11 Mar
Blog

DJI FPV Review: An Endeavor for Serious Drone Pilots

dji fpv review 4 of 8

"The DJI FPV is a fast and agile drone for serious pilots."

  • Incredible agility and speed

  • Responsive controls

  • Low latency video transmission

  • Steep learning curve

  • Soft video quality in low light

When it comes to variety in the drone world, DJI offers perhaps the most extensive lineup aimed at both enthusiasts and professionals. From the Mavic line for those just starting out to the Inspire line for commercial work, DJI seems to have the full range.

While one could argue that DJI dipped its toes into the first-person view (FPV) world with its FPV goggles not so long ago, the DJI FPV marks the company's official entry into the exciting new world of FPV -Drones – those soaring, fast drones that perform like souped-up street racing cars. It opens up a whole new world to existing drone enthusiasts. But what does choosing the DJI FPV really bring you?

Powerhouse animal

I've mentioned to people several times how intimidated I am by the DJI FPV. It's a powerhouse on paper and in real life with its aggressive design language that is a marked departure from previous designs I've seen from DJI. For starters, the two second acceleration time from 0 to 62 mph is a reminder of its raw power – something that shouldn't be taken lightly, especially if it's your first time flying an FPV drone. I managed to get the DJI FPV to 60 mph during my tests, but that's still a step back from its top speed of 87 mph.

The strength and responsiveness is incredible, something that is required to achieve some of your aerial acrobatics. While other consumer drones piloted by me like the DJI Mini 2 and the Mavic Air 2 prefer more gentle movements, the DJI FPV is all about tight movements and quick coverage that provide a different kind of visual capture. For example, you can get the feeling of floating in the air with the DJI FPV because it can make such tight turns.

The strength and responsiveness is incredible.

Because of its incredible performance, I wouldn't recommend the DJI FPV to anyone just starting out. Driving is similar to driving a manual racing car for the first time. It is therefore helpful if you have any driving experience at all.

Steeper learning curve

One reason experience is required is because there is a steeper learning curve to becoming familiar with the manual mode of the DJI FPV. On one hand, I appreciate that the normal mode is similar to controlling DJI's other consumer drones, but flying for the first time was an experience I haven't felt since flying my first drone. I was scared because it was by far the most powerful drone I have ever flown.

Aside from just controlling the drone, there is also all of the equipment that makes up this completely new system. While the drone is at the heart of all of this, there is also the remote control, FPV goggles, and batteries that complete them. I usually just turn on a drone and connect my smartphone to the controller before it's ready to fly. However, because there are more components involved, the DJI FPV will take a little more time to set up and start up.

The new OcuSync 3.0 technology, which is used here with the DJI FPV, delivers reliable video transmission at 810p / 120 frames per second (fps), which enables a real-time view of my flight location and a better feeling for the strict controls that react immediately. This is important because control is everything. Some latency and delay may or may not mean the difference between the drone capturing the shot. Fortunately, DJI's FPV system works like a charm.

If your main goal is to take photos, then you shouldn't get the DJI FPV.

Even so, the menu system is hard to miss. It is difficult to access controls, options, and different modes from a smartphone by tapping the appropriate controls in the DJI Fly app and just relying strictly on the joystick on the FPV goggles. You cannot change the video resolution so easily while the system is running through the protective goggles. To do this, you need to go through a few menus before you get to it. This simply adds to the steeper learning curve of the DJI FPV.

Finally, I really want to emphasize that you cannot control the DJI FPV by yourself. Since you are wearing the DJI FPV Goggles 2, someone else will need to be with you to have a visual line of sight with the drone. Therefore, by default, it is a two-person operation.

Dynamic action footage

If your primary goal is to take photos, then you shouldn't get the DJI FPV – mostly because there are other options that are better suited to it, like the DJI Mavic 2 Pro with its larger camera sensor. The DJI FPV is really intended for the serious videographer who wants to get the nifty and fluid action shots that fast FPV drones are known for capturing. Photos are just an addition to the experience.

Equipped with a 12-megapixel camera with a 1 / 2.3-inch CMOS sensor, the DJI FPV 4K records 60 fps with a bit rate of 120 Mbit / s. With its impressive speeds and tight controls, this drone can definitely achieve a style that DJI's other consumer drones cannot match. I was able to fly right over the waters of the Atlantic Ocean at over 50 mph, then rocket at an angled speed, and finally make a tight turn in mid-flight. Considering this is all happening in real time, this is the kind of footage I couldn't get to with drones like the DJI Mini 2.

You could emulate the look and style, but to get the same pace the footage would have to be sped up to make it look like you're flying at the same incredible speed. It's not the same, however, especially when subjects move in the frame – moving strangely because the footage is speeding up. This is not a problem if the recording contains static elements.

With enough lighting, the 4K footage is sharp and saturated at 60 frames per second, but softens as the sun goes down. There are notable artifacts in the shadows so I made it better match the DJI Mini 2 in terms of low light quality, although it's nice that DJI is offering their D-Cinelike color profile in the post for better optimization. The camera sits on a uniaxial (tilt) gimbal, which, unlike the triaxial gimbals found in DJI's other drones, gives it a very peculiar look as the left / right panning inclines to them during flight Images leads, the pilots see in a real cockpit. The stabilization is thankfully done in the form of RockSteady EIS, which does a good job of reducing vibrations and jitter, but is not as good as a camera sitting on a 3-axis gimbal.

John Velasco / Digital Trends

The DJI FPV's video style is incredibly unique – you won't find anything like it in DJI's portfolio. That alone is the biggest incentive for drone pilots looking for nifty action sequences. You won't get any of the cool cinematic recording modes that DJI is known for like circle, rocket, and boomerang. In order to get similar images, the pilot must expertly steer them.

For serious videographers only

The biggest question is, who is the DJI FPV for? As I mentioned earlier, if your primary objective is to take photos, you have nothing to do with the DJI FPV. It's not for beginners either. It is intended for the serious videographer who wants to capture action sequences, such as when following a high-speed biker through a course.

Our opinion

On paper, the DJI FPV is in close proximity to the DJI Mavic 2 line at $ 1,299 – i.e. at the upper end of the spectrum in the DJI portfolio for consumer drones. It's not cheap, but the pricing is reasonable as it's a complete FPV system in one package, unlike other FPV drones that require a DIY approach.

I would recommend paying the extra $ 299 to get hold of the Fly More kit, which includes two extra batteries and a charging node. Well worth the cost, as it costs $ 159 for a single replacement battery. Finally, for $ 199, the DJI Motion Controller offers a new and unique way to control the DJI FPV by providing controls that make it seem like you are actually controlling something right from the cockpit.

How long it will take?

It's well built, but I'd like to say that you should buy DJI Care Refresh's extended warranty anyway, not only because of the drone's expensive cost, but also because of the fact that piloting such an animal could result in an accident those who are not so experienced. It covers accidental damage and starts at $ 199 for a one-year plan.

Is there a better alternative?

Not really in terms of the visual style of shooting. Yes, you could buy an FPV drone, but the vast majority have to be hand-assembled – while with the DJI FPV, you have a complete system that is ready to use right out of the box.

Should you buy it?

Yes, only if you are a serious drone videographer looking to add a new visual dimension to your recording portfolio.

Editor's recommendations




10 Mar
Blog

DJI FPV Review: An Endeavor for Serious Drone Pilots

dji fpv review 4 of 8

"The DJI FPV is a fast and agile drone for serious pilots."

  • Incredible agility and speed

  • Responsive controls

  • Low latency video transmission

  • Steep learning curve

  • Soft video quality in low light conditions

When it comes to variety in the drone world, DJI offers perhaps the most extensive lineup aimed at both enthusiasts and professionals. From the Mavic line for those just starting out to the Inspire line for commercial work, DJI seems to have the full range.

While one could argue that DJI dipped its toes into the first-person view (FPV) world with its FPV goggles not so long ago, the DJI FPV marks the company's official entry into the exciting new world of FPV -Drones – those soaring, fast drones that perform like souped-up street racing cars. It opens up a whole new world to existing drone enthusiasts. But what does choosing the DJI FPV really bring you?

Powerhouse animal

I've mentioned to people several times how intimidated I am by the DJI FPV. It's a powerhouse on paper and in real life with its aggressive design language that is a marked departure from previous designs I've seen from DJI. For starters, the two second acceleration time from 0 to 62 mph is a reminder of its raw power – something that shouldn't be taken lightly, especially if it's your first time flying an FPV drone. I managed to get the DJI FPV to 60 mph during my tests, but that's still a step back from its top speed of 87 mph.

The strength and responsiveness is incredible, something that is required to achieve some of your aerial acrobatics. While other consumer drones piloted by me like the DJI Mini 2 and the Mavic Air 2 prefer more gentle movements, the DJI FPV is all about tight movements and quick coverage that provide a different kind of visual capture. For example, you can get the feeling of floating in the air with the DJI FPV because it can make such tight turns.

The strength and responsiveness is incredible.

Because of its incredible performance, I wouldn't recommend the DJI FPV to anyone just starting out. Driving is similar to driving a manual racing car for the first time. It is therefore helpful if you have any driving experience at all.

Steeper learning curve

One reason experience is required is because there is a steeper learning curve to becoming familiar with the manual mode of the DJI FPV. On one hand, I appreciate that the normal mode is similar to controlling the other DJI consumer drones, but flying for the first time was an experience I haven't felt since flying my first drone. I was scared because it was by far the most powerful drone I have ever flown.

Aside from just controlling the drone, there is also all of the equipment that makes up this completely new system. While the drone is at the heart of all of this, there is also the remote control, FPV goggles, and batteries that complete them. I usually just turn on a drone and connect my smartphone to the controller before it's ready to fly. However, because there are more components involved, the DJI FPV will take a little more time to set up and start up.

The new OcuSync 3.0 technology used here with the DJI FPV delivers reliable video transmission at 810p / 120 frames per second (fps), which enables a real-time view of my flight and a better feeling for the strict controls that react immediately. This is important because control is everything. Some latency and delay may or may not make the difference between the drone capturing the shot. Fortunately, DJI's FPV system works like a charm.

If your main goal is to take photos, then you shouldn't get the DJI FPV.

Even so, the menu system is hard to miss. It is difficult to access controls, options, and different modes from a smartphone by tapping the appropriate controls in the DJI Fly app and just relying strictly on the joystick on the FPV goggles. You cannot easily change the video resolution while the system is running through the protective goggles. To do this, you need to go through a few menus before you get to it. This simply adds to the steeper learning curve of the DJI FPV.

Finally, I really want to emphasize that you cannot control the DJI FPV by yourself. Since you are wearing the DJI FPV Goggles 2, someone else needs to be with you to have a visual line of sight with the drone. Therefore, by default, it is a two-person operation.

Dynamic action footage

If your primary goal is to take photos, then you shouldn't get the DJI FPV – mostly because there are other options that are better suited to it, like the DJI Mavic 2 Pro with its larger camera sensor. The DJI FPV is really intended for the serious videographer who wants to get the nifty and fluid action shots that fast FPV drones are known for capturing. Photos are only an addition to the experience.

Equipped with a 12-megapixel camera with a 1 / 2.3-inch CMOS sensor, the DJI FPV 4K records 60 fps at a bit rate of 120 Mbit / s. With its impressive speeds and tight controls, this drone can definitely achieve a style that DJI's other consumer drones cannot match. I was able to fly right over the waters of the Atlantic Ocean at over 50 mph, then rocket at an angled speed, and finally make a tight turn in mid-flight. Considering this is all happening in real time, this is the kind of footage I couldn't get to with drones like the DJI Mini 2.

You could emulate the look and style, but to get the same pace the footage would have to be sped up to make it look like you're flying at the same incredible speed. It's not the same, however, especially when subjects move in the frame – which move strangely because the footage is sped up. This is not a problem if the recording contains static elements.

With enough lighting, the 4K footage is sharp and saturated at 60 frames per second, but softens as the sun goes down. There are notable artifacts in the shadows so I made it better match the DJI Mini 2 in terms of low light quality, although it's nice that DJI is offering their D-Cinelike color profile in the post for better optimization. The camera sits on a uniaxial (tilt) gimbal, which, unlike the triaxial gimbals found in DJI's other drones, gives it a very peculiar look as the left / right panning inclines to them during flight Images leads, the pilots see in a real cockpit. The stabilization is thankfully done in the form of RockSteady EIS, which does a good job of reducing vibrations and jitter, but is not as good as a camera sitting on a 3-axis gimbal.

John Velasco / Digital Trends

The DJI FPV's video style is incredibly unique – you won't find anything like it in DJI's portfolio. That alone is the biggest incentive for drone pilots looking for nifty action sequences. You won't get any of the cool movie recording modes that DJI is known for like circle, rocket and boomerang. In order to get similar images, the pilot must expertly steer them.

For serious videographers only

The biggest question is, who is the DJI FPV for? As I mentioned earlier, if your primary objective is to take photos, you have nothing to do with the DJI FPV. It's not for beginners either. It is intended for the serious videographer who wants to capture action sequences, such as when following a high-speed biker through a course.

Our opinion

On paper, the DJI FPV, at a cost of $ 1,299, is in close proximity to the DJI Mavic 2 line – that is, at the upper end of the spectrum in the DJI portfolio for consumer drones. It's not cheap, but the pricing is reasonable as it's a complete FPV system in one package, unlike other FPV drones that require a DIY approach.

I would recommend paying the extra $ 299 to get hold of the Fly More kit, which includes two extra batteries and a charging node. Given the cost of $ 159 for a single replacement battery, the cost is well worth it. Finally, the $ 199 DJI Motion Controller offers a new and unique way to control the DJI FPV by providing controls that make it seem like you're actually controlling something right from the cockpit.

How long it will take?

It's well built, but I'd like to say that you should still get DJI Care Refresh's extended warranty, not only because of the drone's expensive cost, but also because of the fact that piloting such an animal will result in an accident might those who are not so experienced. It covers accidental damage and starts at $ 199 for a one-year plan.

Is there a better alternative?

Not really in terms of the visual style of shooting. Yes, you could buy an FPV drone, but the vast majority have to be hand-assembled – while with the DJI FPV, you have a complete system that is ready to use right out of the box.

Should you buy it?

Yes, only if you are a serious drone videographer looking to add a new visual dimension to your recording portfolio.

Editor's recommendations




09 Mar
Blog

Klipsch T5 II True Wireless Review: Never Mind AirPods

klipsch t5 ii real wireless earbuds rating ry 3

Klipsch's T5 II wireless earbuds

"Klipsch's rocking demeanor turns into a killer set of buds."

  • Great fit

  • Inconspicuous design

  • Great sound quality

  • Solid battery life

  • Fun charging case

  • No wireless charging

  • No active noise cancellation

  • The call quality is not particularly good

Klipsch's T5 II wireless earbuds are stylish, compact, and sound great. But is that enough to set them above all other wireless earbuds?

If you're considering the Apple AirPods or just looking for an alternative, be sure to check out Klipsch's $ 200 T5-II wireless earbuds. They're the second generation of an already great set of earbuds, and while they (like the AirPods) don't have built-in noise cancellation, they have almost everything else. And unlike the AirPods, they are compact and comfortable to wear.

What's in the box?

Riley Young / Digital Trends

While the Klipsch T5 II comes with a printed manual, you can also access all the information in the manual via its app. The earbuds come with a nice selection of silicone earbuds – some oval and some round – which are vital for the comfort of the earbuds as well as their sound quality. With wireless earbuds, the comfort of fit is everything, and the T5 II excels in this area.

You will also find a braided fabric USB-C to USB-C charging cable and a USB-A to USB-C adapter.

The T5 II's charging case is … well, great – it feels and looks like a Zippo lighter. It's metallic and chunky and quite heavy, so it feels pretty nice in your hands. It also has a magnetic lid that feels very secure when it clicks into place. Given the weight, I didn't feel like pocketing the suitcase, but then again, I generally rarely pocket suitcases.

The case has a charging capacity of approx. 24 hours. Add this to the eight hours of playtime you get from the earbuds and that makes a total of 32 hours – which is very good in terms of the earbuds' battery life.

Comfort

Riley Young / Digital Trends

The earbuds themselves, as mentioned earlier, are very comfortable for a number of reasons. First, they're very light – about five grams each. The tube tip is also very slim, and because the tips are made of silicone, they fit snugly in the ear and provide an excellent seal. Due to their flat profile, the T5 II are more inconspicuous than other earbuds. You could easily wear these all day and forget you even have them.

Model selection

There are two other models in the T5 II line. The T5 II Sport offers additional fins and more water resistance. The T5 II McLaren Edition is similar to the Sport model, but offers some improvements in terms of design and aesthetics, as well as an included wireless charging pad.

External control

Riley Young / Digital Trends

There is a fingertip-sized button on the outside of each T5 II bud, and each button has different functions. Functions such as volume, playback, pause, answering calls, ending calls, skipping tracks, etc. are controlled via these buttons. However, it can be difficult to remember which page (and how often) to click for each function. There are guides in the app and manual to walk the user through all of the options, but it can be a bit confusing.

Now, I'm not blaming Klipsch for the complexity – it's difficult to do well controlling a wireless earbud, and we can't think of anyone doing that particularly well. Until you remember them all, be sure to keep this app or guide handy.

Noise suppression / transparency mode

Riley Young / Digital Trends

As mentioned above, these earbuds don't have built-in active noise cancellation. But because the silicone tips fit so well in your ear, much of the outside noise is cut down nicely. Once you start playing music you will not hear much of what is around you. If you want to hear more of your surroundings, you can also activate the transparency mode and move it up or down in the app to get as much or as little outside noise as you want. This is an extremely important feature that too few earbuds offer.

Call quality

These earbuds aren't specifically designed for call quality, but they get the job done. Klipsch's Buds do a good job of removing outside noise, but the sound of the voice itself felt very compressed – to the point that it sounds like an old-school landline phone.

Sound quality

Riley Young / Digital Trends

At first, I didn't get the sound quality I expected, especially because I'm familiar with the original T5. However, this happens when you don't have the right fit in the ear and although I thought I had a good seal, I realized it wasn't after swapping out the installed earbuds for something larger.

As soon as I did, everything opened up. The bass is very powerful, the midrange is very clear and the highs are articulate but never sizzling. Basically, it sounds like a Klipsch speaker. It's a lot of fun to hear with a kind of rock vibe.

There's an EQ built into the app, but I didn't like any of the options, so I set it to "Flat". Strangely, the sound signature is anything but flat. These earbuds sound for what they are, so you don't have to play too much with the EQ to get what you want. The default sound is powerful and engaging, with just enough texture and detail to be as interesting as it is fun.

I've listened to different genres of music and they all sounded great – the sound wasn't pigeonholed to make one genre sound better than another. And that's a big bonus because, for their price, they compete with a wide variety of true wireless earbuds. When it comes to sound quality, these are the absolute best up there.

Our opinion

I don't like much about the Klipsch T5 II True Wireless earbuds. Sure, call quality isn't great, and at times the controls feel a little unwieldy, but they do everything a set of high quality wireless earbuds have to do and they do everything very well. If you're willing to spend some cash on AirPods, I would definitely check out the Klipsch T5 II and see if they literally and figuratively fit better.

Is there a better alternative?

For their price, the Klipsch T5 II are a top choice. For about $ 30 more, the Jabra Elite 85t also offers great sound quality, wireless charging, a comfortable fit, and active noise cancellation. For a little less money, the Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro offers a similarly compact and inconspicuous fit, but it doesn't sound nearly as good.

How long will they last

The Klipsch T5 II are solidly built and last as long as their batteries.

warranty

Klipsch offers a two-year guarantee on the T5 II True Wireless earphones. Further information can be found on the Klipsch warranty page.

Should you buy it?

Yes, the Klipsch T5 II True Wireless earbuds sound great, fit well, and work like a charm.

Editor's recommendations




08 Mar
Blog

Vizio M-Series 5.1 soundbar review (M51a-H6)

Vizio M-Series 5.1 Soundbar (M51a-H6)

"The Vizio M-Series 5.1 is a knockout figure."

  • Support for eARC, Dolby Atmos, DTS: X.

  • Impressive subwoofer

  • Seamless surround effects

  • Comprehensive control

  • Excellent fidelity

  • One HDMI input

  • Less suitable for larger rooms

After recently reviewing the Vizio Elevate soundbar, which produced outstanding Dolby Atmos surround sound (at a high price), I was excited to see the cheaper M-Series 5.1 (M51a-H6) soundbar from Vizio. With virtual Dolby Atmos and DTS: X on board and a compact profile, the $ 300 soundbar system has all the prerequisites for incredible value. But even when I knew all of this, I was surprised. Let's take a look at it.

Out of the box

At first glance, the M-Series 5.1 might look a little… boring. But that’s what it’s all about. The soundbar isn't drawing attention to itself, and I think that's a good thing – you should be able to hear the equipment without visual interference. Vizio did a great job creating an attractive system that would disappear in your room. It's compact, slides right under most Vizio TVs, and has a sleek, charcoal-gray finish.

vizio m series 51 soundbar review m51a h6 5 1Dan Baker / Digital Trends

vizio m series 51 soundbar review m51a h6 5 1Dan Baker / Digital Trends

vizio m series 51 soundbar review m51a h6 5 1Dan Baker / Digital Trends

The system has a 36-inch wide soundbar with six drivers – three mid-range speakers and three tweeters in a configuration for left, center and right – as well as two surround speakers, each with a mid-range speaker and a subwoofer with a robust 6-inch driver Bottom.

The back of the soundbar is pretty simple. There is a power connector and an AUX input connector that can be used for a smart speaker if you want the smart speaker to control the system or to be heard through the surround sound system. There are also two HDMI ports, one for connecting a single device and another that supports eARC for Dolby Atmos and DTS: X surround signals – that's a pretty impressive take at the price.

Everything you need comes in an incredibly well organized box

Dan Baker / Digital Trends

The back of the surround speakers has a single cinch connector that connects the speakers to the subwoofer, as well as a screw hole that allows the speakers to be mounted using the mounting brackets provided.

If you're familiar with Vizio soundbars, you know that everything you need comes in one incredibly well-organized box. There are two power cords (one short and one long if your subwoofer is farther from an electrical outlet), two extremely long surround sound speaker cords, an HDMI cord, a remote control, batteries, an optical cord, and some analog cords, and the the above hardware for mounting the speakers.

Setup options

There are two different setup scenarios for the M-Series 5.1. One is the more conventional configuration, with the soundbar in the front, the surround speakers behind you, and the subwoofer in the back with the surround speakers (which wirelessly receive the surround signal and power the surround speakers).

The setup is plug-and-play and fully automated.

The other setup option (which works well for people who may not have that much space) is to have the surround speakers flank the soundbar at the front and the subwoofer also faces the front of the room. Vizio claims that the M-Series 5.1 can achieve some impressive surround sound effects even with this setup.

Dan Baker / Digital Trends

The setup is plug-and-play and fully automated. After you've plugged the soundbar and subwoofer into an electrical outlet and turned on the system, the two components will automatically connect and you're good to go. If you are using the M-Series 5.1 in a huge, cavernous room, problems can arise if the subwoofer is too far from the soundbar and loses some of its signal, which results in a small popping noise. However, since this system is not intended for larger spaces, I don't see this as a problem for most people

Similar to the Vizio Elevate, the M-Series 5.1 system has a comprehensive set of controls, all of which are managed using the supplied remote control. The remote control allows you to manage the independent balance of the surround speakers, the overall level of the surround speakers, the subwoofer level, the bass and treble levels, and a variety of preset EQ options. This type of control is important so that you can choose the sound of the system to work well with different speaker / subwoofer placement and room feature scenarios. With a little tweaking, I was able to use the system exactly where I wanted it.

Dan Baker / Digital Trends

Sound quality

But how does it sound? In short, the Vizio M-Series 5.1 sounds great. In this price range, no business sounds as good as it does – even to Vizio, which is known for bringing out some pretty high quality soundbars.

The M-Series 5.1 has created a convincing sound circle.

The system doesn't achieve quite as good Dolby Atmos effects as a high-fire speaker system (like the Vizio Elevate), but the fidelity is impressive and the surround effects are seamless and cohesive.

The surround effects in the intro to Mad Max: Fury Road (one of my favorite Atmos surround test tracks) swirl around you. If there are holes in the presentation, you'll notice them straight away. The M-Series 5.1 has created a convincing sound circle, whereby the mix between the surround speakers and the soundbar sounds excellent.

The virtual Dolby Atmos effects have certainly increased the perceived height of the overall presentation and also improved the depth. I just didn't feel like there were objects directly overhead like I did with the Vizio Elevate. When the first chase takes place on Fury Road, a dune buggy flies overhead and, on suitable Dolby Atmos systems, it sounds like the vehicle is approaching you from behind and flying right over you. With the M-Series 5.1 soundbar, the dune buggy seemed to come through me and not over me.

I find this track to be a good stress test as well, as the narrator's soft, gritty voice pushes the boundaries of most soundbars, which often rely heavily on the subwoofer at mid-bass frequencies. I've often found that it looks like most of the voice is coming from the subwoofer, but in my testing I haven't drawn undue attention to the subwoofer. It seemed like the voice was anchored in the soundbar, the bass was just ubiquitous – really impressive.

If you want your living room to feel more like a theater, the M-Series 5.1 is for you. Unlike other soundbars I've tested, the highs here aren't too sharp, the dialogue is never muffled, and the midrange is clear and well-defined. And while soundbars aren't known for being that "musical", I ran a couple of tracks through the M-Series 5.1 and they produced the same sharp fidelity that they did for movies. There wasn't much instrumental separation and the soundstage isn't particularly deep – after all, the M-Series 5.1 isn't an audiophile product to compete with a dedicated music system – but the bass is rich. Instrumental textures are very good and the system provided a comfortable, room-filling experience.

Our opinion

People go to budget-friendly sound bars with managed expectations. For most, it's usually fine as long as it sounds better than the TV's built-in speakers. But the Vizio M-Series X defies those expectations and as such I think listeners will be blown away the first time they listen. For the price, the Vizio M-Series 5.1 is a knockout.

Is there a better alternative?

No. Vizio also offers the SB36512-F6 soundbar, which has two Atmos channels, for the same price. I don't like the design that much though, and I think the M-Series 5.1's fidelity is a bit better. The M-Series also supports 5.1 eARC for higher quality audio, while the SB366512-F6 offers standard ARC.

How long it will take

The Vizio M-Series 5.1 appears to be well built and should last as long as you need to start the upgrade.

warranty

Vizio warrants its soundbars for one year when purchased from an authorized dealer. You can find more warranty information here.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The M-Series 5.1 soundbar is tremendous value and offers an extremely entertaining cinema experience.

Editor's recommendations




06 Mar
Blog

Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Review: Business As Usual for Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S21 plus review back

"The Galaxy S21 + 5G is a sleeker, larger version of the S21. While it's great quality, it doesn't improve the S20 + drastically, nor does it match the height of the S21 Ultra."

  • Noble metal-glass body

  • Breathtaking screen performance

  • Capable camera

  • A 2021 flagship camera is missing

  • S21 Ultra is way better in many ways

If the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G is the best Android phone you can buy right now, and the Galaxy S21 5G has the right ingredients but can't quite pull them together, then where is the Galaxy S21 + 5G? The price is exactly in between and mixes up the lackluster technical data of the S21 a bit, but still doesn't quite match the S21 Ultra for downright high-tech appeal. Is the Galaxy S21 + the confused middle kid or a little star waiting for its moment to shine?

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Since the Galaxy S21 + is almost identical to the Galaxy S21 in terms of software, performance, and camera capability, I won't go into a lot of details here, as DT's mobile editor, Andrew Martonik, already did so in their Galaxy S21 review . Instead, I'll talk about the design and battery that make the S21 + different, as well as some general opinions about the camera and software.

Design and screen

The Galaxy S21 + basically looks the same as the S21, only a bit bigger and a good deal heavier. It weighs 200 grams and is 7.8 mm thick, with a rather flat 6.7-inch screen that leads into the metal case and, most importantly, a Gorilla Glass Victus back panel. Fortunately, the rear cover made of polycarbonate can only be found on the S21. The matte finish hides fingerprints and smudges, and the attractive Phantom Silver color in our photos subtly changes color in different lighting conditions. It is very nice.

Samsung Galaxy S21 plus review above "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/galaxy-s21-plus-back-above- 640x640. jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAAAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

samsung galaxy s21 plus check side buttons module "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/galaxy-s21-plus-side-buttons -module -640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAAABAAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

Samsung Galaxy S21 plus test side camera module "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/galaxy-s21-plus-side-camera -module- 640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAAABAAndy Boxall / Digital Trends

In keeping with the textured metal of the camera module, which is part of the metal housing like the S21 and S21 Ultra, the S21 + feels expensive, looks classy and, overall, is just the right weight to hold. The S21 series design is Samsung's best yet, and the massive camera module on the back of the S21 Ultra takes off the delicate, stylish look. Not so with the Galaxy S21 +. It's just the right mix in that regard, but the size of the phone can still bother some. It's nowhere near as big as the S21 Ultra or the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but it's still a sizable device. My medium-sized hands are struggling to reach over the body of the phone.

The screen is the same Dynamic AMOLED panel as the S21, only bigger. The 6.7-inch screen has a pixel resolution of 2400 x 1080 (FHD +) and a maximum dynamic refresh rate of 120 Hz. The software adjusts the refresh rate depending on what you are doing to keep power consumption under control. It's also a mostly flat panel with less curvature than the S21 Ultra. This has advantages when it comes to gaming but disadvantages when it comes to style. A flat screen can cause the phone to age prematurely.

If you're concerned, the FHD + resolution makes the viewing experience less impressive than the S20 + with WQHD + resolution. Do not worry. Comparing the two didn't reveal any noticeable difference when watching videos – whatever you're doing on the phone looks absolutely great. The video looks amazing, with beautiful colors, sharp details, and more brightness than you really need. This version of GFriends Mago demonstrates the screen's excellent ability to handle rapidly changing colors and tones. At 1080p and 60fps on the S21 +, it looks wonderful.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The beautiful graphics are retained throughout the operating system, supported by the breathtaking brightness of the screen and the refresh rate of 120 Hz for super smooth scrolling, as well as useful adjustment with the Video Enhancer for more vivid colors, a white balance adjustment and various screen color modes. The stunning screen combined with the reasonable size of the Galaxy S21 + in the hand is great for video, gaming, and general everyday use.

camera

The S21 + has the same camera system as the S21 and is almost identical to the cameras of the S20. This means a 64-megapixel main camera, a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera and a 12-megapixel telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. There is also a 10 megapixel selfie camera in a central hole in the screen. However, you will still find many of the same features found on the S21 Ultra, including 8K video recording, the interesting single take mode, image stabilization, portrait mode, and Director's View (where you record video with all cameras and switch between them can) real time) and much more.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

When I compared the S21 + directly with the camera of the S20 +, the software improvements from Samsung were clearly visible. The S21 + can handle shadows and difficult lighting outdoors far better than before, isn't over-saturated in the same way, and has a wider dynamic range. The result is very attractive photos with a tone that is still pop but not as fake as some photos from the S20's camera.

While 3x optical zoom is the preferred option for detail as you get closer to the picture, moving it up to 10x digital won't completely pixelate the photo, but you probably won't want to use the photos very often. To get the best zoom camera, you need to buy the Galaxy S21 Ultra, which has both 3x optical and 10x optical zoom – the difference is significant.

Disadvantage? The wide-angle and main cameras can lack consistency in tone and appearance, with the wide-angle camera increasing the saturation more. The wide-angle camera doesn't take great macro shots on the S21 Ultra either, and focusing on close-ups isn't the S21 + 's forte. The biggest disadvantage, however, is that the S21 + 's camera is only "good" and that is not enough for $ 1,000, especially if it is also the $ 800 Galaxy S21 or the iPhone 12 Pro and Google Pixel 5 far more are capable.

Battery and performance

I'm using an S21 + with an Exynos 2100 chip instead of the US model with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 with 8GB of RAM. On average days with around three hours of screen time, mostly social networking, email, browsing, and messaging, the 4,800 mAh battery drains to around 35% from around 7:30 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., which is means that general usage is a little shorter. You could get two days out of the S21 +.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

However, add in some games or heavy photo or video usage and you only get a single day. About 30 minutes of Asphalt 9: Legends, for example, uses 10% of the battery. If you do this twice a day, you will be nervously watching the percent meter around bedtime. Playing Asphalt 9: Legends over long periods of time showed that the S21 + may not be able to handle intense games as intensely as the S21 Ultra, which has the same chip but more RAM. The game suffered from dropped frame rates and slowdowns, and eventually crashed after a very long session when there was a lot going on on the screen, which wasn't at all on the S21 Ultra. Otherwise, the performance was flawless and no other games had such problems.

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The S21 + has Android 11 with the Samsung OneUI 3.1. It is identical to the S21 and the S21 Ultra. For more information on the software's strengths and weaknesses, check out the reviews of these two phones. The 25-watt fast charging is also the same for all Galaxy S21 models, along with the wireless 15-watt charging and reverse charging. Fortunately, Samsung used a new fingerprint sensor on the S21 + than on the S20 +, and its performance is excellent.

Price and availability

The Samsung Galaxy S21 + is priced at $ 1,000 for the 128GB model or $ 1,049 for the 256GB version. In the UK, the 128GB Galaxy S21 + is £ 950 or £ 999 for the 256GB version. It is now available, either activated via Samsung or Amazon or with a contract with all major network operators.

Our opinion

The Samsung Galaxy S21 + 5G appears to be the middle child of the 2021 S series, and while that's true in terms of size, it's not about technology. The S21 + comes no closer to the incredible capabilities of the S21 Ultra than the S21 and is really only there for those who think the S21 is too small. If you want the true S Series flagship this year, you have to Buy the S21 Ultra 5G.

Does that mean you shouldn't be considering the S21 + at all? No, if you are interested in the S21 or the S21 +, it is the model of the two that you need to buy. The Gorilla Glass Victus back panel gives it the class that the S21 plastic lacks, the larger screen really shows the breathtaking quality, and the battery life – although not exactly long – is better.

The extra cash to spend on the S21 is a little on the high side if the camera is not only the same, but also not as good as the $ 1,000 iPhone 12 Pro or the $ 699 Google Pixel 5 -Dollar S21 + owners interested in camera performance for the $ 1,200 S21 Ultra.

When I tested the Galaxy S20 + in early 2020, I called it the "safe choice," and that's exactly how I see the S21 +. It's pretty and capable, but it doesn't cross borders or lead exciting advances. They know that the quality is excellent and that it will last. The fact that I am saying exactly the same thing about the sequel is both comforting because nothing has changed and depressing because nothing has really changed. The Galaxy S21 + runs as usual.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. Assuming you're not set on an Android phone, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro is the better buy for $ 1,000. The camera is superb, the size is right, the performance is excellent, and since it has 5G this year, it will last just as long as the S21 +. Obviously, things change a little when Samsung offers deep discounts – at the time of writing. The S21 + was brought down to just $ 800, but that's not a permanent sale.

If Android is essential, the Galaxy S21 + 's main competition has not really arrived in 2021. The OnePlus 8 Pro is still very good, but the OnePlus 9 series is on its way very soon and it may be worthwhile to see what the updated model has to offer if you're not in a hurry. If you're in the UK or don't mind importing, the Xiaomi Mi 11 shares the S21 +’s excellent screen and improves the technology in the camera, but battery life suffers.

How long it will take?

Samsung is committed to providing software and security updates for up to four years. The S21 + has an IP68 rating and a metal case, and it has a ton of power plus 5G to keep it updated. All of this means that a two-year contract with a carrier feels relatively new in the end and lasts for at least another year before you really have to think about an upgrade.

Should you buy it?

Yes, this is definitely the model when you can choose between the S21 and the S21. Don't expect this to be anything more than a slightly updated version of the S20 + from last year, however. If this bothers you, there are better options.

Editor's recommendations




05 Mar
Blog

Garmin Lily Review: Bring Fashion to Your Fitness Watch

Garmin Lily Rating Wrist

Garmin Lily Women's Fitness Classic Smartwatch

"The Garmin Lily brings the much-needed feminine flair to a mostly male fitness watch market."

  • Stylish, classic look

  • Pulse oximeter

  • Excellent sleep and wellness tracking

  • Decent battery life

  • Grayscale display

  • No GPS on board

  • No music storage

Smartwatches are usually designed for function and not for fashion, which is why the Garmin Lily attracts attention. With its slim design and feminine color selection, the Lily was carefully designed for women. Garmin hits the bull's eye when it comes to Lily's looks, but surprisingly, the features are a bit short.

The petite size is perfect

There is little doubt that Garmin can make monstrous GPS watches, but the lily shows that Garmin can successfully downsize too. The delicate round face (34.5 mm) and the narrow 14 mm band make the Lily ideal for women. It fits my wrist perfectly and is one of the most comfortable smartwatches I've ever worn. I even prefer it over the Apple Watch SE, which has been a staple on my wrist for years.

With a weight of 24 grams, the Lily is one of the lightest smartwatches on the market. It doesn't put any strain on your wrist and is slim enough that it won't get caught on clothing. You barely even realize you're wearing it until you receive an incoming notification. Although the Lily is small, it offers around four days of battery life between charges.

Creative, classic design

The Lily has a classic design that is more like a luxury watch than your standard fitness watch. The band is delicate and the round display is framed by a thin aluminum or stainless steel bezel that is attractive and non-flashy. Even the sports models that have silicone instead of a leather strap share this classic, good look.

Although the Lily is small, it still delivers up to four days of battery life between charges.

When not in use, the lily's grayscale display disappears, leaving behind a patterned lens. The different colors have different patterns and give the watch a touch of class. The choice of colors is decidedly feminine, but reserved so that it goes well with a variety of outfits. You can wear the lily to work or for a night on the town and no one will know it's a fitness tracker.

Long-lasting but disappointing display

The display is bright and easy to read, but its 16-level grayscale is a step back from the colorful OLED on the Apple Watch and Garmin Venu. The display of the lily isn't bad. It's just not as good as its competition.

The display is covered with Gorilla Glass 3, which is scratch-resistant. After three weeks of wearing the watch, the lens above the display is still flawless.

Robust wellness tracking compensates for missing functions

Like most Garmin devices, the Lily offers numerous wellness features, including stress monitoring and energy tracking of the body's batteries. It can even calculate your breathing rate and blood oxygen levels while you sleep. All of the great wellness tracking, sleep metrics, and widgets you'd expect from a Garmin watch are included in the Lily. Garmin saves a bit on activity options – there are only a handful of timed activities to choose from. While there are fewer choices than most other fitness watches, the activities included are wide enough to cover the basics for most people.

As great as it is at the spa, the Lily lacks some key features. Don't bother setting up Garmin Wallet as you can't use NFC contactless payments with the Lily. It also doesn't have a built-in GPS and instead uses your phone's GPS to calculate distance and pace. Another disappointing area is music. The Lily has a music widget that allows you to control the music that is playing on your phone. The watch does not have built-in memory, so you cannot download music to the watch for offline listening.

Our opinion

The Garmin Lily is ideal for a woman who wants to control her health and fitness with a decidedly feminine watch. The $ 199 price for the sports band and even the $ 249 for the classic leather model are well worth it if you prefer fashion over features.

Is there a better alternative?

If you are a woman looking for a very feminine or classic watch with basic fitness tracking, there is no better choice than the Garmin Lily. If you don't mind a more general look, Garmin Venu or Fitbit Versa 3 might be a better option. Both watches offer an always-on AMOLED display, built-in GPS, and mobile payments for about the same price as the Lily.

How long it will take?

The Garmin Lily has a strong feminine side, but that doesn't mean it's soft. Like most Garmin watches, the Lily is as sturdy as nails and durable. Garmin is constantly updating its watches with bug fixes and new features. If you encounter a problem, Garmin offers a one-year warranty.

Should you buy it?

Buy the lily if you are a woman who wants a fitness tracker that looks like a luxury watch.

Editor's recommendations




05 Mar
Blog

Marshall Mode II Review: Light As A Feather, Loud As Hell

Marshall mode II

"If you like it loud, Mode II puts out a huge amount of sound."

  • Cool design

  • Very convenient

  • Big, bold sound

  • Good call quality

  • Wireless charging

  • Average battery life

  • No quick charge

  • No custom controls

  • No noise cancellation

Marshall's Personal Audio division has made some great headphones and wireless speakers over the past few years, but until now they've been waiting to venture into the insanely competitive category of true wireless earbuds with their $ 179 Mode II. Was it worth the wait for Marshall fans? Let's take a look at it.

What's in the box?

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The small cardboard box contains the Mode II earbuds in the charging case, four sizes of silicone earbuds (media is installed by default), a USB-C charging cable, and some quick start documentation.

design

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Zound Industries, the company that licenses the Marshall branded personal audio products, has always done an excellent job incorporating design elements from Marshall's iconic guitar amps. Mode II maintains this tradition without going overboard.

The charging case features the same amp-inspired textured black plastic as the Marshall Emberton speaker with the Marshall script logo, while the earbuds simply get the stylized "M". In a sea of ​​inconspicuous black plastic earphones, the Mode II is characterized by a retro cool that only the Marshall brand can offer.

That dedication to style even picks up on the USB-C charging cable, which is much longer than a set of wireless earbuds and looks like an electric guitar patch cord – very cool.

I was able to leave Modus II in my ears for hours without getting tired.

Both the earbuds and the wireless charging case are remarkably small and light. At just 44.5 grams in total, they're lighter than the AirPods Pro and AirPods with wireless charging.

The earbuds themselves have a very low profile so they sit almost flush with your outer ear and won't interfere with hats or helmets.

But don't let the small dimensions worry you. The Mode II are solidly built and their case easily protects them from minor mishaps or encounters with other objects when you carry them in your handbag. Thanks to an IPX4 rating, they can survive even your most strenuous workouts.

Comfort and control

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Mode II's small size makes it a very comfortable, yet secure fit. More than most real wireless earbuds I've tried, I've been able to leave Mode II in my ears for hours without getting tired.

Marshall did a great job with the touch controls. If you've read my other earbud reviews, you know that I'm generally not a fan of this type of control and instead prefer the accuracy of a physical button. But Mode II struck the perfect balance of just being sensitive enough that you don't have to tap them repeatedly, but not so hair-triggered that accidental touches become a problem.

Even better, successful touches are confirmed by a subtle but audible feedback tone, which I believe should be the standard practice for all touch-controlled earbuds.

The Marshall Bluetooth app allows you to view the remaining battery life, adjust the EQ and transparency mode (more on that later). However, you cannot customize the controls. The included gestures let you manage play / pause, skip back and forth tracks, answer / end calls, access voice assistants, and turn transparency on and off. However, there is no way to control the volume that you need to use your phone at.

Marshall is sticking to his promise that the Mode II are "in-ear headphones designed for loud devices".

The Mode II are equipped with wear sensors, but strangely enough Marshall limits their functionality to the automatic pause. In other words, if you remove an earbud, your music will automatically pause. However, when you put it back in, you'll need to manually resume your music using the appropriate touch gesture. I really want Marshall to fix this shortcoming with a firmware update and give us the option to completely disable it in the app.

You can either use your own earbud for phone calls or music. Using only the right earbud gives you control of the track while using the left earbud you can talk to your phone's built-in assistant.

Sound quality

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Mode II is factory-tuned with the “Marshall Signature” EQ, a bold and punchy mix that favors the bass. It works with a variety of music genres, from the acoustic sounds of jazz ensembles to the full-fledged electrical studio work of Beck or Daft Punk. Stereo imaging is alive and creates good width and depth for the soundstage.

This signature sound is comparable to both the AirPods Pro and the Jabra Elite 75t, but Mode II offers slightly better clarity, with the upper registers being more noticeable.

If the signature sound isn't for you, the Marshall app lets you create two of your own custom 5-band EQ presets. While playing with these, I found that I was able to significantly cut the bass that some listeners may prefer. You may also want to try turning down the highest frequencies. The standard EQ tends to be sharp and sibilant, which can be a bit annoying, especially when listening at higher volumes.

Marshall speaks of higher volumes and keeps his promise that the Mode II are "in-ear headphones that are designed for loud devices". They get very, very loud indeed – dangerous indeed. I found that even at around 40% volume, I had reached my personal limit for comfort.

If your phone has a built-in ability to reduce loud noise (as most iOS and Android devices do), I highly recommend leaving it on, with a threshold of 85dB or less. Noise-induced hearing loss is no joke and you should take precautions to keep Mode II from maxing out.

Transparency mode

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The silicone earplugs help the Mode II achieve a very good seal in your ear, effectively keeping out external noise. A single tap on the left earbud activates transparency mode so you can hear more of your surroundings.

There is no quick charge option. So if you run out of juice, it will take two hours to fully charge the juice.

You can set the transparency in the Marshall app, but even at the maximum setting, the feature will prefer sounds that are further away rather than those that are close together. This is good for being more aware of your surroundings during times when you are near traffic or other hazards. Having your own voice sound natural for phone calls or conversations is less effective. You will still be aware of a certain subdued quality of these interactions.

Battery life

Marshall mode IISimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The battery life for the earphones is five hours per charge, in the case of an additional four charges for a total of 25 hours. These specifications are almost identical to Apple's AirPods. That's more than enough battery life for a full day, but unfortunately Marshall didn't include a quick charge option. When your earbuds run out of juice it will take two hours to fully charge. This could be frustrating for travelers who suddenly run out of power on a long flight.

You can see the remaining charge on the earbuds in the app, but you'll have to rely on the case's front LED to find out where the juice is – although with a green / orange / red color scheme, that isn't quite as accurate .

Call quality

Marshall Mode II "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/marshall-mode-ii-00007-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Marshall Mode II "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/marshall-mode-ii-00008-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Marshall Mode II "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/marshall-mode-ii-00004-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Since Mode II has no active noise cancellation (ANC) and therefore fewer microphones than the ANC models, I wasn't expecting a particularly good call quality, but Mode II is great for making calls. Wind noise can still overwhelm your voice, but when conditions are reasonably calm these earbuds do a very good job of ensuring that your voice is heard clearly with a minimum of compression.

They automatically switch to transparency mode when the microphones are activated. This comes in handy, but as mentioned above, it doesn't completely remove the muffled sound of your voice in your own ears. Even so, I think Mode II will be decent for most types of calls.

Our opinion

While not as comprehensive as true wireless earbuds at similar prices, the Marshall Mode II offers big, beefy (and loud) sound in a tiny and stylish package that fans of the Marshall brand are sure to enjoy.

Is there a better alternative?

Marshall's iconic style is totally one of a kind, but for the same price or less than Mode II, you can find plenty of excellent alternatives including:

  • $ 180 Jabra Elite 75t: Longer battery life, ANC, better transparency mode, customizable controls and a warmer overall sound, but no wireless charging.
  • $ 130 Soundcore Liberty Air 2 Pro: Longer battery life, ANC, better transparency mode, customizable controls, but bigger and possibly less comfortable.
  • $ 199 Klipsch T5 II: Longer battery life, better protection from water and dust, and better sound.

How long will they last?

Marshall grants a one-year guarantee on Mode II. They appear to be very well built and their IPX4 rating should help them withstand years of use. If you charge them regularly, you can expect the battery capacity to decrease over time.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The Mode II comes with a premium price tag for the Marshall name, but they're stylish, they sound great, and they're very portable.

Editor's recommendations




03 Mar
Blog

Bowers and Wilkins PX7 Carbon Edition Headhpone Review

Bowers and Wilkins PX7 Carbon Edition

"Excellent sound quality, extremely comfortable fit."

  • Very convenient

  • Excellent sound quality

  • Solid battery life and fast charging

  • Can be used while charging

  • USB and cable connection

  • Disappointing call quality

  • No EQ in the app

The quarantine has certainly increased the number of times I use headphones on a daily basis – from playing games to zooming meetings to listening to music while working – and while I have plenty of headphones available, I grabbed the $ 400 Bowers & Wilkins PX7 Carbon every time for the past few months. I love my Sony WH1000 XM4s, which are top-notch headphones, but there are some compelling reasons why I keep getting interested in the PX7 Carbon Edition.

Cases and accessories

While the PX7s aren't the best collapsible headphones, they pack in a neat case that is both handy and fairly stiff, and offers additional protection. Inside the case are a few key accessories: one is a standard 3.5mm cable that plugs directly into a headphone jack, and the other is a USB to USB-C cable that is used for charging or listening or both can be used at the same time – something most wireless headphones just don't do.

Battery life and charging

Bowers & Wilkins claims the PX7 Carbon can run for about 30 hours with noise cancellation turned on. I found that the ANC actually gave me a little less in high mode as opposed to auto. But the bonus is that you can save about five hours on a 15 minute charge, which is fantastic.

Design and comfort

Bowers & Wilkins didn't call this the "Carbon Edition" just because it sounds cool. This is due to the materials that make up this version of the PX7 Carbon. The headphones are made of woven carbon fiber composite that is both extremely light and stiff. They're incredibly malleable – I don't worry about twisting them or pulling them out of shape or breaking them. But more important (for me) than strength is lightness. These are extremely comfortable headphones that won't weigh you down.

The other materials used also contribute to the comfort. The traditional synthetic leather material is found on the ear cuffs and covers a comfortable layer of memory foam. The same layer of comfortable memory foam is also under the headband, and the outer ear cuffs and top of the headband are made of comfortably woven fabric.

There is a small design feature on the outside of the ear cups that is unique to the Carbon Edition: the laser-cut accent on the outer ear cup that accompanies the Bowers & Wilkins nickname.

Controls

There are a number of controls on the back of the right ear cup, including the power button. The on / off switch is great as it is a slide button that acts as a rocker switch and makes it very easy to use (as opposed to pressing and holding and hoping you kept pressing long enough).

Between the power buttons and the volume down button, there is a multi-function button that allows you to control play, pause, forward, skip, answer phone calls, etc., depending on how you press it. It's an "all-rounder, master of nothing" situation that you have to get used to.

Transparency mode

On the back of the left earbuds there is a single Active Noise Cancellation button that allows you to toggle between Off, Auto, Low and High with a quick click. A long press of the button takes you to the transparency mode, which is very good with the PX7 carbons. In fact, I'd say it's the closest thing I've heard to the Air Pods Max (the reigning champion of transparency mode).

Noise cancellation

The noise cancellation on the PX7s is good, but not as good as the AirPods Max, Sony WH-1000XM4, or Bose Noise Canceling 700. Bowers & Wilkins may not have reached the height here, but did well with the tight seal around your ear and Music pumping through the headphones is most likely not to distract you from your surroundings.

App functions

The Bowers & Wilkins PX7 also have an app that lets you adjust the levels of transparency mode and manage your noise cancellation options. However, you cannot adjust the EQ curve at all. In other words, the PX7's sound will stay exactly as Bowers & Wilkins designed it to be.

Audio connections and codecs

The PX7 Carbon are wireless and use the aptX HD audio codec with Android devices (unfortunately Apple users) so you can get good quality sound with the wireless connection. It also comes with the standard 3.5mm wired audio port as well as a USB to USB-C cable for listening and charging. With the headphone cable you could use your own digital-to-analog converter (DAC) like the Dragonfly Cobalt USB DAC, which I like to use. With the USB connection, the PSX7 Carbon uses the same internal DAC as with a wireless connection.

Wireless pairing

The PX7 Carbon can also be paired with multiple devices at the same time, so you can easily switch between your laptop and your phone. It seems like this is a feature all wireless headphones should have, but many just don't. So this is a definite plus.

Call quality

The call quality on the PX7 is… OK. They're certainly not as good as Sony, Apple, or Bose, so I wouldn't recommend them as your best bet for one of those upcoming Zoom calls. While they sensibly blocked out the outside noise during our test on the street, my voice sounded digitized and distant – and not just by wearing a mask.

Sound quality

I like the way these headphones sound – that's why I keep reaching for them instead of Sony or Bose. It's just fun to listen to. They have a much more natural sound than the Sony XM4s – the bass grunts less than the Sony XM4, but there's still a lot of low-end. If you listen to these bass heavy tracks you will get it all. It's very deep and very punchy, but not overwhelming.

The flesh in the middle is extremely clear. Crystal clear. It's very present, but not arrogant in the mix. Vocals sound natural – no squeezing the sound or, on the other side of the spectrum, no chest.

Then there is the high altitude region, which I think is sometimes aggressive. Normally I wouldn't go for something that "sizzles" so high in the heights, but I have to admit it wasn't uncomfortable. It's just a little more than I'm used to – while it's an odd twist, it's something I'm starting to enjoy. The brassiness of a trumpet or the hissing of a cymbal all have a brilliant, bright sheen that almost goes over the edge but reigns in the last second. And I think here comes a lot of excitement for me. Oddly enough, published graphs of the PX7 Carbon's frequency response curve do not support my subjective observation here, but I hear what I hear!

Overall, the frequency response of the PX7 Carbon seems like a roller coaster to me. It starts high in the bass, drops a little into the mid bass, comes back in the mid range, dips a little before the top end, and then climbs up into the treble range. It's a really fun ride.

Our opinion

Price between the Sony XM4 and the Apple Air Pods max offer a great sound experience, even if they're not that mind-blowing in the noise canceling and call quality departments. The PX7 Carbon Edition is more of a fun toy than a tool, but I don't mind – I have a lot of fun listening to it.

Is there a better alternative?

For productivity and travel, the Sony WH-100xM4, Bose Noise Canceling 700 and Apple AirPods Max offer better noise cancellation and call quality, but have different sound profiles. The Bowers & Wilkins PX7 Carbon Editions are best for those who prefer sound quality and comfort above all else.

How long it will take?

Due to the use of high-quality, robust materials, the PX7 Carbon Edition lasts as long as the battery lasts, which should last several years.

warranty

Bowers & Wilkins offers an above-average two-year warranty if the headphones are purchased from an authorized dealer. For more information, see the Bowers & Wilkins warranty information page.

Should you buy it?

Yes. Those who value sound quality and convenience above all other considerations will love these wireless headphones.

Editor's recommendations




03 Mar
Blog

KEF Mu3 True Wireless Earbuds Review: Beauty And The Beat

KEF Mu3 True Wireless Earbuds

"Despite the mediocre ANC, their slim design and great sound make for an appealing package."

  • Beautiful design

  • Comfortable fit

  • Fantastic sound

  • Very good battery life

  • IPX5 water resistance

  • No app for EQ or control tweaks

  • No wireless charging

  • Mediocre ANC and transparency

  • Mediocre call quality

KEF is one of the best-known names in hi-fi, thanks to speakers who have impressed reviewers and enthusiasts for years. The company's LS50 wireless bookshelf speakers are a great example of what happens when you combine classic acoustic expertise with cutting edge technology. I was excited to receive the company's first true wireless earbuds, the $ 230 KEF Mu3. Given the stiff competition from Sony, Bose, Jabra, Sennheiser and Grado, has KEF brought enough of its world-class audio technology to the Mu3? Let's take a look …

What's in the box?

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

In KEF's all-cardboard and easily recyclable box, you'll find the Mu3 in the charging case, a USB-C charging cable, three additional sizes of silicone earbuds (plus the standard media installed on the earbuds), and quick start documentation.

design

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Let's get one thing straight right away: The KEF Mu3 are stunningly beautiful. Both the earphones and the charging case look like sculptures made of highly polished aluminum. They are smooth and shiny. If you leave the charging case in a prominent place like a coffee table, desk, or kitchen counter, people are guaranteed to find themselves unable to resist picking it up just to feel it.

For those who like to get lost in the details of their favorite songs, the Mu3s are more than happy to do so.

The attention to detail continues right through to the hinge mechanism. Most charging cases have weak lids that could break if you aren't careful. If their magnets don't keep them in the closed position, they flutter about worryingly. The lid of the Mu3 feels luxurious by comparison, with a hinge that reminds me of a laptop screen – it stays in any position from open to fully closed. With its aluminum look, it's basically the MacBook Air for charging cases.

Unfortunately, the case is also a bit bulky, so despite its sensual curves, it's not very insertable. But that's fine – KEF seems to have used a hard transparent outer layer on the plastic, and I think it will withstand scratches caused by other objects.

These earbuds also have very acceptable IPX5 water resistance that should protect them from anything other than actual submersion in water.

Comfort and control

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The KEF Mu3 comes with four sizes of soft silicone ear tips, which should mean most people can get a good seal. And here is some valuable advice on the matter: If you feel the need to plug the earbud deep into your ears (which is possible due to its small size), you are probably using the wrong size earbuds.

They did not move at all and felt very comfortable even after several hours of continuous use.

Pushing them in too deep not only becomes uncomfortable, but also degrades the sound quality and the effectiveness of the noise cancellation. I discovered that the hard way. I also found that with the largest earbud I could insert the Mu3 carefully and they didn't move at all and were very comfortable even after several hours of continuous use.

KEF used physical buttons on the Mu3, and that's definitely a good thing. Touch controls can be tricky at best, and I prefer real buttons when they are available.

These buttons are easy to press, but strangely enough, the right button had a more pronounced click response than the left.

With a combination of single, double and long press you can control everything except to jump back a track. However, there is no way to customize these gestures through a smartphone app as KEF didn't create one for the Mu3.

There are also no wear sensors. So if you pull out an earbud, your tunes won't automatically pause.

Sound quality

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The KEF Mu3 are wonderful to hear. Their bright and clean highs, precise mid-tones, and expertly executed bass create surprises with every new track you start. There's no trace of mud that often obstructs smaller earbuds. Applying instrumental jazz standards like Dave Brubeck's Summertime or Duke Ellington's St. Louis Blues, you can appreciate the sheer musicality of KEF's mood, not to mention the soundstage, which is so tightly controlled it feels like the distance between instruments up to being able to measure the inches.

For those who like to get lost in the details of their favorite songs, the Mu3s are more than happy to do so.

When I played it for the first time, I was disappointed with the bass and feared that KEF had become too conservative with the low end in an effort to achieve this so-called “neutral” or balanced EQ. It turned out that I just wedged the earbuds too far in my ears.

When I found out my mistake, I found that not only is there a lot of bass on tap, but that the Mu3s can also use that bass selectively and only hit you with deep resonance when needed.

The transparency mode (ambient sound mode) doesn't let in as much noise as I want.

I think the Mu3 are near perfect in terms of EQ, but since listening experiences are the subjective things they are, you should know that the lack of an app means there is no way to rebalance the sound signature, if it doesn't suit your needs.

Noise cancellation and transparency

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) has become a standard feature of true high-end wireless earbuds, but there is still a huge difference in how each model performs. The Mu3 noticeably reduces the low frequency noise when the ANC is activated. However, it's a far cry from the silence offered by the Apple AirPods Pro, Bose QuietComfort Ear Buds, and Nuheara IQbuds2 Max.

Similarly, the transparency mode (ambient sound mode) doesn't let in as much sound as I would like. It certainly makes conversations easier and gives you greater situational awareness, but it's not the magical "hey, it's like I'm not wearing earbuds" that these other models convey.

Without an app there is no way to dial in one of the two functions and not to change the ANC trigger action. A single press of the left earbud controls noise cancellation, but forces you to toggle between three modes (ANC, Off, and Transparency) instead of being able to toggle between ANC and Transparency, which are actually the two most commonly used modes.

Battery life

KEF Mu3 True Wireless EarbudsSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

KEF really surprised me here. Most true wireless earbuds – even the very expensive ones – typically have a battery life of five to seven hours on a single charge. But the Mu3 delivers nine hours – and that with the ANC switched on. This is by no means the longest time, but it doesn't have to be. After another 15 hours in the charging case, you have a whole day before you have to connect the USB-C charging cable.

Better still, they also have a five minute quick charge system that gives you an extra hour of playtime. My only real disappointment is the lack of wireless charging. When KEF first announced the Mu3, wireless charging was one of the features listed so it may be available again in a future version.

Call quality

I've found a strong correlation between an earbud's ANC / transparency performance and its call quality, and the Mu3s are no exception. You do a little effort not to lose your voice in front of competing background noise, and the sound that is recorded has a scratchy, thin quality to it.

They're probably much better indoors, but outdoors, where a lot of calls seem to be making through earbuds, the Mu3 should be used sparingly.

Our opinion

Although they lack some of the features we would expect from true wireless earbuds at this price point, the KEF Mu3s are beautifully finished, sound amazing, and have a generous battery life.

Is there a better alternative?

As good as the Mu3 is, you will find more features with comparable sound quality and prices in these competitors:

The $ 230 Sony WF-1000XM3 App-supported EQ, adjustable ANC and transparency, longer battery life, better call quality, support for Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa and customizable controls

The $ 230 Jabra Elite 85t App-assisted EQ, wireless charging, adjustable ANC and transparency, customizable controls, a feature to find my earbuds, and better call quality, but they don't sound quite as crystal clear as the Mu3.

The $ 230 Grado GT220 sound very similar to the Mu3 and charge wirelessly, but they don't have ANC or transparency mode and are considerably bulkier.

How long will they last?

The KEF Mu3 appears to be very well built with high quality materials. KEF gives them a two-year guarantee, which is better than many of its competitors. When you add their IPX5 rating, I think they will last for many years if properly cared for.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The Mu3 ignores a lot of the bells and whistles and instead focuses on a beautiful design, a comfortable fit, great sound, and great battery life. As long as you agree to this compromise, they will provide a great listening experience.

Editor's recommendations




«‹3536373839›»