Apple Watch Series 5 Review: Very Close to Perfection

"The Apple Watch Series 5 is near perfect and the best smartwatch you can wear right now."

  • Stylistic look

  • Comprehensive fitness functions

  • Really helpful health traits

  • Useful always-on display

  • The cellular model can replace your phone for a short time

  • No significant changes compared to Series 4

  • No native sleep tracking

The only product I gave a perfect rating for is the Apple Watch. The Series 4 Apple Watch for 2018, to be precise, as not only was it Apple's best product of the year, but it was also the best smartwatch you could buy. Apple has updated the watch to that Series 5and brings a handful of new features while maintaining the same design.

Does that mean it is no longer excellent? Do not be absurd. It is still miles ahead of the competition.

Same iconic design

The Apple Watch Series 5 is visually unchanged from the Series 4. It is available in either a 44mm case or a slightly smaller 40mm size for those with slimmer wrists. The case is still a slim 10.7mm and the 44mm model I'm wearing in the pictures weighs only 36 grams. It is hardly noticeable on the wrist, never gets stuck under a shirt cuff and the curvy cover is wonderfully ergonomic.

Sounds like it was designed by someone who knows watches right? Yes it was and it really shows. The days of being upset about the Apple Watch not being round are long gone. It has become an iconic watch design, and Apple's improvements to the Series 4, which increased the viewable area of ​​the screen without enlarging the body, made it really attractive. I'm not saying I don't want to see a circular Apple Watch (I'd love to see the company approach one), but I definitely don't think we need one. This design has become a classic.

Then there is the build quality and the presentation. It comes in an elongated box that can be opened. The watch case is wrapped in a tiny, soft protective bag. The strap is separate and if you get the Sport Band version it even has medium and long options in the box. The watch case is delicate but durable, and even the cheapest aluminum model feels exceptionally high quality. The matt, room-gray housing, which was combined with the white sports band above, is simple, stylish and wonderfully finished. It is as high quality as mobile products.

The design of the Apple Watch Series 5 hasn't changed because it's simply not required.

Would you like to opt for the Apple Watch made of stainless steel, titanium or ceramic? Sure, go for it, but there's no noticeable difference in texture or build. Yes, they are more durable and you get extra "Boasters" points, but that's about it. Nobody will know if you don't tell them. So stick with aluminum (it's 100% recycled, so it's better for the environment anyway) and spend the money saved building a collection of alternative tapes instead.

The design of the Apple Watch Series 5 hasn't changed because it's simply not required. The only place you can go from here, if technology allows, is to make the case even slimmer and the bezels smaller. Until then, it's fabulous.

A display that is always available

Here is the big change for the Series 5 compared to the Series 4: It has a display that is always on, meaning it always shows the time. It sounds a bit silly, but this has never been an option on the Apple Watch before. It wasn't a huge issue as the Apple Watch was quick to react when you raised your wrist, but it cures the pain of not being able to glimpse the time. A not-so-subtle increase in the wrist to see the time wasn't always appropriate, after all.

This also applies to fitness tracking: if you want to do push-ups and look at the watch to see your data without stopping, it was previously impossible. Workouts are now shown on the always-on display so you can easily check your progress.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

The Series 5's always-on display is more than just a skeleton-style environmental mode. Pick the right watch face and it's an almost identical copy of the usual version. Apple had to overcome battery life considerations to make it work.

Speaking of watch faces, there's a selection of new ones out there. While almost all of them are customizable, there are several standout winners. The Californian dial is attractive, but the Numerals Duo’s bold simplicity is my favorite. It's easy to match the color of the numbers with your watch's strap for a really put together look.

WatchOS 6, which is installed on the Series 5 and is also available for previous generations, has some fun novelties to offer. I like the little tap on your wrist to mark the hour. It's a wonderful recall to the hourly "beep beep" sound of a digital clock from my childhood, without the hassle that such a function would cause today.

I've set up every Apple Watch since Series 0 and it worked the first time every time.

The Noise app is an interesting continuation of Apple's commitment to health. It warns you when you are in a noisy environment and how continued exposure to the sound can damage your hearing. The app measures around 74 decibels in a busy pub and issues a warning when the sound level reaches 100 dB. This is one of those features that isn't immediately helpful, but it does add extra awareness of your surroundings.

The Apple Watch and WatchOS 6 work so well together that they put all other portable platforms to shame with great performance and a simple, quick-to-learn user experience. It's fun to use too. I like the haptic feedback that is impressively tactile against your wrist or finger, and using the digital crown to zoom in and out on the app screen still looks great after all this time. It's all so cohesive and smart.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

It's not without its problems, however. When the watch face sleeps over a displayed notification or app like the new compass, the background will blur and the time will appear in the top right corner. It's not attractive. Waking up the clock and performing your first task takes a little patience as you have to pause for a second before interacting with the screen after tapping the display. This is the only time the software is slow.

These are just small handles, not real problems. Even the setup process is flawless. After scanning the first screen of the watch with your iPhone's camera, the process takes about 10 minutes. It is so easy. There is no messing around during pairing and no graphics are rotated while waiting for updates. I've set up every Apple Watch since Series 0 and it worked the first time every time.

Fitness and health tracking

The Apple Watch is the only fitness and health tracker you'll ever need to wear unless you're focused on a specific sport like marathons or some other form of high-intensity workout that requires specific metrics. It takes care of steps, calories, hourly exercise, relaxation, VO2 max data, hours of standing, and exercise tracking for everything including swimming and cycling, as well as other activities like yoga and elliptical training.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

All of this is available elsewhere, but where Apple stands out is the comprehensive picture it creates of your health over time and the extra tracking that actually saved lives. All of this is one big reason to keep wearing the Apple Watch, and you can't say that about any other smartwatch. The longer you wear it, the more information will be gathered and the more trends will become apparent so that you can change your lifestyle for the better.

There is a new Trends tab in the Activity app on your iPhone (180 days of activity data is required to view these trends) that provides extensive data on your level of activity over time.

The Series 5 Apple Watch didn't add sleep tracking, a long-rumored new feature. Whether this is seen as a disadvantage depends on the importance you put on it. There are apps that monitor sleep using the Apple Watch. However, this and all future official Apple features require you to wear the watch to bed. This means making alternative plans so as not to charge the watch overnight. Is it a major oversight? In my opinion no, but it would be welcome in the future.

The Series 5 Apple Watch didn't add sleep tracking, a long-rumored new feature.

Data is stored and collected in the activity app on your iPhone. When you find that you have slacked off, it will suggest ways you can improve. There are also many daily motivational tools where "closing the rings" (an indication of achieving your activity goals) is addicting and lacking a goal one day is frustrating. It works because it is simple, but the simplicity doesn't mean you will lose interest or miss out on valuable data.

Introduced in WatchOS 5 and the Apple Watch Series 4, Electrocardiogram (EKG) monitoring is available to most owners around the world after an early launch only in the US. It's easy to use, but only meant to be used when you feel an irregularity in your heart rate. It doesn't resemble the heart rate monitor, which is useful for both fitness tracking and medical purposes, and instead falls into the same category as the watch's fall detection mode: you may not know you need it until you do. With it there, you can have peace of mind if you have an irregular heartbeat concern as a notification will be sent when one is detected.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

The data from the Apple Watch makes the activity and health app on your iPhone easier to use. The information displayed is easy to understand, there is a wealth of statistical and information about your daily activity. Even after just a few days of wearing the watch, you will find out where improvements can be made.

Everything is easy to use, the menus are large and clear, and the apps on the iPhone are both informative and attractive. There is no other fitness tracking system that is so well presented, instantly accessible, properly motivating, and durable.

Battery and performance

Has the screen always on ruined battery life? No. It is possible to get a full day (around 8 a.m. to 11 p.m.) and then half of the following day out of a single load. It takes about an hour to charge and a midday charge would easily take the remainder of the second day of use.

Your own usage will vary, and it is expected that battery life will decrease if you use the calling features of an Apple Watch or if you do extended periods of fitness tracking with GPS and heart rate monitoring. Even then, a day should still be possible. This also applies to the smaller 40 mm Apple Watch, which we also tested.

It goes without saying that you have to charge a smartwatch every day, and there are new features that put additional strain on the battery in the Series 5. However, it is disappointing that the new model failed to extend the battery to two days with regular use. Such an extension of the useful life would also make the addition of sleep monitoring more likely.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

Early examples of the Apple Watch did not have the required level of performance. That has changed, and the only time the Series 5 suffers badly is when it is subjected to significant stress while using apps that require data. It's smooth, fast, and never frustrating, but the S5 chip inside doesn't offer any performance gains and instead focuses on efficiency.

The nice thing is that you can use apps on the watch if you want. When you set it up, iPhone automatically adds the Watch version of the apps already installed on your phone. You don't need to install the iOS version of an app on your iPhone if you don't want to as the App Store is now available on the watch itself thanks to WatchOS 6.

What else can the Apple Watch do? It works with Apple Pay, you can store music on it locally (or use Spotify / Apple Music), pair bluetooth headphones with it, make calls and leave your cellular phone at home, chat with Siri after long press digital Crown, reply to messages and emails, check the weather, use it as a remote shutter release for the camera, and even practice mindfulness with the Breathe feature. It is no exaggeration to call the Apple Watch the most complete, feature-rich, everyday smartwatch you can wear.

Price and availability

The Apple Watch Series 5 is available now in the Apple Online Store, in retail stores and at partner locations. The aluminum body costs $ 400 for the 42mm and $ 430 for the 44mm. Pricing is $ 500 for the GPS + Cellular 42mm model and $ 530 for the 44mm version. The stainless steel Apple Watch starts at $ 700, the titanium model starts at $ 800, the ceramic starts at $ 1,300, and the Hermés version starts at $ 1,250.

Apple offers a one-year warranty against manufacturing defects. AppleCare + also offers a more comprehensive coverage plan, but it'll cost you $ 50 for two years.

Our opinion

The Apple Watch Series 5 is superb. No other smartwatch offers nearly the same level of fitness tracking, comfort, performance, or portability.

Apple Watch Series 4 owners don't really need to upgrade, but those who didn't buy the last Apple Watch should go for this.

Is there a better alternative?

No. You would only consider another smartwatch if you have an Android phone and want a WearOS device for better integration. There is a problem with that, however. WearOS is light years behind WatchOS.

In 2020, Apple released the Apple Watch Series 6 and Apple Watch SE. The Series 6 should be viewed as the model that needs to be purchased now. However, if you have a Series 5, there isn't a compelling feature update to make an upgrade necessary.

How long it will take?

Three years, if not more. The Apple Watch Series 4 is a year old and strong. If you have an Apple Watch Series 2, it gets the latest software. So there's no reason why the Series 5 shouldn't be happy with your wrist for long.

Should you buy one?

Yes. Absolutely, completely, 100% yes.

Editor's recommendations




Jabra Elite 85t Review: The Best AirPods Pro Alternative

Jabra Elite 85t

"Small but powerful, the Elite 85t offers impressive performance across the board."

  • Very convenient

  • Excellent sound quality

  • Excellent noise cancellation

  • Customizable controls

  • Excellent call quality

  • Wireless charging

  • Average battery life

  • No aptX or LDAC

Jabra's $ 180 Elite 75t and $ 200 Elite Active 75t are two of the best true wireless earbuds you can buy. They're comfortable, they sound great, they have decent battery life, and they can withstand a lot of water and dust. Active noise cancellation (ANC) will also be available from October.

Who could ask for more?

Yet more is precisely the goal of the new $ 230 Jabra Elite 85twhich, thanks to a new hybrid ANC system, promise better sound and improved noise suppression. They also aim to end occlusion – the feeling some people get when wearing in-ear earphones, that their ears are filled with cotton.

High goals indeed. Has Jabra succeeded? Let's find out.

What's in the box?

Jabra Elite 85tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

First, praise for Jabra: The Elite 85t ship in a very small and fully recyclable box. A few tiny plastic labels are left over, but for the most part, it's an exceptionally eco-friendly package.

This box contains the Elite 85t, which is already contained in the charging case, a USB-C charging cable, two sets of silicone earplugs and a small brochure with a security and guarantee print.

design

Jabra Elite 85tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Jabra knows that if something isn't broken, you won't fix it. Rather than reinventing the wheel, the hugely successful design of the Elite 75t has been adopted and simply enlarged to accommodate some of the new technology and features.

The charging case is more portable than ever, but now weighs a little more. That's likely because Jabra had to find room not only for the larger 85t earbuds, but also for the wireless charging capability. It's a handy feature that is showing up on more and more real wireless earbuds at varying prices from $ 50 to $ 350. So it's good to see that Jabra hasn't ignored them.

Little known fact: You can actually buy these Elite 75t or Elite Active 75t with a wireless charging case, but only from Jabra.com.

The USB-C port for wired charging is located under the hinge on the back of the case. However, Jabra made a careful decision to move the case's LED display to the front to make it easier to see.

Despite the extra bulk, the earbuds are still amazingly compact. The same single physical button – which I think is the best control system you can find – also returns. Unfortunately, due to its semi-open design, Jabra has not been able to maintain the amazing IP55 and IP57 ratings of the Elite 75t and Elite Active 75t, respectively. The 85t are still IPX4, however, which is good enough for all but the wettest situations and is identical to the AirPods Pro.

Convenience, control and connections

Jabra Elite 85t "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/jabra-elite-85t-00003-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Jabra Elite 85t (left) and Elite 75t Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Jabra Elite 85t "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/jabra-elite-85t-00005-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Jabra Elite 85t (right) and Elite 75t Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Jabra Elite 85t "class =" m-Karussell - Bild dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/jabra-elite-85t-00004-640x640.jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP//yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7Jabra Elite 85t (right) and Elite 75t Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Elite 75t sets a new standard for comfort and fit for true wireless earbuds. The 85t are just as comfortable, but their slightly larger shape means they don't fit quite as securely. I've always been very happy with how deep I can put the 75t in my ear canals thanks to its small body and tall tower, but the 85t sits a hair flatter.

The oval-shaped earbuds feel great, but their asymmetrical shape prevents you from twisting the earbuds in your search for the best fit. Oval earplugs can be hit or missed. They're fantastic on the AirPods Pro, but I found them challenging on the 1More Air ANC.

The choice of tip size is therefore even more important, and Jabra only offers three sizes in total. Media usually suits me best, but I've jumped on the big ones to get a better seal.

Switching back and forth between ANC and the HearThrough environment modes can be done instantly.

A good seal is crucial for both sound quality and noise cancellation. It is therefore a bit surprising that Jabra did not offer a test for fitting the earplugs in the Sound + app. These tests that Apple and Amazon use on their earbuds provide an extra level of reassurance that you have the right earbuds for your ears.

The 85t use a semi-open design that allows a small amount of air between your inner ear and the outside world. According to Jabra, this improves comfort by eliminating the pressure build-up that can occur with fully enclosed structures like the Elite 75t. This is also why the 85t is larger than the 75t – semi-open designs require a little more internal volume.

Since air travel is a bit hard to come by at the moment, I couldn't put this special claim to the test. What I can confirm, however, is that the 85t feels a lot more airy than the 75t, and they definitely reduce the feeling of having something in your ear.

As I said above, the controls are amazing. There's a click combo for every function imaginable, including volume and voice assistant access. Switching back and forth between ANC and HearThrough environmental mode can be done instantly with a single click. It's a faster transition than any other ANC earbud I've tried.

Not a fan of how Jabra mapped the controls? Simply jump into the Sound + app and rearrange it as you wish.

My only small point of criticism: With the Elite 75t, pressing buttons is practically powerless and happens regardless of where you place your finger. In contrast, the 85t uses an offset switch. You have to press the part of the button that is closest to the small triangular microphone slot for it to click as effortlessly as the 75t.

Like the Elite 75t before them, the Elite 85t has wear sensors and can automatically pause and resume music if you remove or paste it. It's accurate and incredibly fast.

Pairing the Elite 85t is a breeze. However, if you're an iPhone user, do yourself a favor: don't try to pair them through the Jabra Sound + app as stated in the box. I've never found this technique to work. Instead, just pair them normally in the Bluetooth section of the iOS Settings app and then open the Sound + app.

After pairing, I was surprised to have some really terrible connectivity issues. The left earbud sounded like it had an electrical short circuit, and the right bud wasn't much better. DT Senior Editor Caleb Denison experienced the same thing with his review unit. Oddly, however, it seems very specific in terms of location.

It only happened in my office, where I am surrounded by wireless devices and metal cabinets, and even then only sporadically. I'm pretty sure this won't be a problem for most people, and I expect Jabra will be releasing a firmware fix for it soon.

As with the Elite 75t and most other Jabra wireless headphones, you can pair the 85t with two devices at the same time. It's a great convenience for those of us who hop back and forth between computers and phones, but very few companies offer it (it's called Bluetooth Multipoint). The next thing you'll find is Apple's auto-toggle feature on the AirPods. However, it only works when transferring between two different Apple devices.

Sound quality

Jabra Elite 85tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

With the Elite 75t models you have the choice between different sound signatures. The normal 75t are huge on bass, while the Active model offers a much more neutral EQ. Both sound really good, but their soundstage is pretty tight and creates a sound that is more “in your head” than outside.

The Elite 85t are simply some of the best sounding true wireless earbuds you can buy right now.

The Elite 85t are much more expansive and also have more details. They offer greater accuracy across the entire EQ spectrum, which allows instruments to be separated from one another. A good example of this is Thomas Newman's Dead Already from the American Beauty Soundtrack. With the Elite 75t, the multiple percussion layers are clear and full, but it's only when you use the Elite 85t that you will notice how tightly the 75t packs these layers. In contrast, the 85t open them directly, letting them take up a much larger space. With that extra space, you can really appreciate Newman's selection in the studio and the textures that selection created.

By default, the 85t have a relatively neutral EQ. You can pump up the bass in the Sound + app for a thunderous low end or increase the highs for more vocal clarity, but I didn't find a need for that either.

Our benchmark for actual wireless performance is the Sony WF-1000XM3. I spent a lot of time hopping back and forth between these earbuds, the AirPods Pro and the 85t. The Elite 85t are incredibly close to the Sony XM3 from an acoustic standpoint, and I think they beat the AirPods Pro in terms of warmth and resonance. In other words, the Elite 85t are simply some of the best sounding true wireless earbuds you can buy right now.

The only thing that could have improved the sound of the 85t would be adding higher quality Bluetooth codecs like aptX, aptX HD or LDAC.

Noise cancellation

ANC on the Elite 85t is excellent.

Since both the Elite 75t and Elite Active 75t have ANC thanks to a recent firmware update, you may be wondering if the 85t is worth spending the extra cash on. In a word: yes.

ANC on the Elite 85t is excellent. It uses a hybrid system of feedforward and feedback microphones (as opposed to the 75t models which only have feedforward microphones). You can use the Sound + app to select exactly the noise cancellation you want. When this setting is set to the maximum, it's just as effective as the AirPods Pro and better than the WF-1000XM3.

But what sets the Elite 85t apart is the complete absence of any floor noise. If you listen carefully when no music is playing, you can usually hear a faint hiss when using ANC. It's noticeable on the WF-1000XM3 and even the AirPods Pro, but the 85t are completely silent.

It also needs to be repeated how quick and easy it is to switch between ANC and HearThrough modes – it's almost instantaneous. The AirPods Pro must be held down to toggle while the XM3 forces you to toggle between ANC on, ANC off, and ambient mode.

Battery life

Jabra Elite 85tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The only area that hasn't improved much on the Elite 85t is battery life. It's essentially unchanged from the Elite 75t: you get about seven hours of operation with the ANC off and 5.5 hours with the ANC on. In fact, if you want to be picky, this is 30 minutes less run time than the 75t with ANC off.

Fast charging also remains unchanged. A 15-minute charge adds just one hour to playtime.

By today's standards, these statistics are not much to write home about. However, when you factor in the capacity of the charging case, you can still get a full day out of these buds (19.5 hours with the ANC on, 24 hours with the ANC off). And, to be fair, you have to spend a lot more money to get a lot longer battery life with a set of true wireless earbuds with ANC and great sound.

Call quality

Jabra has always had a reputation for making Bluetooth headsets with great call quality, and the Elite 85t maintains that credibility. The calls were crystal clear and only the loudest traffic or construction noises could keep up with my voice.

HearThrough mode (known as sidetone for phone calls) made my voice sound completely natural at the end of the conversation, which is very important for longer calls as it reduces fatigue.

Our opinion

With the Elite 85t, Jabra has taken its proven wireless earbud formula and made some big improvements. The result is a premium set of noise canceling earphones with premium sound quality and features that make them ideal companions for work, leisure, or travel.

Is there a better alternative?

At that price I don't think so. Sony WF-1000XM3 offer slightly better battery life, but are much larger and bulkier and cannot be charged wirelessly.

While iPhone users may prefer that AirPods Pro I think the Elite 85t sounds better and costs less because of its tight integration with the Apple ecosystem and hands-free Siri access.

How long will they last?

Jabra's products are very well made and the Elite 85t seems no exception. With only IPX4 protection, they won't withstand as much water or dust as the 75t series, but Jabra still gives them a two-year warranty in case something happens. I suspect the 85t will last for many years if used carefully.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The Elite 85t will satisfy your need for comfort, tranquility and sound quality for less money than its closest competitors.

Editor's recommendations




Blue by ADT Video Doorbell Review: Not Done Cooking Yet

Photo of the doorbell on the wall.

Blue from ADT doorbell camera

"The boring hardware and an app that urgently needs redesigning make this experience uncomfortable."

  • Clear video, even at night

  • face recognition

  • View all of the video feeds on the main screen of the app

  • Boring hardware

  • Sluggish app

  • Buried camera controls

  • Late notifications

What do you do when you're an old security company constantly challenged by newbies to the DIY space? Smart Home Tech makes the installation of security systems from complex to rudimentary accessible to the everyday user. ADT recognized this and passed a "If you can't beat them, join them" policy. So Blue was born from ADT.

One of the main focuses of the Blue by ADT security system is that Blue doorbell camera. This is a doorbell camera with a 180 degree field of view and facial recognition that can see who is at your door. Your front door is the center of coming and going around your home. Therefore, camera cover is critical to any security system.

It's a gray box

The hardware for the doorbell isn't particularly exciting. I checked out the Pearl Gray version which has a modern, if a bit boring, look. Basically, it is a rounded rectangle. At the top is a large black camera lens that is set to 130 degrees by default. However, you can expand it to 180 degrees if you don't mind a little fisheye effect. Every Blue by ADT device has a diagonal slash on the bottom that glows blue when the device is in operation. This is a nice accent. The ring light around the doorbell is a nice addition to the aesthetic that shows people exactly where the button is so they don't smudge the camera lens thinking it is a button.

This isn't the bulky doorbell I've checked, but it sure is a chunky boy. You want to make sure that the look of the doorbell matches your current front door decor. We tested the Pearl Gray version. There is also a darker graphite option.

The doorbell is mounted in an unusual way. It comes with a power plate that you connect the wiring to. Then mount this power plate on your wall. The doorbell itself has a tiny on / off switch that you have to set to "on" before you click the doorbell onto the power plate. The doorbell also includes a small battery backup for times when you lose power. However, our tests have shown that this is measured in hours rather than days.

The video from the Blue Doorbell camera is crystal clear

After connecting the doorbell to the app, all the usual video doorbell tasks will be performed. You will receive motion notifications and when the bell rings. You can also purchase an additional carillon extender for around $ 50. This is a large gray box that you plug into an electrical outlet. The extender doubles as a doorbell, a Wi-Fi extender, or both. I loved having the extender plugged into a back room so I knew if someone was coming to the door and I couldn't hear our mechanical doorbell.

The doorbell also has facial recognition, which didn't seem to work very well for me. I only tested the doorbell for a few weeks, at a time when not too many people came to visit. It is possible that face recognition might show up on my face over time, but I give it the benefit of the doubt that I just haven't tested it long enough.

Crunchy video quality

The picture quality is quite good. The video is sharp with good detail, although there is a very noticeable fish-eye effect when the lens is set to 180 degrees. Even at night the video is crisp and clear. You can set the video quality between 720p and 1080p. Clips are recorded whenever an event occurs. However, these events are limited to movement and people. It would be great to see Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) step in here to interrupt the movements. I also want the doorbell to tell me if there is an animal or a package on my doorstep. You can get this from the Nest Hello doorbell. The app also lets you manually adjust the camera's brightness and contrast, which is lovely, but that leads to my biggest problem with the system.

Then everything falls apart because of the app

The app isn't that great. It certainly has some high points, but the overall experience is very slow. It takes 7-10 seconds for the doorbells to ring. Motion notifications can take minutes. So if someone takes Santa Claus off your front door, you will be too late to stop them. Videos take between 10 and 30 seconds to load. This is a very long time to stare at your phone and wait for it to take action. Switching between menu options started slowly, but that actually cleared up towards the end of our review period.

The first time you log into the app, each camera you set up will take a snapshot to refresh the main screen. Refreshing this snapshot can take up to 10 seconds, which makes it feel less like a guard guarding the base and more like a rent-a-cop trying to turn off the TV when the boss walks in. As I mentioned earlier, you can adjust the brightness and contrast, which is lovely, but the part of the app where you do the adjustments is four levels deep in a menu. Then you need to go back to the main screen and wait for another snapshot to be taken to see how your customizations have evolved.

Blue is constantly expanding the capabilities of this device so you should see upgrades in the future too.

The app isn't all bad. The first time you enter the app it will show all of the cameras you have set up and you can live stream them all at once which is lovely. The home page also has an up-to-date history of all recorded events, as well as a crime monitoring section similar to the Ring & # 39; s Neighbors app. You can also partition off parts of your porch that you don't want to detect movement from. When you use the talk feature to speak through the doorbell, your voice will be loud and clear.

However, when you factor in the app's sluggishness as well as some rare connectivity issues, it's not a good experience overall. I worked pretty hard with a product manager at Blue by ADT to resolve some of the connectivity issues and I think we resolved most of them. But in the days since that conversation, I still noticed the doorbell was occasionally disconnected from the WiFi. No other doorbell I have tested has such failures. ADT's Blue said there were more server-side changes released this week. Hence, it is possible that this will help clear up some issues.

Our opinion

There are some great ideas here. Not only is the hardware pretty uninspired, but it also checks a few boxes, including battery backup, easy installation, and crisp video quality. But the app, which is vital to the overall experience, is really making things sour. It needs to be revised. There are also some connectivity issues. It is very likely that updates to the app will fix most of the problems. However, for now, this is a doorbell that is difficult to recommend.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. The blue doorbell camera doesn't do anything other doorbells don't. The 180 degree field of view is adjusted by the Vivint Doorbell Pro. The talk function is taken over by practically every other doorbell camera on the market. The doorbell doesn't record 24/7 footage so you no longer have to scrub through a timeline – like you would with a Nest Hello. Other than that, the motion detection is very accurate, so you basically get clips of everything that goes on outside your door. Unfortunately, the app and uninspired design hold that back.

How long it will take?

The Blue by ADT video doorbell is solidly built, so I can imagine it will last for several years. It's water resistant and can withstand temperatures of -40 ° to 104 ° F, or as we like to call it "September" in Chicago. In addition, the Blue by ADT video doorbell works with Google Assistant, IFTTT and Alexa and the offer is solid. Blue is constantly expanding the capabilities of this device so you should see upgrades in the future too. A one-year guarantee is given on Blue by ADT cameras.

Should you buy it?

No. In the video doorbell space, there are too many alternatives that work better than this one. The product costs $ 199, and while the video quality and expandable chimes are good, the app makes the entire experience untenable. There are just too many alternatives out there that do a better job.

Editor's recommendations




Wyze Cam V3 Review: A Benchmark for Inexpensive Cameras

Wyze Cam v3 on table side profile

Wyze Cam v3 review: A new benchmark for inexpensive cameras

"It's almost unbelievable that Wyze has packed so much into something so cheap."

  • It costs $ 20

  • Works both indoors and outdoors

  • More details with colored night vision

  • Tons of security checks

The attack continues! Wyze has been on the move in the last few months, announcing a number of new smart home devices that seem to have diversified its portfolio overnight. However, the latest announcement is a continuation of one of the most popular devices. Going back to its roots, the Wyze Cam v3 aims to seduce consumers not only because it works both indoors and outdoors, but also because it is feature rich and costs less than $ 20.

Iconic design for outdoors

The iconic design of the original remains a staple with the Wyze Cam v3 as well. The cube-shaped design is made entirely of plastic. For a surveillance camera, it is undoubtedly compact enough to be discreet wherever it is placed. The camera itself can be rotated around its base and tilted to almost any angle for the best viewing angle. In contrast to its predecessors, it is now equipped with an IP65 construction to cope with nature – and therefore more versatile than before.

Wyze Cam v3 power cordJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

However, if there's one aspect of the design that I'm not keen on, it has to be the dangling power cord. There is a short 8-inch cable that ends with a micro-USB socket which then plugs into a standard micro-USB cable. Since this short 8-inch cable is permanently attached to the camera and the camera is accidentally damaged or damaged on its own, the entire device requires maintenance instead of just replacing a micro-USB cable like other cameras.

There is definitely cause for concern, but I also understand that it is likely a necessary change to make it weather resistant. Even so, the design is an upgrade as it can be used either indoors or outdoors for more versatility than before.

Ambient lighting helps with colored night vision

Security cameras provide a lot of information with their recordings. The Wyze Cam v3 has an improved camera with a wider 130-degree field view, 20 FPS recording, a Starlight CMOS sensor and an aperture of 1: 1.6. While like the v2 it still has 1080p resolution, every other aspect of the camera is vastly improved.

For starters, the wider field of view captures more of the scene, which is useful if you place it in a corner for the greatest possible coverage. The Starlight CMOS sensor is probably the figurehead here, as it enables the v3 to see much better in the dark and to draw details – and at the same time provide the conversation with colored night vision.

The 1080p video it produces is adequate in detail and quality, although its dynamic range can be challenging in contrasting lighting conditions, generally overexposing the highlights. Still, I can see other small details from the footage and it proves its worth when the sun goes down with its colored night vision.

Colored night vision without question coughs up details that you cannot find.

While standard night vision in black and white makes it easier to see in almost pitch black conditions, the additional advantage of color vision offers more details – for example the ability to distinguish the color of a person's shirt. This is invaluable information in emergency situations. So it's fantastic that night vision colors are offered. If you compare the footage side by side, colored night vision undoubtedly highlights details that you cannot find with standard night vision. However, there still needs to be some level of ambient lighting in the scene for it to work effectively. If there aren't, colors are hard to tell.

Two-way conversation is also enjoyable: it produces clear voices through the app and a decent volume through the speaker.

Broader security features

As a rule, cheap cameras are rather elementary. With the Wyze Cam v3, this is far from the truth. This proves to me that my home is safe when I'm not around. First of all, Wyze has the controls necessary to address my needs. From being able to record based on motion or sound detection, setting detection zones to minimize false positives, to adding custom schedules and automated operations, there are a number of options to choose from. There's even a chance to detect smoke and carbon monoxide sirens which will then send a notification.

Wyze Cam v3 on the tableJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

All of this shows that the brand has a better understanding of users' security and privacy needs. Although there is 14 days of cloud storage that saves 12 second clips, I appreciate that there is the option for local storage via the microSD card slot. I would recommend using the microSD card as, just like the Wyze Outdoor Cam, it can record time-lapse recordings of almost any length.

It's there to protect my home when I'm not around.

The offer is rounded off by two-factor authentication, an integrated siren that can be activated via the app (rather weak), and an option to switch off the camera electronically via the Wyze app.

Our opinion

The Wyze Cam v3, at a ridiculously low cost of $ 20, sets the standard for what it means to be an entry-level surveillance camera these days. You will not find anything nearby that offers the same safety features, versatility indoors and outdoors, and colored night vision that offers more detail than normal night vision.

How long it will take?

Aside from the concern I mentioned about the proprietary dangling cable, it's solidly constructed. Since it is made of a sturdy plastic housing, its light weight helps prevent damage from falls. A 1 year limited warranty applies in the event something goes wrong internally due to a defect.

Is there a better alternative?

If you're ready to get a little more out of it, cameras like the Ring Indoor Cam and Eufy Indoor Cam 2K Pan And Tilt are top contenders as they aren't overly expensive. The former benefits from leveraging Ring's diverse ecosystem, while the latter has useful 360-degree pan and tilt functionality. There is even the Wyze Cam Outdoor to consider, as it is very similar, but has an internal battery with which it can be operated offline without being connected to a power source.

Should you buy it?

You shouldn't just buy it, you should probably buy a few and build a decent security camera system in your home for a fraction of the price you would pay for other complete systems.

Editor's recommendations




Apple iPhone 12 Review: The Best iPhone for Most People

Apple iPhone 12 review blue back angle 2

"The iPhone 12 is insane value for $ 799 and questions how many people need to buy a 12 Pro."

  • Excellent camera performance

  • Fast and consistent software

  • Nice and colorful hardware

  • Good battery life

  • 5G connectivity

  • Lightbody feels a little cheap

  • MagSafe currently offers little

The iPhone 12 Pro is the focus of press and technology enthusiasts. It's the full-featured, high-end model and the price is damn, we all want one. What it overlooks, however, is that most people have more reasonable expectations and budgets and are immediately interested in the standard iPhone 12.

The iPhone 12 is the phone people use to get in the door (or on the website) and have the option to change their choices to a Mini, Pro, or Pro Max. And that puts a heavy load on the iPhone 12: it has to be really good because most people choose it by default. Here's how well it meets expectations. And why it is, indeed, the best iPhone 12 model for most people.

Hardware, design and display

The iPhone 12 is exactly the same size as the 12 Pro – Apple's own cases are interchangeable. And with a case on the phone, all you can tell is that it's not a pro, but the missing third camera lens – although you still get that large case with a square camera that reminds you of the space that more sensors take up if you had done this you would have spent more money.

iPhone 12

However, if you're brave enough to use your phone without a case, or at least convinced you would wear it naked, there are plenty of other differentiators in the hardware. The first is the colors, which you've no doubt seen in a row that look like a bowl of cone. The colors of the iPhone 12 are fun, playful, and bright – even that blue, which is one of the relatively muted options alongside black.

The iPhone 12 is characterized by a fresh appearance and a familiar high quality of execution.

iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro

The frame of the iPhone 12 is made of aluminum, not stainless steel like the 12 Pro, and the metal is kept in a matte texture that matches the hyper-gloss of the 12 Pro. Instead, the gloss is transferred to the rear glass. This is a boon to the handle, but an absolute fingerprint stain magnet – it will never be clean once you take it out of the box.

Aside from stains, which are just a reality of modern glass-backed phones, the iPhone 12 stands out. It's a really nice design and I'm so glad we're returning to those angular lines from the metal pillow shapes of the past few years. There's only more for your fingers and eyes to discover, and it's actually easy to hold. This is even more true of the 12, which is about 15% lighter than the 12 Pro, though that lightness helps make it feel a little cheap or weak. If you had never had the 11 Pro or 12 Pro in your hand, you wouldn't think about it – this is just a lightweight and easy to manage phone.

The brightness is impressive if you remember that the screen is larger than before (now 6.1 inches) thanks to a new OLED display with smaller bezels on all sides. And when you add the sharp transition from screen glass to metal sides, it feels even more compact. The Face ID notch is still visually annoying, but the Face ID itself is well worth the compromise.

iPhone 12

The display is excellent especially for this price point. It's clear, bright, and colorful with good viewing angles and minimal color shift. And since it is a laminated OLED, the visibility outdoors is of course also good.

The only difference, at least on paper, is that the iPhone 12 has a maximum brightness of 625 nits versus the 800 nits of the 12 Pro. The distinction is strange, as teardowns show that the displays are interchangeable, and Apple's own documentation shows that both can achieve the same 1200 nits when viewing HDR content. I can hardly say that the display on the 12 Pro is brighter, but I also don't know if that's just a mental trick. It certainly doesn't look like it's 28% brighter as Apple's numbers claim.

The new Ceramic Shield glass promises a 4-fold improved drop performance, which we all appreciate, but I'll make it clear: There is no claim that it is better against scratches. My test device had already noticed some normal scratches with normal use over the course of a week. So don't expect this display to be indestructible. I managed to clumsily drop the phone from waist height onto the sidewalk, luckily with a silicone case, and there were no ill effects.

Features, software and performance

For many people, the best thing about the iPhone 12 is that it offers the exact same iOS 14 software experience as the current phone. While this may seem boring to Android users, who supposedly have the opportunity to try a new twist on Android every time they upgrade their phone, this consistency is a big reason why so many people stick with iPhones.

iPhone 12 Pro blue

Depending on how old your current iPhone is, the only difference from the 12 is that everything just runs faster – and it will be fast for years to come too. The A14 Bionic chip is faster than anything you're currently using and is clearly designed for future iOS features.

The only differences in daily use between the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro can be noticed when you really press the phones. The iPhone 12 has 4GB of RAM (storage) for the 6GB of the 12 Pro. So if you multitask a lot or play an intense game while streaming media in the background, you may notice a small difference in performance. And we know the smaller storage capacity is why some of the most advanced camera processing features are limited to the 12 Pro.

With all my regular use, which is not that difficult, I did not notice any difference in the opening times of the app, the graphics or the like. Ultimately, the A14 Bionic is still running the show, and that is what matters. Nobody can blame the iPhone 12 for being slow.

Even with less memory than the 12 Pro, the iPhone 12 flies with everyday tasks.

There is no reason for me to repeat myself talking about 5G and MagSafe, the two big features of the iPhone 12 generation, after writing hundreds of words on both in my iPhone 12 Pro review. Hope you will read the details there as they are fully applicable to a discussion of the iPhone 12 as well. However, a brief summary is in order.

The gist of the 5G discussion is this: Right now you are mostly using Sub-6 5G which behaves like charged 4G. It's a little faster and smoother without using more power than you are used to – that's great, but not groundbreaking. The so-called mmWave 5G, which is mostly used by Verizon but is growing with T-Mobile and AT&T, is the dramatically faster but incredibly sparse network that is still years away from its ubiquity. There is no reason to buy the iPhone 12 to the 5G but it sure will be nice to have for years to come.

iPhone 12 MagSafe accessories

MagSafe is exciting, especially knowing that Apple has a good track record of getting these kind of ecosystems right (mostly) and will get the critical mass of supported phones and accessories soon enough. But at the moment there isn't much to say. Apple makes a charger that, while nice, isn't that much different from the way you use most wireless chargers. The enclosures, two of which are available, are just passages for other MagSafe accessories. We need to see a robust market for third-party MagSafe accessories before we can judge the success of this system – this may take a while.

Battery life

After spending a week on the iPhone 12 Pro checking out all the new features and running numerous 5G speed tests, I was able to settle into the iPhone 12 right away and use it even more normally, as I would later in the life after Review rush is over. This gives my rating of the 12 battery a better analysis of the "real use".

And if you stop testing the iPhone 12 and just start using it, the battery life is really good! Yes, the capacity is the same as the 12 Pro, which is actually lower than the iPhone 11 Pro, but Apple knows what it's doing here with a much more efficient chipset that the phone runs on.

You will easily get through a full day on a full battery.

With my normal usage, which includes much of my time on Wi-Fi and primarily keeping up with lots of email, messages, social media apps, utilities, and lots of podcasts over Bluetooth, 30% can get through a day without any problems remaining. That means I have a lot of overhead for those heavier days, with lots of photos and videos, streaming from YouTube or new podcast episodes, hotspotting over 5G, or taking video calls. Despite all of this, I usually only turn on the energy-saving mode (20%) for dinner – and make it to bed without charging.

If you chose the iPhone 12 rather than the 12 Pro, your expected usage is likely a little lower at first. And it doesn't matter: using the 12 and 12 Pro the same, battery life wasn't an issue on either phone. The iPhone 12 Pro Max is obviously going to be the true battery champion for people who have to push the limits of their phone every day.

Cameras

The main attraction for buying the 12 Pro compared to the 12 is the improvement in the camera. It's important to note, however, that the 12 provides most of the 12 Pro's camera experience. The 12 Pro offers a "telephoto" camera, lidar sensor, Dolby Vision HDR video at 60 fps (out of 30), and the promise to support Apple ProRAW files in the future.

The camera is identical to the 12 Pro where it counts: the main camera and the image processing.

This telephoto camera is just a 2x zoom behind the main camera, which is not strictly necessary. Lidar brings portrait mode to night mode, which is cool but not necessary. Remember that the normal night mode is otherwise the same on both phones. And if you want to shoot HDR at 60 fps, you've probably just bought an iPhone 12 Pro.

The main, ultra-wide, and selfie cameras are all identical hardware supported by the same camera processing, including Smart HDR 3, Deep Fusion, and every other Apple buzzword. That said, most people wouldn't notice any difference in camera features between the 12 and the 12 Pro – that is large for iPhone 12 buyers.

As I've mentioned many times, check out my iPhone 12 Pro review for more camera thoughts (and lots of sample photos).

Camera performance is fantastic with an iPhone 12 Pro for $ 999, which means it's particularly good here for $ 200 less. The main camera consistently produces bright, crisp, and colorful photos with a warm and punchy profile that is appealing but not overdone. HDR effects don't go crazy and usually do well at reducing highlights and enhancing lowlights. Portrait mode is still great for real chest portraits, but is better for full body shots or inanimate objects.

At night you will immediately see the advantages of the larger aperture and the improved processing in night mode. Photos go head-to-toe with the Pixel 5's night vision device, but the iPhone 12 has the advantage of not having to switch to a separate mode for these photos – the camera decides when to do so. And even though I didn't have lidar, I didn't have any problems with autofocus in the dark.

In most scenarios, it's easy to get great photos. And yes, Dolby Vision is cool too.

As I discussed in my iPhone 12 Pro review, the Dolby Vision HDR draw is interesting but not currently practical. DV HDR can only be viewed on modern iPhones, Macs, and Apple TVs connected to compatible TVs. Anywhere you view or share it, e.g. B. on social media platforms, the default dynamic range is displayed. You save large files: A one-minute 4K 30 HDR clip has a size of approx. 250 MB. Fortunately, Apple's typical 4K 60 fps video looks great in SDR too, with good stabilization for handheld recording.

Our opinion

Those who already have an iPhone and are looking to upgrade to the latest phones should start with the iPhone 12 as the default choice. It's a great phone that has all of Apple's usual strengths: great hardware, a beautiful display, consistent performance, and now an especially great camera. It also has good battery life, 5G connectivity for the future, and fascinating additions like MagSafe. Overall, it's a fantastic phone at a reasonable price.

Only consider upgrading to the iPhone 12 Pro if you can knows that you need what it offers. I recommend paying an additional $ 50 for 128GB of storage on the iPhone 12 The 12 Pro costs $ 150 more. For that money, you get a heavier stainless steel case in new colors, an additional camera with some additional camera features, and more memory for possible future performance improvements. Most people just don't care enough to make the money worth it, and better spend that $ 150 on a couple of suitcases and MagSafe accessories.

Are there any better alternatives?

This price range is competitive. For those willing to move beyond the Apple world, there are several Android competitors available. The Google Pixel 5 offers a similarly simple approach as the iPhone with comparable camera and slick software for $ 100 less. The OnePlus 8T is the same price, with better hardware, but weaker cameras. And the Galaxy S20 FE offers an Apple antidote with a bigger screen, more cameras, more flash, and more features.

Obviously, most of the people will stay in the iPhone ecosystem, so there really is only one other option: spend $ 200 more on it an iPhone 12 Pro. If you're pragmatic and buy a 128GB storage model, that's only a $ 150 upgrade. For this money you get a heavier stainless steel frame, an additional telephoto camera, a lidar sensor for extended camera functions and a subtle memory expansion. It won't blow most people who are likely satisfied with an iPhone 12, but it's a good choice when money isn't a big deal.

How long it will take?

With Apple's excellent track record of updating iPhones with new software for several years after it was released, and a powerful A14 Bionic processor, the iPhone 12 will no doubt stay safe for three years without a second thought. The aluminum frame isn't technically as strong as the 12 Pro's steel, but most other phones are also made of aluminum.

There are also some concerns that the Ceramic Shield glass, despite being severely cracked, could be very sensitive to scratches – but we cannot see the long term viability of Ceramic Shield until it has been in the wild for years.

Should you buy it?

Absolutely. If you are in the iPhone ecosystem, the iPhone 12 is an excellent all-round phone with an excellent price-performance ratio.

Editor's recommendations




iRobot Roomba i3 Plus Review: Self Emptying For Easier Life

iRobot Roomba i3 Plus dirt disposal unit

iRobot Roomba i3 + robotic vacuum cleaner

"Thanks to the automatic dirt disposal system, cleaning takes place efficiently and without intervention."

  • Excellent cleaning performance

  • Cleans efficiently to save time

  • Car dirt disposal system

  • Great for avoiding obstacles

  • Virtual boundaries cannot be created

  • Sounds disgustingly loud empty

You never have to have owned or used a Roomba to know the reputation that preceded the robotic vacuum cleaner. Much like Apple in the world of smartphones and DJI with aerial drones, iRobot has an immense, established presence that gives consumers a sense of trust.

The latest robotic vacuum cleaner, the iRobot Roomba i3 Plus, borrows a useful feature from its premium siblings – and at the same time bears significantly lower costs. This combination seems to be a direct response to the various units that have hit the market over the last year that have offered premium features at mid-range prices. Shark's IQ robot is one of them and offers the convenience of a self-draining system. However, the iRobot offer is an equally convincing argument in itself.

Smart cleaning without advanced sensors

I've never owned or used a Roomba, but I'm familiar with the various technologies implemented by today's sophisticated robotic vacuums that make them efficient cleaners. LiDAR, laser navigation and cameras have proven effective in turning today's robotic vacuums into efficient cleaners – the best models that still use the routine of navigating with bumps and movements. You don't get any of these fancy features with the Roomba i3 Plus, but I was still shocked by its performance.

iRobot Roomba i3 Plus on the floorJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

Instead, floor sensors are used on the underside for navigation. In this way, it can effectively track its movement in rooms, so that cleaning doesn't just happen in random formations. In many cases, when there are clear, wide open spaces, cleaning is carried out in straight lines. Additionally, I'm impressed that it can handle clutter with ease. Even with some charging cables on the floor and shoes lying around, the Roomba i3 Plus didn't need fancy sensors to navigate around them.

All of this brings me to its incredible cleaning performance which sweetens its value as an efficient cleaner. The double, multi-surface rubber brushes pull in dirt and debris perfectly – without getting tangled by animal hair and other long fibers. While it only has a single edge brush that helps it wick away debris, the powerful suction helps reduce the spread of debris throughout the funnel. Nooks and crannies are handled well, although they do tend to readjust their position.

I am impressed that it can handle clutter with ease.

Overall, for a robot vacuum cleaner based on floor sensors, the iRobot Roomba i3 Plus is a highly efficient and competent cleaner that meets all of my cleaning needs.

Convenience of automatic disposal

Automatic disposal robots are still few and far between, and even iRobot's own offerings, the Roomba i7 Plus and the s9 Plus, cost $ 800 and $ 1,100, respectively. They're not cheap, which is why the Shark IQ Robot's price tag under $ 600 was so attractive to many. Fortunately, the Roomba i3 Plus gets the same convenience with the iRobot Clean Base automatic debris removal system – all at almost the same cost as the Shark for under $ 600.

iRobot Roomba i3 Plus dirt disposal unitJohn Velasco / Digital Trends

The convenience of setting the robot to clean on its own and then return to base when it has self-emptied is a benefit that means one less thing on my to-do list. I don't really mind emptying the robot myself as this is all I've experienced before, but I fully understand the inclusion in the robot's automation. However, it sounds like a jet engine is starting at top speed – it's so deafening – albeit less than a minute. The disposal unit can absorb dirt and debris for up to 60 days. However, I wish there was a more accurate way to know about the app. If you're wondering, a 3-pack of the disposal bags is $ 20.

If the trash can on the robotic vacuum cleaner gets filled while it is cleaning, it will automatically stop and return to the base to dispose of it – and then return to where it left off to complete the cleaning. Again, it is this type of automation that reduces the need for intervention at my level. The battery life is also excellent as my apartment can be cleaned for an hour without any problems.

No restricted areas

Although I am delighted with the efficient cleaning of the Roomba i3 Plus, it lacks a feature that I can rely on – and that sets up the restricted areas in my apartment. With other bots, this is achieved in two ways: using magnetic stripes to set these boundaries, or placing them on a map via the app. Unfortunately, there is also no option for the Roomba i3 Plus. Quite simply, it gets clean everywhere and everywhere as soon as it starts.

If you have areas in the house that you do not want to be disturbed by a robot vacuum, the ability to set up virtual boundaries / restricted areas is vital. In addition, the robot vacuum cleaner cannot assign any rooms. I think I am spoiled by the way other vacuum cleaners can recognize and define rooms. This is very helpful when you just want a specific room to be cleaned instead of everything. Even so, there are options in the iRobot App that you can use to set schedules for cleaning and connect them to other devices and services. For example, you can set up Roomba i3 Plus to start a cleaning session when you are not at home.

The Roomba i3 Plus is a remarkable cleaner that made me worry less about cleaning it.

Let's call it a compromise, but its inability to accurately map rooms and set virtual boundaries exactly sets this model apart from iRobot's other premium robotic vacuums.

Our opinion

I first met an iRobot Roomba and was impressed with how well it cleans – both picking up dirt from floors and carpets and cleaning it efficiently. The idea of ​​being even more independent and automated is made even clearer by the automatic dirt disposal system. For a mid-ranger, the Roomba i3 Plus is a remarkable cleaner that leaves me less worrying about cleaning.

How long it will take?

Interestingly, the deliberate choice of tough, matt plastic with a dark gray fabric upper part makes the Roomba i3 Plus less prone to dirt and dust after every cleaning. I prefer it to the shiny glass panels I see in many other bots.

The construction feels solid for the most part, but a little maintenance will extend the life of this bot. In particular, long strands of hair can collect around the edge brush, so cleaning it after each use is helpful.

If something goes wrong internally due to a defect, a 1 year limited warranty applies with purchase.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes, if you are ready to lose the money. The older iRobot Roomba i7 Plus is the logical alternative, although it is already a few years old. It has the same automatic dirt disposal system and benefits from room allocation functions that can be used to identify rooms.

My personal all-round favorite recommendation is the Roborock S6 MaxV, partly because of its intelligent obstacle avoidance, the built-in security camera and the ability to mop floors. You pay more, but it's a 2-in-1 combo that gets your job done. If not, there are several more bots to consider covering the price range and features.

Should you buy it?

Thanks to its efficient cleaning and disposal system, you rarely have to interact with the iRobot Roomba i3 Plus. It is a powerful robot that can do the cleaning on its own. So it's definitely worth buying.

Editor's recommendations




Bose Smart Soundbar 300 review: Sonos Beam-beater

Bose Smart Soundbar 300

"Packed with features and great sound, it's an investment you won't regret."

  • Expansive and rich sound

  • Either Alexa or Google Assistant

  • Elegant, minimalist design

  • Listen to private headphones

  • AirPlay 2

  • Expensive for a small soundbar

  • Some music services are not supported

  • No Chromecast option for Android

Bose has gradually expanded its portfolio of smart soundbars and its $ 400 Smart soundbar 300 is the newest addition. It's the smallest and most affordable product in the range, but it has most of the features of its more expensive siblings, the Soundbar 500 for $ 550 and the Soundbar 700 for $ 800.

It might be the perfect choice for those with smaller rooms (or just smaller budgets). Is it right for you Let's try it out.

What's in the box?

In a mostly recyclable box (with some foam inserts that you may need to throw away), you get the Smart Soundbar 300, a power cable, an optical cable, a remote control and a quick start guide.

design

Bose Smart Soundbar 300Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Bose's soundbar design philosophy is one that I fully support: these speakers should be heard, not seen. The Smart Soundbar 300 is almost invisible with its completely matt black housing and its extremely flat shape.

It will look like home when I'm in front of virtually every television I can think of.

At just 2.25 inches tall and 27.5 inches wide, it won't block the bottom of your screen and (depending on the design of your TV) you might even be able to place it under the screen between your legs.

But it's also elegant. With clean lines, a button-free exterior, and a wraparound metal grille, it will look like home sitting in front of virtually every television I can think of. The $ 400 Sonos Beam – Bose's closest competitor – is a bit narrower, but also a bit bigger.

In the upper left corner, a small multi-colored LED light strip gives you visual feedback on the status of the speaker. Two white bars indicate a break, a single blue bar indicates Bluetooth and a small red point means mute. It would be cool if Bose used it to display the volume, but unfortunately not that lucky.

If you'd like to mount it on the wall, an optional bracket is available for $ 40.

The connection ports, which include an HDMI-ARC, an optical input, an Ethernet port, an infrared expansion port and a subwoofer output, are located on the rear. We'll discuss how these can be used in a moment.

Setup and connections

Bose Smart Soundbar 300Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

As with the Soundbar 500 and 700, the Smart Soundbar 300 is not just a TV speaker, it's also a wireless smart speaker that can be added to other Bose wireless speakers for a whole house audio solution. For this reason, the Bose Music app is required to set up (and use the non-TV features) (free on iOS and Android). Today, most people likely have a phone or tablet that can run the app. If you don't, consider one of the many soundbar systems that aren't based on Wi-Fi or app control.

The music app makes setup effortless. In a few minutes the soundbar will be connected to your wireless network and you can configure the soundbar 300 with either Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant, or just skip this step (you can always change it later if you change your mind).

The advantage of connecting the speaker to your TV using the supplied optical cable is that you don't use any of your HDMI connections, which depending on the TV set can be scarce. Since the Soundbar 300 is not compatible with advanced audio formats like Dolby Atmos or DTS: X (which require HDMI ARC), an optical connection is really all you need.

Usually, using an optical connection means missing out on the HDMI enabled TV control features. Thanks to the infrared heater of the Soundbar 300, you can still use Alexa or Google Assistant to operate TV functions without HDMI. This is a neat trick that the Sonos Beam can't.

Oddly enough, Bose recommends using an HDMI cable, which is more reliable than using infrared. It's not included in the box, however, as most people already have an extra HDMI cable, while optical cables tend to be harder to come by.

The bass connector for wiring a subwoofer is proprietary, so it cannot be used with another company's subwoofer. However, if you're not a fan of cables, it makes more sense to upgrade the low-end of the Soundbar 300 to include Bose wireless subwoofers, which cost $ 400 Bass module 500and the $ 700 Bass module 700. If you want to create a more immersive surround sound atmosphere, the soundbar is compatible with the $ 299 wireless device too Bose surround speakers or $ 500 Bose surround speaker 700.

Streaming music from the Bose Music app over WiFi provides the best sound quality for Android users, but it's not a great music management app (more on this below). Instead, Apple users will be happiest with AirPlay 2, which gives every app on your phone or tablet a direct Wi-Fi connection to the speaker. Spotify subscribers can use the Spotify Connect feature to connect to the speaker from any Spotify app. There is also bluetooth on board which will be the best option for Android users.

Speaking of Bluetooth: The Soundbar 300 has the same Bose SimpleSync technology as the more expensive Soundbar 500 and 700. With SimpleSync you can pair a set of Bose Bluetooth headphones or a Bluetooth speaker with the soundbar and control the volume for the two devices independently of each other . It may work with third party headphones – I tried one set Bowers and Wilkins PX5 Headphones and it worked, if a little out of sync. However, your mileage may vary: The Sony WH-1000XM4 was not recognized by the soundbar.

Sound quality

Bose Smart Soundbar 300Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

If you're looking for room-filling sound, look no further. The Bose Smart Soundbar 300 delivers the goods, whether it's bigger, better sound for movies and TV shows, or just listening to your favorite music.

By default, the speaker's EQ is comfortably neutral and has a good frequency balance that works well with a wide variety of music genres and TV content. Given that soundbars are usually the tool of choice for those looking for a simple home theater upgrade, it's a good thing that you can dramatically increase the bass response using the Music app.

Don't get me wrong, the Soundbar 300 can't deliver the kind of bone-jarring bass a dedicated subwoofer can, but in a smaller space, like a bedroom, it has more than enough oomph to bring even the biggest blockbusters to life .

Not that it has to be confined to a small room – the soundbar can get very loud and does so without distortion.

The result is an impressive feeling that the Sonos Beam cannot quite keep up with.

For voice-heavy music or TV dialogues, the soundbar offers flawless, clear playback. Higher frequencies work freely and have both structure and airiness – an unusual combination, even with more expensive speakers.

I was particularly impressed by the sound stage width of the Soundbar 300. The angled full-range drivers impressively reflect the sound from your side walls in the direction of the display / listening zone and create an impressive feeling that the Sonos Beam cannot quite keep up with. The beam feels warmer and has more resonance when it comes to string instruments like bass or cello, but it's also a more reserved sound. The soundbar 300's dispersion pattern feels much more open.

Dialog enhancement mode is essentially a one-click EQ adjustment that brings higher frequencies to the fore and forces other bands to fade into the background. It's not a substitute for something as specific as the Zvox AV157 TV speaker, but it does go a long way in making cloudy speech easier to spot.

Multiroom audio and music sources

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 and Sonos Beam "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/bose-smart-soundbar-300-00012- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAABose Smart Soundbar 300 (front) and Sonos Beam Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 and Sonos Beam "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/bose-smart-soundbar-300-00014- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAABose Smart Soundbar 300 (right) and Sonos Beam Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 and Sonos Beam "class =" m-carousel - image dt-lazy-no "src =" https://icdn4.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/bose-smart-soundbar-300-00013- 640x640 .jpg "srcset =" https://www.digitaltrends.com/://www.digitaltrends.com/R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAABose Smart Soundbar 300 (right) and Sonos Beam Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Bose Music app provides an easy way to manage multiple Bose wireless speakers in your home, including the ability to group them for shared or separate playback. It's not perfect – you can't pair stereo speakers or use them as surround to upgrade a soundbar like the 300 – but for most people it provides very good control.

However, this control does not extend very far into streaming music. The app supports a decent selection of music services including Apple Music, Amazon Music, Deezer, Spotify, Pandora, iHeartRadio, TuneIn, and SiriusXM. However, there is no consistency. Some services are searchable, others are not, and each has its own interface. There is no way to create playlists with the app. You are therefore dependent on the tools of each service. You can save playlists, albums, and songs as presets, but the app only gives you six presets to work with.

Not only is the Sonos system better, it's orders of magnitude better, with universal search, unlimited favorites, multi-source playlists, and support for every streaming service under the sun.

remote control

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 remote controlSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Smart Soundbar 300 comes with a small and simple infrared remote control. It covers the basics: volume, mute, play / pause, power, and source selection (music, TV, bluetooth). The rubberized surface and the curved back make it easy to hold and use.

The only unusual aspect of this remote control is the ability to use the music app to synchronize the power button function with your TV and / or cable box. When you do this, pressing the power button turns the soundbar and these two other devices on and off.

Voice assistants

Bose Smart Soundbar 300Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

With the Soundbar 300 you can choose Alexa or Google Assistant as your voice. A.I. You can change your mind at any time, but just like a Sonos smart speaker, you can't do both at the same time.

Regardless of which A.I. If you choose, the soundbar's microphones are great at picking up the wake-up words and commands.

The feature you choose determines which features you can use. Here you will find an overview of the advantages of the individual systems. One important consideration for those who want to use their music to control their music: the service you want to control must be supported by the Bose Music app as well as the voice assistant you choose. Otherwise it won't work.

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 appAlthough the Google Assistant works well with YouTube Music, you won't be able to bring up YouTube Music tracks on the soundbar 300 (or currently with Bose smart speakers).

Regardless of which A.I. If you choose, the soundbar's microphones are also great at picking up wake-up words and commands from across the room – no shouting required. A tap on the microphone button gives you complete privacy. I especially like the fact that the LED light strip responds to let you know your wake word has been heard. The Sonos Beam can also confirm wake-up words, but instead uses an audio chirp, which I find more intrusive.

Those who set up Alexa in the soundbar can use Bose's Voice4Video technology, which extends the control and control of Alexa to your TV and cable box – even if those devices are not directly compatible with Alexa. Once configured, you can ask Alexa to turn on the TV and even switch to a specific channel.

I found this feature to be a bit successful. Basic commands like “Alexa, turn on the TV” worked fine, but channel changes were found to be more inconsistent. When I asked Alexa to switch to channel 33, I sometimes saw "333" on the screen. At other times the channel request would be correct, but the channel change itself was not performed. And sometimes it just worked.

It is possible that these glitches are related to my particular TV and cable box combination. However, since I was using HDMI rather than optical, I would have expected more consistency.

Our opinion

The Bose Smart Soundbar 300 is an excellent choice for music and movies in small to medium-sized rooms with an expansive sound and some really innovative additional features.

Is there a better alternative?

If you're looking to build a whole house audio system, the $ 400 Sonos Beam is a better choice. It sounds great and its software platform remains the best in the business for those who want complete control over their music and speakers.

However, if you're really looking for a soundbar that can drastically improve the audio performance of your TV for movies and shows, and do an equally good job with your favorite music, the Bose Smart Soundbar 300 sounds better in my opinion.

How long it will take?

The Bose Smart Soundbar 300 comes with a one-year warranty. Bose has an excellent reputation for making quality products, and I trust the Soundbar 300 will last as long as you need it to be.

Should you buy it?

Yes. While the Bose Smart Soundbar 300 is expensive compared to many other TV speakers, its sound quality, customization, additional features, voice control, and expandability make it an investment you won't regret.

Editor's recommendations




Apple TV 4K Review: Stunning, But Strictly For Apple Fans

Apple TV 4K test: breathtaking, but exclusively for Apple fans

"The Apple TV 4K is a boon for Apple power users (but anyone else is better off with a Roku Ultra)."

  • Extremely intuitive user interface

  • Siri's search / control has been vastly improved

  • Powerful graphics and processing

  • Nice 4K HDR picture

  • In some cases the SDR content is dimmed slightly

  • No longer the only way to do AirPlay

  • Expensive compared to the competition

Apple introduced the Apple TV 4K in 2017. Despite ongoing software updates that can be expected as a streaming force, the hardware and price have stayed the same.

For the first year after its launch, Apple was able to justify the starting price of $ 179 for the 32GB model (the 64GB model costs $ 199). After all, it was one of the few streaming devices on the market that supported 4K, Dolby Vision, and Dolby Atmos.

But it's 2020 now and Apple's competitors haven't stood still. Roku updated its flagship $ 100 Ultra, Amazon launched and continues to update its $ 120 Fire TV Cube, Nvidia is updating its game on the $ 150 Shield TV, and Google officially moved to the remote media category with the incredibly affordable $ 50 Chromecast with Google TV Streamer.

Apple's little black box does a few things better than these other products, but that list is dwindling, making it increasingly difficult to make an argument that you should be spending that much. Let's take an updated look at the Apple TV 4K and see if it's still the king of Streaming Device Hill.

Out of the box

Apple wrote the rulebook for the out-of-box experience, and the Apple TV 4K packaging proves that the company is still the master at this point. From the heavy cardboard box to the neat cable management to the first-class appearance of the box and the remote control, everything on the Apple 4K TV screams “premium”, which you should expect given the price of 180 US dollars.

For that sum, you'll get a streaming device that feels like loving care and attention has been put into its design. Most streamers are made of plastic, but Apple's is visibly superior. The remote control feels good too – it's just right in your hand and makes you want to swipe up on the touchpad.

Apple TV ReviewBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

In addition to the Apple TV 4K, its power cord and its remote control, you also receive a lightning cable for charging the remote control and a quick start guide with all three sentences. That's all you need as setting up couldn't be easier.

configuration

If you own a relatively new iOS device (sorry, iPad 2 owners, you're excluded here), you can already experience the fastest set-up process we've seen from a set-top box so far. After selecting the language and country, simply hold your iPhone or iPad near the Apple TV 4K and a few clicks later your WiFi information and Apple ID have been copied. All of your iTunes purchases – music, TV shows, movies – are instantly available on your new Apple TV 4K.

Bonus, if you're a third or fourth generation Apple TV owner who saves device settings in iCloud, your tvOS layout will automatically sync so your new streamer looks almost exactly like your old one – only better.

If you don't own an iPhone or iPad, you'll quickly find that you're not getting the best that Apple TV 4K has to offer. As you would expect, the more you invest in the Apple universe, the more bonuses and amenities you will enjoy.

However, once you've manually connected to your WiFi router (or, better yet, plug in an ethernet cable for a better overall experience), you'll find that plenty of goodies are in stock. Either way, your Apple TV 4K will be set up in no time.

If this is your first Apple TV, or if you don't store your tvOS setting in the cloud, then Netflix, Hulu, and many of the other common suspects aren't pre-installed. So you have to go get them. Apple makes it a little easier for pay TV subscribers by collecting provider information and then automatically downloading the streaming apps that users can enjoy with their pay TV subscription.

You must also sign in to all of your apps. This is the most tedious process of setting up a streaming box or smart TV. Apple makes it easier by automatically offering text entry through iOS on the iPhone or iPad to enter usernames and passwords, or by using Siri to say the letters and numbers out loud and have them transcribed. Both methods are infinitely less of a chore than chasing and pecking through a virtual keyboard, although this option is also available.

User experience

Apple has always had a focus on user experience (known technically as "UX" because of acronyms), which has led to buzzwords like "it just works" and products that have a reputation for being easy for everyone to use . The Apple TV 4K is rich in UX, and the convenience and well-conceived features are deep. There is also a plethora of apps for Apple's set-top device. We cannot discuss all of them here, but we will address those who we consider to be the most notable.

Siri

Most people are already familiar with Apple's digital assistant, but Siri on Apple TV 4K is especially helpful.

Remote Tips and Key Features for Apple Digital Trends:

  • Ask Siri, "What should I see tonight?" A menu of suggested movies and shows is displayed in the lower third of the screen. All recommendations are selected daily by the editors to show what is particularly important.
  • Double tapping the Home button on the remote will bring up recently used apps. This allows you to seamlessly switch between apps without having to go back to the home screen.
  • Move your most used apps to the top line of the home screen for quicker access. For example, add Netflix to your mix. When the icon is selected, shortcuts to Netflix titles will appear at the top. Just click on a title to view it.
  • Easily organize apps on Apple TV with folders.
  • When you highlight a track in Next, hold the button and you'll get quick shortcuts like marking an episode as viewed.
  • You can add any iTunes movie to your Up Next queue using Siri by saying "Add Up to Up Next" on the movie page.
  • Press the play button on any song in Watch Now to start playing immediately.
  • Ask Siri to “Play TVShowX” from your Next list to continue watching.

One of Siri's most helpful uses is finding content that you want to watch – specifically, finding 4K and HDR content that you can watch.

Siri search results are no longer as exclusive as they used to be. Apple might have limited search results to iTunes listings, but Apple TV 4K now shows whether the TV show or movie you want to watch is available outside of iTunes. The quest for orange is the new black, and you have options to buy or rent through iTunes, or watch it for free on Netflix (assuming you have a Netflix subscription, of course). A search will give you similar results for The Handmaid & # 39; s Tale, which you can watch on iTunes but which is free with a Hulu subscription.

Additionally, a narrow search for a specific movie title or a more focused search for movies with specific actors will produce a long list of results from numerous streaming sources. We tried searching for “Movies With Charlize Theron,” and there were certainly many that we could only get through iTunes, but there were several available from other streaming services to which we subscribed. We even searched for “4K Movies on Netflix” and loved it when Apple TV 4K showed us a long list of titles we could watch in 4K.

Other search tricks include asking to see movies in 4K HDR from multiple sources and refining your search by saying, "Just show me the sci-fi movies."

If you miss a dialogue, ask Siri, "What did you say?" and it will backup the video for 15 seconds and enable subtitles for that period. You can also ask Siri to skip forward or forward for a specified amount of time instead of using the backward or fast forward buttons.

Layout: TV app or symbol grid

The layout of the Apple TV 4K is intuitive, especially for previous Apple TV users, with a big and bold grid of colored icons for each app. However, starting with tvOS 13, Apple TV users have a different way of using the Apple TV app as their home screen.

The TV app acts as a single point of contact for all of your streaming needs and has an interface that mimics what you watch on Netflix or Amazon Prime Video. The difference is that the TV app pulls content from all major services, not just one, and makes recommendations based on your viewing patterns and subscriptions.

Supported services include Apple TV +, Disney +, Hulu, HBO Max, Peacock, and Pluto TV. For some services, such as Netflix, the TV app shows the programs that are recommended. However, to actually watch them, you will be directed to the Netflix app instead of watching them in the TV app.

It can keep track of which movies or episodes you've watched, thus providing "Watch Next" and "Watch Next" lists.

If you're a Spectrum or AT&T cable customer, you can watch your subscribed channels in the TV app instead of having to switch inputs on your TV.

With sections dedicated to sports and kids, plus the ability to access the same content on the go with the Apple TV app for iPhone, iPad, or Mac, it's a very robust experience.

Gaming, fitness and more

Apple Fitness PlusApple

You have to hand it over to Apple: Although the Apple TV 4K is quickly approaching its fourth birthday, it keeps getting new features.

In 2019, Apple added Apple Arcade, a subscription service for casual gamers. To enhance the experience, support for gaming controllers has been expanded from the very restrictive list of devices designed for iOS to include both the Sony PlayStation 4 and Microsoft Xbox controllers. Unfortunately, developers and gamers haven't exactly made Apple Arcade a runaway success.

More recently, Apple announced its Fitness + subscription service, a virtual series of workouts guided by professionally hosted videos (via Apple TV, of course) and tied to the sensors built into the Apple Watch. We can't tell just how good Fitness + is (it will be rolled out later this year), but here's how it compares to Peloton on paper.

The latest version of Apple TV software, tvOS 14, has some cool extras like picture-in-picture, the ability to monitor HomeKit-compatible security cameras from your TV, and support for audio sharing if you have two Apple or two Pairing Apple Devices Suggests wireless headphones to Apple TV 4K.

The information

The Apple TV 4K makes it clear if 4K with HDR is available for the content you're watching, which is more than can be said for some of its competitors. There are also numerous reviews for TV shows and movies that are sourced from multiple outlets such as Rotten Tomatoes. You can also learn more about the cast and crew of your favorite movies and TV shows by clicking on the actors' profile picture. This is similar to Amazon's X-ray functionality, but is better implemented.

The speed

The Apple TV 4K is fast thanks to the A10X Fusion processor under the hood. If your internet connection can keep up, load times are lightning fast, info screens appear instantly when you click them, and even scrolling through long title tapes is remarkably smooth and fast.

The image quality

In HDR mode, the picture quality of the Apple TV 4K is excellent. The 4K content in Dolby Vision and HDR10 looks beautiful, especially with movies on iTunes. Most of the standard dynamic range (SDR) content also looks very good.

Pro Tip: Apple TV 4K converted 24fps movies to 60fps before they were delivered to the TV and there was no way to turn them off. Now there is an option to "match content" for audio and video in the settings we recommend.

Dolby Atmos

A key addition to Apple TV 4K, which was introduced with tvOS 12 in 2018, was support for Dolby Atmos, the leading surround sound format for home users. While not fully compatible with all apps (Plex can handle Dolby Atmos, for example, but only if the source is Dolby Digital Plus and not Dolby TrueHD), this was a huge win for home theater owners with Dolby Atmos sound systems. Here's how to find out if you're actually getting Dolby Atmos on your Apple TV 4K.

If you subscribe to Tidal's HiFi tier, you can use the Tidal app to listen to Dolby Atmos songs if you have a compatible home theater system or soundbar.

Dwindling benefits

There was a time when owning an Apple TV was the only way you could AirPlay screen mirroring or transfer content from an iOS device to your TV. It was also the only way to access iTunes movies and TV shows. Times have changed, however, and these once-exclusive features are increasingly being built into the latest generation of smart TVs and third-party streaming devices.

The iTunes Movies and TV app and the Apple Music app are available from 2018 and newer Samsung Smart TVs.

AirPlay 2 has been added to the latest smart TVs from Samsung, LG, Vizio, and Sony. There will also be 4K-capable Roku in the coming months. Along with AirPlay 2, most of these devices also get Apple's smart home platform, HomeKit, which Siri can use to control them.

The Apple TV app, arguably the nerve center for the overall Apple TV 4K user experience, also appears on the same devices as well as Amazon's Fire TV platform. The TV app isn't the entire Apple TV experience, but it's a significant part.

When you consider how much functionality is included in lower-cost streaming devices like Chromecast with Google TV, Fire TV Stick 4K, or Roku Ultra, how much value do you put in the exclusive features of Apple TV 4K like Apple Arcade? or Apple Fitness +.

warranty

The Apple TV 4K warranty provided by Apple protects against product defects for one year before purchase. Apple also offers an extended warranty for the AppleCare Protection Plan.

Our opinion

The Apple TV 4K is a fast device with Apple's unique design stamp. Those deeply immersed in the Apple universe will be delighted by the way the streaming set-top box integrates with other Apple devices, as well as the Siri integration which offers convenient search and voice control , be thrilled.

Is there a better alternative?

For Apple power users, the Apple 4K TV is just the thing. For everyone else, devices like the Streaming Stick + from Roku, the Roku Ultra, the Fire TV Stick 4K from Amazon or Chromecast with Google TV offer a much better price-performance ratio.

How long it will take?

With the A10X Fusion processor inside, the Apple TV 4K still has a lot of untapped potential. And even if Apple announces new hardware this year, you can bet the company will continue to support the current generation for many years to come.

Should you buy it?

Buy the Apple TV 4K if you are heavily invested in the Apple universe and / or have a large library of movies, TV shows, and music in the iTunes Store – and you don't intend to buy a new smart TV anytime soon. Don't buy the Apple TV 4K if you just want to get 4K HDR content through an easy-to-use device that's priced well below $ 100.

Editor's recommendations




Bose QuietComfort 35 II Gaming Review: Lost In Translation

bose quietcomfort 35 ii gaming review boseqc35iigaming1

Bose QuietComfort 35 II Play

"Bose is a noob in gaming audio, and it shows."

  • Pleasant, balanced sound

  • Light and comfortable

  • Excellent active noise cancellation

  • Lack of virtual surround sound

  • Lacks audio punch in action games

  • Not wireless when gaming

  • Bad value

I have four headphones. That may sound silly, but I suspect you're not far behind me. Here is my list:

  • Wireless PC gaming headset
  • Sony PlayStation 4 wireless headset
  • Wireless earbuds
  • Wired headphones

I blame this absurd situation with the clutter of audio compatibility that can be found on different devices. My PC gaming headset works great for my PC, but not well with the PlayStation 4, and not at all with something that lacks USB-A. My Sony PS4 headset is only useful for the PS4. My wireless earbuds technically connect to anything I own. However, due to their short battery life, I am reserving them for use with my phone. And my wired headphones, now 12 years old, are still the best choices for music, but they require a 3.5mm headphone jack and are too big to be used from the comfort of a desk.

Obviously, my life would be less cluttered with just one device to get it all done. Enter the Bose QuietComfort 35 II Gaming. Based on the popular QC 35 II wireless noise-canceling headphones, the gaming model has a wired microphone for lag-free PC games. They connect to everything I own and can even connect two devices at the same time.

At $ 330, however, the promise of all-round connectivity doesn't come cheap. Can QC 35 II Gaming keep its promise?

Audio quality

Crystal clear audio is the main goal of this headset. It is a conversion of a wireless headset that is usually aimed at audiophiles. So I was expecting an excellent experience.

I'll start with the bad news. The Bose QuietComfort 35 II Gaming begins its life as wireless headphones, so they lack the taste in sound that I expect from a wireless gaming headset. They're balanced and crystal clear, but lack surround sound virtualization, a feature that is now combined with games like butter on toast.

Matthew S. Smith / Digital Trends

Simply put, the QC 35 II Gaming is not trying to take your socks off. They're great for Final Fantasy XIV, where the game's amazing soundtrack can take center stage, or Microsoft Flight Simulator, where clear sound makes air traffic control chatter easier to hear and modest bass rewinding an airplane engine drone.

However, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the lack of punch was so noticeable that at first I thought my audio settings were wrong. It wasn't you. The QC 35 II Gaming can't keep up with the impressive virtual surround sound of headsets like the Logitech G733 or the SteelSeries Arctis 7.

The tradeoff for this is the great audio quality everywhere else, which is important. Modern gaming headsets are big bucks, but usually have a muddy sound that strips away details and nuances.

Matthew S. Smith / Digital Trends

Switching from a Logitech G733 to the QC 35 II is a day versus night difference – and I really enjoy the G733. The headset from Logitech is flawless in almost every situation. But put them against Bose on my Spotify Rewind playlist, and Bose will train the Logitech.

Your opinion on the sound of the QC 35 II Gaming depends on what you are playing. If all you want to do is gamble and play games that make adequate use of virtual surround mode, a dedicated gaming headset is better for you. If you're looking to listen to a wide variety of media or play games that have great soundtracks and audio design above volume, the Bose QC 35 II might make sense.

Microphone performance

The Bose QuietComfort 35 II games are defined by an additional microphone that is connected to the audio jack on the headset. The microphone is then connected to a puck using a 3.5mm audio jack. And this puck, which also functions as a volume control, is then connected to your PC via USB.

Confused? Here's the real head scratcher. The QC 35 II Gaming already has a built-in microphone. So why another corded microphone?

The answer to that question – which hardcore gamers have already guessed – is lag. Bluetooth is not a perfect solution for gaming due to latency. It is not ideal to hear an opponent's rifle 200 milliseconds after firing. Because of this, wireless gaming headsets come with proprietary wireless dongles instead of using Bluetooth. However, the QC 35 II Gaming already has Bluetooth, so Bose taps on a wired microphone that is also used to connect the headphones.

Matthew S. Smith / Digital Trends

It's not a good solution. At $ 330, the QC 35 II Gaming is at the high end of wireless gaming headsets. They're not actually wireless when playing games, however. More precisely, the QC 35 II Gaming are wireless Bluetooth headphones that can be converted into a wired gaming headset.

The company makes this clear in its marketing out of fairness to Bose. The QC 35 II Gaming is designed as a gaming headset that also has a "wireless lifestyle mode". Bose doesn't lead anyone astray. However, that doesn't make the wired microphone any less annoying.

At least the wired microphone is excellent. I compared it back to back to the Logitech G733, the Logitech G533, and the Razer Kraken. The QC 35 II Gaming was the clear winner. All four headsets are sufficient, but the QC 35 II Gaming has a clean, crisp quality that is a step above the norm.

Comfort and design

Alright. I've been banging on this evil for a while now – and rightly so. It's a cumbersome attempt to turn a great pair of wireless headphones into a gaming headset, and it doesn't quite work. The Bose QC 35 II Gaming, however, remains at its core the Bose QC 35 II. You can read our Bose QC 35 II review to get the expert perspective of our A / V editor, but I'll summarize the benefits.

The QC 35 II Gaming are compact, foldable for mobility and come with a travel bag. They are light and comfortable to wear. The ear cups, while still an over-ear design, are smaller than most gaming headsets and breathe well. The processing quality is excellent. The phone app that manages wireless connections (the QC 35 II Gaming can connect to two Bluetooth sources at the same time) is simple, but works well enough.

Matthew S. Smith / Digital Trends

It is in the so-called "lifestyle mode" that these advantages are most important to the gaming version, and this is not an unattractive pitch. You can use the QC 35 II Gaming at home with a gaming rig, listen to music on your phone while doing housework, or take them for a walk around the neighborhood.

You can now buy gaming headsets with lag-free wireless connectivity and built-in bluetooth like the SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless. Just like the QC 35 II Gaming, these headsets can also serve as all-in-one audio devices. However, they're bigger, heavier, often don't work as well with mobile devices, and usually have a retractable (rather than detachable) microphone.

Don't forget the QC 35 II Gaming's active noise cancellation either. It's effective, eliminating most repetitive sounds, and making everything else much less loud. This is less useful for gaming than it is for traveling. Bose is the master of ANC and the ANC quality of the QC 35 II Gaming is superior to any gaming headset or wireless headphones I have used.

Battery life

The battery life of the QC 35 II Gaming underlines the cumbersome conversion of the headset. Bose claims up to 40 hours in wired game mode and up to 20 hours in wireless lifestyle mode.

That's right. Battery life is limited in wired mode. Forty hours is a long, long time. I usually don't play more than two hours a day, so the QC 35 II would theoretically last three weeks and I've never compromised its endurance while wiring it. On the other hand, gamblers who gamble a lot will eat through a fee in two or three days.

Bose quotes 20 hours of wireless battery life. They seem close to that number. The QC 35 II QC gaming headphones are so comfortable that I wore them more than usual. That's a good sign, although I charged it once every two to three days – more often than the less comfortable Logitech G533, which is my usual daily driver. Still, I can't knock on Bose for wanting to wear the QC 35 II Gaming.

Additional functions

The QC 35 II Gaming has a customizable button that can be used to control ANC. It can also call Alexa or Google Assistant. This is an important function for the QC 35 II wireless headphones, but irrelevant for a gaming headset. This can be useful when using the QC 35 II Gaming as wireless headphones. The built-in microphone is preferable to telephoning from anywhere in the room.

As already mentioned, the QC 35 II Gaming comes with a volume puck. Inclusion is a wise decision by Bose as it will ease the annoyance of using cables. Without the puck, you'd have to plug the headset directly into your desktop's 3.5mm audio, and that would be a chore. Adjusting the volume by rotating the puck is also more convenient than using the headphones' volume buttons.

However, wire length was still a problem. A short 3-foot 3.5mm audio cable connects the microphone to the puck. It's barely long enough for the job. I usually run the audio cable from my wired headphones on the side of my desk so it doesn't get caught on my keyboard or the HOTAS (Hands on Throttle-and-Stick) I use for Microsoft Flight Simulator. However, this is not possible here.

Our opinion

The Bose QuietComfort 35 II Gaming are great wireless headphones that are built into a disappointing gaming headset. They look great, sound great, and have an excellent ANC. The wired implementation of gaming connectivity isn't ideal, however, and it's difficult to balance that with the $ 330 price tag.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. The SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless, Sennheiser GSP 670 and HyperX Cloud Flight S are examples of great gaming headsets that can connect via WiFi or Bluetooth. If all you want is a gaming headset, solid entries like the Logitech G733 start at $ 130.

The Bose QC 35 II Gaming beat them as everyday headphones. But when you buy a gaming headset, gaming is a priority. Other gaming headsets are easier to use, support wireless gaming, and have 7.1 virtual surround sound.

How long it will take?

The QC 35 II Gaming are exceptionally well built and personally I have never broken a headset or headphones (despite washing my AirPods). Accidents aside, you can assume that the QC 35 II Gaming will last as long as the battery life lasts. Heavy users might want a new pair in three years, but I think most owners will be in use for at least five years.

Should you buy it?

No. The Bose QuietComfort 35 II are great wireless headphones, but disappointing as a gaming headset. Gamers should stick to headsets that are designed from the ground up for gaming.

Editor's recommendations




Google Chromecast 2020 Review: What We Always Wanted

google chromecast 2020 review edit yt 00 37 27 22 still009

Google Chromecast 2020 review: what we always wanted

"Google's Chromecast with Google TV is a huge hit in our book."

  • Affordable

  • Support Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos

  • Slick UI

  • Responsive

  • Integrated Google Assistant

  • Dolby Vision is always activated by default

  • Recommendation algorithm is still learning

I am impressed. The new Google Chromecast with Google TV looked pretty good on paper, but now that I've been using one for the past few weeks I can safely say it's even better than expected.

I never warmed myself to the original Chromecast. You call me old school, but I like a remote control and screen surface – the original Chromecasts didn't have one. I just couldn't handle my phone, tablet, or PC, which was the main controller for my television. The $ 35 Google Chromecast, which has been around for 7 years, was never for me, and the Google Chromecast Ultra's $ 70 4K resolution wasn't enough to attract me. To my surprise, I'm really excited.

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the Google Chromecast with Google TV is for everyone. Let's examine what this little dongle can and can't do and if it's right for you.

Out of the box

Google Chromecast with Google TV has an unnecessarily long name, although technically it makes sense to distinguish what is different from previous Chromecast versions (more on that in a minute). Fortunately, almost everything else on the device is very simple.

Caleb Denison / Digital Trends

It all starts with the packaging and what's in the box. The packaging appears to be almost entirely recyclable – and there isn't much of it. Inside the box is the Chromecast dongle, a remote control, a small USB-A chip, a USB-A to USB-C cable, and two AAA batteries – and folks, I love the batteries.

Yes, you read that right. The AAA batteries that Google ships with the new Chromecast share the same silky, rubbery silicone casing as the Chromecast dongle, remote control, and power cord. I actually giggled with glee as I slid it out of its plastic cocoon to place in the remote. Nice touch, Google. Win unboxing.

Features and Specifications

As is well known, the original Chromecast and Chromecast Ultra (4K) allow users to find content on their phones and cast it on their TV for viewing on the big screen. The original devices were essentially invisible. The big improvement here is the addition of an on-screen interface and remote control.

The remote has power and volume buttons that you can use to control your TV. Oddly enough, the power button is on the bottom left of the compact remote, but the volume buttons on the side are familiar to anyone who has used a Roku or Amazon Fire TV remote with similar buttons.

There is a circle on the top of the remote that you can click up, down, left, and right with. Below the circle is a Google Assistant button, a back button, a mute button, two hotkeys for accessing YouTube and Netflix, and a home button. The remote feels great, but the button layout took a bit of getting used to, if only because I've been using other streaming remote controls for so long.

Caleb Denison / Digital Trends

The Chromecast dongle plugs directly into the HDMI port on a TV, so there is no need to worry about a high-speed HDMI cable that supports 4K HDR and Dolby Vision.

That brings up two of the most amazing features of the new Google Chromecast, especially for the $ 50 price tag: Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. Dolby Vision content libraries are growing rapidly with services like Netflix, Disney +, and Amazon Prime Video. This content looks amazing on a Dolby Vision enabled television. Dolby Atmos surround sound support is also available, but availability varies from streaming app to streaming.

Google doesn't publish much about the new Chromecast's antenna, but in my experience it did an above-average job of getting Wi-Fi signals for steady streaming.

configuration

As easy as it is to use the new Chromecast, it will take some time to set up. This is true of many streaming devices today as they evolve. There are a few hoops to jump through here that are unique to the new Chromecast, however.

If you don't already have the Google Home app for iOS or Android, you'll want to download it. You need to set up the Chromecast. Once the Chromecast with Google TV is on, it will appear as a new device that can be set up in the Google Home app. Just follow the instructions and the device will be connected to your network in no time. Most people will be using Wi-Fi, but there is an ethernet adapter accessor available as an additional purchase.

From there, Chromecast will offer some apps to install (others will have to be installed manually at a later date), test that your TV's power and volume are working, get updates, restart a few times, and set up Google Assistant voice tracking. and finally the device is set up. This will take a while. But wait, there's more.

Caleb Denison / Digital Trends

This is where Google could significantly improve the Google TV experience: By registering users with their streaming apps. Google saves all of my passwords. I am signed in to my apps on my Android phone. It's not a huge challenge for Google to automate the login process. So … please, Google?

Right now, users have to go through the tedious process of entering usernames and passwords for all of the streaming apps they subscribe to. In all fairness, this is probably the most time consuming part of the setup.

One last and very important note: By default, the new Chromecast is delivered with Dolby Vision always active. This means that if your television supports Dolby Vision, everything will be displayed in Dolby Vision and your picture preferences will therefore be limited. Additionally, non-Dolby Vision content will not look right. Even the colors of apps on Google TV don't look right. To fix this, navigate to Settings and under Video Settings select Synchronize content. This ensures that the TV will only switch to Dolby Vision mode when it is playing Dolby Vision content.

The Google TV part

The new Google Chromecast with Google TV is all about the screen surface of Google TV. Although it is very different from Sony's Android TV interface and some Hisense TVs, as well as the Nvidia Shield, it looks familiar with differences despite a few buttons.

Google TV is heavily focused on content recommendations. It learns what you like to see over time and tries to put the focus you want on the content you want. Plus, you don't have to go into a specific app to view it. At least not manually. You just see a place where you can click Captain Marvel, right next to a slide to click Stranger Things. There is no evidence that the content is on HBO Max or Netflix. At least not until the next screen when you press the play button.

Caleb Denison / Digital Trends

If you want to explore content available on a specific platform like Netflix or HBO Max, the apps are all arranged on a strip just below the “For You” section. Whether you need / want to do this may depend on how well Google determines your display settings and habits.

For households with multiple viewers, the support of individual profiles is vital and don't worry, the new Chromecast supports it.

performance

The new Google Chromecast with Google TV works well as streaming hardware. It does a pretty good job of keeping up with my quick clicks and scrolls, although I can certainly tell if I press it hard, much like I did with the Amazon Fire TV Stick and Roku Streaming Stick +.

Apps and content also load quickly. The casting is the same as ever, so there are no changes there. Overall, given its $ 50 price tag, the device is perfectly capable. You'll need to upgrade to an Amazon Fire TV Cube or the new Roku Ultra to get something significantly faster or more powerful.

For me, however, the actual performance metric here is that of the Google TV experience. And on this front I have to say: So far, so good.

Google TV didn't completely set my display preferences, but to be fair, I've only been using it for a few weeks. I also expect Google to throw a few things against the wall to see what sticks with me. The process takes time and I will update this section as I learn more.

Caleb Denison / Digital Trends

I also enjoy having my YouTube suggested videos look the same on my TV as they do on my phone. It's the little things.

The new Chromecast can also be combined with many other smart home devices from Google. This allows you to view video feeds from Google Nest cameras and Google Nest doorbells and act as part of a whole house audio solution. You can also control the new Chromecast using a Google Home or Google Nest speaker.

The Chromecast with Google TV clearly offers more value to Android phone users and fans of Google products in general. If you're a die-hard Apple fan, the Apple TV 4K offers a similar experience – for about three times the cost.

I think the new Google Chromecast with Google TV is a fantastic choice for just about anyone who isn't married to a smart TV platform yet.

Our opinion

The new Google Chromecast with Google TV is a smart step in the right direction for a large tech company that needs a little more presence in the streaming hardware space. The original Chromecast sold well because it was so cheap, but I think this new model will sell even better because it's a device that you can interact with. If Google can evolve its content recommendation engine, it could be the world's best-selling streamer in a matter of months.

Is there a better alternative?

The Roku Streaming Stick + offers a simple streaming platform with its own perks, but doesn't offer the kind of content recommendation that Google TV does. At $ 40 and 4K / HDR capabilities, this is a good option, but I hesitate to call it "better". In comparison, Amazon Fire TV 4K also supports Dolby Vision, is firmly connected to the Amazon universe with Alexa integration and costs 50 US dollars. If the specs are similar, the choice depends on whether you are with Team Google or Team Amazon.

How long it will take?

It's hard to imagine the new Google Chromecast with Google TV going irrelevant within four or five years. This is roughly how long you want to use the device before you get the new latest version.

Should you buy it?

Yes. The new Google Chromecast with Google TV is an outstanding product.

Editor's recommendations