The Bluesound Pulse Soundbar 2i is bulky and frustrating

Bluesound Pulse Soundbar 2i Rating 1

"The excellent sound quality is affected by poor design decisions and a poor user experience."

  • Excellent balanced, neutral sound

  • Tons of connection and accessory options

  • Compatible with wireless audio for the whole house

  • Works with Airplay

  • The bulky, high design limits the placement

  • Poor user experience overall

  • Expensive

Bluesound is not a household name, but it is a close competitor to Sonos in the fight for over-connected, intelligent high-fidelity audio. The Pulse Soundbar 2i is the second generation soundbar from the company for the living room and offers serious audio chops.

At $ 900, it's a little more expensive than the Sonos Arc, but doesn't offer Dolby Atmos support like its rival. Does it have other features that could make it a better choice? Let's take a look.

Large drivers, bulky housing

The Pulse Soundbar 2i is not nice. When we review soundbars, we do it from the perspective that they shouldn't draw attention to themselves. The best are slim and compact, and if you have to look at them, they have at least sophisticated lines and a classy finish. The Bose Soundbar 700 is a good example of this.

The Soundbar 2i seems to be the opposite. The Soundbar 2i places more emphasis on sound quality than in a room and is 5.5 inches tall. To put this in perspective: The feet of my 65-inch LED TV from Sony only lift the bottom of the TV a little more than 2.5 inches from the media stand.

That said, if I placed the Soundbar 2i in its optimal position directly under the TV, it would cover about two inches of the bottom of the TV. It's good that the soundbar has an IR receiver in the front, because the IR receiver of my TV is blocked due to its height.

Jaron Schneider | Digital trends

This isn't ideal, and for anyone with a similar living room setup, the Pulse Soundbar 2i will look incredibly large and just as intrusive. However, if you choose to wall-mount your TV, this is less of a problem. Bluesound contains a variety of wall adapters to simplify this.

If the reason why Bluesound made the Soundbar 2i so big is to record the speaker system, it was mainly the sound quality. The technical data of the drivers in this soundbar are impressive. It includes two 1-inch tweeters, two 4-inch woofers, two 2-inch midrange speakers and two 4-inch passive radiators.

Connected, but confusing

If you're looking for a variety of connectivity options and codec support, the Soundbar 2i is flush with these. It not only supports almost every conceivable audio file format, but also a variety of codecs, including aptX via Bluetooth as well as USB, Optical, RCA Line-In, HDMI ARC and eARC. There is also Wi-Fi for direct streaming from a number of services, including Tidal's master tracks.

If your home has it, chances are that the Soundbar 2i can play it. Thanks to Bluesound's impressive list of support devices, you have many options if you want to invest in this system.

If you want a wireless connection to the Soundbar 2i, you can grab a NAD M10 A / V receiver that supports built-in bluesound. If you have an existing home theater system that you want to integrate the Soundbar 2i into, the company's Node 2i connects the Bluesound app interface to this system and integrates everything into the Soundbar 2i for a multiroom setup without you having to create any new ones Gotta buy devices Got it. The number of add-on options is substantial and there is a lot more going on in Bluesound than in its competitor Sonos.

If you're looking for a variety of connectivity options and codec support, the Soundbar 2i is flush with these.

Unfortunately, I'm not the biggest fan of the Bluesound app, which is the control center for all Bluesounds devices, including the Soundbar 2i. Not only is it faulty, it is also not intuitive to use. Sure, there are many options in the app that allow you to fine-tune the type of audio you want to get out of the Soundbar 2i, but finding and using these features is not what I would imagine. In this area, the Sonos app is much more user-friendly.

The Bluesound Soundbar 2i makes me stupid.

In particular, the use of the Soundbar 2i with HDMI ARC has not been explained in the literature supplied or in a guided setup in the app, and the Soundbar is not intelligent enough to use standard HDMI signals and give you audio.

When I connected the soundbar for the first time and set it up via the app, at no time did I have to activate HDMI ARC via the app to get sound pass-through. I had to go to Google and find out how to get sound from the bar. The device has told me so little about how it works.

This is a step that feels like it should just happen and not something that I should tell the soundbar through the app. At least the app should be more open about what the Soundbar 2i is capable of and how the setup can be completed properly.

RIGHT: This is the home screen and you can tap either the top right or left. | MEDIUM: If you tap on the top right, you can choose which output the soundbar should use. This does not allow HDMI pass-through, but only the volume control. | RIGHT: To get an HDMI pass-through, tap HDMI ARC in the top left. This separation is absolutely unintuitive.

The Soundbar 2i does not have the supplied remote control. I'm not sure how that decision was made by anyone at Bluesound, but I can't get it over with.

Firstly, it is a speaker system for the home theater – it requires a remote control. Second, if you don't have an HDMI-ARC on your TV and want to connect via an optical connection, you can easily change the volume of this soundbar. All controls are in the app (more on that in a moment), but using an app to control your soundbar in your own living room feels shaky and disconnected, not to mention slow and boring. You can pick up the Bluesound RC1 IR remote, but that's an additional $ 60 for something that should have been included. We complained that Sonos overcharged for accessories, but Bluesound takes it to a new level.

On a positive note, the Soundbar 2i can work with most IR remote controls that you will find in a household if you set them up with the app. That sounds great, but the app never tells you that this is an option, and neither does the literature that comes with the bar. You almost have to trip over it as a skill. All of this stems from the problem at hand – the user experience is exceptionally poor. Everything about the bluesound experience seems to have been done by an engineer who wanted to pack as much as possible into the product but didn't help anyone massaging the usability in it.

The Soundbar 2i makes me stupid. Sonos guides you superbly through setting up one of its devices and mixes picture clues with specific instructions so you never feel lost. If you work with many different devices that can offer a variety of services, this type of hand holding is an absolute must. It is a shame that Bluesound does not help you as a consumer because the acoustic quality of this soundbar is excellent.

Powerful, pleasant, neutral sound

I mentioned the impressive array of drivers in the Soundbar 2i, and while they're not pretty to look at, they do provide an excellent listening experience. I am very happy with the sound quality of the Soundbar 2i and almost completely fix the above-mentioned problems with the user interface of the product.

The music bar 2i really sings in music.

The bass in the Soundbar 2i does not match the raw performance of a subwoofer, but it offers more than enough rumble for films and adds depth to the music.

I actually preferred the Soundbar 2i as a music speaker to a home theater centerpiece. While movies sound great, they lack a surround sound feel. Achieving this in a single, center-weighted bar is difficult, but not impossible. The Sonos Arc does a better job in this department thanks to its Dolby Atmos support, and The Fives from Klipsch makes me better with first-class cinema sound thanks to the real separation of left and right.

Jaron Schneider | Digital trends

While the cinema isn't the best choice, the Soundbar 2i really sings when playing music.

All of these drivers work together to produce a sound that allows you to disassemble any particular instrument in an orchestra or hear the nuances of the melodies in a rock ballad clearly. Bluesound has set its 2i soundbar to work almost like a reference monitor, with incredible clarity and excellent neutral sound reproduction.

I liked the sound from the Soundbar 2i so much that I moved it away from my TV – since it blocked the bottom of the screen anyway – and put it on my coat so that it was in the best position to play music, while I was reading on the couch. It played the sound in my living room beautifully, and when I enjoyed this beautiful musical experience, I complained about how this wonderful piece of sound hardware was held back by UI decisions that were so easy to avoid.

I tried the Soundbar 2i with the wireless subwoofer from Bluesound, the Pulse Sub, but was not impressed. The submarine was slim and easy to connect, but it offered little change in the way I experienced music or movies. Even at maximum performance, it didn't give me the rumble I was looking for. I think the soundbar does a good job of its own so that you can pass the submarine on for the time being.

Our opinion

The Bluesound Pulse Soundbar 2i is a bit strange in the soundbar. It's better in music than in the cinema, is formatted to work well with wall-mounted TVs in particular, and is heavily dependent on its app. Excellent overall quality helps with redemption, but most users should choose Sonos' more intuitive options.

Is there a better alternative?

The Sonos Arc is the most direct competitor and offers the same promises as a soundbar with multiroom connectivity. As a bonus, the Arc is $ 100 cheaper and supports Dolby Atmos. The Bose Soundbar 700 is also an excellent choice, and The Fives by Klipsch offers everyone the opportunity to fight for their money as real stereo monitors.

How long it will take?

Bluesound offers the standard 1 year warranty but the build quality is excellent and I don't expect this device to fail soon.

Should you buy it

No, it's hard to recommend the Soundbar 2i. Despite the excellent audio quality, it works better as a speaker than a TV soundbar, and the user interface takes a lot of work. That makes it a passport of mine.

Editor's recommendations




Matterhackers Pulse XE 3D Printer Review: A Durable High-End 3D Printer

matterhackers pulse xe review 11

MatterHackers Pulse XE NylonX Advanced Materials 3D printer package

"If you need to print with exotic, high-performance materials, this is the right printer."

  • Excellent out-of-box performance

  • Wide material capacities

  • Durable, well-designed components

  • Attractive, modern design

  • State-of-the-art functions

  • Requires a dedicated computer to reach its full potential

  • Lack of ventilation system

  • Not the fastest

Printing with high-performance materials can be difficult. Sure, there are options on the market, but most come in the form of retrofitting aftermarket components to a printer in one way or another, at least in the mid-range consumer market. Enter the MatterHackers Pulse XE, the highest end of the MatterHackers Pulse line of 3D printers, and one of the few devices designed exclusively to instantly print some of the hardest materials on the market.

The pulse line is an interesting linchpin of its creators. MatterHackers has long been known as a reseller of a wide variety of 3D printers and materials that can be used with them. Thanks to this, MatterHackers has been effectively gathering information about what members of the 3D printing community expect from their printers for years and showing what types of pulses are available. The Pulse range is available in three options with multiple combinations of even more specialized hardware and a love letter to your market. Resolve dozens of common complaints with out-of-the-box hardware and include many of the most common aftermarket upgrades as standard components. In conjunction with MatterControl (MatterHackers control software), each pulse is an attractive product in itself.

STANDOUT FUNCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The outstanding selling point of the Pulse XE is its versatility, but also its user friendliness should not be underestimated. With a build volume of 250 x 220 x 215 mm (10 x 9 x 8.5 inches), the Pulse finds a good balance while maintaining a manageable space requirement with a respectable capacity.

In addition, the leveling routine via the connected BLTouch sensor ensures a reliable, easy-to-calibrate printer. The functions of MatterControl when a host device is connected to the printer make it incredibly easy to use. An optional magnetic removable build plate (included with this test model) makes removing the print incredibly easy.

MatterHackersJames Lynch / Digital Trends

Finally there is Olsson Ruby nozzle on hotend. The Pulse XE can hardly be called "high performance" when using a standard brass die for extrusion. The name of the Olsson Ruby nozzle doesn't just sound cool. At the top of this otherwise normal-looking 3D printer nozzle is a small ruby ​​with an even smaller hole on the bottom that serves as an opening. The hardness of the ruby ​​gives the nozzle an exceptional lifespan and enables it to withstand even the most abrasive filaments with ease. While other nozzle options exist that achieve similar goals, they are typically made entirely of hardened materials such as steel. The ruby ​​achieves the same goal with a laboratory-made gem that is held in the head of the nozzle. Admittedly, this is the brightest way to get things done.

The Pulse XE was manufactured using some of the highest quality parts in the consumer for prosumer markets

Another unique feature of the Pulse line is that, unlike most printers on the market, MatterHackers printers are specifically designed for their MatterControl control software, as they work mostly independently and connect to a computer that serves as a backup option. Connecting a dedicated computer to the Pulse increases its capabilities through several functions that are otherwise only found in the upper market segment. From the ability to self-calibrate with up to 100 individual data points, to a greater degree of control over movement during printing, to the resumption of 3D printing that was interrupted in the event of a power failure or other power failure, MatterControl increases the flexibility of the Massive machine (as long as the semi-finished print is still on the bed when the power supply is restored). This doesn't mean that the Pulse can't work on its own in the same way as other printers, just that adding a dedicated controller turns a Matterhackers Pulse from a good all-round performer into a cutting-edge piece of personal manufacturing equipment.

BUILD QUALITY AND RELIABILITY

The quality of the Pulse XE should not be underestimated. With a frame made from a hybrid of specially machined aluminum, anodized extrusions and precise 3D printed components (undoubtedly made with other pulse printers), this printer was built for a long service life. The damping mounts attached to each of the motors offer noise reduction, and care and attention has obviously been put into the overall design. The underlying build quality is one thing, but a lot can go wrong on a 3D printer with good bones. So what about the other components? In this area, MatterHackers definitely used the best that they could find.

MatterHackersJames Lynch / Digital Trends

As an example, MatterHackers decided to use E3Ds v6, a precision-made hot end from one of the most respected brands in 3D printing. To push the plastic itself, the ultra-high-performance extruder from BondTech was selected to ensure additional performance. The Ultimachines RAMBo Mini-Motherboard (with Panucatt's Azteeg x5 GT as an even more powerful upgrade) forms the brain of the device and the excellent VIKI 2 control panel at the front.

In short, the Pulse XE has been manufactured using some of the best consumer end parts for prosumer markets and also uses many parts that are normally added to printers as aftermarket upgrades as standard. All of this results in a precision-made printer with a legendarily reliable extrusion mechanism, a long-life motherboard (just like Lulzbots Taz 6 and Mini, and I would say every motherboard that NASA trusts me will trust) with an easy-to-read, informative display the front of the device. In the month that I had the Pulse, he easily mastered every challenge I faced him and has printed almost continuously since leaving the box.

PERFORMANCE

Could the Pulse XE have disadvantages with all of these great features? Unfortunately yes. While the Pulse works incredibly reliably and immediately has remarkable versatility, the biggest disadvantage of the XE and the Pulse line in general is the underlying design. The Pulse XE is a 3D printer with a side bed or bed spinner, ie the print bed moves from side to side in one direction to move the model to be printed. This is an incredibly easy to construct, maintain, and repair design (since this configuration allows easy access to the axle and its parts), but has the obvious disadvantage that moving the bed can cause reliability problems if it moves too quickly (Due to the dynamics of the bed in the fight against changes in direction). . This can manifest itself in the fact that in extreme cases the entire pressure shifts from side to side to small, wavy lines over the pressure at lower speeds. Momentum is not a friend of a bed sling. This means that the Pulse XE prints at an average speed that should be enough for most, but fades compared to the speeds of some other models.

James Lynch / Digital Trends

How good it prints, the Pulse XE works flawlessly right away. I have nothing to report about any scatter marks or stains, the layers are smooth and the corners are absolutely within the tolerances that you would expect. While it is worth noting that print quality for most 3D printers in the FDM or FFF category (i.e. they use a hot nozzle to extrude plastic filaments) may need to be roughly the same over time, modification and careful optimization the Pulse XE doesn't work whatever to produce excellent prints. With a thin layer of glue on the build plate and a short automatic calibration process, I was able to simply select "print" from the MatterControl user interface and leave, knowing that I would return to a finished model. The adhesive may be a sticking point for some, but is easy to apply and required to print the materials for which the XE was developed, such as. B. nylon (which has the ability to permanently bond to most reusable construction areas and thus permanently ruin them). A plate that does not require glue and is intended for use with other materials is available as an additional option from MatterHackers.

So if I am not talking about speed and not necessarily print quality, what am I talking about when I call the XE a "high performance" DD printer? In a word, materials. The components of the Pulse XE are designed to reach and withstand elevated temperatures, push plastic with greater force, and withstand the risk of damage from some of the more exotic materials. Some of these components are significantly more expensive than the standard, which explains the high cost of this machine, but the advantages are significant in terms of versatility. Thanks to these hardened components, the XE has access to materials such as nylon and polycarbonate, as well as materials with hard fibers or particles to increase strength, such as carbon or glass fibers.

Access to these materials opens up whole worlds to a print shop owner. Glass-infused nylon is widely used to manufacture power tool housings, drone frames, and low-power electronics heatsinks, while polycarbonate can be used for such diverse things as high-strength electronics housings, greenhouse walls, and any application that values ​​high impact strength. Another advantage of the hardened nozzle, however, is a material that few newbies would consider a risky material for a printer, namely anything that glows in the dark. With its hardened nozzle, the Pulse XE can withstand the heavy load of hard particles, which give the objects glowing in the dark their clear shine, whereby the nozzle of a standard printer wears out as soon as the first layers of the material are in place. From surprisingly challenging to previously impossible, the MatterHackers Pulse XE seems to print with almost any plastic that can be turned into a string.

SAFETY

James Lynch / Digital Trends

All of this goes well with an often overlooked disadvantage of working with such materials. Safety. I have used nylon extensively in my pulse testing over the past month, and during that time I had to feel quite comfortable in a ventilator because of the dangers of using such materials. For example, nylon releases some chemicals when it melts, but one of the most notable must be hydrogen cyanide. Yes, the cyanide. While my mask filters out a good amount of these toxic materials, it is certainly not a long-term solution. Proper ventilation through my skylights and exposure limitation also help, but an option for a filtered housing for the Pulse would work well for the future. Until then, use should be limited to a room where such materials are adequately ventilated and not in locations where the user can be continuously exposed to the materials during the printing process.

Our opinion

Overall, my time with the Pulse XE was phenomenal. From my fourteen printers, it quickly became a favorite, and the use was largely a blast. I can't imagine a task I couldn't do, and the latest version of MatterControl has proven to be an incredibly powerful control system. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to work with some of the wilder materials, and to those who are simply looking for a highly reliable printer, the cheaper standard Pulse is also a good choice.

Is there a better alternative?

While the desktop FDM printing market definitely has a lot of competition, the Pulse line stands out across the board. The basic Pulse model goes from head to toe with the original Prusa i3 MK3 / S, but offers the advantages of many other customization options and a shorter lead time.

In the meantime, the Pulse XE can be seen as a competitor to the Lulzbot Taz line and other real performance printers. In this case, the Lulzbot has an advantage in terms of build volume, but the ready-to-use ability of the Pulse XE to print with some of the most powerful materials on the market without modifications or additional components, magnetic beds, and slightly lower costs means that it is attractive Option remains.

How long it will take?

One of the biggest advantages of open source 3D printers like this is that their future lifespan is more or less unlimited. Both motherboards used in the Pulse run commonly used, widely used firmware systems that use a common protocol that has been standard in the 3D printing community for years. One particular advantage of the Pulse line is that it relies on MatterControl. Further updates to more advanced features are likely to be in preparation, and support for the product will be available in the coming years.

Should you buy it

Would you like to work with the best without fuss? If so, absolutely! Otherwise yes! This thing is awesome!

Editor's recommendations