Jackery Explorer 1000 Power Review: Almost Unlimited Power

The Jackery Explorer 1000 basically gives you unlimited power.

Jackery Explorer 1000 portable power plant

"The Jackery Explorer 1000 Portable Power Station is a solar-powered powerhouse that will keep you charged and ready to go for days."

  • Massive power bank

  • Solar panels are legitimate

  • Offers every type of outlet

  • Potentially unlimited performance

  • Expensive costs

  • Ridiculously difficult

When I first sat down to check out the Jackery Solar Generator 1000, I was initially – and wrongly – disappointed and it was entirely my fault. When Jackery wanted to measure interest in a product review, I took the opportunity. I thought about getting some kind of battery backup for my home if the power went out. Moreover, I had been looking for a good way to generate electricity while camping, and that seemed a good fit too. So before we get to my false disappointment, let's talk about what this device is.

The Jackery Solar Generator is a portable 1000W power plant with a capacity of 1002 Wh. It has three pure sine wave AC sockets, 2 USB-C ports, 1 USB-A port that supports Quick Charge 3.0, and a DC port. In short, you can plug basically anything from the phone to the fridge with this bad boy and it will be fine. All power connections are on the front, along with an LCD display that shows you the current charge level, incoming power and outgoing power. Both the AC and DC sections have power switches so you can turn them off when not in use. There is a single flashlight on the side with its own power button, and on the left is a large opening that takes in the airflow for the fans inside.

Power from the sun

The Jackery Explorer 1000 is a portable 1000 W power plant.Adam Doud / Digital Trends

Together with the Explorer 1000 you can buy two SolarSaga 100 solar modules that charge the Explorer. The cells run at 23% efficiency, which is quite decent in the field. They can generate up to 100W of peak power on a sunny day. Each of these panels weighs just over 10 pounds each. The Explorer 1000's battery weighs over 22 pounds. The panels fold up to 24 x 21 x 1.4 inches; Simply put, none of these packages are very portable or small.

That, along with large and obvious warnings to protect all components from rain, questioned the suitability of this product as a "camping device". Carrying around 40 pounds of gear isn't exactly my idea of ​​portable. But we'll discuss that later.

I used the jackery to power a couple of different portable setups for work. In one case, my son used it on his Windows laptop, Chromebook at school, iPad, Android phone, and wireless headphones for two and a half days. I also set up a mobile workstation with a Windows laptop, an iPad, a portable monitor, and two wireless chargers that lasted me two days in a row. During that time I drew around 40-60W of power. I admittedly forgot to turn off the sockets overnight, which could probably have kept me going for half a day or so.

Such a device ensures that you can work or stay connected even if you lose power at home, even if you have days of power outage.

Using the battery is very easy. Just plug in whatever you need to power it and turn on the outlets you want. You turn them on in groups – AC and DC. As you work, you will notice when the fan starts up as it is quite loud. It is not loud, but it can safely cover a person speaking softly. Really, the fan is my only complaint about the device. It's really noticeable.

When charging, I tried two different methods. First I put the Explorer 1000 in the wall. It took about eight hours to fully charge. It's not that bad at all. Next, I blew up the two solar panels and that's when the fun began.

Power from the sun

Two large solar cells charge the battery in less than a day in bright sunlight.Adam Doud / Digital Trends

On the first day I tried to leave the battery and solar panels in my conservatory because I was paranoid about rain. It was a cloudy day, but the battery still managed to take a 41% charge. The second day I was lucky enough to catch a sunny day so I set up the panels on the back deck facing the sun. I rotated the plates twice throughout the day for maximum exposure and was able to fill the rest of the battery with ease. But the most interesting part of the experience was the numbers.

In bright sunlight, both solar modules began to consume more than 100 W. If you recall, my portable productivity device used between 40 and 60 watts of power. Math is hard, but that suggests that I could theoretically work indefinitely with this battery. If I set up my workspace near a window and put the panels outside, I charge more than I use. Of course, under ideal conditions. But the possibility is still fascinating.

The Jackery Explorer 1000 powered my portable workstation for 2 full days.

But let's get back to the "portable camping device" I talked about earlier. When I think of "camping" I think of a tent and out in the elements. But camping can also involve a trailer, and that's the use case I think this device is designed for. In a camper you need strength and the ability to generate more electricity. You are also much better protected from the elements in a camper than in a tent and you don't have to take the battery anywhere with you. Just keep it in the motorhome.

But also, a device like this ensures that you can work or stay connected even if you lose power at home, even if you have days of power outage. This is a very important use case. Since it is a solar generator, this electricity is also cleaner and quieter than a gas-powered generator. If you are looking for a backup power supply for your home or a portable power generator for a trailer camping trip, this is a solid piece of equipment. It even has a flashlight if you're looking for a 20 pound flashlight.

Our opinion

Overall, this is a great power generator / battery that does exactly what it says on the tin. The battery pack and solar panel combination adds up to an expensive $ 1,300 with the solar panels included (or $ 1,000 without them), but honestly, many backup generators are about the same or even more expensive. The wide variety of ports available, including USB-A, USB-C, AC, and DC, means you can power anything. The two solar panels are huge – ridiculously huge – but they can charge the entire 1000 Wh battery in less than two days. This is impressive.

Is there a better alternative?

Certainly there are other power supplies and portable batteries of this size, but there aren't many of these sizes with this ability to generate power and with so many outlets. It's pretty hard to beat on all of these points. If you want to save some money, you can use a gas generator, but over time a gas generator takes gas while the jackery only needs the sun. The last time I checked, the sun is still clear.

If you're looking for something that is easier to haul, this is this RAVPower portable power plant is a 7.7 pound alternative that delivers 250W when using a single outlet – or a total of 300W when using both sockets. It's also much cheaper and perfect for those weekend camping trips. It is enough to power a peloton bike for your next workout too!

Will it take?

The Jackery Explorer is made of thick, durable plastic. I don't expect any problems on this front, but it's insanely heavy so I could see that a faulty drop would do some damage. It would take extraordinary circumstances to break this thing. My only concern is the lack of water resistance on both the Explorer 1000 and the solar panels. Not only is there a lack of water resistance; There are warnings on the packaging to keep these devices away from water. The Jackery also comes with a two-year guarantee.

Should I buy it?

Yes, if you fall into either of the two categories I have outlined. If you're looking for a reliable backup power supply that can run some vital equipment in the event of a power outage, or if you're a RV owner looking for power in the great outdoors, this is a great facility. It sure is expensive, but the value it offers is top notch.

Editor's recommendations



OnePlus Nord CE 5G Review: A Cheap Phone Made to Last

OnePlus Nord CE

“The OnePlus Nord CE 5G is a lightweight, affordable phone with a two-day battery that is future-proof and long-lasting with 5G and a range of software updates, provided you're not too demanding. But just a little more money brings you something better. "

  • Two days of battery life

  • Reliable, fast software

  • Light

  • Screen lacks liveliness

  • Processor struggles with intensive tasks

The OnePlus Nord CE 5G is a phone that is designed to last for a few years and is good value for money with no high starting price. It's no surprise that the Nord CE 5G has such a strong bang-to-buck ratio on paper as OnePlus has focused on delivering quality hardware for years. But is a value-oriented data sheet enough? Now that I've spent almost two weeks with the Nord CE 5G, it's clear why you don't have to spend more, but it's also clear why you should.

design

My Nord CE test model is in the color Blue Void and it's nice. It's obviously closely related to the Ultramarine Blue on the OnePlus 8 Pro, but with fewer shades of green and prefers to turn subtly into purple around the edges instead. It catches the light well and the back of the glass – not Gorilla Glass, but from another unnamed manufacturer – is handy and feels cool.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The chassis is made of plastic. It weighs 170 grams and is 7.9 mm thick, and that's thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, Realme 8 5G, and the first OnePlus Nord. The rounded case and flat screen make it comfortable to hold, but the plastic volume and power buttons feel cheap.

It's unfortunate that the Nord CE 5G doesn't have that wonderful OnePlus alarm slider that has been standard on most other OnePlus phones from the start and is an integral part of the brand's identity. This is despite the company's insistence that the Nord CE is just as much a OnePlus phone as these more expensive devices. It has a 3.5mm headphone jack on the bottom of the phone which can be enough for some compensation.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

I could complain about the lack of imagination in the design – it's basically the same as the first Nord, and how many more times will we see this shape camera module on a phone? – but it seems a bit silly to do so. The OnePlus Nord CE 5G has a pretty, completely undemanding design that is more noble than the price suggests and is a real eye-catcher in this special color. It's one of the cheapest 5G phones you can buy, but you would never know if you just looked at it from the back.

screen

Here's the first time you want to spend more on a phone, and a small downgrade from last year's Nord. The Nord CE 5G has a 6.43-inch fluid AMOLED screen with a refresh rate of 90 Hz and Full HD resolution, which is a decent spec on paper but misses HDR10 +. In reality, it can't compete with the screen on phones that cost little more, like the Galaxy A52 5G.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It lacks warmth and vibrancy when it comes to watching video, even after you've dug into settings and made sure Vivid is set to display mode. Watching Carfection's Shelby Mustang GT500 review reveals the screen's coldness as the crazy green paint job didn't show up like it did on higher-end screens.

At maximum brightness, the screen is visible in all lighting conditions, but it loses a bit of clarity at extreme angles. It comes standard with a screen protector that is covered in fingerprints and it really doesn't make the front of the phone look very attractive. I wiped this phone a lot more than most of the others.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Hard comments? Possibly, but OnePlus is good at screens, and while the 90Hz response rate is much to be welcomed, the Nord CE 5G's performance can't compete with that of the Galaxy A52 5G, and even the Google Pixel 4a adds some of the life to it, that is missing the screen of the Nord CE. However, it is very similar to the Realme 8 5G, which suggests that we should expect it from a phone at this price point.

camera

On the back of the OnePlus Nord CE there are three cameras, a 64-megapixel main camera, an 8-megapixel wide-angle camera and a third 2-megapixel monochrome camera, which can be used separately. The main camera's photos are bright and colorful, but sometimes a little too saturated, and it struggles in difficult lighting conditions. The wide-angle camera becomes even more saturated and struggles in the shadows, where it loses details.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The camera app will show a 2x zoom option, but this is not an optical mode and if you use it the final picture will lose detail. The monochrome camera takes pure black and white photos, but with a low number of megapixels, although I've still enjoyed using it in the past. The video mode can record at up to 4K at 30 frames per second, there is a night mode for still images and a pro mode.

It can't compete with the Google Pixel 4a in terms of photo quality, but that's not really surprising, and the Galaxy A52 5G's camera gives photos a warmer, slightly more attractive look. That being said, and apart from the inconsistency between the main and wide-angle cameras, the Nord CE's camera takes photos that you'll be happy to share, but they may need to be edited beforehand. OnePlus includes an editor in its Gallery app, but the filters are mostly terrible and the customizations aren't as extensive as in Snapseed or Google Photos.

Where the Nord CE stumbles is when you try to do something too technical. It's stupid trying to focus in portrait mode, and it often refuses to focus on something that seems too close to it. Provided you aren't expecting too much, the Nord CE 5G's camera is fine, but if you experiment and really enjoy playing with the camera, it won't often impress.

Performance and software

My Test Nord CE has 8 GB of RAM, more than enough for most smartphones, and is paired with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G processor. The 750G released in 2020 is a confusing little thing. It's a step up from the Snapdragon 765G in the First North with newer Kryo 570 cores, but its Adreno 619 GPU is a step backwards compared to the Adreno 620 in the 765G. It's made in an 8nm process instead of a 7nm process, but uses the same X52 modem and supports both Sub-6 and mmWave 5G connections.

The Snapdragon 750G is newer than the still-current 765G, and although the G in the name indicates that the processor is geared towards gaming, the Nord CE 5G is happiest when playing casual games like Asphalt 9: Legends, which is rather fast and more exciting than anything more intense.

Genshin Impact is playable with minimal slowing down, but the phone gets warm, verging on hot, after playing for a while, especially if you spend a lot of time fighting. While I have never received an overheating warning, after long sessions with Genshin Impact, I have received a “Your phone's operating temperature has returned to normal” on a few occasions. What lets the Nord CE down more when playing is the sound, which is delivered through a single speaker and can be uncomfortably tinny.

The phone wins in general software, however, with OnePlus's excellent OxygenOS 11 running smoothly and bug free during my time with the phone. I like the always-on screen, which can be customized in a number of ways, and the battery scheduling feature for overnight use. I didn't have any issues with app compatibility or updates, and the settings menu is easy to navigate. It's one of the Nord CE 5G's greatest strengths.

OnePlus Nord CE 5G always on the screen

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

oneplus nord ce 5g review apps

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

oneplus nord ce 5g review browser

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

OnePlus Nord CE 5G settings

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

While the Snapdragon 750G sounds like it should be a little powerhouse, it's not always as snappy as I'd like it to be. For example, it can stall while multitasking. It's not a deal breaker, but you will definitely notice an improvement in speed and responsiveness when using a more powerful phone. The Nord CE is fine for general use, and it has enough power for casual gaming too.

Battery and security

The OnePlus Nord CE is a great phone for casual use, and the battery reflects that. Use it carefully – around two hours of screen time – and barely 30% is consumed before the end of the day. On some quiet days, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G still had power at the end of the second day when connected to either Wi-Fi or 4G LTE. Play games for an hour, play a video, and mix it up with general usage, and the battery should still last a full day with some spare.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

OnePlus' proprietary Warp Charge 30T Plus charge reliably brings the 4,500 mAh battery to 70% in just over 30 minutes, but it takes at least a full hour to reach capacity. Battery life and fast charging are two of the best things about the Nord CE 5G. The Galaxy A52 5G is the Nord CE's archenemy, and while Samsung's phone outperforms the Nord in some places, the Nord's fingerprint sensor is superior. It works really well, even though it's placed quite low on the screen, and there's a quick face-unlock system there as an alternative.

Price and availability

The OnePlus Nord CE 5G has only been announced for the UK, and it is unknown if it will ever officially come to the US. In the UK, it starts at £ 299, around $ 420 for the 8GB / 128GB version and £ 369 / $ 525 for the 12GB / 256GB model. It is now available for pre-order through the OnePlus online store and is sold through Amazon, John Lewis retail stores and the Three Network. It will be released on June 21st.

Our opinion

The OnePlus Nord CE 5G proves that an affordable phone can be powerful, good-looking, and come with great software. If this covers all of your needs then great, you will be happy with it. However, this is where it is worth understanding whether you should spend a little more to get a superior product that will last even longer, and while there is nothing wrong with the Nord CE 5G, making sure your new phone lasts is crucial.

It's Samsung's fault that the Galaxy A52 5G made such a strong offer. It has an IP67 water resistance rating for increased durability, a better screen, a good camera, two days of battery life, and looks just as pretty (maybe even a little more modern). Add an equally robust software commitment and microSD card slot, and it's worth the extra over the 8GB Nord CE 5G as it will almost certainly last longer.

At no point did I feel the need to rip my SIM card out of the Nord CE 5G, so its frustrations never climbed high, and the brilliance of OxygenOS makes up for some of them anyway. However, there is no escaping the fact that while the OnePlus Nord CE 5G is a solidly reliable phone that is reasonably future-proof with 5G and two years of software updates, if longevity is one of your goals and it really should be at all costs, a balanced one Longer-lasting phones are available for little more money.

Is there a better alternative?

The price of the OnePlus Nord CE 5G is very competitive. We recommend going for the £ 299 8GB / 128GB version as it represents the best value. In the UK, the Realme 8 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5G are challenging the Nord CE on price, but there's little to technically separate them.

We recommend the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G because it has a generous, well thought-out range of functions, is probably more stylish and durable and has a larger, more beautiful screen for little more money. It costs $ 499 in the US and £ 399 in the UK. Getting a 5G phone under $ 500 in the US is a challenge, but also consider the Google Pixel 4a 5G if the camera is a priority.

How long it will take?

The Nord CE doesn't have a waterproof rating or a particularly tough case, so you'll need to put it in a bag if you want to protect it. OnePlus offers a selection of very colorful cases that are perfect for the job. There is good news on the software side, with the company promising two years of updates and three years of security updates. Provided your usage doesn't change there is no reason not to hold up for three years.

Should you buy it?

No. As good as it is, we recommend buying the Galaxy A52 5G for its added features and increased durability.

Editor's recommendations



Jaybird Vista 2 Review: Tough Wireless Earbuds For Athletes

Jaybird Vista 2

"As long as calls are not a priority, the Jaybird Visa 2 earbuds are an athlete's best friend."

  • Completely waterproof and dustproof

  • Compact and secure fit

  • Great sound quality

  • Wireless charging

  • Very poor call quality

  • ANC struggles with wind noise

We were pretty impressed with Jaybirds Vista when it launched in 2019. As the company's third attempt at creating a premium, sport-friendly set of true wireless earbuds, the Vista for $ 150 (which debuted at $ 180) was virtually successful where the previous Jaybird Run and Run XT did not.

They sounded great and were compact and sturdy in design. But time is not waiting for anyone, and if you want to be the best running headphones or simply the best for any type of intense activity in 2021, you need more. Much more. Can Jaybird's new Vista 2 claim this award for $ 200? Let's find out.

What's new?

If you are familiar with the original Jaybird Vista and are wondering what will bring you an additional $ 50 investment, the following are new to Vista 2:

  • Active noise cancellation (ANC) and transparency modes
  • Longer battery life
  • Wear sensors for music auto pause
  • Better dust and water resistance
  • AAC bluetooth codec support
  • Wireless charging
  • "Find my" function for each earphone and the charging case

What's in the box?

Jaybird Vista 2Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

In the box, which is almost entirely recyclable, you will find the Vista 2 earphones already in their charging case, a USB-A to USB-C cable for charging, earplugs in three sizes (Jaybird calls them "Eargels") and some paper documentation.

design

Jaybird Vista 2Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Sports-oriented earbuds are often bulky affairs, but Jaybird has stayed true to the pocket-friendly design of the Vista.

You know the phrase, "If it ain't broken, don't fix it," and that sums up Jaybird's approach to Vista 2. Put them side by side with the original Vista and you can see that much has been preserved. They have the same compact and ergonomic shape, the same eargel style with the integrated stabilizing fins and an almost identical charging case, although the new one has more rounded contours. However, Jaybird has eliminated the small indentation on the front edge of the lid, which makes opening the case difficult, especially with sweaty or wet fingers.

Sports and fitness-oriented earbuds are often bulky affairs with large ear hooks and even larger charging cases. It's great to see that Jaybird has stayed true to the design it created with the Vista.

Also retained (and improved) is the Vista's class-leading durability. Not only do the earbuds meet the MIL-STD-810 standard for environmental resistance, they now also have an IP68 rating for complete dust and water protection, while the charging case has its own IP54 rating. Keep in mind that the earbuds do not float and bluetooth signals do not carry well through water. Therefore, swimming with them is not recommended. For fun, I leave the earbuds on the bottom of a sink filled with water. When I ripped them out 30 minutes later, they seemed fine.

The contacts on the charging case are corrosion-resistant, so all you have to do is wipe off excess water and you're good to go. The case can now be charged wirelessly, which is especially useful if you have a phone that can wirelessly charge accessories like the Samsung Galaxy S21.

The most noticeable difference is the woven fabric that now covers the outer part of the earbuds. Jaybird calls it "WindDefense" fabric and, as the name suggests, is supposed to act as a windsock and prevent wind and other noises from disturbing the microphones.

Underneath this fabric is a physical button that can be used to trigger the usual actions like controlling playback, selecting tracks, etc., but now each earbud also has an embedded accelerometer for tap control.

Comfort, controls and connections

Jaybird Vista 2Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Given the choice between in-hook earbuds like the Powerbeats Pro and earbuds with internal fins like the Vista 2, I'll be using the fins every time. It's true that when you put them on, they're a little less comfortable, but they're easier to put on and there's no hook to bother my glasses. Not to mention how much smaller they are!

You may not want to wear them for hours, but they are more than comfortable enough for a two-hour workout.

As for the fit, don't worry: the combination of the stabilizing ribs and the conical shape of the silicone earbuds make it very difficult to accidentally remove the Vista 2. If anything, they can be a little tricky to remove thanks to the incredible sealing of the eargels. You may not want to wear them for hours, but they are more than comfortable enough for a two-hour workout.

Under the fabric outside, the hidden buttons click with a satisfactory feel, and the free Jaybird app allows you to select specific functions for each click sequence on each earbud. When you include the three click types (single, double, click and hold) and the optional double tap gesture, that's eight options, more than enough to cover play, skip tracks, volume, ANC mode, and more. My only minor flaw is the volume control. It's only accessible via the click and hold gesture, which I find too imprecise for volume adjustments. You're probably better off using your phone's controls for this.

The double-tap gesture, which is mainly used to toggle between ANC and transparency (or "SurroundSense" as Jaybird likes to call it), is also reasonably responsive, although I've experienced a couple of times having to repeat it with a slower cadence.

The built-in wear sensors (new for Vista 2) let you automatically pause your music when you remove an earbud (and resume it when you put it back in). It can be turned on or off in the app and I found it to be very responsive to changes.

Fun to browse the different sound recipes that others have discovered and shared.

Jaybird claims that as a Class 2 Bluetooth device, the Vista 2 can be about 10 meters from a phone or tablet before it is disconnected. This is certainly true outdoors. Inside, it's closer to 20 feet depending on the obstacles between the earbuds and their source device.

And yes, you can use each earbud independently for music or phone calls if you need to.

Sound quality

While the Vista 2 is geared towards athletes who, let's face it, don't just sit around for critical listening sessions, the Vista 2 sounds great. Out of the box, the signature is balanced, if a little tame, but once you jump into the Jaybird app and start tweaking the EQ, these earbuds really shine.

Simply switching from the standard “flat” EQ to the Signature setting was enough to increase the overall dynamic range significantly, and it also helped bring out details in the mids and highs while delivering punchy bass.

Speaking of EQ, one of Jaybird's most interesting features is its social sound settings. Users can create their own custom EQ setting, name it, and share it with other Jaybird users. I suspect most people will find the handful of built-in EQ options sufficient, but it's fun to browse the various sound recipes that others have discovered and shared.

There is also a personal EQ function that creates settings based on the audible frequencies. In the end, I preferred the built-in settings, but it's a nice touch.

As you'd expect from exercise earbuds, there's plenty of deep bass on tap. And while this gets a little exuberant and sometimes dulls the midtones, these EQ settings can help fine tune how much boom you want to accompany your activity.

Noise cancellation and transparency

Jaybird Vista 2Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Jaybird Vista did a fine job of passive noise isolation thanks to those tight fitting eargels, but the Vista 2 takes it up again with the addition of ANC. It's not a massive change in the noise cone when you turn it on, but it is exactly what you need to reduce outside noise enough so that it no longer disturbs your concentration.

Jaybird's SurroundSense transparency mode lets you adjust how much sound to let in and how much effort to try to compensate for wind noise (low, medium, or high). When you're active (double-tapping one of the earbuds), you can have normal conversations with people around you or simply increase your awareness of traffic and other potential dangers. I really appreciate that you can decide whether to toggle between Off, ANC and Transparency or two of these modes with this double tap.

There is one downside, however, and it's a big one: wind noise isn't suppressed at all, and I'd even argue that it's more noticeable when the ANC is on than when it is off. Given that Jaybird specifically handled this with its WindDefense fabric, this is particularly disappointing.

Call quality

Jaybird Vista 2Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

As long as you are in a quiet indoor location or outdoors on a very quiet day, the call quality on the Jaybird Vista 2 is good enough for most types of calls.

But if there is even a slight breeze, that wind noise will completely erase your voice. Again, it's really weird considering the presence of this WindDefense fabric, not to mention the fact that these earbuds are entirely designed for outdoor living in every other way. If you're wondering why these earbuds only get 3.5 stars on our rating scale, this is the main reason.

Jaybird tells me it will keep updating its firmware to improve call quality, but there is a limit to what it can do since the microphone is placed on the Vista 2.

Find my earbuds

Jaybird Vista 2

Jaybird Vista 2

Most earbuds that have a "Find My" feature usually just give you the option to get the earbuds to emit a high-pitched howl so you can find them between the sofa cushions. Jaybird does this too, but goes a step further by showing you the location of each earbud and charging case on a map – something it can do since the case actually has its own bluetooth beacon.

The Jaybird app dutifully displayed the earbuds and case on a map, but I couldn't get it to force a tracking sound from the earbuds. Hopefully this will be fixed with a firmware update.

Battery life

The original Vista didn't boast particularly impressive battery life (six hours per earbud and 10 hours more in the charging case). The Vista 2 improves this significantly with eight hours per earbud and 16 hours in the case. The fast charging remains the same: five minutes gives you an additional hour of gaming time.

At a volume of 50% and the ANC switched on, the earphones knocked off after six hours. Turning ANC off should get you down to the stated 8 hour number, but I haven't tested this.

Our opinion

The only thing stopping the Jaybird Vista 2 from being the perfect workout earbuds is its terrible phone call quality. Otherwise, they absolutely hit it and offer the Powerbeats Pro some serious competition.

Is there a better alternative?

The Vista 2 hits a sweet spot in terms of equipment and price, without any direct competitors. For $ 150 is the JBL Reflect Mini NC gives you almost all of the features of Vista 2 and they have much better call quality. They don't have wireless charging, they don't last that long, and they're not as rugged as the Vista 2, but they give you a choice of voice assistants.

If you're a die-hard Apple fan and want to summon Siri hands-free, this is it Powerbeats Pro are still a very good choice, but their large ear hooks and lack of ANC or wireless charging make the regular $ 249 price tag seem unnecessarily high.

How long will they last?

With the Vista 2's incredible protection from water, dust, and other damage, it should last for years with regular use. Batteries are always the big unknown, but there's no reason to think the Jaybird Vista 2 will be better or worse than other brands. Jaybird supports the Vista 2 with a one year warranty.

Should you buy it?

Yes – that is, if you can put your terrible call quality behind you. When calls don't matter, the Jaybird Vista 2 are great sounding workout earbuds that are badass.

Editor's recommendations



Asus VivoBook Flip 14 Review: A Fast, Cheap AMD Laptop

Asus Vivobook Flip 14 review 3

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 2021

"The Asus VivoBook Flip 14 is a powerful budget laptop despite the disappointing display and build quality."

  • Outstanding productivity performance

  • Mostly attractive aesthetics

  • Affordable

  • Active pen is bundled

  • Upgradable RAM and storage

  • Mediocre build quality

  • Glossy display

  • Below average battery life

Everyone likes a good budget laptop. They may not seem as exciting as the latest and greatest, but budget-conscious laptops have their place. Not everyone has the resources or the need for a laptop that costs well over $ 1,000, but everyone deserves great things. Finding a diamond in the rough can be a lot of fun.

Most manufacturers have a distinct budget lineup, and in Asus' case, that's the VivoBook. The company recently launched the updated VivoBook Flip 14, an AMD-powered 360-degree convertible 2-in-1 designed to deliver solid performance and an exciting experience at a low laptop price.

I checked the VivoBook Flip 14 configuration for $ 629 (if Asus offers it on their website, it will sell for $ 600) which has an AMD Ryzen 5 5500U CPU, 8GB of RAM, a 512GB PCIe -SSD and a 14-inch IPS Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) display in the increasingly old-fashioned 16: 9 aspect ratio. You can also get a version with a 256GB SSD for just $ 529. Attractive features for the price, but does the VivoBook Flip 14 keep its value proposition?

design

The VivoBook Flip 14 is mostly made of plastic, with the lid lined with an aluminum alloy. You don't have to buy plastic for this price, but it's not uncommon. Unfortunately, the build quality was not up to the usual Asus standard, with a lid that bends with too little force and can cause LCD distortion, quite a bit of flex in the keyboard deck, and a case base that yields to pressure. The similarly priced Acer Swift 3 is more solidly built, and for around $ 300 you can grab the HP Envy x360 13, which is also much better built – unsurprisingly, both machines are on our list of best budget laptops . You won't find many 14-inch 2-in-1s at this price level, so I can't think of a direct comparison that we tested.

Aesthetically, the VivoBook Flip 14 is a little more impressive, if a little strange at the same time. It comes in a “Bespoke Black” color scheme that covers 99% of the chassis. There's a bright silver logo on the lid and some chrome bars around the touchpad, but that's mostly it. It is strange that the Enter key has a lime green border and lettering and stands out rather boldly – but at the same time I would say garish. And it's the only element on the laptop that bears that color, so it's not part of a theme.

If you're usually struggling to find Enter, the bold color scheme helps, but I usually don't run into this predicament so the color scheme detracts from the aesthetic for me. Still, I think the VivoBook Flip 14 looks better than the Swift 3 and is on par with the Envy x360 13. In fact, it's as attractive as a more expensive notebook like the MSI Prestige 14 Evo and has a more distinctive look than the Lenovo Yoga 7i 14 2-in-1, which is also about $ 300 more expensive.

The bezels are a bit big with a screen-to-body ratio of 82%. Premium laptops tend to be 90% or better, but the VivoBook Flip 14 isn't bad for a budget device. That makes the chassis a bit bigger, and it's not the thinnest or lightest 14-inch laptop at 0.72 inches and 3.31 pounds. The Yoga 7i comes in at 0.69 inches and 3.09 pounds, while the MSI Prestige 14 is 0.63 inches thick and weighs 2.85 pounds.

The Acer Swift 5, another 14-inch clamshell, is just 0.59 inches thick and fairly light at 2.31 pounds – it's also twice as expensive. Looking at our budget competition, the Acer Swift 3 is 0.63 inches thick and weighs 2.65 pounds, and the HP Envy x360 13 is 0.65 inches thick and weighs 2.92 pounds. Obviously, the VivoBook Flip 14 doesn't win the thin and easy battle.

Asus built its ErgoLift hinge into the VivoBook Flip 14, which is a nice touch considering the overall complexity of the 360-degree hinge. It works well, raises the keyboard deck to a more comfortable typing angle, and theoretically offers additional space for air to circulate – except there are no vents on the bottom of the laptop. Rather, the air is sucked in via the keyboard, so that the usual thermal advantages are not available. Anyway, the hinge is a bit stiff and the lid takes two hands to open, but it keeps the display in place in clamshell, tent, media, and tablet modes.

Asus has also built in some upgrade options. The SSD slot is easily accessible if you ever want to upgrade the memory, and of the test device's 8 GB of RAM, 4 GB is soldered to the motherboard and the other 4 GB is plugged in. So you can swap this out for an 8 GB chip if necessary and increase your RAM to 12 GB. A maximum of 16 GB is available, which of course has to be configured when ordering the laptop.

Connectivity is good, with a USB-A 2.0 port, a USB-A 3.2 port, a USB-C Gen 2 port, a full-size HDMI 1.4 port, a 3.5mm audio jack and a microSD card reader. A proprietary connector provides power, and given the AMD chipset, there is no Thunderbolt support. Wireless connectivity is a bit behind the times with Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 4.2.

performance

The VivoBook Flip 14 featured the first six-core Ryzen 5 5500U CPU we tested, and I was curious to see how it compares to the various Tiger Lake variants from Intel and the Ryzen 7 series. I got away impressed.

It didn't dominate Geekbench 5, with the lower single-core score typical of AMD chips and the more competitive multi-core score. It landed in third place in the comparison group, behind the Asus ZenBook 13 UM325UA with an eight-core Ryzen 7 5800U, which dominated, and the MSI Prestige 14 Evo with its four-core Intel Core i7-1185G7. In PCMark 10, the VivoBook Flip 14 took second place behind the ZenBook 13 and did particularly well in the content creation of this test. Accordingly, the Ryzen 5 5500U is competitive with Intel's Core i7 and significantly faster than the Core i5.

The VivoBook Flip 14 was particularly convincing in two particularly compute-intensive apps, Handbrake and Cinebench R23. In the Handbrake test, which encodes a 420 MB video as H.265, the Asus was 31 seconds faster than the Prestige 14 Evo and only seven seconds behind the ZenBook 13. The results in the demanding Cinebench R23 test were similar, where At least in multicore mode, the VivoBook Flip 14 took just second place behind the ZenBook 13 and was significantly faster than the Prestige 14 Evo. And the Ryzen 5 5500U is a real step up from the previous generation, making the VivoBook Flip 14 an impressive budget performer.

As with all current Ryzen laptops we tested, the VivoBook Flip 14 excels in CPU-intensive tasks and will go through the typical productivity workflow. It can handle creative applications too, although its Radeon Graphics doesn't offer much in the way of enhancing applications that the GPU can take advantage of. Of course, this also applies to Intel's integrated Iris Xe graphics. In this comparison group, only the HP Envy 14 with its Nvidia GeForce GTX-1650 Ti brings real added value for these applications. Everywhere else, the VivoBook Flip 14 will do exceptionally well, especially given its $ 630 price tag.

Underdog Bench 5
(Single / multiple)
Handbrake
(Seconds)
Cinebench R23
(Single / multiple)
PCMark 10 3DMark time spy
Asus VivoBook Flip 14
(Ryzen 5 5500U)
1102/5432 131 1180/7579 5191 1099
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Core i7-1185G7) 1593/5904 162 1479/6680 4866 1465
Acer Swift 3 2020 (Ryzen7 4700U) 1120/4831 152 N / A N / A 975
HP Envy x360 13 (Ryzen 5 4500U) 1101/4485 176 N / A N / A 902
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325UA
(Ryzen7 5800U)
1423/6758 124 1171/7824 6034 1342
HP Envy 14 2020 (Core i5-1135G7) 1398/4741 190 1343/5028 5178 3147

One area that won't impress is gaming. The 3DMark Time Spy test result is nothing special, and the VivoBook Flip 14 performed poorly in Fortnite. It only managed 25 frames per second (fps) at 1080p and medium graphics, in line with laptops with Intel Iris Xe graphics. It reached 15 fps in epic graphics, which in turn corresponds to Intel's integrated GPU. Simply put, the VivoBook Flip 14 is not a gaming laptop at any cost.

display

Spend $ 630 on a laptop and you'll be giving up on something. There is usually a big tradeoff in display quality and the VivoBook Flip 14 is no exception.

First, it's not very bright at just 230 nits (we like to see 300 nits or more). This is almost identical to the 233 nits of the Acer Swift 3, and so the VivoBook Flip 14 is not alone among budget laptops with a weak display. The contrast is also poor at 720: 1, below the Swift 3's 770: 1 and well below our preferred threshold of 1000: 1. The Lenovo Yoga 7i 14 performs even worse with 690: 1, which shows that it is not only true budget laptops that suffer from poor contrast.

Next came the VivoBook Flip 14's colors, which were incredibly narrow. The coverage of the Adobe RGB color space was only 50% and the sRGB color space was only 66%. That's well below the 70% and 95%, respectively, that we normally see minimums on mid-range and premium laptops – and the HP Envy x360 13, which is on our top budget list, scored 71% and 96%, which is much better is. I notice that the Swift 3 was in the same class as the Asus at 48% and 64%, respectively. The VivoBook Flip 14's color accuracy was better than the Swift 3's 4.76 at a Delta E of 2.62 (1.0 or less is considered excellent), while the Envy x360 13 got a lower 2.26.

Subjectively, the VivoBook Flip 14's display wasn't bad, but it wasn't great either. It's enough for web browsing and productivity apps, but that's about it. Viewing media on the 2-in-1 device was also not a terrible experience despite the poor colors and contrasts.

Two downward facing speakers provide audio with Harman Kardon tuning. The speakers get loud, but also distorted, with crackling at any volume above 80%. Treble was blown out and mids muffled, which resulted in a tinny sound. Of course there was no question of bass. You'll be fine with system sounds and the occasional YouTube videos, but anything else requires headphones or a pair of bluetooth speakers.

Keyboard and touchpad

The keyboard on the VivoBook Flip 14 is eerily reminiscent of HP's Specter keyboard, which is purposely a good choice. It offers good spacing, large keys with attractive and easy-to-read lettering and a number of Home, PgUp, PgDn, End and Fn keys on the far right. Unfortunately, although it looks like a Specter keyboard, it doesn't feel like it. There's a lot of travel and a nice click to the switches, but the ground motion is too abrupt. There's no crisp jump like HP, and the overall typing experience isn't nearly as comfortable. I would rate this keyboard a few steps behind the Specter and Dell XPS keyboards and way behind Apple's Magic Keyboard on the latest MacBooks. I will notice that the three-level backlight is even and useful.

To be clear, the touchpad is way too small. There's still plenty of room on the keyboard deck for a larger version, and the small size is reinforced by the fingerprint reader in the right corner. The touchpad is a Microsoft Precision version, so it works fine with good support for Windows 10 multi-touch gestures, but it's tiny.

The display is of course touch-enabled, as it is a 2-in-1, and an Asus active pen is included. It supports Windows 10 inking well, with smooth strokes and precise response.

The fingerprint reader mentioned above has Windows 10 Hello support for passwordless login. It was quick and accurate during my tests, and it was welcome on such an inexpensive laptop.

Battery life

Asus only put 42 watt hours of battery into the VivoBook Flip 14, which is not much for a 14-inch display even with Full HD resolution and a powerful CPU. I wasn't expecting great battery life.

Starting with our web browser test that ran through a number of popular websites, the VivoBook Flip 14 lasted nine hours. That's a little less than average for this class of machine, but not a terrible result. The Acer Swift 3 managed just eight hours, while the HP Envy x360 13 managed a little over nine hours. In our video test, which plays a Full HD Avengers trailer until the battery runs out, the VivoBook Flip 14 lasted 12 hours, again slightly less than average, but not too much compared to the Swift 3's 10 hours disappointing. The Envy x360 13 beats both with 13 hours.

The VivoBook Flip 14 lasted just over two hours in the PCMark 10 gaming test, which stresses the CPU and GPU, which is average for the test. The Lenovo Yoga 7i managed just over 2.5 hours, and we didn't test the Swift 3 or the Envy x360 13 with this benchmark. In the PCMark 10 Applications test, which is the best indicator of battery life, the VivoBook Flip was again below average with just over nine hours. That still beats the 8.5 hours of the Yoga 7i.

Overall, the VivoBook Flip 14 was only a hair behind the pack in terms of battery life. It will likely take a full working day if you don't put too much stress on the CPU, but it definitely suffers from the small battery. However, this is again a budget laptop, and so the results are pretty good if you keep the price in mind.

Our opinion

The VivoBook Flip 14 is really very fast for a $ 630 laptop. Its build isn't the best, its battery life is slower, and its keyboard isn't one of my favorites. But a laptop that works like this for so little money shouldn't be neglected.

If you have a demanding productivity workflow or occasionally use creative applications, the VivoBook Flip 14 will give you the performance you are looking for. And nothing else is so bad about the laptop that you shouldn't think twice about it.

Are there alternatives?

I'll start with the Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA. It's not a 2-in-1, but it costs just $ 170 more for a color-accurate OLED display, a faster AMD Ryzen 7 5800U CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB PCIe solid-state drive. If your budget isn't that tight and you don't really need a 2-in-1, then the ZenBook 13 is a great option.

If you need a 2-in-1 and your budget is limited, the HP Envy x360 13 is a solid alternative. It's also a little more expensive, but you get better performance, better battery life, and a better display. What do you dislike?

How long it will take?

The VivoBook Flip 14 isn't the most solid notebook we've tested, but it's not bad for a budget device. It won't withstand extreme abuse, but with normal wear and tear at home and in the office, it should last for several years. You won't be surprised by the one-year limited warranty.

Should you buy it?

Yes, if you don't need a color-accurate display and you are short of money. The outstanding performance of the VivoBook Flip 14 makes up for many of its weaknesses.

Editor's recommendations



Oppo Band Review: First Attempt Fails to Captivate

Oppo band

"The Oppo Band goes the same well-known route as many other low-cost fitness wearables and is therefore difficult to stand out."

  • Heart rate and blood oxygen tracking

  • Accuracy does not match with other devices

  • No automatic screen brightness

The Oppo Band is the first fitness tracker from Oppo, a company better known for its smartphones like the Find X3 Pro than for wearables, although it has recently attracted attention with the Apple Watch-like Oppo Watch. Given that the basic fitness tracker is such a well-established piece of tech these days, what can Oppo bring to the genre to highlight its maiden voyage? Unfortunately, the answer is not very much.

design

The Oppo band has a 40mm main body that is attached to a thick rubber band that is secured with a plastic pin. You have to take the sensor out of the bracelet when it needs to be charged, which reveals a plastic bezel piece like a bezel on the bracelet itself, giving it a classier, more coherent look than old Xiaomi Mi Band models that used the same charging method . It's the only design element that sets the Oppo Band apart from most of its competitors.

Oppo bandAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

The strap has a lot of holes so it will fit most wrist sizes, although it was difficult for me to get the fit just right as it was either a little too loose or a little too tight. This will of course vary from person to person. I wear the Oppo band 24 hours a day and haven't noticed any skin irritation, but it does get a little hot at night when worn.

What I have noticed is that the plastic bezel that surrounds the module on the bracelet is worn out slightly and has picked up a few small notches after only a short period of wear. I haven't climbed any mountains or actually gone through any activity that could be described as "tough". So if you take part in activities that break things, the Oppo Band may not look good for long.

Oppo strap from the side on the wristAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

The AMOLED screen measures 1.1 inches and is very colorful but does not have automatic brightness adjustment so you can choose the right setting for you. With the default setting of 20%, it cannot be seen in sunlight and ideally needs to be increased to 80%, which has an impact on battery life.

Health tracking

On the back of the main module of the Oppo Band there is an optical heart rate sensor and a blood oxygen sensor (SPo2), while inside there is a 3-axis gyroscope. It doesn't have a built-in GPS or electrocardiogram that you'd likely find on more expensive fitness tracking wearables. It records a range of activities including indoor and outdoor walks, running and biking, and swimming (it has a water resistance of 5 ATM), yoga, cricket, and a few others. Sleep tracking is also an option.

Oppo HeyTap app training screen

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Oppo HeyTap app sleep screen

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Settings of the Oppo HeyTap app

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Main screen of the Oppo HeyTap app

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It connects to the HeyTap app that I used on an iPhone 12 Pro during my test. The app contains settings and adjustments for the band itself, as well as historical activity data. The daily calendar view is relatively simple, with daily overviews showing the number of steps, exercise time, calories burned, and active hours. To view individual workouts, you must select another option that includes a real-time heart rate graph. Finding these different sections is a bit confusing at first.

The accuracy of the Oppo Band is not as good as that of many other fitness wearables.

Sleep tracking breaks down sleep stages, assigns a sleep score, and uses the SPo2 sensor to provide breath analysis. Oppo gives some information on where to improve, but nothing that you won't find on any other fitness tracker. All data is presented simply and clearly, but without much depth. The Oppo Band is suitable for people who want to know more about their health and want to follow regular exercise sessions, but it does not provide detailed data and advice for people who are serious about fitness or a specific sport.

Oppo strap on the wrist from behind

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Oppo band review screen

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The strap on the Oppo belt

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The accuracy of the Oppo Band is not as good as that of many other fitness wearables. At night, the SPo2 sensor often showed sudden, dramatic drops that were not registered by other models or recorded by the Withings Sleep Analyzer. The number of steps was also usually significantly lower than with other wearables. In a single day the Xiaomi Mi Band 6 and Honor Band 6 were worn, it recorded 4148 steps while the Mi Band 6 displayed 5645 and the Honor Band 6 5565. On another occasion when it was tested against the Fitbit Versa 3, it showed 225 steps versus the Versa 3's 467. When comparing the heart rate monitor, the Oppo Band's results were consistent with other wearables.

software

Oppo's software is a simple swipe-and-tap proposition, with a swipe up or down to scroll through the menu and a swipe left to right to change the watch face. This is an unusual choice and quite frustrating. I almost never want to change a watch face once one has been selected, so this gesture feels like a waste. It would have been preferable to show notifications or have quick access to exercise tracking.

Oppo band training screen

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Notifications on the Oppo band

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Oppo band heart rate monitor

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Oppo strap on the wrist

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The screen is very responsive – sometimes it reacts a little too quickly, which can lead to errors – but the software is quite lengthy and most functions take longer than they should to perform. Would you like to start a workout? Tap the screen to wake it up, swipe up twice, tap again, select a workout, and tap again. Again, these actions would be minimized with a more sensibly designed gesture control system.

Notifications are reliable and while they cannot be interacted with, the text is clear and properly formatted. Music can be controlled but not saved from the Oppo Band, and there are a few other simple features like a stopwatch, weather screen (but only if you give it access to your location at all times), and a phone finder.

battery

It takes about an hour to fully charge the Oppo Band's battery, and although Oppo claims it will last for 12 days, it will depend a lot on the features you are using.

Oppo tape chargerAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

With the screen brighter and sleep monitoring, heart rate monitoring, and notifications turned on, the battery lasted eight days before I had to recharge it. It would have taken nine if I'd left it flat.

Price and availability

The Oppo Band is available now in the UK and costs £ 40 or about $ 56 from Oppo and Amazon. It wasn't officially released in the US, although imports will be available from outlets like Amazon and AliExpress. If you choose to get one this way, make sure it is the "global" version as the Oppo tape was previously available in China and functionality may be different from the UK / global model.

Our opinion

Oppo enters a very crowded room with the Oppo Band. There are several inexpensive fitness trackers out there, and while perfectly acceptable in terms of design and software, the accuracy issues are less acceptable, battery life is no better than its competitors, and the accompanying app doesn't have enough in-depth features to appeal to serious fitness fans . The Oppo Band does not attract attention.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. The Honor Band 6 can be purchased for roughly the same price and has better smartwatch functionality, more style, and a beautiful screen. The Xiaomi Mi Band 6 is even cheaper than the Oppo Band and fulfills the same functions. The Samsung Galaxy Fit 2 is slightly more expensive but more readily available, and while it doesn't quite offer the same functionality, it's more than enough for the casual trainer. If you're keen to spend more, we recommend the Fitbit Charge 4, which benefits from a better app experience, rich data, and good battery life.

How long it will take?

Apart from the easily scratchable plastic cover around the main module, the thick rubber band feels strong and the whole thing is waterproof up to 5ATM. No software update has come in for the Oppo Band during the time I had it that I was hoping would fix the accuracy issues. If you're happy to accept that it may provide data that is different from other models, the general functionality of the Oppo Band means it will last for several years, provided your own use doesn't change.

Should you buy it?

No, there are better and more accurate fitness trackers.

Editor's recommendations



Nanoleaf Elements Review: Smart Lighting From the Forest

nanoleaf elements look like wooden light panels

"You will fall in love with the rustic appearance of the Nanoleaf Elements and at the same time appreciate its smart functions."

  • Unique lighting design like no other on the market

  • Easy to use, intuitive app

  • easy installation

  • Incredibly customizable

  • High price point

  • No support for 5 GHz networks

Smart lights from Nanoleaf earned a spot in the background of more Twitch streams than I can count, and for good reason: the Nanoleaf Aurora and Nanoleaf Canvas look amazing, with loads of customization options to suit just about any mood. With that in mind, I took the chance to review the Nanoleaf Elements, the newest addition to the company's lineup.

Nanoleaf Elements look like they are made of wood and are lit from within. Their purpose is ultimately decorative, but they will stand out when placed on a wall and make for a real talking point. This is no ordinary set of smart lights!

Design: Natural light that makes you feel like you are in a forest

The design of the Nanoleaf Elements is the main attraction. The hexagonal design leads to six specific points that are equipped with an LED. This allows the elements to generate light at each of the six points and shine from the outside in.

The panels made of imitation wood attract attention and give the lights a rustic look that makes them a great addition to a dining room. While the Nanoleaf Elements only produce white light, the temperature of the light can be adjusted to produce different levels of heat. The light ranges from 1,500K to 4,000K – from cold white to warm white.

However, the light is not that bright. At just 22 lumens, you could use it for reading if you were sitting right next to it, but it doesn't provide enough light for any kind of task-oriented work. It makes for great mood lighting and with a lifespan of 25,000 hours, these lamps will last a long time.

In my experience, the lights create a kind of peaceful atmosphere. They are perfect for a quiet dinner or just to chat with friends in the background.

easy installation

The Nanoleaf Elements are easy to install. It took less than 10 minutes to create the pattern I wanted on my wall, and that includes the 30 seconds of pressure required to attach each panel to the wall. The panels have a swivel pad on the back that allows you to easily adjust the angle, and each side has a fastener to snap the connectors into place.

Thanks to this design, you can create an almost infinite number of shapes and designs with tiles. A single power supply can support up to 22 panels, although the device I tested only came with 10. The maximum number of tiles per controller is 80, but you'd have to set up a really impressive system to deal with the maximum number of tiles. It would take up quite a bit of space – at 9 "x 7.75" per title, the elements are large enough to function as wall art all on their own.

A complete set of functions

The choice of pattern and design of the tiles is yours, and the Elements contain a whole host of features that give them many different capabilities.

For example, you can play music and sync the lights to pulse and move to the beat. The Connect + feature means the tiles will automatically sense where they are in relation to each other to ensure that the lights shift in an organic and natural way. In the Nanoleaf app, you can arrange tiles in specific patterns and assign roles to each one.

That leads to the next important feature that Nanoleaf offers: touch controls. You can set specific tiles to perform tasks based on touch. For example, one panel can scroll through different HomeKit scenes while another can change the pattern or turn on the lights in your home.

The Nanoleaf Elements also connect to all major smart home platforms and intelligent assistants. You can turn your lights on and off and change the pattern through Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple HomeKit. The Elements also connect to Samsung SmartThings and IFTTT.

The Elements kit also comes with a manual control panel. All you have to do is connect it to one of your tiles to turn the panels on or off, change the pattern, mix the patterns, and much more. However, I would recommend connecting it to the edge somewhere near the floor. It doesn't light up and sticks out like a sore thumb when the rest of the panels are lit.

An intuitive app

One of the standout features of the Nanoleaf Elements is the ease of use of the above app. If you've used a Nanoleaf product before, you know there are thousands of custom scenes for Nanoleaf Aurora and Canvas. You may think that you don't have access to these scenes – after all, they rely on color – but that's not entirely true.

The elements translate all the different colors into different heat levels. This means that every single scene is available. If you don't like the default scenes and patterns in the app, just look for one that better suits your tastes.

The layout wizard allows you to visualize the design before creating it. Just line it up and organize the tiles and then tap the eyeball icon in the bottom right and it will show you what the pattern would look like on your wall with augmented reality.

You can also invite users through the app so that more people can control your lights.

Finally, you can use the Explore tab in the app to check out related apps, scenes, integrations, and more. If you're new to Nanoleaf, the Explore tab makes it easy for you to familiarize yourself with all of the different options the Elements offer. You can also sign up for the beta program this way to explore new, not-yet-public features.

Our opinion

The Nanoleaf Elements are a beautiful, fresh interpretation of intelligent lighting that really stands out due to its rustic design. Other decorative smart lights appear to be aimed at a playroom or arcade, but the Elements will feel right at home in your mother's kitchen. The easy installation and intuitive app are just cherries on a great core system.

Is there a better alternative?

There is no other intelligent lighting system like the Nanoleaf Elements on the market. Sure, there are plenty of lights out there that offer a wide variety of colors, but if you want a natural look the Elements are the only real option.

How long it will take?

With a lifespan of 25,000 hours, the Nanoleaf Elements will continue to function for a long time. That's 1,041 days and 16 hours. So if you don't keep the lights on 24/7 (and even then they will last forever), your Elements will be working for the foreseeable future. A two-year warranty is also included with the purchase.

Should you buy it?

The Nanoleaf Elements are a fantastic lighting system, but the cost is a little prohibitive. At $ 300 for the Elements Smarter Kit and $ 99 for each expansion pack, the Elements will make a dent in your wallet. However, if you want to create a unique lighting system in your home, there is nothing quite like it.

Editor's recommendations



Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti Review: More of What Gamers Need

nvidia rtx 3070 ti rating 2

Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti in the test: More of what gamers need

"The Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti is a reasonable value for great 4K gaming performance."

  • Beautiful design

  • Decent value

  • Great 4K gaming

  • HDMI 2.1 included

  • Strong performance in content creation

  • Requires more power than the RTX 3070

  • Closer to RTX 3070 than 3080 in performance

The Nvidia RTX 3070 was already one of the most recommended graphics cards. It delivered powerful 4K performance but cost a reasonable $ 500. That's downright cheap in today's market where graphics cards are sold for twice their retail price.

After Nvidia released the overpriced RTX 3080 Ti last week, Nvidia is releasing their more modest RTX 3070 Ti. It costs just $ 100 more than the 3070, and it fills the market with lower-priced options that offer the performance PC gamers need.

Is the RTX 3070 Ti the best graphics card you can buy or is it just as unnecessary as the RTX 3080 Ti?

Specifications

RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 RTX 3080
GPU GA104-400 GA104-300 GA102-200
interface PCIe 4.0 PCIe 4.0 PCIe 4.0
CUDA cores 6,144 5,888 8,704
Tensor cores 192 184 272
RT cores 48 46 68
Base clock 1.575MHz 1,500MHz 1.440MHz
Boost clock 1.770MHz 1.725MHz 1.710MHz
memory 8GB GDDR6X 8GB DDR6 10 GB GDDR6X
Bandwidth 608 GB / s 448 GB / s 760 GB / s
Memory bus 256-bit 256-bit 320-bit
TDP 290W 220W 320W

The RTX 3070 Ti represents a small advance in specifications over the RTX 3070. It has only 4% more CUDA cores than the RTX 3070, while the RTX 3080 has 29% more cores. If that tells us anything, it is that the RTX 3070 Ti has a lot more in common with the 3070. That might sound obvious given the name, but the RTX 3080 Ti was actually a bigger step up from the 3080 in the raw CUDA number.

Of course, there is much more to these cards than just the core number. The RTX 3070 Ti has a faster GDDR6X memory with a greatly expanded bandwidth, now up to 608 GB / s (gigabytes per second). The bus size remains the same, however, so the wider 320 bits are left to the RTX 3080.

The RTX 3070 Ti's faster clock speeds should also help with gaming performance. This is noteworthy as the frequency tends to decrease as more cores are added to a card. For example, the RTX 3080 Ti has a lower clock rate than the standard RTX 3080.

Of course, the RTX 3070 Ti also has a bit more tensor and RT cores to help with both ray tracing and DLSS performance. It's only a marginal improvement, however, and leaves a larger gap between the 3070 Ti and the 3080.

design

I tested the reference device, the RTX 3070 Ti Founders Edition manufactured by Nvidia itself. Like other cards in the RTX 30 series, the 3070 Ti has a beautiful dark silver case accented by beveled edges and a black aluminum back plate. The intake fan is on one side and the exhaust is on the other, creating the same “push-pull” system found on the other cards in the RTX 30 series.

It looks identical to the RTX 3070, but is a little longer. Both are standard two-slot cards, but the 3070 Ti is an inch longer at 11.5 inches. That's just 0.3 inches shorter than the RTX 3080 and 3080 Ti. That means you may have a harder time fitting it into smaller form factor cases than the RTX 3070.

Unlike the RTX 3070, the Ti model requires the use of both 8-pin PCIe power connectors. The reason? Well, the RTX 3070 Ti sucks 290 watts of power compared to the 220 watts of the RTX 3070. This also means that Nvidia recommends a larger 750 watt power supply in your system – compared to a 650 watt device with the RTX 3070.

Like the other cards in the series, they must be routed to the card's 12-pin connector using the adapter supplied by Nvidia. It was mentioned up to the point of nausea, but the need for an adapter creates a messy look in your rig.

On the back there are three DisplayPort 1.4 ports and an HDMI 2.1.

performance

I tested the RTX 3070 Ti in the same system as the 3080, 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 6700 XT. It was in a 30-liter case with 32 GB of RAM and an Intel Core i9-10900K. Unfortunately, we did not have a test device of the RX 6800 XT, which is a closer price and performance comparison to the RTX 3070 Ti. All titles were tested in 4K, 1440p, and 1080p with maximum and medium graphics presets. However, the following results are in 4K at maximum settings.

Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti Nvidia RTX 3080 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
3DMark time spy 13893 16108 11726
3DMark fire strike 26516 28460 26830
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50 52 42
Battlefield V 80 100 69
Fourteen days 70 95 58
Civilization VI 139 158 115

If you want a general idea of ​​performance, the RTX 3070 Ti is about 8% faster than the 3070, while the RTX 3080 is 14% ahead of the 3070 Ti. Of course, these numbers can vary quite a bit from one game to the next. Take a look at Battlefield V, for example, where the RTX 3080 is 20% faster. Then there's Fortnite, which was 26% faster on the RTX 3080.

In a CPU-bound game like Assassin's Creed Valhalla, of course, the margin was tighter. We're only talking about a few frames per second (fps). And unfortunately, the RTX 3070 Ti can't quite play the game at maximum settings in 4K. The game's average 68 fps at 1440p was a smoother and more enjoyable experience. This also applied to Cyberpunk 2077. Even with medium settings in 4K, the RTX 3070 Ti only achieved an average of 48 fps. If you want to turn on the ray tracing effects (which you really should) that's another reason not to even bother playing in 4K.

We also tested the RTX 3070 in a different system, the Dell XPS 8940. It is a smaller desktop with more limited cooling and a non-standard GPU, so it was not included in the standardized test results above. Based on the numbers provided by Nvidia, it's around 3% slower than our XPS system, which I took into account in my evaluation and comparison.

This is an important consideration as the RTX 3070 Ti costs $ 100 more than the RTX 3070 and $ 100 less than the 3080. Hundreds of dollars for 10% better performance isn't bad, especially when compared to the RTX 3080 Ti's one-sided pricing of $ 1,200. This card cost $ 500 more than the RTX 3080 and offers roughly the same increase in performance. On the other hand, the performance is closer to the RTX 3070 than the RTX 3080, which means that both the 3070 and 3080 offer slightly better performance per dollar.

In all of my tests, the card never got too loud or rose above the maximum 83 degrees Celsius. In my Time Spy runs, the GPU temperature never exceeded 76 degrees.

I've also tested some creative accomplishments. First, I tested the RTX 3070 Ti in the Blender benchmark, which allows you to choose the component that will render the image. Many applications use a combination of CPU and GPU, which makes the Blender benchmark a great way to test the strength of the RTX 3070 Ti on its own. I ran the first three tests in the benchmark and found between 11% and 22% slower render times compared to the RTX 3080.

The difference in graphics performance in PugetBench Adobe Premiere fell into a similar void at 11%. This test measures how much the GPU speeds up important video editing tasks like playing and exporting 4K videos.

Our opinion

Any other year would be hard to argue for an RTX 3070 Ti. The 3070 and 3080 launched less than a year ago and were already great graphics cards that offer great 4K gaming at a decent price.

The global shortage of chips and the spread of crypto mining have made the existence of the RTX 3070 Ti a little more meaningful. It ranks between the 3070 and 3080 in terms of both performance and price. And unlike the RTX 3080 Ti, Nvidia didn't raise the price just because it could.

Are there alternatives?

The RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 are both good alternatives from Nvidia. The 3070 Ti is sandwiched right between the two and performs just as well for the price. On the AMD side, the closest competitor is the Radeon RX 6800 XT for $ 649.

How long it will take?

The RTX 3070 Ti should keep your rig up to date for over 10 years. It supports the latest technology and screen resolutions and is designed to ensure that PC games released in five years' time can still be played.

Should you buy it?

If you can find it at (or near) retail price, buy it.

Editor's recommendations



Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021) Review: A Camera That Tracks You

Amazon Echo Show 8 2021 home screen.

Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021)

"The Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021) gives you the freedom to move around during video calls thanks to a new pan and zoom camera."

  • The camera keeps the user in the picture during video calls

  • Lively adaptive display

  • Excellent room-filling sound

  • Recycle the same design as before

With the release of the 3rd generation Amazon Echo Show 10 earlier this spring, Amazon certainly brought out its big guns in the form of a swiveling touchscreen that we've never seen before in a smart display. While there was an undeniable buzz around the 10-inch display, it doesn't feel the same for its newest brother, the Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021). You could say that the announcement was a little lukewarm.

Still, it's the successor to the only smart display that sold me the power of Alexa in a smart display. Its predecessor managed to hit all the points, making it the most versatile smart display in Amazon's product range when I checked it in autumn 2019. The new 13-megapixel camera can be used to digitally pan and zoom during video calls, but seriously, there has to be more to it than that.

Design: Still just the right size

I really enjoyed the original Echo Show 8 because it wasn't too small or too big. In fact, you could say the size was just right. When looking at the new Echo Show 8, you'll find it hard to tell the difference between it and its predecessor, as Amazon chose to recycle the design. From its dimensions of 7.9 "x 5.4" x 3.9 "to the same monitor plate design with fabric covering, the Echo Show 8 (2021) is an exact facsimile of its predecessor.

Amazon Echo Show 8 2021 front viewJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

However, by today's standards, the design is as generic and boring as it is with smart displays. Compared to its closest rival, the Google Nest Hub (2nd generation), it looks a bit bulky, although its size still makes it better for placing on tables, counters, and desks than its 10-inch sibling.

Amazon definitely took the easy way of recycling the design, which is a shame because I would have liked to see it trimmed a bit – while still having room for the 8-inch display.

Display: even more lively than before

I can immediately see that Amazon has improved the display. Although the resolution of the 8-inch HD touchscreen remains at 1,280 x 800 pixels, the new adaptive color function makes images look photorealistic in any lighting situation.

Amazon Echo Show 8 2021 oblique viewJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

The result is a display that automatically adjusts its color temperature so that the photos you scroll through appear lifelike regardless of the time of day or the ambient light conditions. Gone are the bleeding edges that I noticed on the display of the predecessor, replaced by an evenly lit screen that is fascinating to look at. In fact, I'll go as far as to say it's a more attractive display than the one on the one Amazon Echo Show 10 (3rd generation).

Sound performance: room-filling sound

Don't be so quick to turn down this one based on looks as it takes a hit in terms of sound performance. That's not too big a surprise when you consider that the predecessor also impressed me with its booming bass and power. Equipped with the same 2.0-inch neodymium speakers with passive bass radiators, the new Echo Show 8 still proves that it is still a relevant speaker that fills rooms.

Amazon Echo Show 8 2021 side viewJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

You feel like audio is preferred in the lower range, which can be seen from the bass being so pronounced, but it's not too overwhelming – especially if you have adjusted the bass, mids and treble settings through the settings menu or the alexa Optimize the app.

Features: YouTube is still a process

If you watch videos heavily on YouTube, the Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021) is not for you as there is no dedicated feature for it. Instead, it still opens the web browser and redirects you to YouTube's website. While you can still watch clips, the experience isn't as intuitive as what you'd get with a Google Assistant smart display. But you really shouldn't be too surprised because we're dealing with an Alexa Smart Display.

The new adaptive color function makes images look photorealistic in every lighting situation.

Rather, the experience continues to focus on the Amazon ecosystem. If you are a Prime subscriber, enjoy all of the rewards and benefits that you have with the Echo Show 8 (2021). From asking Alexa to stream music or video content to receiving notifications when Amazon orders have been delivered, there's no denying that Amazon has it all.

Similar to its siblings, it functions as a home hub for quick and easy smart home control at the push of a button or by voice via Alexa. Speech recognition is still accurate and excellent even with slight background noise.

Camera: No standstill for video calls

Equipped with a 13-megapixel camera, its outstanding feature, you no longer have to stand still or stationary in front of the Echo Show 8 (2021) when making video calls. That's because it now automatically pans and zooms to keep you in the frame. This is a feature we've seen in other smart displays like Facebook Portal and Google Nest Hub Max, but it's obviously a different implementation than that of the Echo Show 10 (3rd generation).

It works pretty well. However, it's best not to be too jerky or fast when moving, as the tracking moves at a moderate speed – enough that it never feels unpredictable. It's a nice addition during the work-from-home era, but it's hardly a defining feature among smart displays. You can use this digital pan and zoom feature on Alexa calls, but I appreciate that it is supported on Zoom calls as well. It would be nice to see wider support for this on other video chat platforms, but time will tell.

Amazon Echo Show 8 2021 pan and zoom cameraJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

If you're concerned about potential snoops, there's a switch that mutes the microphone and disables the camera. In addition to video calls, the camera is vital when you are away from home. I've always enjoyed using the drop-in feature which gives me instant access to the camera from my smartphone, which is perfect for seeing if the kids have come home after school or if there are any pets sniff for snacks. Alexa Guard subscribers also receive notifications when unusual noises are detected – such as breaking glass or triggering smoke alarms.

Our opinion

Sometimes we have high expectations when it comes to subsequent devices. We often long for larger, more elaborate functions. The Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021) is an iterative gadget that only makes a significant improvement in camera functionality. In addition, it is no different from what its predecessor offered.

Thankfully, the cost of the Amazon Echo Show 8 (2021) won't change at $ 130. If you don't crave to be able to move around freely during video calls, save the extra cash and buy the $ 110 First generation Amazon Echo Show 8.

Is there a better alternative?

If you need something smaller, the Amazon Echo Show 5 (2021) is the obvious choice. Conversely, if you want all the bells and whistles in an Alexa-powered smart display, the Echo Show 10 (3rd If you're a fan of the Google Assistant, the Google Nest Hub (2nd generation) is the direct rival of the Echo Show 8 as it is similar in size but has a unique sleep tracking mode that you won't find anywhere else with a smart display.

How long it will take?

Although it's made of plastic, it's the sturdy variant that makes me confident that it can withstand minor accidents and bumps. Since it remains stationary in any location, it will likely remain operational for a long time. In the event of an internal defect, there is a one-year limited warranty that covers the defect.

Should you buy it?

Yes, if you really need that pan and zoom feature on video calls. If not, stick with the original model as there is no functional difference between it.

Editor's recommendations



Sony WF-1000XM4 Review: Smaller, Better in Almost Every Way

Sony WF-1000XM4

"With a completely new design and many improvements, they are hard to beat."

  • Great sound quality

  • Good battery life

  • Great noise cancellation

  • LDAC bluetooth codec

  • Wireless charging

  • May not fit small ears

  • Something is missing in high-end details

Sony's highly anticipated successor to its highly rated WF-1000XM3 True Wireless Noise-Canceling Earbuds is finally here: The WF-1000XM4 is priced at $ 280, and it even addresses our very few criticisms of the XM3 with a slew of improvements – some big, some small.

Has Sony set a new benchmark for the true wireless world yet again, or is there still work to be done? Let's get into that.

Video review

What's in the box

Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

First of all, kudos to Sony for developing packaging that should be adopted as the industry standard. The XM4 comes in a tiny box that avoids all of the flashy lettering and glossy prints you see on boxes from companies like JBL and Soundcore. This allows each piece to be recycled or composted.

The only hint of plastic is in the thin outer packing tape that holds the two halves of the box together. Once opened, there's no way to close it again, but I'll bet most people toss their earbud packs away anyway, which is really the whole point.

Inside you will find the WF-1000XM4 already stowed in its charging case, a short USB-C charging cable, two additional sizes of foam earplugs (the media are pre-installed) and a printed manual.

design

Sony WF-1000XM4 vs WF-1000XM3Sony WF-1000XM3 (left) and WF-1000XM4 Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

As much as we praise the WF-1000XM3, they always had one big caveat: they are some of the bulkiest buds you can buy that aren't specifically designed for aggressive training. This applies to the earphones and their charging case with a copper tip.

The WF-1000XM4 earbuds are 10% smaller than the XM3, which is good, but not earth-shattering. The charging case, on the other hand, is 40% smaller and now also offers wireless charging as an option. This is a big deal. The case still isn't small for AirPods Pro, but it's not the weird man anymore when you look at the rest of the real wireless options. I can now conveniently call it a pocket bag – which I can't say about the XM3.

The touch-sensitive interfaces are now much easier to type.

The case lid opens easily and stays open on its own until you close it, which it does with a satisfactory click. But getting the earbuds is surprisingly tedious compared to the XM3 due to the incredibly strong magnets and the narrow shape of the charging port. On the plus side, these magnets also grab the earbuds as soon as they get close to the jacks and reinsert them immediately and safely.

The other big change is the shape of the earbuds themselves. For years Sony has used the same capsule shape for its true wireless earbuds, with most of the case sticking out clearly from your ear. For the XM4, Sony designers tried something completely different and created a more compact, rounded case that fits much tighter. It looks a lot better in my opinion, although there may be some disagreement about the look of the prominent copper-capped microphone housings. And not just optically: The touch-sensitive user interface now takes up almost 100% of the exposed part of the earphone, which makes typing more easy. With the XM3, you had to make sure your fingers were connected to a small touch-sensitive circle.

I'm not a fan of touch controls in general, but the XM4 could turn me into a convert.

It's also worth noting that with the XM3, Sony fixed one of our other small flaws: the lack of water resistance. With an IPX4 rating, the XM4 are officially sweatproof for the gym or wherever you want to take them with you.

Comfort, controls and connections

Sony WF-1000XM4Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

I find the WF-1000XM4 quite comfortable to wear, but I'm not sure everyone will agree. The new shape is designed to fit inside your concha – the cavity that leads to the ear canal. But the XM4 are pretty big. If you have small ears, you may not be able to put them in all the way. The XM3, in comparison, has a much smaller "footprint" in the concha, to use an awkward metaphor.

The XM4 feels bigger to my ears than most of its top competitors, including the Jabra Elite 85t, Apple AirPods Pro, Master & Dynamic MW08, and JBL Tour Pro +.

The foam earplugs adapt to the shape of your ear better than silicone: you don't have to struggle to find a suitable set.

If your ears can accommodate the larger shape of the XM4, you will be rewarded with a very secure fit. There's a lot of surface contact, and once in place, it's not going anywhere. They inspire much more confidence than their predecessors.

While the XM3 was available with silicone earplugs, the XM4 only comes with memory foam. They mold to your ear shape better than silicone, which means you probably won't have to struggle as much to find a set that fits. But they also create a stronger feeling of having an object in the ear canal, and they degrade faster than silicone.

I'm generally not a fan of touch controls, but the XM4 could turn me into a convert. The generous size of the touchpad makes typing easy, accurate and fast.

I'm less enthusiastic about Sony's control customization scheme that it has retained from the XM3. The headphones app groups the controls by function: environment, playback, volume and none. Since each earbud can only be assigned to one control group, you have to select your two favorites. Do you want to control playback and volume? You cannot change the ANC mode. Like ANC control and also playback? Volume is no longer available. JBL does the same, so this situation isn't unique to Sony, but I would prefer more flexibility à la carte.

At least for Android users there is a workaround. The XM4 enables wake word access to both Google Assistant and Alexa when using a phone with Android 6 or higher. Each of these voice assistants can adjust the volume for you. So when you choose playback and environment for your physical controls, you can always say, "Alexa, turn up the volume."

Wear sensors let you pause and resume playback automatically whenever you remove or reinsert the earbuds, and they work really well and are quick to respond to changes. If it bothers you, you can turn it off in the headphones app.

The frequency response is strong end to end and the bass has incredible depth.

The XM4's excellent bluetooth connection works very smoothly and allowed me to place 12 or 15 meters between the earbuds and my phone before the connection started shaking. In contrast to the XM3, which occasionally gave me tiny dropouts of half a second, the XM4 never missed a blow. I just wish Sony had found a way to incorporate bluetooth multipoint that allows you to connect the earbuds to two devices at the same time. Sony's full-size WH-1000XM4 can do this, but it's still a rarity in the world of earbuds.

Sound quality

Sony WF-1000XM4Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

The WF-1000XM4 sounds great. The frequency response is strong end to end and the bass has incredible depth. I guarantee that whoever uses them will enjoy their rich and full sound signature.

But as I jumped back and forth between the XM4 and XM3, something became clear: the XM3s show clearer upper mids and high frequencies, which give the vocals a little more presence. It also adds a level of power that the XM4 seems to lack.

These observations are based on factory settings without EQ adjustments in the Sony Headphones app. Switching the XM4 to “Bright” or “Treble Boost” helps a little, but even then I think the XM3 is better overall for clarity.

Will you notice if you just hear the XM4? I doubt it. It's only when you put the two of them next to each other and listen to each other track by track that it really becomes clear.

The XM4 are the first true Sony wireless earbuds to support the company's high quality LDAC Bluetooth codec. In theory at least, you should use it to reproduce far more nuances than the XM3, which only works with the much lower SBC and AAC codecs. In addition, the XM4 features DSEE Extreme, Sony's latest version of its excellent digital signal processing technology, which can upscale compressed digital music such as MP3s to a far higher quality.

To be clear, the difference between these two siblings is really a matter of taste. The XM4 does a better job of low-end details that you can really hear when songs layer the bass guitar, drums, and low-end synthesizer. Too often these elements get smeared together, but the XM4 lets you hear them clearly which is a real delight. So think of the XM4 as an alternate take on Sony's superb sound quality, but aimed at those who want to hear extra detail at the bottom.

Noise cancellation and transparency

Sony WF-1000XM4Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Sony's noise cancellation technology has always been great, and the WF-1000XM4 manages to improve on it. Sony claims that the built-in V1 processor chip in the XM4 improves the XM3's ANC performance across the board, reducing external noise across the audible spectrum. I tend to agree.

The XM4s aren't just better at masking sound; they're better at making it invisible.

One of my benchmark tests for ANC is running my loud bathroom fan, which makes both low-pitched and high-pitched noise. Then I turn ANC on and off to hear the differences and repeat the process at different distances. The XM4 is an ace in this test, killing almost 90% of fan noise at 3 feet and 100% when I'm sitting right in front of the bathroom.

But the XM4s aren't just better at masking sound; they're better at making it invisible. Some ANC systems kill external noises but introduce new ones, such as: B. a low hiss that can be heard when no music is playing. The XM4's ANC system is very quiet, which is what you need when you need to concentrate in a noisy environment and don't want music to drown out these noises.

Apple's AirPods Pro have built a solid lead over the WF-1000XM3 in this area, but the XM4 has once again leveled the playing field. But the XM4 is still not as effective at suppressing wind noise as the AirPods Pro, even with Sony's optional wind noise reduction system.

The transparency mode is also more convenient to use thanks to the new talk-to-chat function. It uses sensors to find out when you are speaking and automatically turns on transparency mode while you pause your music. I thought it worked really well. The headphones app lets you toggle them on and off, adjust the sensitivity, and decide how long to keep the transparency on after it detects your voice.

Battery life

Sony WF-1000XM4Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

When fully charged, Sony claims eight hours of playtime with the ANC on and an impressive 12 hours when it is off – a large increase over the XM3's six and eight hour capacity, respectively. Several features, like wake word access to voice assistants and wind noise cancellation, will reduce these numbers, but by and large I found them to be correct.

The XM4 also gets a faster quick charge option: a five minute quick charge adds another hour to playtime, while the XM3 took 10 minutes to gain 90 minutes of playtime. The charging case contains enough juice for two full charges, which gives a total listening time of at least 24 hours before you have to go looking for a power outlet or a wireless charging mat.

Compatibility with voice assistants

Sony has always been agnostic about voice assistants on their headphones: you can use your phone's built-in assistant or switch to Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant.

Android users even get something that was a rarity with wireless earbuds: the ability to trigger Alexa or Google Assistant by simply saying their wake-up words. I've tried both assistants and it works just as well as the Google Pixel Buds or the Amazon Echo Buds, with each assistant responding quickly and accurately to my voice commands.

Call quality

Sony WF-1000XM4Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Calling up the WF-1000XM4 is good. Most competing noises, such as traffic, are effectively neutralized, as is wind noise, which was a weakness of the WF-1000XM3. It's not perfect: when the earbuds try to correct for those external noises – especially wind – it can make it sound like you're talking through multiple layers of fabric. But since that's preferable to the annoying whistling of the wind, I think it's an improvement.

During a call, the earbuds automatically deactivate ANC, but you can still turn it back on or switch to transparency mode, which is not possible with all earbuds during a call.

Our opinion

Sony has taken the already excellent WF-1000XM3 and made significant improvements across the board with the new WF-1000XM4. While the new shape can cause some fit issues for some, they are some of the best true wireless earbuds you can buy.

Is there a better alternative?

Function by function, it's hard to find a range of wireless earbuds that can really compete with the WF-1000XM4, but there are better options for certain functions.

The AirPods Pro and Bose QuietComfort earbuds are better for ANC and transparency, with the Bose shining particularly brightly for call quality.

The Master & dynamic MW08 deliver a more nuanced sound quality with better clarity.

And now that Sony is still selling that WF-1000XM3 For a discounted price of $ 180, they're still worth considering if you're okay with some missing features like wireless charging and water resistance.

How long will they last?

Sony backs the WF-1000XM4 with a one year warranty, but I expect they will last for many years. Both the processing quality and the materials are excellent. The foam earbuds will likely need to be replaced every six months with regular daily wear, but this is not uncommon.

Should you buy it?

Absolutely. If you are looking for wireless earbuds with fantastic features, great ANC, and fantastic sound quality, you can't go wrong with the WF-1000XM4.

Editor's recommendations



Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart Review: Superhero Spectacle

Ratchet fires a huge gun in Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart

"Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a pure superhero spectacle that takes full advantage of the PS5 hardware."

  • Exciting set pieces

  • Lots of weapons

  • Fantastic look

  • Impressive technology

  • Disjointed story

  • Overzealous DualSense support

Insomniac know how to make a superhero game. In the past few years, the studio has released two excellent Spider-Man titles of death defying action and big budget set pieces that could make Kevin Feige jealous. So it's no wonder that Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a full-blown Marvel video game film.

It's a natural evolution for one of Sony's most enduring first-party franchises. While it began as a standard 3D platformer in an era when Sony spawned animal mascots, it has only pumped up the galactic spectacle with each new console for the past two decades. With Sony's most impressive hardware yet in the PS5, Insomniac Games can finally play its Hollywood chops and transform the duo into compelling pint-sized Avengers.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a technical powerhouse full of exciting platform set pieces and busy environments. Its weapons arsenal doesn't quite reach the creative heights of previous editions, but the visual high makes for a fun summer blockbuster.

Marvel's Ratchet & Clank

Like previous games in the series, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is an action-packed third-person platform game. The eponymous Lombax hero Ratchet combs planets for collectibles as he carves his way through waves of enemies while the robot Clank tackles puzzle interludes. It's always been a recipe for success for Insomniac, and not much has changed about the secret sauce here. Everything is a little bigger and more noticeable, but the core gameplay is still rock solid.

Playing through a world really feels like flashing through another Hollywood action set piece.

The main difference this time around is that the game plays with alternate realities. Ratchet finds himself in a dimension where his rival Dr. Nefarious has finally taken control of the galaxy. It wouldn't be a "Mirror World" story without a doppelganger, so the game includes a second Lombax called Rivet that players control almost every other level. Functionally, it's exactly the same as Ratchet, which feels like a missed opportunity. Equipment, weapons, and upgrades are shared between both Lombaxes, so it feels like playing the same character with a pallet swap from planet to planet.

Rivets with hover boots in Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart.

It's hard to complain about when Lombax up-to-the-minute gameplay is so much fun. Each level is a finely designed amusement park with exciting rides. When players aren't hunting for secrets or blowing up enemies, they'll race off ramps on the back of a beetle or drag on roller-coaster-like rails as explosions go off in all directions.

This is where the superhero DNA really becomes visible. Playing through a world really feels like flashing through another Hollywood action set piece. This can make the experience feel disjointed at times, as the game's strangely tangled story feels like a way to justify putting dozens of different ideas together. But as with any good blockbuster, it's best to sit back and take in the colorful sensory explosion.

No superhero movie is complete without a few sidekicks. The clank sections are sparse but a perfect change of pace. They revolve around simple ball puzzles where Clank must safely guide projections of themselves to an exit with balls that they can speed up, jump and do more. The more exciting side missions come from Glitch, a miniature mech that Ratchet uses to fend off microscopic viruses. It's little shooter sections that offer some mind-boggling movement, effective haptic feedback, and the game's most charming original character.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart isn't the most narrative-addicting adventure, but it offers the same thrill as Insomniac's Spider-Man games. The heroes are just a little furlier.

Lights, camera, action

The Ratchet & Clank series sets itself apart from other mascot platform games with its focus on action, and that is true here as well. Rift Apart offers players a buffet of weapons and grenades to experiment with. The game does an excellent job of encouraging players to use them all instead of picking one and quitting it. Each weapon can be leveled up, expanding your personal upgrade tree. I found myself back and forth between my guns in every battle, really driven to see what each one could do in its final form.

A close up of the ratchet in the Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart.

Compared to previous entries, the arsenal is a bit tame this time around. There are plenty of recurring favorites, but few of the new weapons feel as creative as tools like the Groovitron or Qwack-O-Matic that turned enemies into ducks in Up Your Arsenal. The most memorable tool is the topiary sprinkler, which temporarily turns enemies into shrubs. This is one of the few weapons that master the series' slapstick fight.

I found myself back and forth between my guns in every battle, really driven to see what each one could do in its final form.

It feels a bit like Insomniac played it more directly to make better use of the PS5 DualSense controller. Many weapons have alternate modes of fire or quirks that take advantage of the controller's adaptive triggers. The headhunter sniper zooms in depending on how hard the left trigger is pulled, for example. Not every gun makes use of this idea, but those that add a little extra depth to the shooting.

The technology is fun to use, but admittedly it can be a pain point. And I mean a literal one. The pull-off resistance becomes physically demanding. With a weapon like the ricochet, players must hammer the right trigger multiple times to destroy enemies. The trigger pull is so hard that I switched to my middle finger just to give my pointer a break. Returnal really got to the heart of how to develop gunplay around adaptive triggers with their Alt-Fire system, but I can imagine a lot of gamers will turn the feature off here entirely.

The gunplay may have been reworked a little to fit the PS5 itself, which is what we've seen in games like Destruction AllStars. Despite these quirks, the fight is still chaotic. When I electrify a creature with a weapon, I create a perfect "weird nonsense" moment in which my stunned enemy wobbles in place like a cartoon character after plugging a fork into an electrical outlet. Shooting down a creature is always rewarded with some sort of detailed animation that is a joy to see.

Big budget thrill

If Returnal is the best presentation of the PS5 controller, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is the game that best shows off the console itself. It's a visually stunning game that plays like a CGI movie. There were moments when I didn't even realize I had regained control of the character after smoothly coming out of a cutscene. The worlds are so rich in detail that they look like they belong in a pre-rendered film sequence.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is in many ways the best example of how powerful this current generation of consoles is.

Take a location like the game's opening world, a little slice of a busy city. It's not just a couple of major buildings that some NPCs are walking around in. The sky is filled with flying cars whizzing overhead and neon signs flashing far in the distance. For an even easier treat, clap the wall of a box and enjoy the explosion of particles that occurs when hundreds of wood splinters and bolts fly in all directions.

The real star of the show is the PS5's SSD, which Insomniac takes full advantage of. Ratchet and Rivet are given a tether with which they can cross portals and teleport them forward seamlessly using a technical magic trick.

Ratchet flies a kite in Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart.

This is particularly useful for the entire alternative dimension angle. There are “pocket dimensions” scattered over the levels, which take the player to a completely different level of challenge without loading time. Whenever games try to pull such tricks, there is always a secret seam that they use to hide the wait. Check out God of War, which uses a mystical zone to hide the loading between areas. When those moments happen behind the scenes at Rift Apart, they are completely invisible.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is in many ways the best example of how powerful this current generation of consoles is. It offers spectacle after spectacle and creates its own version of "film magic" for games. I just wanted to reach into a bag of popcorn for the whole adventure.

Our opinion

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is another great PS5 exclusivity that really shows what the hardware is capable of. It's a visually detailed platformer with three thrilling Iron Man films. Filming suffers a little from an overzealous DualSense integration that is literally painful, but Insomniac has created a colorful blockbuster that's crammed with good old-fashioned comic mischief.

Is there a better alternative?

If we think of this as a superhero game (which it is), it's about on par with Marvel's Spider-Man. Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury offers a little more value for platformer.

How long it will take?

The story lasts about 10-12 hours and I got 100% within 15. There are good reasons to play again, however, as weapons can level up the second time around.

Should you buy it?

Yes. It's another strong exclusivity for the PS5 range, and one that really gets the most out of the system.

Editor's recommendations