediate marks. When asked about my heart rate, for example, I can only really say “between 110 and 120 beats per minute”.

This uncertainty is exacerbated by the fact that the sensor does not measure your heart rate continuously. You can set it up for daily use in the app to read every five minutes, 30 minutes, or two hours, and it only seems to update every few minutes as you exercise. The app is not linked to Apple Health, Google Fit, Strava or any other fitness platform. From a fitness tracking perspective, the Xiaomi Mi Band 6 for $ 50 offers far more options than the Sequent SuperCharger for $ 482.

A fitness tracking system that is tedious to activate, has limited functionality, provides questionable accuracy, and does not offer the ability to share the collected data outside of the standard app is not very inspiring. It will absolutely not satisfy someone serious about fitness, and its cumbersome controls will prove annoying to someone who only uses it casually.

Price and availability

the Sequent SuperCharger 2.1 Premium HR as seen here costs $ 482. Alternatively, you can buy the watch without a heart rate monitor for $ 428, or an aluminum version instead of stainless steel without a heart rate monitor for $ 374. It is available from Sequent's own online shop.

Our opinion

The Sequent SuperCharger is ideal as a showcase for the kinetic energy system. The tech is really interesting and worked well during my time with the watch. Not having to charge a smartwatch is highly desirable, liberating, and by far the Sequent watch's greatest draw. Unfortunately, the far less successful smart features don't give me any reason to put on the clock. While it's okay not to show notifications, fitness tracking can't keep up with current smartwatches and fitness bands, isn't very intuitive, and isn't detailed enough for anyone serious about exercising.

It has the right references for a good watch – a modern Swiss design, sapphire crystal and a stainless steel case – plus that eternal energy, but without convincing intelligent functionality, the innovative way in which it is powered is wasted. For almost $ 500, a world of excellent and highly desirable watches opens up – smart and different – and the Sequent watch struggles to keep up.

I saw the original version of the SuperCharger 2018 at the Baselworld Watch Show and then tried the SuperCharger 2.0 for a short time in 2019. Now in 2021, even though the time has passed and the watch is getting a heart rate monitor, the SuperCharger 2.1 sadly feels like it's still stuck in 2019, and that's not good enough when the rest of the hybrid market is heading up and moved up.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes sir. If you specifically want a hybrid smartwatch, we recommend checking out Casio's G-Shock range. For example, the solar-powered G-Shock GBD-200 includes fitness tracking and notifications, while the GBD-H1000 adds GPS and a heart rate sensor. The Withings ScanWatch is even more health-oriented, has a minimalist design and is made of high-quality materials. The Skagen Jorn Hybrid HR has an e-ink screen to minimize power consumption, a heart rate monitor and other intelligent functions. All of them cost less than the Sequent SuperCharger.

If you really want more smart features, a full touchscreen smartwatch is the only way to go. We recommend the Apple Watch Series 6 or Apple Watch SE for iPhone owners or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 for Android phone owners.

How long it will take?

The stainless steel case and the scratch-resistant sapphire crystal ensure that the SuperCharger retains its appearance even with rough handling, it is also waterproof up to 50 meters and is covered by a generous 5-year guarantee. The app is available for iOS and Android. Provided the app is kept up to date, the Sequent SuperCharger should last for many years, helped by the lack of a battery that needs to be continuously charged every day.

Should you buy it?

No. Although the kinetic energy system is innovative, fitness tracking is too simple to be of any use and the high price tag is very difficult to justify.

Editor's recommendations



10 Sep
Blog

Origin Neuron (2021) Review: A Prebuilt Worthy of the Premium

Origin neuron on a table.

Origin Neuron (2021) Review: A Pre-Made Well Worth the Premium

RRP $ 2,387.00

"You can build the same system for less money, but Origin makes a compelling case not to do that."

advantages

  • Excellent cable management and design

  • Minimal bloatware

  • Lifelong 24/7 support

  • Great CPU, GPU, and motherboard options

  • Easy to update

disadvantage

  • Expensive

  • Few non-Corsair part options

  • Limited ports on the front

Why buy a desktop PC when you can make one yourself for less? Origin PC, which was acquired by Corsair a few years ago and specializes in pre-built PCs, has been trying to answer this question for years. But now, with GPU prices where they are, buying a pre-built desktop has never made so much sense.

Although Origin's pre-built desktops contain many off-the-shelf parts, they're more than just a few hastily thrown together components.

The Origin Neuron shows that. It is the mid-tower option from the Origin range and serves as a middle ground between the extended Tower Genesis and the Chronos with a small form factor. Like all Origin desktops, you can equip the Neuron with whatever parts you want, including the latest graphics card from AMD and Nvidia.

Given how expensive graphics cards are right now, the Neuron is a solid alternative to building your own gaming PC. If you don't want a massive tower to take up too much space, or a small form factor machine that could be prone to noise issues, the Neuron is the perfect option. And in 2021, most midrange configurations won't cost much more than building a gaming rig yourself.

draft

Origin Neuron sits on a table.

The Origin Neuron is made up of off-the-shelf parts – assuming you can find a graphics card, you can put together an exact match. Because of this, it doesn't offer the convenience of an HP Omen 30L with its tool-less design. You still need to unscrew things and have a shelf for parts on hand when you want to get in.

Still, the Corsair 4000X case makes upgrades effortless. The side parts are each equipped with latches to the front, which allow easy insertion, and the knurled screws cannot be lost. They even have a little yellow ring around them, which makes them easy to spot when you remove the side panel.

It's worth noting that the Corsair 4000X is just one of the case options. It has a tempered glass side panel that stays on the side of the case even when the knurled screws are pulled out. There is a handy lever for removing it that I could use to remove the side panel without smearing fingerprints on it.

While you can put together the individual pieces of the Origin Neuron yourself, it may not be possible to do so with the same level of cleanliness. The device is remarkably well built, with neat cable routing on the back of the case and minimal overhang at the front. That's a testament to Origin's building expertise, as well as the large, open space that the Corsair 4000X offers.

The back of the Origin Neuron.

You also have plenty of room for upgrades. With all commercially available parts, you can swap everything in the case across the board. The Corsair 4000X comes with two SSD trays and two hard drive bays that offer you plenty of space for storage. M.2 support depends on the motherboard you choose.

After everything was set up, I checked out the pre-installed software. There were a couple of programs out there that you will be using most of them. You have access to a graphics card overclocking utility, Corsair iCUE and an audio settings app. I would have preferred MSI Afterburner for the overclocking tool as it is the de facto option for many enthusiasts (including myself). Even so, these programs are useful and won't bloat the machine.

Connectivity

Which ports you get on the Neuron depends on the selected configuration. Each case and motherboard has a different combination. For the build Origin sent me, I was spoiled for choice in terms of connectivity, but unfortunately only the back of the case.

Up front, the Corsair 4000X has a pathetic choice. They have a USB 3.0 port, a USB-C 3.1 port and a headphone / microphone combo jack. That's it. While I loved seeing USB-C on the front, Corsair could have squeezed an additional USB port or two on the front. The 4000X has a clean design without too many exposed ports, but a few extra USB ports wouldn't have hurt that.

Connections on the front of the Origin Neuron.

My test unit came with an Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero motherboard, which is not available on the Origin website at the time of publication. This board comes with an absurd number of ports. It includes Gigabit and 2.5 Gbit LAN, USB-C 3.2 and 10 USB 3.2 ports. If you need a lot of USB devices, this board is for you.

While you can't currently buy the board in my unit – at least through Origin – there are many other options. At the time of publication, I found an MSI MEG X570 Ace board that fits in the same class as the Crosshair board. Unfortunately, it doesn't have that many USB ports, so grab the Crosshair when it's available and you want a high-end motherboard.

Each case has two USB ports on the front – either USB-A or a combination with USB-C. An SD card reader would have been nice too, although most commercial cases don't come with one.

Internals

My test device was equipped with the latest parts from AMD and Nvidia, including the 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X and the 12 GB RTX 3080 Ti. Although this is about as high-quality as gaming desktops, the Neuron can hold even more. Origin offers up to 64 cores Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (but not the Pro model like the Lenovo P620 offers).

Central processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
GPU Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
case Corsair 4000X
Storage Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32 GB 3,200 MHz (2 x 16 GB)
storage Corsair MP600 1TB, Samsung 870 QVO 2TB
power supply Corsair RM850X 80+ gold
USB ports 11 USB-A, two USB-C
Networking 2.5 Gbit, 1 Gbit Ethernet

The standard configuration costs about $ 2,400. For that price, you get a Core i7-10700K, 16GB of storage, and an RTX 3060 Ti. While this is the "starting price," you can actually save money by configuring the machine yourself. By swapping out a Ryzen 5 5600X and RX 6700 XT, I was able to bring the Neuron down to $ 2,100 using the configurator.

My review unit is just over $ 5,100, and that's a mid-range configuration. Armed with the best of the best, you can easily spend over $ 10,000 on the Neuron. If that sounds like a lot, it's because the Neuron is way more expensive than the competition.

I configured an almost identical Maingear Vybe for $ 5,051, and a similar Falcon Northwest Talon configuration was $ 5,352. For Custom, the Neuron is where it should be. Pre-made ones are a different story. The slightly lower spec HP Omen 30L costs around $ 2,500. The pre-configured Maingear Vybe with an RTX 3080 Ti now costs $ 3,500.

The pre-made vybe is the most interesting comparison. It's almost identical to the Neuron Origin I sent myself, just with a Ryzen 9 5900X processor. Origin offers a pre-built version of the Neuron, but it is limited to one configuration. At HP and Maingear, you have access to a range of options, all less than customizing your own rig.

This is a top of the line machine with some of the highest quality components inside.

Still, it is difficult to get into a bad configuration given the options the Neuron offers. Outside of the motherboard, graphics card, and processor, you have access to Corsair parts, and Corsair makes great RAM, power supplies, and AIO coolers. While vertical integration may rub some people the wrong way, I can't fault it. This is a top of the line machine with some of the highest quality components inside.

You will have access to Corsair drives most of the time too, although Origin does offer some Samsung options as well. Samsung drives are some of the best, so I was excited to see them.

Still, I have a few issues with the build options. For one, there are no options for air cooling. You can only choose one AIO, and only one is available from Corsair. Additionally, RGB case fans are obscenely expensive as you can only access Corsair options. They're some of the best pc case fans out there, but they come at a price to match.

And price is the main problem. I split the base machine at currently available prices (with the MSRP for the graphics card) and came up with $ 1,430. That's nearly $ 1,000 in premium for Origin for additional branding, and it all adds up to a standard configuration of $ 2,400. However, given current graphics card prices, the Neuron isn't bad business. Given the inflated pricing, building this machine yourself would cost nearly $ 2,000.

Processor power

CPU block on the Origin Neuron.

Processor performance depends on how you configure the Neuron. If you choose the Ryzen 9 5950X, as with my test device, you're in luck. Aside from AMD's own Threadripper chips, there is nothing that powerful on consumer desktops.

The 16 cores and 32 threads went to work quickly in Cinebench R23. Cinebench uses the processor to render an image instead of the graphics card and measures both single and multi-core performance. It got a score of 25,116 on the multi-score, which is faster than any desktop CPU you can buy outside of Threadripper.

Aside from parts of the workstation class, there is no other processor as powerful as the Ryzen 9 5950X.

As a reference, Intel's 10-core i9-10900K achieved a score of around 15,000. Single-core performance was on par with other processors in the Ryzen 5000 series, including the one in the Falcon Northwest Talon.

Geekbench 5 offers more down to earth performance, but even then, the Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by around 30%. This test also showed some benefits for single-core performance. My example chip showed a modest improvement of around 6% over the CyberPower Xtreme that rocks the Ryzen 7 5800X.

The Ryzen 5950X showed how close it can get to Threadripper chips in the content creation benchmarks. It got a total of 1,088 in PugetBench for Premiere Pro. That's about 18% off the Threadripper 3995WX, which costs nearly $ 5,500. Aside from parts of the workstation class, there is no other processor as powerful as the Ryzen 9 5950X.

In Handbrake, the Ryzen 9 5950X actually met the Threadripper 3995WX, with only one second between the render times. Intel's Core i9-10900K didn't do that well and was about 35% below the Ryzen 9 5950X in my handbrake test.

Gaming performance

For the machine Origin sent me, 4K is the goal. The RTX 3080 Ti can exceed 1080p and 1440p in most games and achieves frame rates of around 100 frames per second (fps). You don't have to look any further than Red Dead Redemption 2 to see where the Neuron averaged 110 fps at 1440p Ultra settings.

The RTX 3080 Ti aims at 4K but doesn't always arrive. At maximum 4K resolution, I managed 55 fps in Assassin's Creed Valhalla. This is a very punishing title, and the RTX 3080 Ti is on the high end of the performer. Nevertheless, the HP Omen 30L only showed a slight improvement over the RTX 3080. As far as the Falcon Northwest Talon with an RTX 3080 is concerned, it performs identically.

Origin neuron with side wall turned off.

Red Dead Redemption 2 did much better with an average of 72 fps at 4K Ultra. Fortnite was also no match for the RTX 3080 Ti, as it scored points above the RTX 3080 at 89 fps with all sliders. Assassin's Creed Valhalla and Red Dead Redemption 2 are two of the most challenging games on PC, and the RTX 3080 Ti can still keep up with them.

The RTX 3080 can also keep up. Even in the most demanding of situations, just a few frames separate it and the Ti model at 4K. Keep in mind that the RTX 3080 Ti costs an extra $ 718 over the RTX 3080 in the Neuron. This additional price hardly buys you any more performance with 4K.

This even applies to synthetic benchmarks. When I compare my 3DMark Time Spy result to the average of the RTX 3080 results with the same configuration, there is only about 5% difference. For reference, the RTX 3070 Ti is only about 10% slower than the RTX 3080 Ti in this test, while it costs $ 1,000 less on Origin.

Ray tracing is a major feature of the RTX 30 series, so I turned to Control for ray tracing performance. To my surprise, the RTX 3080 Ti managed 35 fps at 4K with ray tracing on high. That's about a 44% performance hit for enabling ray tracing, but you can always use Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) to increase the frame rates.

The RTX 3080 Ti is a 4K gaming monster, but that shouldn't come as a surprise. It's better for the price Origin is asking. What surprised me is the proximity to the RTX 3080, which is significantly cheaper. The non-Ti model is slower, but with over $ 700 at stake, a few extra frames are hard to justify.

Guarantee and support

An important reason to be pre-fabricated is the support. After all, there are no guarantees of screwing up a build yourself (even if the chances are slim with the right guidance). Origin, along with virtually all other custom PC builders, doesn't do well in this regard. The Neuron comes with a standard one-year parts exchange warranty with free shipping for the first 45 days only.

The Neuron comes in a wooden box so free shipping after 45 days is not a big deal. One year is the standard for most PC manufacturers, including Maingear, Falcon Northwest, and CyberPowerPC. For the warranty period, however, I would have liked free shipping. That upgrade alone costs $ 70 on Origin.

It's not all bad news for support, however. After purchase, Origin offers 24/7 lifelong support as well as lifelong free labor if you want to upgrade your PC across the board.

Our opinion

Like most custom-built PCs, the Origin Neuron charges a premium for convenience. However, this premium is not as high in 2021 as in previous years. Given the current price of an RTX 3080 Ti, you could build the exact machine Origin sent me for around $ 1,400 versus $ 2,400. That extra $ 1,000 will give you the build, some extra goodies, and a parts guarantee.

As someone who loves to assemble PCs, I will always choose to save money and share a system myself. However, the price difference on Origin isn't that big, especially on machines with lower specs. As my tests show, you can get most of the performance of an RTX 3080 Ti out of the RTX 3080, and this difference alone brings the price scales back into balance.

Overall, the Origin Neuron is an expertly built machine that deserves its price in a sea of ​​machines that don't. However, DIY is always cheaper, and the 2021 Neuron won't change that either.

Are there alternatives?

Yes sir. The Maingear Vybe and Falcon Northwest Talon are custom alternatives, and the HP Omen 30L and pre-made Maingear Vybe are cheaper options that you can't configure. Origin stands out for its build quality, including clean cable management and minimal bloatware. However, all components are sold separately and you can save a lot if you put them together yourself.

How long it will take?

The Origin Neuron will last as long as you want it to. It uses standardized parts so you can upgrade and expand it for as long as it complies with the ATX standard. The base model will last at 1080p and 1440p for several years before you need to upgrade.

Should you buy it?

A $ 1,000 building fee is hard to swallow when you can make an exact match yourself, but for those who don't want to build their own, the Neuron is an excellent premium option.

Editor's recommendations



02 Mar
Blog

2021 Volkswagen Arteon SEL Premium R-Line 4Motion Review

2021 volkswagen arteon review front three quarters

2021 Volkswagen Arteon review: German luxury for everyone

"The Arteon combines style, technology and comfort to create a truly upscale experience."

  • Looks great inside and out

  • Well equipped

  • Wireless Apple CarPlay / Android Auto

  • Good balance between driving behavior and handling

  • Not as sporty as rivals

  • Inconspicuous driver assistant technology

Volkswagen may be the "people's car", but sometimes Germany's largest automaker tries to be lifted.

This is the case with the Volkswagen Arteon 2021. VW's flagship wants to offer a little more luxury without breaking the bank. VW tries to raise the Arteon above its smaller models primarily through design, a more luxurious interior and a long list of technical features.

The Arteon competes with the Nissan Maxima, Toyota Avalon and Kia Stinger in the dwindling niche of mainstream brands' prestige cars. However, VW is so confident in the Arteon that it also named the Acura TLX and Infiniti Q50 luxury sedans as competitors. However, as we shall see, the Arteon is missing a key component that these luxury brands offer.

VW launched the Arteon for the 2019 model year, but the 2021 Arteon is getting a major update. It receives the latest MIB3 infotainment system and driving aids for travel assistants and emergency assistants as well as an updated design and newly mixed equipment. The base front-wheel drive Arteon SE starts at $ 38,190, but our test car was an SEL Premium R-Line model with 4Motion all-wheel drive and a base price of $ 48,190.

Design and interior

The main selling point of the Arteon is its styling. It's still recognizable as a VW, but doesn't look as good as the automaker's other models. To achieve this look, VW designers used the old Detroit formula "longer, lower, wider" to give the Arteon a wider stance, short front and rear overhangs, and a low roof, similar to "four-door coupes" from luxury brands such as Audi A7 and Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class. Large wheels (18 inches, 19 inches and 20 inches for SE, SEL and SEL Premium) fill the wheel arches well.

VW gave the Arteon plastic surgery for model year 2021, but you'll need to look carefully to see the differences. The chrome bars of the radiator grille have been reshaped, as have the front air intakes. SEL and SEL Premium models receive the previously optional R-Line appearance package as standard. This adds sportier style elements such as a rear spoiler and an LED light bar in the radiator grille (all trim levels are equipped with LED headlights and taillights as standard).

The sleek design of the Arteon comes at the expense of the passenger compartment. Due to its low roofline, the Arteon has less headroom at the front and rear than the more conventional Volkswagen Passat. This sedan also has more front legroom, but the Arteon has a bit more rear legroom thanks to a longer wheelbase.

It's still recognizable as a VW, but doesn't look as good as the automaker's other models.

The headroom and front legroom are also the worst among the Arteon's competitors. At the rear, VW offers more headroom and rear legroom than the Nissan Maxima or Kia Stinger and is right behind the Toyota Avalon in these key figures.

Like the Stinger, the Arteon has a tailgate instead of a traditional trunk. At 27.2 cubic feet with the rear seats installed, the VW offers significantly more cargo space than the Kia, Nissan or Toyota. You can also fold the rear seats down for up to 56.2 cubic feet of cargo space.

The typical VW interior has a minimalist design that is both functional and aesthetically pleasing. Designers have avoided the visual clutter in the Toyota Avalon's interior, and controls are placed exactly where you need them. While the material quality is somewhat inconsistent across the VW range, the interior trim materials on our SEL Premium test car seemed appropriate for the price of the car. The Base SE models are covered with V-Tex synthetic leather, while the equipment variants SEL and SEL Premium are equipped with standard nappa leather – a higher quality than is usually the case in this segment.

Technology, infotainment and driver assistance

The Arteon is getting some notable technical improvements for the 2021 model year, including the latest MIB3 infotainment system from VW. This adds wireless Apple CarPlay / Android Auto connectivity, multiple device pairing, and USB-C ports. Two connections for the occupants in the front seats are standard, while the SEL Premium models have a third connection for the second row. A built-in Wi-Fi hotspot, Amazon Alexa compatibility, and a SiriusXM satellite radio receiver are also standard. Charging mobile phones is also standard in the SEL and SEL Premium equipment variants, while the SEL Premium has a Harman Kardon audio system with 12 speakers.

Although the operating system is different, like the previous year's model, the 2021 Arteon still gets an 8.0-inch touchscreen. The 10.0-inch digital cockpit instrument cluster screen is also broadcast, but is now standard on all models. Compared to the old MIB2 system, the screens don't feel dramatically different because they have similar graphics and menu layouts. That's not a bad thing – the user interface was still easy to use – but the main benefit of MIB3 seems to be the updated smartphone connectivity, not the display. Neither were we fans of the new VW haptic control, which is installed on the dashboard and the steering wheel. They had to be deliberately pressed like normal buttons, but lacked the tactile feel of real analog controls.

The interior has a minimalist design that is both functional and aesthetically pleasing.

In the area of ​​driver assistance, the 2021 Arteon has two new functions – travel assistant and emergency assistant – but only for the higher-level models SEL and SEL Premium. Travel Assist combines adaptive cruise control with automated lane centering so the car can steer, accelerate, and brake on highways with clear lane markings (but you must always keep your hands on the steering wheel). Emergency Assist was developed for situations in which the driver is unable. It monitors the driver's attention and automatically brakes the car to a standstill if no activity is detected. All Arteon models also have standard blind spot monitoring, forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking.

None of the Arteon's direct competitors offer an equivalent of Travel Assist or Emergency Assist. Fortunately, we didn't have to test the Emergency Assistant, while the Travel Assistant showed that this type of technology still had a long way to go. The system was a little slow to respond when we changed the set cruising speed, and while it was able to keep the Arteon in its lane, it tended to turn late so the car came pretty close to the yellow or white lines. This is a mistake that a novice driver would normally make. Shouldn't a machine be better?

Experience at the wheel

The Arteon offers an impressively refined driving experience, but one thing is missing from its competitors: sportiness.

VW only offers a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with a turbocharger, eight-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive as standard. All-wheel drive is available in the equipment variant SEL and as standard in the SEL Premium, but not available in the basic SE model.

The Nissan Maxima and Toyota Avalon offer more power than the 268 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque that the Arteon can muster. The larger V6 engines that are standard in the Japanese sedans both produce around 300 hp with roughly the same torque as the Arteon's Turbo-Four. The Kia Stinger's base four-cylinder engine has less power than the Arteon engine, but the Kia is also available with a 3.3-liter twin-turbo V6 that develops 365 horsepower and 376 lb-ft of torque. The Stinger and Avalon are both available with all-wheel drive, but Toyota only offers it with a less powerful four-cylinder engine.

The ride quality was impressive, even on winter-ravaged roads with crater-sized potholes.

Big cars like the Arteon have traditionally valued comfort versus performance, but the Maxima and Stinger have been sporty designed, and even the Avalon now has a TRD performance model. The Arteon just has nothing to counteract this. It's not slow, but the acceleration doesn't exactly push you back into your seat. The steering is precise and while the Arteon doesn't have that floating feel typical of large cars, there is no sense of urgency either.

At a more relaxed pace, the Arteon is excellent. The standard adaptive chassis has made an excellent balance between handling and comfort. The ride quality was impressive, even on winter-ravaged roads with crater-sized potholes. Our only complaints were rough gear shifting and we felt excessive tire noise.

The Arteon would make a great long-haul cruiser or commuter, but it also has what it takes to be a good driver's car. We'd love to see a tighter, livelier version (like the Arteon R sold in Europe) alongside the standard version.

Fuel economy and safety

The fuel economy of the 2021 Volkswagen Arteon is 25 mpg (22 mpg city, 32 mpg highway) with front-wheel drive and 24 mpg (20 mpg city, 31 mpg highway) with all-wheel drive. That's not bad, but only because cars like this are typically not designed to be fuel efficient. The only exception is the Toyota Avalon Hybrid, which is rated at 43 mpg together.

The Volkswagen Arteon 2020 was recognized by the Insurance Institute for Road Safety (IIHS) as a “Top Safety Pick” and achieved the top rating “Good” in all crash tests. The Arteon missed the highest rating “Top Safety Pick +” due to the low scores for its standard headlights. These assessments should be carried over to the 2021 model. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has not published any crash test ratings for the 2021 Arteon.

VW offers a four-year, 50,000-mile warranty on new vehicles and two years of free scheduled maintenance, both of which are transferable to subsequent owners. Nissan and Toyota both offer a three-year warranty on new vehicles of 36,000 miles, but also a five-year warranty of 60,000 miles on the powertrain. Kia tops them all with a 10 year 100,000 mile warranty on the powertrain and a five year limited 60,000 mile warranty. VW also lacks the excellent reputation for reliability of the Japanese and Korean brands.

How DT would configure this car

To achieve maximum technology, you need to go for the SEL Premium R-Line model with the highest range. It has a parking assistant and the Harman Kardon audio system with 12 speakers as well as all the technical functions from the equipment variants below, including the driving aids for the travel assistant and emergency assistant, charging the mobile phone and recognizing traffic signs. The SEL Premium also has standard all-wheel drive, heated and ventilated front seats and a massaging driver's seat.

Our opinion

Cars like the VW Arteon tend to offer more of everything – more power, more space, more comfort – to gain prestige and justify higher prices. VW makes the game better.

The Arteon has numerous premium features, from nappa leather to the latest smartphone connectivity, but it also feels more upscale than its competitors. The Nissan Maxima and Toyota Avalon feel like larger versions of their respective automakers' other sedans, while the Kia Stinger can't compete with the Arteon in terms of interior quality, technical features, or general sophistication.

VW's flagship feels like a real luxury car, but it also has luxury car prices. Our highest range SEL Premium R-Line test car had a price tag pretty close to a mid-range Acura TLX, a car that VW considers a competitor. The Arteon lacks some of the Acura's more sophisticated features, like the ELS studio audio system, but the real difference is on a winding road. The Arteon can do a lot of things, but not sporty.

Should you get one

Yes. Don't be a badge snob.

Editor's recommendations




05 Aug
Blog

Samsung Galaxy A71 5G Review: Premium Midrange At A Price

Samsung Galaxy A71 5g review 1

"Despite the growing value of cheaper devices, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range phone."

  • Modern design

  • Good value for the price

  • Nice display

  • Long-lasting battery life

  • Camera is just fine

  • No wireless charging

Cheap phones have a moment right now. While there were always good options in the under $ 400 range, 2020 seems to be the year of the cheap phone, thanks in part to the ultra-powerful iPhone SE and the new Google Pixel 4a. But older cellphone series like the Samsung Galaxy A series have been around for years and they have a huge fan base. Thanks to Samsung’s strong brand and carrier relationships, the A-series, which includes the new $ 600 Galaxy A71 5G, is one of the best-selling phone lines ever.

My test device is the 5G model from the US carrier, which offers 5G support and a Qualcomm processor (not to be confused with the various international models).

As the most expensive A-series device, the Galaxy A71 5G faces more intense competition – which means that it has to offer some serious advantages in order to be worth buying. Does it really compete? I tested the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G to find out.

design

The Galaxy A-series usually has a solid design, and although the build quality is sometimes not quite at the level of more expensive phones, the look is still there. That remains true here. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G offers a beautiful and large edge-to-edge display with a hole cut out for the front-facing camera and a rectangular camera projection on the back, which is reminiscent of the Galaxy S20.

The bezels around the display are razor-thin and the phone therefore looks very modern. The lower bezel is slightly larger than the others, but barely noticeable and makes no real difference in everyday use. Interestingly, the hole cutout at the top of the display is smaller than that of the Galaxy A51, although it appears to offer the same camera hardware.

Thanks to the plastic back, the phones feel very light.

On the edges of the phone you will find a USB-C connection, a volume rocker and a power switch. And there is a headphone jack, which is a nice touch these days.

The phone is also comfortable to hold and is very light. Part of it probably has to do with the fact that the back of the phone is made of plastic instead of glass, but it still feels pretty high quality and doesn't seem to scratch or ring easily.

A modern design is one thing that sets some midrange phones apart from the competition. For example, the iPhone SE has a greater focus on performance than design, although it still looks good. Then there is the Pixel 4a, which also offers an edge-to-edge design, but only costs $ 350.

display

At 6.7 inches, the display of the Galaxy A71 5G is slightly larger than that of the Galaxy A51 with 6.5 inches. Here, however, the differences end – you still get the same AMOLED panel with a resolution of 1080p and a refresh rate of 60 Hz.

This is not necessarily a bad thing. The display actually looks great, and although a higher resolution would have been nice, a flagship-level display would hardly be expected. This is particularly true given the fact that it is still an AMOLED panel that provides deep black levels and vivid colors. It can also get light enough to be used outdoors even in direct sunlight. In a few years, we should expect 1440p resolutions for midrange phones, but right now this is a great display for a phone in this price range.

A higher refresh rate may have been estimated, but is not expected in this price range. With a higher refresh rate, the software feels smoother and the animations are more natural. Samsung's high-end phones, such as the Galaxy S20, offer refresh rates of up to 120 Hz. We hope that these higher rates will also apply to mid-range phones in the next few years.

There is a fingerprint sensor under the display, which apparently works quite well. It worked much faster and more accurately than the Galaxy A51's fingerprint sensor. It has occasionally failed, but no more than other fingerprint sensors I use.

performance

Under the hood, the Galaxy A71 5G offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 processor, 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage. The result is a fast phone that's reactive and fast enough for most multitasking and even most mobile games. This is in direct contrast to the Galaxy A51 which, due to its Exynos 9611 processor, generally seemed to freeze and stutter under more than easy use.

Of course, it's not necessarily the best performing phone in its price range, especially in a flagship iPhone SE world. The iPhone SE offers the A13 Bionic chip from Apple – the same processor as the iPhone 11 Pro. The best comparison in the Android world would be the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, which can only be found on flagship phones like the Galaxy S20.

The Galaxy A71 5G will outperform the vast majority of the competition. The phone will outperform the Snapdragon 730-equipped Pixel 4a, but in everyday use, the Pixel 4a may feel a bit smoother and more responsive due to its stripped down software. We have to wait until we get our hands on a Pixel 4a.

The Galaxy A71 5G also performs well in mobile gaming. The phone seemed to be able to handle games like Call of Duty: Mobile and Asphalt 9 with ease, and while it didn't load as quickly as flagship phones, the actual gaming felt smooth and smooth.

The solid performance is also reflected in benchmarks. Here are the benchmark results we got on the phone.

  • AnTuTu: 324,648
  • GeekBench 5: 617 single-core, 1,916 multi-core

These results are excellent for a phone in this price range. It doesn't really come close to the iPhone SE, which reaches over 480,000 on AnTuTu, but with the Snapdragon 765, it should surpass almost anything else that is cheaper. If you can add an additional $ 50 to $ 100 to your budget, you can of course purchase the OnePlus 8, which offers a flagship Snapdragon 865 and even better performance than the Galaxy A71.

This device also offers 5G support, making it one of the cheapest phones. It supports both mmWave and Sub-6GHz 5G, so you should be able to achieve ultra-fast speeds wherever your network operator offers them. This won't be one of the cheapest 5G phones for long – manufacturers are likely to add more and more 5G modems to their phones this year. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is due to appear sometime in the fall and will only cost $ 500.

If you want 5G on a budget now, this may be the way to go – but wait a few months and you'll likely have a lot more options.

software

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G comes with Samsung's One UI operating system. Samsung's software skin has evolved significantly over the years, improving usability and removing bloatware. Still, Samsung could be even better at generally offering less third-party software. The T-Mobile variant Galaxy A71 5G contains a number of T-Mobile apps, an extensive selection of Microsoft apps that you may not want or need, Spotify, McAfee and much more. Some of these apps can be removed, others stay with you.

A user interface generally looks and feels relatively different from standard Android, thanks to its larger square apps, more colorful user interface, and wide range of customizations. You can choose between the classic three-button navigation system or the new Android gesture controls from Google. A user interface also has some unique features like the built-in screen recorder, integration with Windows computers when you want to set them up, and more.

Customization is another strength of Samsung software. A user interface offers a variety of customization options, and many people love the ability to tweak pretty much anything related to the home screen, theme, etc. However, others simply feel overwhelmed by all options and are better served by OnePlus & # 39; OxygenOS, the standard Android offered on a pixel phone or even Apple's iOS.

As is so often the case with Samsung phones, the Galaxy A71 5G is unlikely to receive super-fast updates. We expect the phone to receive important updates for at least a year. Hopefully it will make it on Android 11, but Samsung hasn't confirmed anything and you shouldn't buy the phone as you hope it gets a lot of updates. If you want to stay up to date with Android, buy a pixel.

Camera quality

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G offers a quad lens camera with a 64 megapixel main sensor, a 12 megapixel ultrawide sensor, a 5 megapixel macro sensor and a 5 megapixel depth sensor. It's a solid selection of cameras, and although I personally would have preferred a telephoto lens to a macro lens, the Galaxy A71 5G can generally deliver great photos.

Of course, the photo quality depends on the situation, and a phone is not necessarily as consistent as more expensive devices. When the lighting is good, the photos are colorful and bright, with adequate dynamic range and solid details. In low-light conditions, the photos are relatively noisy and have no details, which is usually the case with medium-range phones. There's a built-in night mode that removes the noise, but photos are still not on the same level as devices like the iPhone 11 Pro and Google Pixel 4 XL.

The elephant in the room here is the new Google Pixel 4a. There are few early reviews of the Pixel 4a, but most suggest that the device offers a camera that matches the standard Pixel 4. This is a flagship camera in a $ 350 phone. Don't expect this on the Galaxy A71 5G, though the phone comes a lot closer to a flagship in price.

The macro lens is more or less useless for the phone because it has a fixed focal length and is therefore extremely difficult to focus on a subject. Even if you get a good focus, there aren't many details and the colors are a bit subdued.

Despite the problems, you will find that photos are more than passable in most situations.

Battery life

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G easily lasted a whole day under relatively heavy use, and we don't expect anyone to have any real issues with the battery life itself. The battery of the Galaxy A71 5G has a capacity of 4,500 mAh, and at the end of a long working day, I still had 30% to 40% left.

If you run out of juice at some point, you can charge the device relatively quickly. The phone supports 25-watt quick charge, which means the device gets 50% of its battery back in just 30 minutes. It’s pretty impressive.

The only feature that's really lacking is wireless charging, although it's not necessarily unacceptable that a phone in this price range doesn't have this feature. We hope that wireless charging will become cheaper phones over the next few years.

Price and availability

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is located between real mid-range phones and flagships and costs $ 650. Depending on your wireless service provider, you can get it at a cheaper price. For example, T-Mobile is offering the phone for $ 600. It's actually not a bad price considering what you get – but there is definitely some competition in the price range. The device is available from Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and directly from the Samsung website.

Our opinion

With solid performance, modern design, and 5G support, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a great phone for the price. The fact that it offers 5G support is probably not a reason to buy the phone alone, but it's an added bonus. However, the proliferation of new budget phones at the flagship level dampens the excitement about their value.

Are there alternatives?

If you can spend an additional $ 50 to $ 100, you get the OnePlus 8, which offers better performance and a more modern design.

If you're ready to make the switch, the iPhone SE will perform better than any other Android device and will only cost $ 400.

Then there is the Pixel 4a, which is unlikely to perform as well as the Galaxy A71 5G, but offers a much better camera, modern design, and more – all for $ 300 less than this phone.

How long should it take?

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G does not have an IP protection class. You should therefore keep it away from the pool or bathroom if possible. The phone should last a good two years before it needs to be replaced. The plastic back breaks much less often than a glass shelf.

The Galaxy A71 5G offers a limited one-year warranty, but only covers manufacturing defects.

Should you buy it

Yes, but only if you want a solid Samsung phone for $ 650 or less. Otherwise, consider spending more on the OnePlus 8, or save almost half of that money, and purchase the Pixel 4a.

Editor's recommendations




01 Aug
Blog

Vanmoof S3 Review: Premium Style At An Affordable Price

vanmoof s3 rating rear profile 1

"The Vanmoof S3 is equipped with excellent technology at a medium price and absolutely great as a bonus."

  • Eye-catching design

  • Useful app

  • Integrated lights and fenders

  • Smooth automatic transmission

  • Excellent brakes

  • Lower power assist levels are not helpful

  • Feels bulky when driving

  • The battery cannot be removed for charging

Vanmoof was way ahead of the curve when its Dutch founders, the Carlier brothers, founded the company in 2009. Maybe ahead of the curve. Electric bicycles were treated as a novelty in 2009. However, their popularity has skyrocketed in recent years. I regularly ate the dust of a Vanmoof enthusiast on my evening walk out of the office – back when it was still that way.

Now Vanmoof has a couple of news bikes at his disposal, just like everyone is looking for a way to explore our new, socially distant, outdoor lifestyle. I tried the more conventional Vanmoof S3, which sells just under $ 2,000 for just one hair. It has a sibling, the Vanmoof X3, with smaller tires and a frame that is easier to step over, but most of the other components are identical between the two.

The start time of the S3 could hardly be better, but it has a lot of competition. Every major bicycle manufacturer is now represented in the e-bike arena, and some offer over a dozen models. Can Vanmoof keep his lead?

design

One thing is certain, a Vanmoof is unmistakable. The company's design revolves around a thick, straight center tube that extends across the wheels at each end of the frame. It is a look that is classic and modern at the same time.

This is a classic bike for modern life.

Vanmoof keeps an eye on this important property by minimizing all other distractions. Like the company's other motorcycles, the Vanmoof S3 is painted in either matt black or blue and has almost no branding. It's a snappy, sleek design that fits the purpose of the S3 directly. This is a classic bike for modern life.

That doesn't mean that the Vanmoof S3 is without peer. The Gazelle Ultimate T10 is a personal favorite thanks to its combination of ultra-modern sensitivity and easy passage practicality. The new Vado SL from Specialized is also very attractive. Nevertheless, Vanmoof absolutely has the Trek and Giant bicycles that look more like improved bicycles than like specially built e-bikes.

The S3 is equipped as standard with front and rear fenders as well as front and rear lights. It's a big deal, especially for an e-bike that sells for $ 2,000. It's not uncommon for e-bikes in the S3 price range to throw one or both fenders overboard. Although the lighting is usually standard, it is often not as attractive or bright as that of the Vanmoof. If you buy the Vanmoof X3, which has smaller wheels and a less conventional frame, you will also get a built-in luggage rack for carrying small items.

Assembly and initial setup

While Vanmoof has a few dealers, its network is tiny. You will probably order online. Bicycles are large, heavy objects and can be difficult to assemble.

The company does everything it can to alleviate this anger. Open the box and you will immediately find detailed assembly instructions next to a toolbox that contains everything you need to assemble the bike. There's even a handy pull cord that allows you to slide the bike out horizontally instead of lifting it out vertically.

This does not mean that assembly is child's play. I cut myself when my hand slipped as I tightened an uncomfortable plastic clip that holds the front motor cable securely to the frame. However, the overall difficulty is no greater than assembling an Ikea chest of drawers. If you can handle it, you can handle it.

After assembly, setting up the app is easy. Simply download it to your phone, create an account and the bike will automatically connect. It worked seamlessly and I never had a problem with the app connecting to the bike.

technology

The app is probably the actual heading function of Vanmoof. While many competitors technically have apps, they are often simple and buggy. Vanmoof's app, on the other hand, is great. It provides ride summaries, allows you to adjust bike settings, shows the current location of the bike, and provides access to support topics, among other things.

I found that the bike's Bluetooth range is not particularly good. If the app is kept in my garage, it will lose connection to the bike as soon as I leave the room. Other Bluetooth devices I own have no problem communicating across multiple walls. I think Vanmoof could do better.

The bike doesn't have an LCD display, and instead uses a sophisticated LED grid to show speed, battery life, and other information on the center tube. Vanmoof calls this a matrix display. It is a unique touch that makes the design of the bike more coherent. The matrix display is bright and always easy to read, even on a sunny summer afternoon at noon. Oh, and if you want a laptop to go with the bike, check out the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14.

It is the combination of the app with this matrix display that distinguishes this bike in everyday use. Most e-bikes have a small black and white LCD screen and are controlled via buttons or twist grips. This is effective, but simple. Instead, Vanmoof only uses the matrix display for important information and transfers the most control over the bike to the app.

This speaks for the focus of the bike on errands and the way to work. It is built so that you can drive with everything you normally carry and to places that you would otherwise reach by car or transit. Using the app is great in this regard, as your phone is always in your pocket and you stop frequently. Your phone's display is much brighter and easier to use than any LCD you find on an e-bike.

Anti-theft device

Vanmoof bicycles have built-in anti-theft technology. This includes a lock for the rear hub, an alarm, and an optional paid service that promises to track down and replace the stolen bike if it can't be found.

The lock is activated by aligning a mark on the hub with the same mark on the rear chain guard and then pressing a button near the dropout of the rear frame. After locking, an alarm sounds when the rear wheel of the bike moves.

It works as advertised, although I wouldn't trust it. The alarm could be louder and a thief could pick up and pull the bike away (although its sensitivity would make it difficult to do without triggering the alarm). You should always use a strong lock to secure your bike to a fixed attachment. Still, Vanmoof's alarm is reasonable support that could give opportunistic thieves a break.

Driving impressions

If the Vanmoof S3's commuter-friendly design isn't already obvious, you will surely feel it when you get on your bike for the first time. The relaxed frame and the retracted handlebars of the bike offer an upright feeling and excellent visibility. As is so often the case with an upright driving position, this comfort comes at the expense of agility. It's an easy bike to turn on a narrow road at low speeds, but it doesn't feel eager or nimble.

The S3 weighs 42 pounds. This is heavier than most conventional bikes, but light for an e-bike. The Specialized Como is 45 pounds, while the Gazelle T10 Ultimate is 51 pounds. The S3 doesn't feel light on the pedals, but your back will love the lightweight frame as you pull the bike up stairs or over a large curb.

Fat tires help the S3 deal with small bumps and potholes without any problems. It's a smooth ride over manicured sidewalks or tightly packed gravel. However, if you encounter large potholes, the rigid frame and lack of suspension on the bike can cause large bumps from the handlebars.

The electric motor of the S3 is attached to the front wheel and delivers power in four stages or can be switched off completely. The lowest power level is worthless, but higher settings are strong. I usually drove around at level three or maximized the performance on paved bike paths. The bike's engine switches off at 32 km / h. This is the maximum speed allowed for a class 1 e-bike like the S3. There are settings that comply with European and Japanese regulations, but as expected, this will make the top speed even lower.

Adrenaline junkies should, however, look elsewhere. The performance is tentative compared to racing options such as the Specialized Vado or the Giant ToughRoad GX E +. While the S3 has a "turbo" button, hitting is only a modest gear and is most useful when you need a little more juice on a steep hill.

While the S3 lacks the thrill, it's supple. The front hub motor pulls with a steady stance. Don't take that for granted. Many e-bikes in the Vanmoof price range, such as the Pedego City Commuter Lite, use a rear wheel hub motor. A rear hub can dramatically shift the balance of a bike backwards, making wheelies a little too easy. The balanced, sophisticated power transmission of the S3 is good for every e-bike and excellent for an e-bike with a price of $ 2,000.

The S3 brakes are activated with a soft, precise feel that creates trust.

The power is transmitted via a chic four-speed automatic transmission. That's right, you don't even have to switch for yourself. Four speeds are not many, and I felt that on steep hills. Nevertheless, I will bring this automatic transmission over the bargain six, seven or eight-speed transmission that can be found in most e-bikes in this price range.

The S3's deceleration is more impressive than its acceleration. The bike has hydraulic disc brakes at the front and rear. While almost all e-bikes have disc brakes, some mid-range bikes have mechanical disc brakes, a setup that can feel chunky or wooden. The S3 brakes are activated with a soft, precise feel that builds trust and prevents too much brake from being accidentally pressed.

Battery life and range

There is a 504 watt-hour battery in the large top tube of the Vanmoof S3. The range is indicated at 37 to 93 miles. In most situations, you are closer to 37 miles than 93 miles.

My most demanding trip was a 23-mile trip with maximum performance on a paved, flat bike path. As a result, almost half of the battery was used up, suggesting that in the mid-1940s I would see the total mileage if I kept going until the battery was empty. I have also made numerous short trips, approximately 10 miles each, at level three. .

These results are typical of a modern e-bike. Most commuters cover short distances (less than 16 km), so the range of the S3 should last for several days, if not a whole week.

You can't just remove the S3's battery (Vanmoof says it can only be removed for maintenance) and charge it away from the bike. This can be impractical if you have a small apartment and want to keep the S3 in a common room.

Our opinion

Vanmoof's S3 is a feature-rich commuter bike that sacrifices little despite a mid-range price of $ 2,000. This bike is an excellent choice if you need a bike for city errands or for daily commuting up to 32 km round trip.

Is there a better alternative?

While the price of $ 2,000 for the Vanmoof S3 appears very high next to the $ 600 you can buy on Amazon, I generally recommend avoiding them. They do their job, but use components that are as inexpensive as possible, which affects longevity. They also tend to have small batteries.

The Propella e-bike is the best affordable alternative. Starting at $ 1,100 for a single gear or $ 1,300 for a seven-gear, this is a less complicated option with a smaller battery and inferior brakes. Still, it's a nice entry-level bike with decent components, and works well for commuting 10 miles or less.

RadPower is another good choice. The brand manufactures a variety of electric bikes that offer excellent value for money, such as the affordable RadRover and its sturdy RadWagon. RadPower is all about function. So you prefer Vanmoof when design and technology are important to you.

The Vanmoof S3 has only a few strong rivals that come very close to its $ 2,000 price tag. Pedego's City Commuter Lite is nowhere near as sophisticated. Trek, Specialized, and Giant tend to go into a higher price range, so their motorcycles, which sell for around $ 2,000, can't usually compete with the Vanmoof.

Don't forget the sibling of the Vanmoof S3, the X3. The motorcycles are similar, but the X3 has smaller wheels, a lower top tube, and an integrated front rack. I would expect the X3 to be even better for short distances and errands in the city, while the S3 would be better for long distances and errands.

How long it will take?

A bike can last a very long time, although e-bikes are limited by the longevity of the battery and the durability of other electronic devices. You should also know that e-bikes require more maintenance than a standard bike. Still, I would expect at least five to ten years of operation, and that could be extended as long as replacement batteries are available.

The bike comes with a three-year warranty against defects, which is not particularly long for an electric bike. Vanmoof has a smaller dealer network than its larger competitors such as Specialized, Trek or Giant. This could make it difficult to find service if you are not near a dealer.

Should you buy it

Yes. The Vanmoof S3 is a mid-range commuter e-bike with an outstanding design and great technical features.

Editor's recommendations




30 May
Blog

2020 Toyota GR Supra 3.0 Premium Review: Return of the King

2020 Toyota Supra Review

2020 Toyota GR Supra 3.0 Premium

"Toyota's reborn flagship sports car was worth it."

  • Punchy acceleration

  • BMW infotainment system

  • Excellent cabin ergonomics

  • Overall refinement

Toyota is known for the everyday life of Camry and RAV4 and does not have many nameplates that cause excitement. That is why the return of the Supra is such a big deal. For Toyota, the Supra is what the Ford Mustang is, a legendary performance car with a passionate fan base. Like the Mustang, the Supra became a movie star thanks to the Fast & Furious franchise.

In contrast to previous Supra, the fifth generation 2020 model was developed with external help. It may have a Toyota badge on the hood, but there's actually a BMW Z4 under the 2020 Supra. The two cars were developed together, which gave Toyota a new Supra at a fraction of the cost of self-development. It also means that you can find German DNA on practically every inch of this supposedly Japanese sports car.

A similar strategy spawned the Toyota 86, which partners with the Subaru BRZ. We liked the 86, so can Toyota use the same magic with another partner? To find out, we spent a week with a Toyota GR Supra 3.0 Premium 2020 ("GR" stands for "Gazoo Racing", the Toyota division responsible for fine-tuning the car).

2020 Toyota Supra rear three quartersStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The Supra has a base price of $ 50,920, but the premium model offers features like Apple CarPlay wireless, an improved audio system, and a larger touchscreen. Together with an optional driver assistance package, the price of our test car rose to $ 56,615.

Design and interior

Inside and outside, this car is like no previous Supra. Instead of being based on previous models, the exterior design of the 2020 Supra is based on the 2014 Toyota FT-1 concept. The implementation of concept cars in production vehicles is always difficult, since concepts are generally not designed for crash tests or the ergonomics of the interior . While a significant amount of the FT-1 made it to Supra production, some compromises were made. The frontend in particular looks a bit bloated compared to the FT-1, which is probably a concession to the European safety standards for pedestrians.

Apart from the Toyota logo on the steering wheel, the interior is only BMW. The gear lever and the rotating infotainment controller come directly from the German automaker's catalog, and the touchscreen is located on the top of the dashboard and is not embedded in it like any other Toyota. The BMW DNA of the car is also shown in small details. To open the hood, you have to pull the lever twice and press a button on the gear lever to make it work. Even the doorbells have the same clear BMW sound.

The Supra has one of the best driving positions of all current sports cars.

It is not a bad thing. BMW knows a lot about the great interior, and the Supra is no exception. It has one of the best driving positions of all current sports cars. It is easy to feel comfortable, the low dashboard offers an excellent view outwards and all controls are easily accessible from the driver's seat.

However, if you expect luxury, let yourself be disappointed. This may be a BMW interior, but it's an entry-level version, especially compared to the Supra's BMW Z4 sibling.

The 2020 Supra is only available as a two-door, two-seat coupé. In contrast to the "Fast and Furious" -era Supra, there is no removable roof panel. The interior roughly corresponds to that of the convertible Z4 only, although the BMW offers a little more headroom. However, the Toyota offers 10.2 cubic feet of cargo space for the 9.9 of the Z4. The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray and the Porsche 718 Cayman have 12.6 cubic feet and 14.9 cubic feet of space, though divided between the front and rear trunks.

2020 Toyota Supra interior

Technology, infotainment and driver assistance

The Supra has the same iDrive infotainment system as current BMW models with identical graphics, menu arrangement and control dial. The standard touchscreen is 6.5 inches in size, and an 8.8-inch digital instrument cluster is also standard. Premium models receive an 8.8-inch touchscreen as well as a head-up display and charging the mobile phone.

Since the Supra uses a BMW infotainment system, it receives wireless Apple CarPlay – the only Toyota model with this function. However, base models do not get CarPlay at all and Android Auto is not available. BMW plans to add wireless Android car to 2021 models, but it's unclear whether the Supra will get it too.

The infotainment experience shows that it is no shame to borrow from the best.

As with the entire interior design, the infotainment experience shows that there is no shame in borrowing from the best. The iDrive system worked just as well in the Supra as in other BMW models, with intuitive menus and a control dial that was much easier to use than the cumbersome touchpad from the Lexus luxury department at Toyota. The only blemishes were a screen that washed out in direct sunlight and an audio system that sounded more impressive on paper than it did in real life. (Premium models receive a JBL system with 12 speakers and 500 watts.)

The driver's standard aids include autonomous emergency braking, a forward collision warning, a lane departure warning with steering assistant and an automatic high beam. The optional driver assistance package offers adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring, a rear traffic alarm and parking sensors.

2020 Toyota Supra infotainment controller

Experience driving

Open the hood of the Toyota Supra 2020 and the logic of the BMW partnership becomes clear. The German automaker knows how to build a great driver car, yes, but more importantly, BMW was able to equip Toyota with an inline six-cylinder engine. An inline six was the calling card of the last Supra, but Toyota no longer has one in its lineup. Instead of spending the money to develop a new engine on just one model, Toyota borrowed BMWs.

2020 Toyota Supra logoStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The 3.0-liter turbo engine is shared with the Z4 and numerous other BMW models, as is the eight-speed automatic transmission (if you want a manual transmission, get an 86). Our 2020 test car made 335 horsepower and 365 pound-feet of torque, but 2021 models get a boost to 382 horsepower and 368 pounds per foot. Toyota will add a 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbocharged engine to the range for 2021. All Supra models are equipped with rear-wheel drive to ensure the best possible handling.

Toyota says the 2020 Supra 3.0 can go from zero to 60 miles an hour in 4.1 seconds. That's about as fast as a Porsche 718 Cayman S (the basic Cayman is 0.1 seconds slower, but 0.1 seconds faster with the optional Sport Chrono Package). According to a Motor Week test, it's also 1.0 seconds faster than a 1993 Toyota Supra Turbo, if you're wondering how the modern Supra compares to its movie star predecessor. According to estimates by both manufacturers, the more powerful 2021 Supra 3.0 reaches zero to 60 miles per hour in 3.9 seconds and thus corresponds to the six-cylinder BMW Z4.

What differentiates the Supra from other sports cars is its maturity.

The Supra felt quick, but that wasn't the biggest impression. What differentiates the Supra from other sports cars is its maturity. It was comfortable and quiet enough for a long road trip and agile enough to make the back roads fun. The Supra offers a better balance between comfort and sportiness than its Z4 sibling, which feels more like a traditional luxury car than a real sports car.

Toyota has also achieved this with its own tuning. While some other automakers offer a confusing set of driving modes and expect customers to find out what works best, Toyota stuck with just two modes: normal and sport.

2020 Toyota Supra engineStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

While the engineers nailed down some details, they missed others. Toyota could have spent a little more time tweaking the steering, which has the same feedback as a worn arcade game. While the Supra is admirably refined, this also makes for a less appealing driving experience. The car only really comes to life when you reach extra-legal speeds. The Supra was also not designed to drive with the windows down, a compromise that would likely result in higher aerodynamic efficiency. Lower the windows at more than the speed of the parking lot and the buffeting noises become unbearable.

Fuel consumption and security

The 2020 Supra has a total output of 26 mpg (24 mpg city, 31 mpg highway), which is identical to the Toyota BMW Z4 sibling and slightly better than a Porsche Cayman S. Over a week's drive, we have an average of 24 mpg in the car's on-board computer.

Since the Supra is a new vehicle, crash test assessments from the Road Safety Insurance Institute (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are not yet available, and predicting future reliability is difficult. However, expect the Supra to resemble a BMW rather than a Toyota in this area, as all of the main components come from the German company. This means that reliability may not be in line with Toyota's reputation.

Toyota offers a three-year comprehensive warranty of 36,000 miles and a five-year warranty of 60,000 miles for the powertrain, which are average for a new car.

How DT would configure this car

Toyota keeps things simple with just two trim levels: Base and Premium. You want to choose the latter if you want the most technology. The premium model comes standard with a larger 8.8-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and a head-up display. On the driver's side, the optional driver assistance package, which offers adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring, rear traffic warning and parking sensors for $ 1,195, is required to use all functions.

Earlier generations of the Supra have been well served by the aftermarket, and we assume that this will be the case with the new model. Parts may take some time to launch, but numerous upgrades should be available in due course. Papadakis Racing has already brought the BMW engine of the Supra to 1,000 hp, which shows that the engine has great tuning potential.

Our opinion

The wait for the Toyota Supra 2020 was worth it. It is a well-designed sports car that combines driving pleasure with everyday usability and sophistication. Some fans may not like Toyota's use of a BMW platform, but they probably haven't driven the new Supra. From the infotainment system to the engine, the BMW bits make this car so good.

However, this goodness comes at a price. The base price of the Supra of $ 50,920 undercuts the Porsche Cayman and the Chevy Corvette. However, if you activate the check boxes for optional technical functions, this gap is largely closed. The Corvette starts at $ 59,995 – just $ 3,380 more than our test car – and offers a different level of performance. If you're not connected to the idea of ​​a two-seater, you can also have a pretty Ford Mustang for the same price as a basic Supra.

For much less money than the Supra, two sports cars – the Nissan 370Z and the Toyota 86 – offer more personality. With available gearboxes and more visceral driving experiences, they leave the Supra out in sensations. However, no one can keep up with the Supra in terms of performance or technology, and the Supra is the only one of the three we'd like to take on a road trip.

Should you get one?

Yes. The Supra is a great sports car that you can drive every day.

Editor's recommendations