08 Mar
Blog

House of Marley Redemption ANC review: Sustainable sound

House of Marley Redemption ANC

House of Marley Redemption ANC

"The Redemption ANC looks great, but little annoyances add up."

  • Active noise cancellation

  • Aesthetically impressive

  • Made from sustainable materials

  • Faulty touch controls

  • Bulky design

The new Redemption ANC True Wireless Headphones from House of Marley are the kind of product you want to love. There is a lot to discover between aesthetics, commitment to sustainability and the introduction of active noise cancellation.

Unfortunately my love is not blind. Despite all the positive aspects that House of Marley has packed into its $ 199 wireless earbuds, it's impossible to overlook the problems that these beauties hold hostage.

design

As part of the House of Marley mission statement, the brand, which belongs to the Bob Marley family, is committed to making its devices as sustainable as possible. The Redemption ANC are made from materials designed to reduce the environmental impact of the earbuds, including bamboo, Regrind silicone – material made by recovering and recycling post-process and post-consumer waste – and Regrind wood fiber composite , which is produced by combination of wood derivatives and plastic fibers.

House of Marley Redemption ANCRiley Young / Digital Trends

Who would have thought that environmental responsibility could look so good? The well-crafted bamboo finish of the Redemption ANC, as well as the matching design of the case in which they sit, make these buds the most attractive that are currently available. Compared to the conservative styles of other buds like Apple Air Pods 2 and Samsung Galaxy Buds +, these stand out when they sit in your ears.

Speaking of AirPods of the second edition: The Redemption ANC, like other real wireless earphones, has adopted the popular Apple style. The most noticeable difference is how big the Redemption ANC is compared to the AirPods. Weighing 0.15 pounds, I was constantly aware of the sturdy buds sticking out of my ears.

The silicone ear fins and three pairs of silicone ear gels that came with the Redemption ANC gave me a lot of customization options, and I had no problems finding the right combination.

Setup and control

After setting up the earbuds – there is no associated app here, just a quick start guide and a video that will effectively guide you through pairing with your mobile device – you can use the built-in controls on the device. Which, I thought, is a sensitive issue.

The Redemption ANC can turn active noise cancellation and ambient mode on and off, answer and end calls, pause and skip songs, and call your phone's voice assistant using the touch controls on each bud. Every function works. It just depends on how often you have to touch the buds before you find the right place for activation.

Riley Young / Digital Trends

In my experience, the Redemption ANC has the same problems as the House of Marley Liberate Air. There are no buttons on these buds. In order to use the touch controls, I had to exert precise pressure on an exact location on the stem. It was annoying at best, and in those cases I kept tapping the buds just to change lanes, which was annoying at worst.

On a positive note, due to the tricky touch controls, I didn't accidentally trigger a command when I set it in my ear. This is a common problem that I encounter when trying other, more sensitive earbuds.

Adequate active noise cancellation

Three taps on the Redemption ANC's left earbuds activate active noise cancellation, and three additional taps allow ambient mode to record ambient noise. Both functions worked well and were tested under conditions ranging from a moderately quiet office to a busy sidewalk.

Riley Young / Digital Trends

These features are no better than noise cancellation in the Apple Air Pods Pro or Sony WF-1000XM3, for example, but the Redemption ANC is at least $ 30 cheaper than either of these options. In fact, they belong to a select group of earphones that currently offer active noise cancellation for under $ 200. These include 1More True Wireless ANC and Amazon Echo Buds.

The Redemption ANC has some other, less sexy, but still important functions. House of Marley announces seven hours of playback on a single charge, but drops to five with active noise cancellation enabled. According to my tests, this was accurate, although the left bud seemed to die continuously almost 10 minutes before the right one. The case contains up to three additional charging processes that have been checked again and are therefore within the competitive range of the 24-hour battery life of the Apple AirPods 2.

They are IPX4 certified and offer welding and splash protection. They kept up well during training and on walks with the dog in the early morning dew.

Sound and call quality

When testing the sound quality of the Redemption ANC, there was only one logical starting point. I opened Spotify, went to the curated playlist "This is Bob Marley" and made myself comfortable.

House of Marley Redemption ANCRiley Young / Digital Trends

The bass response from The Redemption ANC is impressive. Marley songs like Jamming and Buffalo Soldier don't waste time introducing low cadences, and these buds never missed a beat. This is a nice change, considering that certain earphones in the lower range leave something to be desired.

Overall, I thought the sound was excellent, although it could have used a touch of high-end clarity in selections like Marley's Redemption Song and Exodus. While bass was welcomed by Marley as part of most discography, I sometimes found it overwhelming when I tried music outside the reggae genre. An adjustable equalizer that attenuates the lower end and improves the acoustics makes a significant contribution to making the Redemption ANC really sound special.

The call quality was a highlight as the Redemption ANC provided a clear dialogue across multiple calls even during rush hour.

Warranty information

House of Marley grants a two-year guarantee against defects in material or workmanship.

Our opinion

Adding active noise cancellation and improved sound quality to its second recording on real wireless earbuds is an important step in the right direction, but the Redemption ANC leaves us with too many unsolved problems.

Is there a better alternative?

For another $ 30, you can buy the Sony WF-1000XM3, which is one of our favorite real wireless earbuds. Alternatively, the Apple AirPods 2 are offered at the same price as the Redemption ANC. While they lack active noise cancellation, they have the upper hand over functions such as comfort and ease of use. The Elite Active 75t from Jabra also deserves to be part of this conversation. It offers above-average sound, battery life and water resistance.

How long it will take?

House of Marley placed great emphasis on the materials from which these buds are made and even gave the insurance a two-year guarantee. The repayment ANC should be able to last.

Should you buy it

No. I've enjoyed these earbuds, including their active noise canceling, outstanding looks, and sustainable initiative on which they were built. Ultimately, however, it is an oversized product that needs functional corrections. It shouldn't be this love.

Editor's recommendations




08 Mar
Blog

2020 Toyota Camry Hybrid Review: It’s Great, But Buy The LE

Toyota Camry Hybrid

2020 Toyota Camry Hybrid Review: It's great, but get the LE

"The Toyota Camry Hybrid remains a reliable choice among hybrid sedans."

  • Outstanding reliability and security

  • An improved entune system is an improvement

  • The latest redesign still looks good

  • The basic equipment offers many great functions

  • With higher equipment, the fuel consumption is lower

  • The XLE can get quite expensive

  • Trunk is small for a medium sized sedan

The Toyota Camry Hybrid has been around for more than a decade, unlike the Corolla, which received a hybrid version for the first time in 2020. The Camry, however, benefited from regular updates from Toyota through its characteristic and reliable hybrid system. It also benefited from a major redesign in 2018 that gave it a sportier look and cutting-edge technology.

I drove the Camry Hybrid XLE, the highest configuration. The MSRP starts at $ 32,730, and some extras have been added to my test car, including the driver assistance package, adaptive headlights, a sunroof, and the navigation package that also updated the audio system. All in, including the target fee, my lender Camry was priced at $ 39,766.

A Camry hybrid without a bell or whistle starts at just over $ 28,000 for the base LE fairing. There's also a Hybrid SE that starts at $ 30,130 and adds a few luxurious details like faux leather upholstery and shift paddles.

Since I've driven the fanciest Camry Hybrid, it's only fair to compare it to the fanciest versions of its closest competition: the Honda Accord Hybrid and the Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid. The Accord Hybrid's upper fairing is similar to that of the Camry Hybrid XLE (with the extras in my loaner) and starts at $ 36,245. The Ioniq Hybrid starts at $ 31,200, several thousand dollars lower.

The competition also comes from the house. The Toyota Prius is synonymous with hybrid technology, and its top spec also has a starting price north of $ 32,000.

design

Toyota's design is often designed as boring, boring, and for the masses, rather than having style. The redesign of the Camry in 2018, however, churned up the company's design language with a sportier look for the four-door mid-size sedan. The front end is more aggressive and the lines along the body stretch towards the rear of the car.

Toyota Camry Hybrid exteriorToyota

The inside of the XLE is clean and tidy. The middle touchscreen of the updated infotainment system does not hover uncomfortably over the dashboard like the screen in the Camry. This trim also has tiger eye wood paneling that enhances the feeling of luxury.

Spaciousness and comfort are close to most mid-size sedans. The batteries are arranged so that they do not penetrate the seat or trunk, but the trunk is slightly smaller than that of the Accord and much smaller than that of the Ioniq. The Prius has less passenger space, but if you have to carry large or awkwardly shaped items, its hatchback is a big plus over the Camry's trunk.

technology

My lender Camry's updated Entune infotainment system had razor-sharp graphics on a screen that could be split up to display several types of information, such as: B. the next round in the navigation area and the current title in the satellite radio. The touch inputs were simple, with physical buttons on either side of the screen. My Camry's improved infotainment included a bird's-eye view camera, which I appreciated when parking in parallel.

Toyota Camry Hybrid interiorKristen Hall-Geisler / Digital Trends

Setting up my phone for the Entune system was a breeze. I was able to pair my phone in less than 10 seconds. Both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on all Camry hybrids, a major advance over previous model years where Android Auto was missing.

The driver receives a screen between the analog displays. This ad is full of information, though I'm sure it can be customized if you take the time to figure out how. If I own the car, I bring a cup of coffee to the driver's seat and spend some time in the driveway with the electronic instruction manual to set everything up as I like it. However, not everyone will be so patient.

Toyota Camry Hybrid instrument displayKristen Hall-Geisler / Digital Trends

The flood of information on this 7-inch TFT screen was overwhelming but useful, and the steering wheel controls made it easy to scroll through different types of information. I was able to check the fuel consumption of my trip, the route I was listening to, and the status of my driver assistance functions such as lane departure warning and adaptive cruise control. My lender also had a 10-inch heads-up display (HUD) that was massive and visible in every light. I relied on the HUD for basics like speed, more than the 7 inch screen.

When you upgrade to expensive panels and add packages, you need to choose which high-tech features you like best. The top panel of the Accord Hybrid contains many functions of my Camry Hybrid XLE with additional packages. However, the Accord also has a WiFi hotspot, while the Camry can connect to Alexa. If you care about screen size, look elsewhere. The upper fairing of the Ioniq Hybrid has a 10.25-inch screen and the Prius Limited has an 11.6-inch screen.

Fuel consumption

Toyota made a fascinating choice for the Camry hybrid system. The basic LE cladding has lithium-ion batteries that are light and efficient. It combines 52 mpg.

But this is not the car that I drove. I had the XLE, which like the medium-weight SE has heavier and less efficient nickel-metal hydride batteries. It is an older technology that has served the Toyota hybrid system well for years, and it is less expensive. Unfortunately, this means that the fanciest Camry Hybrid has the lowest fuel consumption: an estimated 44 mpg city / 47 mpg highway / 46 mpg combined.

Toyota Camry HybridToyota

This is much better than a conventional gas-only sedan, but not particularly good for a hybrid. The Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid achieves a total of 55 mpg and the Prius XLE a total of 52 mpg. If you want to buy the Camry and save money, choose the cheaper and more efficient basic Camry.

The EPA estimates are also optimistic. They are a great way to compare apples to apples, but I personally find that my mileage rarely lives up to the EPA sticker. During my time, I only drove the Camry Hybrid XLE on roads and made no special efforts to reduce fuel consumption. I've seen just under 40 mpg, which is frankly better than I expected.

Regardless of which equipment package you drive, the Camry Hybrid delivers a total of 208 hp. The transmission was smooth and quiet, and the acceleration is punchy. It was not a problem to get into the traffic flow or carry out a quick pass.

safety

Every Toyota is equipped as standard with a version of its Safety Sense Suite with technical functions for driver assistance. The Camry Hybrid has Safety Sense P, which includes a forward collision warning, pedestrian detection, automatic emergency braking, a lane departure warning system and adaptive cruise control. If you want more, the driver assistance package offers a bird's-eye view camera, rear traffic alarm and the head-up display.

The insurance institute for road safety has awarded the 2020 Camry the Top Safety Pick +, its highest recommendation.

Safety Sense is as easy to use as any other system on the market. The controls are on the steering wheel and are easy to reach without a glance once you know where they are. By switching the middle display to show the safety technology, the tracking distance between you and the car in front of you and your lane keeping status become clear.

The insurance institute for road safety has awarded the 2020 Camry the Top Safety Pick +, its highest recommendation. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration awarded the Camry Hybrid five out of five stars in all of its crash tests.

The predicted reliability values ​​are above average for the Camry Hybrid, although there is currently a recall with a coolant leak. Toyota offers a typical warranty for the Camry Hybrid with 3 years / 36,000 miles for a comprehensive warranty and 5 years / 60,000 miles for the drivetrain. All hybrid components are guaranteed for 8 years / 100,000 miles.

How DT would configure the Toyota Camry Hybrid 2020

While it was great to have all the bells and whistles in the Camry Hybrid XLE, the better fuel economy in the LE is attractive. I would go for this model and add the package that includes the sunroof, blind spot monitoring, and updated 8-inch touchscreen and entune system for around $ 2,700.

Wrap up

The 2020 Toyota Camry Hybrid has been around for years. The technology is proven and reliable, and improvements over the years have kept the design and technology up to date. It is still a good choice for hybrid sedan buyers.

There are only a few disadvantages of a car that has so many features even in its basic configuration. But paying for the top panel of this test car didn't seem to work. The base Camry hybrid already contains a lot, and you can add most goodies at a reasonable price. In addition, the basic model is more efficient.

Should you get one?

Yes, if you want a reliable, efficient limousine at a reasonable price. Just rethink the suspension for the top fairing.

Editor's recommendations




07 Mar
Blog

Google Stadia Review: You Can’t Play Games On Potential

google stadia review rs 3

Google Stadia Premiere Edition

"Google Stadia has immense potential, but a confusing interface and small library sell it briefly."

  • Excellent picture quality

  • Plays excellently on TV and on the phone

  • 1080p animal is free

  • Poor PC performance

  • Latency can be an issue

  • Too few games at the start

  • Subscription is not a good value

This review was updated by Matthew S. Smith on 03/04/2020.

I picked up Death Stranding when it was released. Not a download, but a real, physical CD. I took it home and put it on my PlayStation 4 Pro.

You think that would be the end, but it was not. An installation bar crawled across my screen at an agonizing pace. When it was done, I checked the time on my phone. An hour and a half had passed since I touched the game for the first time; 40 minutes since I put it in the console.

Google wants to fix this with Stadia.

What is Stadia?

Stadia is Google's cloud gaming service. You need an internet connection and a Google account. If you have this, starting a game is easy. No expensive console or gaming rig is required. There is no need to install from a disc or cassette. There is nothing to download. Just buy, play, and off you go.

That is the dream anyway. It is big and that means big obstacles. Errors, a lean library and confusing interface decisions bring Stadia's cloud gaming future to the ground.

Stadia basics

Google relies on the simplicity of Stadia, but it is not easy. Misunderstandings about the service have increased since its announcement. It was called "Netflix for games". It was called a console replacement. It was referred to as a switch competitor.

Here is the summary: Stadia is a cloud service that runs games on Google's servers and then transfers them to your device. You can play on a TV, phone, or PC.

Stadia is not an all-in-one game library like Xbox Game Pass, so the comparison "Netflix for games" falls apart.

Stadia has two levels of service. The basic level offers 1080p quality with stereo sound. Unfortunately it is not yet available. The Stadia Pro tier costs $ 10 a month, offers 4K HDR quality, 5.1 surround sound, and benefits like free games and game discounts.

This isn't an all-in-one game library like Xbox Game Pass, so the Netflix for Games comparison falls apart. Aside from a handful of "free" games included in Stadia Pro, you need to buy the Stadia version of every game you want to play in the Stadia store.

Rich Shibley / Digital Trends

Confusion comes in the small print. You can play on your TV, but you'll need a Google Chromecast Ultra to launch it. You can play on a phone, but you need a supporting Android phone. You can play on your PC, but only in the Chrome browser.

There is more. PC users can play on startup, but they cannot play in 4K with HDR. That will not come until 2020. There is a whole table that lists the different ways in which Stadia devices and game controllers work together (or do not work together). You cannot buy games on TV. This is only possible in the Stadia app on your phone.

Stadia has a limitation for every situation.

Access is also confusing. Stadia was launched, but only if you either ordered the $ 129 Founder's Edition or bought the Premiere Edition for a similar price. This includes a Chromecast Ultra, a controller and three months of Stadia Pro. Don't you want the hardware? Then you won't be able to play for now, even if you're ready to pay for Stadia Pro.

It goes on and on and on. Stadia has a limitation for every situation that undermines the simplicity promised by Google.

No, I don't have to wait for a game to be installed like I did when I brought Death Stranding home. But Stadia still gives me a lot to fear.

The controller is overpriced

The founders edition I received for this review includes the Chromecast Ultra and the Stadia controller. We have tested the Chromecast Ultra in the past and it is a simple streaming puck so I don’t spend time describing it. The Stadia Controller, new and unique in Stadia, is more fascinating.

OK, I lied. It is not. It is a generic controller. The design has a lot in common with the Nintendo Switch Pro controller, while the Thumbstick layout is similar to PlayStation's DualShock4.

The Stadia controller feels good in the hand and works well, but is not comparable to the controllers from Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony. The triggers feel a bit loose and the D-Pad is vague compared to the DualShock 4 or Nintendo Switch Pro controller.

Rich Shibley / Digital Trends

The only unique features are two buttons that are located above the "Stadiums" button (which brings up the "Stadiums" menu) and below the "Select" and "Start" buttons. One calls Google Assistant, the other takes screenshots. Technically, these add more features, but I found them confusing. I have pressed the wrong key many times because I am used to having only two keys in this area. However, I assume that I will familiarize myself with the time.

The Stadia Controller can be purchased individually for $ 69. This is the Nintendo Prize and the Stadia Controller doesn't deserve it. An Xbox wireless controller costs $ 60 at MSRP and is often available for far less.

Some good news? The controller works with other games and services. It even works with other cloud gaming services like GeForce Now and Shadow from Nvidia.

You do not have to buy the Stadia controller if you wait until the service is generally available next year. Alternative controllers, including the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One controllers, can be used to play Stadia on a phone or PC. However, they don't work with Chromecast Ultra.

Stadiums fulfill the dream …

It's not looking good for Stadia, is it? The start of Google was half-hearted. Many functions are missing or confusing.

Here's the good news: Stadia works. The dream of seamless, patch-free, download-free and high quality games is true.

I spent most of my time playing Stadia on TV. My home has the luxury of gigabit internet, so I wasn't surprised to see smooth gameplay on my TV. Still, it's an impressive technical feat. The picture quality was excellent. Blur, banding and stuttering were rarely visible, but the image quality was comparable to a console most of the time.

As confirmation, I switched between Destiny 2 in Stadia and Destiny 2 in my PlayStation 4 Pro and found little difference. Details appeared the same on everyone. In dark scenes, the stadiums lacked contrast, but otherwise there were few flaws.

Rich Shibley / Digital Trends

The mobile experience (via WiFi) was even more breathtaking. Destiny 2 looked fantastic on the small, sharp display of the Pixel 3a. Stuttering and delay were rare annoyances that didn't stop me from playing the game.

I am still amazed at how smooth it felt. Stadia sets new standards for graphics quality on mobile devices. This is the full experience running in console quality on a smartphone. The phone doesn't even heat up and the battery life is reasonable as games are run in the cloud. I used less than half of the battery on the Pixel 3a during a two-hour session of Destiny 2.

Google promised to deliver a console-quality gaming experience over the Internet. At this point, Stadia delivers the goods. I couldn't tell the difference between Stadia and my PlayStation 4 Pro. Unlike my PlayStation, Stadia never asked to install, patch or update a game.

As an added bonus, Stadia's loading times are fantastic. Levels are usually loaded in just a few seconds. This is a big leap over the PlayStation 4 Pro, where charging times over 30 seconds are the norm.

… but you have to wake up at some point

At best, Stadia delivers what was promised. This is a technical achievement that deserves recognition. But I think you know what's next. It's time to talk about the shortcomings.

The latency was a companion on all devices that I tried. Google tried to downplay the latency in its marketing, but made no mistake. It is there.

The problem was the worst in Mortal Kombat 11, which like all fighting games requires accurate timing. After less than half an hour, I stopped playing in frustration. I was consistently hit shortly after I pressed the D-pad to dodge while my attacks wielded the space my opponent was just a moment before. I'm the first to admit I'm bad at fighting games, but I've played Mortal Kombat 11 on both the PC and the console. The game felt appealing to both.

Rich Shibley / Digital Trends

In Destiny 2, the latency was bearable thanks to the slow pace of action, but I found that I often missed over-corrected and melee attacks that I should have hit. It didn't make the game more difficult, but it lacked the crisp, snappy feeling I'm used to from playing Destiny 2 on a PC.

The problem was temporary and came and went like the tide. In the worst case, I turned 360 degrees in Destiny 2, as if I had suddenly teleported into a session from Tony Hawk. In other cases, the latency was absent, so even Mortal Kombat 11 felt smooth for a few minutes. Latency often correlated with reduced image quality and stuttering, but not always.

The picture quality can be excellent, but it can be neglected depending on the available bandwidth and the device you are playing with. As you'd expect, you'll have the best experience if you have a great ISP and can connect directly to a router via Ethernet. However, if you cannot do this, you can expect blurriness in the image. The level of softness depends on the resolution you want to play with and the quality of your connection. If you're using Wi-Fi, you can expect the picture quality to vary significantly during your gaming session.

How important that is depends on what you're playing. It didn't affect my experience in Destiny 2 as the game's strong art style shines through even when Stadia's image quality leaps. Shadow of the Tomb Raider, on the other hand, tries a sharp and realistic look. If you are on a PC or TV, you will find that the bandwidth forces the stream to a resolution well below that of the screen.

About this game library

Stadia's technical achievements and shortcomings are worth discussing. It is a revolutionary platform with immense potential and serious problems. However, all of this may not matter since there is not much to play.

The platform offers a slim selection of games. The list includes several popular peculiarities, including Destiny 2, Red Dead Redemption 2, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, and the recent Tomb Raider trilogy.

Rich Shibley / Digital Trends

These are good games, nothing will lure players to Stadia from other platforms. Even Apple Arcade started with a strong selection of exclusive games.

I'm also deeply upset with Google's decision to create its own platform. This hurts Destiny 2 deeply, where you can only play with other Stadia players (but your profile is cross-save compatible). Want to show a friend a success in Red Dead Redemption 2? You need to take a photo of it on your phone because your friend may not have used Stadia and may not even have heard of it.

Google's game prices don't look good either. Many games are sold at their original MSRP. Mortal Kombat 11 for PlayStation 4 costs $ 25 on Amazon and $ 59.99 on Stadia. This pattern is repeated throughout the cast. Occasional sales lower the prices of selected titles, but the offers have not yet impressed.

The limited library makes Stadia Pro subscription difficult to bear. Why should you pay $ 60 for Mortal Kombat 11 in Stadia and get a monthly subscription of $ 10? This is only useful if you do not have a current generation console and a playable PC, but want to play modern games with 4K resolution and HDR switched on.

This is the most serious problem for stadiums. It's faster and more convenient than my PlayStation 4 Pro, but I can't play Death Stranding in Stadia. I also can't play Control, Civilization VI, The Witcher 3, Final Fantasy XIV and many other games that I enjoy. Patches and system updates are annoying, but I would rather deal with occasional patches or installations than just play the handful of titles on Stadia.

Use all the data

Streaming can use a lot of data, and Stadia is no exception. In fact, it is one of the data hungry services you can use today.

I tested the data usage when playing Destiny 2 on the Pixel 3a via WiFi. After three test runs, each lasting five minutes, the average data usage was approximately 830 megabytes per test. Do the math and Stadia consumes an incredible 10 gigabytes every hour.

Stadia consumes an incredible 10 gigabytes every hour.

Playing at this speed is not possible on the go, even if you have a data connection that is reliable enough to make it possible. You will quickly use up your data limit. Remember that even unlimited plans are not really unlimited. Heavy players may encounter their data limits when connected to the internet at home, although I assume that this will be rare.

Our opinion

The Stadia from Google is an amazing technical feat. I am honestly impressed with its quality and performance. I was skeptical, but I came out as a convert. Cloud gaming works. Home consoles will last at least another generation, but Stadia proves that the cloud can really replace a console – at least if you have an excellent internet connection.

That makes it a shame that the execution of Google Stadia has turned into a labyrinth with no exit and with many dead ends. The functions do not work the same on all devices. PC performance is a disaster. And the limited game library will not win Stadia fans.

Maybe one day I'll leave my consoles to the cloud, but I'll keep them for now. Stadia is not worth the price of the $ 129 Premium Edition or the $ 10 monthly subscription.

Is there a better alternative?

Alternatives include GeForce Now from Nvidia, Shadow, PlayStation Now and Microsoft’s Project xCloud, which is still being tested. Shadow is arguably the most mature of them, and since it mimics a PC, it can play almost anything a PC can play. The downside is pricing; With an annual commitment, it is at least $ 12.99 per month. Nvidia's GeForce Now is the budget option and even offers a free tier with a session limit of one hour, but limited to a resolution of 1080p.

Should you buy it

Stadia has potential. However, you cannot play potential games.

Editor's recommendations




07 Mar
Blog

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Review: Brawn Over Brains

“You may have thought the camera was the best feature. It is not at the moment. "

  • Large, beautiful screen with a refresh rate of 120 Hz

  • The zoom lens frames beautiful pictures

  • Battery life that blows through a day

  • First-class installations with 5G for every large carrier

  • Expensive

  • Inconsistent, sometimes erroneous photo and video performance

The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is an elaborately equipped device with an extravagant price. With $ 1,400, you get an opulent 7-inch display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, the best internals you can expect from an Android phone, 5G compatibility with all major networks and, perhaps most importantly, a monstrous camera setup.

With 108 MP on the main lens, 48 ​​MP on the telephoto camera and up to 100x zoom, it is clear which function Samsung expects for the knockout punch. Despite its robust statistics, this heavyweight is prevented from becoming the undisputed camera champion.

Design and display

There are no two options – this is a big phone. With a 6.9-inch display – just a tenth of an inch less than usual – the slim Galaxy S20 Ultra is a large device that is somewhat unwieldy to hold.

My hands are slightly above average, and even I had to be extra careful to have a good grip when I pulled them out of a pocket or picked them up. It's big, heavy, and a bit top heavy (did you see the hump of the camera?). I used the one-hand mode for the first time because otherwise I simply cannot operate this phone with one hand.

Riley Young / Digital Trends

That said, it looks and feels like the Grand – or rather 1.4 Grand – you paid for it. The Quad HD + (3200 x 1440) Dynamic AMOLED delivers deep, deep black and popping, saturated colors paired with sharp detail reproduction. Combined with the booming clarity of stereo speakers, this is one of the best viewing experiences you can have on a phone.

It's as bright as the iPhone 11 Pro at its peak, making it easy to see in direct sunlight, while the saturated colors can help brighten darker areas for difficult viewing situations.

New this year is the 120 Hz refresh rate of the screen, twice that of the Samsung Galaxy S10 with the industry-standard refresh rate of 60 Hz and switching between tasks seems pleasantly fluid.

Camera performance

On paper, the camera setup of the Galaxy S20 Ultra is the main attraction of this device. You can get a big, beautiful screen on the S20 Plus for $ 200 less. The Ultra tilts the scale with a 108 MP main camera, accompanied by a similarly stacked 48 MP tele-shooter and a 12 MP ultra-wide-angle camera to top it off. While this system offers some advantages that no other phone can replicate at the same level, the overall performance of the camera is mixed.

Riley Young / Digital Trends

Several reviewers have reported a number of problems with the S20 Ultra's camera, which Samsung has officially fixed in a software update. Reported issues that were not officially named by Samsung include over-aggressive image processing (excessive sharpening and smoothing) and focus problems, two issues that are not new to the Galaxy S series.

We'll update our test when there's an update, but my S20 Ultra has shown significant improvements over the Galaxy S10 in all of these areas, apart from focusing.

In ideal lighting scenarios, the main camera of the S20 Ultra shoots great colors and details in the standard 12 MP recording mode, which takes pictures by pixel binning on the 108MP sensor. Here the Ultra shows its improvements in detail capture and dynamic range over the Galaxy S10 because it is less likely to blow out highlights, smooth out gradients, and produce excessively warm photos. This was the case for both the main sensor and the 40 megapixel selfie camera, which improved significantly in the same areas compared to the S10's selfie game.

More impressive details can be found in the 108 MP recording mode of the main camera. You can't see this kind of difference when looking at photos on your phone. However, zoom in on a specific area of ​​a photo on a larger, higher resolution screen and you'll see how detailed this mode is. This way you can crop photos into a smaller area and still get perfectly divisible images.

Yes, the zoom lens is as impressive as you heard it, but after zooming in about 30 times, it becomes more of a party trick than anything else. High zoom images are too grainy to be useful as saying, "Look at what I can do." In addition, distant subjects are difficult to see with the naked eye. Therefore, you are unlikely to ever notice a shot that you can only take at 100x zoom. Even if you did, the grainy, blurry result would not be pleasant.

Compared to other devices such as the iPhone 11 Pro and Pixel 4 (maximum 2 x optical zoom), the S20 Ultra has a 4 x optical zoom and uses a mixture of digital and optical magnification called "space zoom" up to 100x. The Ultra captures appealing details up to 10 times, with Samsung saying it is "lossless" while the loss of quality of the iPhone and pixel becomes apparent. The S20 Ultra has some slight losses, but nothing like the Pixel and iPhone at this zoom level.

Compared to the Huawei P30 Pro, which has a 5x optical zoom and uses a similar optical / digital hybrid to achieve 10x, there is hardly any difference between the two when it comes to optimal lighting. Step into the night and you will see a noticeable advantage in dynamic color rendering for the zoom of the S20 Ultra over the P30 Pro.

s20 10x

p30 10x

8x pixels

iPhone 10x

  • 1.
    S20 Ultra 10x
  • 2nd
    P30 Pro 10x
  • 3rd
    Pixel 4 8x
  • 4th
    iPhone 11 Pro 10x

Taking photos in low light and using Samsung night mode have been improved over the Galaxy S10. While the former's details and colors are the best, the latter is a step behind Google's Pixel 4 and iPhone 11 Pro conditions for consistently creating good-looking, accurate images.

There have been cases in less challenging low-light situations where the S20 Ultra took the best looking photo and produced sharp details and punchy colors that weren't too dramatic. But in challenging situations, such as a dark alley or even a dimly lit restaurant, the Ultra showed problems with focusing, heavily yellowed shots, and sometimes a blotchy mess.

These were situations in which the Pixel 4 and iPhone 11 Pro defeated the Ultra, and the same was true for handheld shots of the starry sky. It was easy to take these shots without errors on the iPhone and Pixel, but the S20 Ultra takes a few tries. In some situations in night mode, no usable photo could be taken at all.

Perhaps these issues will be fixed in the upcoming update, but at the moment software and processing are keeping the S20 Ultra from the dominance of the camera despite its strong hardware.

Single take is fun. This feature captures about ten seconds of video and then pulls portraits, black and white images, wide-angle photos, short GIF-like videos, and whatever the A.I. looks useful. This way you can quickly create alternative settings for a photo. It's perfect for quick, casual photos that you can share on social media or instant messaging.

Video performance

8K video recording is available, but you may not want to use it. An obvious problem? There aren't many places you can really appreciate it except an 8K TV. It also doesn't work with other key features like Samsung's Super Steady Stabilizer. 8K videos take up an enormous amount of storage space (a 31-second video uses 301 MB of storage space – over half a gig per minute).

You can forget about 8K video recording after the sun sets. These videos are significantly more grainy than those shot at a lower resolution than 4K, even though they use the same camera sensor and lens. Stabilization disturbances, shutter rolls and accidental distortions (especially in bright light) are all evident.

In truth, most of these problems can affect the video recording of the Galaxy S20 Ultra, regardless of resolution, stabilization mode or lighting – it's just a question of the situation in which these effects occur the least. Although the iPhone 11 Pro is not perfect even at night, its superior image processing avoids the many disturbances, distortions and eye-shaking pans that the S20 Ultra generates. This is also the case when you step into daylight, although the problems of the Ultra are generally less.

The video looks best at 1080p and Super Steady in bright light. Distortions are much less common in daylight, but shutter rolls are still noticeable, making camera pans look edgy and overworked. Enabling Super Steady Stabilization, which only works with 1080p video, will reduce this so much that I would recommend taking photos with Super Steady enabled as much as possible.

Both 4K and 8K shots are less attractive due to their poorer stabilization and locking roller. At night, however, you have no choice but to do 4K or less without Super Steady, as 8K is useless in such low light conditions and Super Steady uses the Ultra wide-angle lens, which cannot capture enough light for a usable video even at night.

4K video at 60 fps at night looked best from all options, but distortion, glitches, and shutter rolls were still common, much more than on the iPhone 11 Pro.

Performance, battery life and 5G

The cameras may not deliver the promised decadence, but every other aspect of the S20 Ultra's performance doesn't disappoint. With 128, 256 or 512 GB of memory and 12 or 16 GB of RAM in combination with Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon 865 processor, you don't want anything anymore when playing, multitasking or using the Ultra every day. Add 5G support to all major U.S. networks, and you have an entertainment and workforce package that is as expensive as its price. This cannot be said about any iPhone or many Android phones – especially not one of the latest flagships.

If you're lucky enough to have around 5G and even more lucky that it is mmWave, you can expect download speeds of up to 1.6 Gbps during my NYC tests on Verizon's mmWave network, though I would often hit between 400-800 Mbps on Big Red's spotty mmWave cover. If you're not at Verizon, don't fret since the Ultra also works on Sub-6 GHz and 2.5 GHz -Access networks – good news for T-Mobile customers who enjoy much broader, but significantly slower (about 100Mbps top speed). 5G coverage.

Battery life can be where the S20 Ultra offers the most unassailable performance, and with so much going on, it is much appreciated that this basic but integral part of the great phone experience has not been shortened. Much like we saw the iPhone 11 Pro Max, this bigger phone has a bigger battery. With the refresh rate of 120 Hz activated on the display, a well-known source for increased battery consumption, I was able to use the S20 Ultra consistently for a whole day, with very little consumption for about a day and a half.

This was very similar to my experience with the iPhone, which has no 120 Hz display option. Activating a refresh rate of 60 Hz on the S20 Ultra can take an hour or more, depending on use, but for the smooth running of 120 Hz, this little bit of battery sacrifice is a breeze.

Our opinion

The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is almost everything you can expect from a high-end smartphone – on paper. In practice, it is a phone with a base price of $ 1400, which means it has to be the best or damn close. The camera does not meet this expectation.

Are there any better alternatives?

The iPhone 11 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus cost hundreds of dollars less and offer great big-screen experiences with plenty of battery life. The iPhone is also the well-rounded camera experience, although it can't keep up with the Ultra's zoom. Perhaps the upcoming Samsung update could at least result in parity in photography, although the videography is unlikely to match. The Note 10 offers the Samsung experience in a lighter, slightly smaller package with a pen for booting.

If you're a photography purist who doesn't care about spending a full day of battery life, the Pixel 4 XL is another option that offers a sleek Android experience and a camera to be with the iPhone Main competitor.

How long it will take?

This is one of the best points of the S20 Ultra. It is equipped for a certain time. With all the important 5G bands and camera hardware that is ahead of its time (and at this time with its own software), the Ultra is designed for durability. All of this, combined with its IP68 water and dust resistance, means that you should work solidly with the Ultra for two years.

Should you buy it

No. At the moment, it's hard to justify spending $ 1,400 on a camera-centric device that just isn't the best smartphone camera you can buy. For a similar big-screen experience, it seems just as good to get the S20 Plus for $ 200 less.

Editor's recommendations




07 Mar
Blog

EufyCam 2 Review: Great night sight and a year-long battery

eufyCam 2 at night

"The EufyCam 2 signs up for subscriptions but maintains excellent video quality."

  • Rechargeable

  • The battery can last up to a year

  • Clear night vision

  • Wireless installation

  • Slight video delay

  • Some video distortion

The eufyCam 2 von Anker is an intelligent wireless surveillance camera that works with Google Assistant, Alexa and Apple Homekit. It has a 100 dB intruder siren, a long-lasting battery, impressive video quality and can detect human movements. It compares well with other large companies in the surveillance camera market, but has some disadvantages.

Installation couldn't be easier

I'm not the one who climbs a ladder to connect cables to a surveillance camera, and I hate hiring people to install things. Nobody has time for it. Fortunately, the EufyCam 2 is wireless. Plus, the battery lasts a full 365 days, so you don't have to worry about the cameras after they've been installed for a year. When electricity is needed, the batteries are rechargeable.

eufyCam 2 and HubAlina Bradford / Digital Trends

Setting up the EufyCam 2 takes longer than other wireless surveillance cameras because it has a hub that you have to set up before you even get to the cameras. Fortunately, the process is easy and the Eufy Security app (a different app than the other Anker Eufy Smart Home products) guides you through the steps.

Free, free, free

Other cameras like the Arlo Pro 3 and the Ring Stick Up Cam charge premium services or save your videos in the cloud. This is a big trouble. The monthly payment is a charge that significantly increases the total cost of ownership. The last thing you need is a different subscription.

I think the people in anchor heard our cry for help. There is no fee for storing videos or anything. This is because everything is stored in the Eufy Hub. The hub has 16 GB of storage space for up to 3 months of video.

Video quality

eufyCam 2 video

The eufyCam 2 has two thumbs up when it comes to video quality. It has a breathtaking video that is super clear. In fact, the video is much clearer than what I've seen from the Ring Stick Up camera, although both have 1080p HD cameras.

However, there is a little distortion that you don't normally see with high-end cameras like the Arlo Pro 3 and Ring. While distracting, I noticed that the video improves when the camera sees a person, so the face is amazingly clear.

That is the intention. Anker programmed the camera's recognition algorithm to recognize people. When a person is recognized, the AI ​​improves video quality around the person's face to make the image as clear as possible.

The camera’s night vision is the clearest and sharpest I’ve ever seen.

Even better, the night vision of the camera is the clearest and sharpest I've seen on a surveillance camera. Usually night videos with most cameras are pixelated. The EufyCam 2 has sharp night shots that make it easier to see who is lurking on your veranda or in your garden.

The Eufy website says the video is real time, but I would be different. I noticed that there was at least a few seconds between the occurrence of an event and its appearance in the app's live feed. Well, a few seconds doesn't seem like much, but in an emergency situation, a few seconds can mean a lot.

Our opinion

It's hard to impress me when it comes to surveillance cameras, but I was really impressed with the EufyCam 2. It offers great videos, is compatible with a variety of smart home assistants, is easy to install, and lasts for a surprisingly long time Batteries are rechargeable. For me, these advantages outweigh the low video delay and the slight distortion of the fish eyes.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes and no. Other cameras, like the Ring Stick Up Camera and Arlo Pro 3, don't have the same video distortion, but the EufyCam 2 offers better clarity, especially at night. When it comes to price, this camera costs $ 350 more than most wireless cameras of its caliber, although it is cheaper than the Arlo Pro 3. It is worth noting that the price includes two EufyCam 2 cameras and the hub additional cameras includes price at $ 150 each.

How long it will take?

The EufyCam feels robust. It will definitely withstand the weather and curious birds. It also comes with a limited warranty and a 30-day money-back guarantee, no matter why you want to return it.

Should you buy it

Yes. The excellent night vision alone would be a reason to buy it.

Editor's recommendations




07 Mar
Blog

Formlabs Form 1+ SLA 3D Printer Review

Formlabs Form 1+ SLA 3D printer

"Formlabs & # 39; Form 1+ produces some of the highest quality prints we've seen from a 3D printer, but high up-front costs and maintenance will scare off hobbyists."

  • Outstanding print quality

  • Attractive design

  • Supports multiple materials

  • Expensive

  • Maintenance intensive

  • Too complex for DIY repairs

When you hear the expression “3D printer”, you are probably imagining a conventional FDM (Filament Deposition Modeling) printer. These are the ones who take a thermoplastic coil, heat it up and spray it through a nozzle to create objects layer by layer. This technology has made leaps and bounds in recent years and is still improving today – but recently another 3D printing technique has crept into the mainstream: stereolithography, or SLA for short.

Instead of melting plastic to create objects layer by layer, SLA printers use a laser projection system to “grow” objects from a pool of UV-curable resin. When the laser flashes over the resin shell, a thin layer solidifies on the building board, which is slowly pulled upwards with each new layer.

Formlabs' Form 1 printer (which has now become Form 1+) was one of the first consumer-oriented SLA printers to hit the market. At $ 3,300, it's still more than most FDM consumer models, but according to the company, it can "outperform even high-end FDM presses."

Does it live up to all the hype? We got our hands on the company's new and improved Form 1+ to find out.

Features and specifications

When unpacked, the form weighs 1+ 18 pounds and measures 12 x 11 x 18 inches. Compared to most of the other 3D printers we've used, it's definitely a bit more compact – so it can be placed almost anywhere – including your desk. It's not that big that it affects all of your desktop real estate.

The bad news is that this leads to a relatively small construction area. Under its UV-blocking orange hood is the Form 1+ with a 4.9 × 4.9 × 6.5 inch building board, a removable resin shell and a 405-nm violet laser of class 1. Basically, this last specification means that the laser is strong enough to solidify resin with just a short flash, but not so strong that it burns your eyeballs if you stare into the printer while it is making your parts.

The machine also comes with the Form Finishing Kit: a set of tools, trays and other materials that you can use to improve your prints after they are finished. This is a nice touch for sure, but it's not just a nice little bonus that Formlabs introduced as a bonus – it's crucial and you have to use it every time you print something. More on that later.

Finally, the printer comes with a number of different "functional resins" that allow you to print more than just hard plastic parts. In addition to the normal photopolymer resin, Formlabs also offers a clear resin for faster printing, a flexible variant for the production of parts that can be bent easily, and a “pourable” variant for the production of molds.

Setup and configuration

According to Formlabs, Form 1+ was created to be simple and easy to use. This statement could not be truer in terms of furnishings. We are not sure if it could be easier. Everything is pre-assembled and since there is no filament extruder to play with, the machine does not need to be calibrated. To start printing, all you have to do is empty some resin into the tray, connect the printer to your computer's USB port, load a print file, and click Go.

The most difficult part of the setup is probably the installation of the associated software. Due to the nature of Formlabs' SLA printing technology, the printer cannot use conventional slicer programs such as Cura or Slic3r – it only works with PreForm.

Fortunately, the program is fairly easy to install and use. The user interface is great – the menus are organized logically, the icons make the button functions fairly obvious even to the unfamiliar user, and editing your 3D model is extremely intuitive. The learning curve is extremely low, but this is partly due to the fact that no advanced customization options are available in the program.

The system's default configuration settings should be sufficient to get you started. If something does not work or you need to make adjustments, all advanced settings are made in PreForm. This saves you the tedious task of navigating through menus on a tiny LCD screen and allows you to use a mouse instead of a button or a directional pad.

Construction quality and design

If a 3D printer can look cool, Formlabs has made it here. Unlike the efficiency-oriented industrial look that most printers seem to prefer, Form 1+ offers a much more elegant and attractive design. It looks like a modern "box with curved corners", which makes it feel a little more polished and professional – if you don't mind this large orange UV hood.

Practically every component feels robust and reliable on this machine.

Form 1+ also achieved good grades for the build quality. Nothing about it feels weak or cheap. The hinges on the bonnet, the clips in the resin shell, the single button on the front – practically every component feels robust and reliable with this machine. And although it probably wouldn't survive a fall from your desk, the occasional accidental bump won't bother him.

Printing performance

To test the capabilities of the printer, we went through our usual glove with print benchmarks and test objects.

The first thing we measured was the print speed. In theory, these SLA printers are said to be much faster than their brothers, who melt filaments because they only have to flash a laser over the resin shell to create a layer. To test the speed, we first printed a 1x1x1 centimeter cube with the standard layer thickness of 100 micrometers. With this setting, the printing took exactly 19 minutes. However, this is not particularly quick. For the second test, we increased the layer thickness to 200 micrometers (which is only possible with the clear resin from Formlabs – not with the colored variant). With these settings, the printer spat out the cube flat in 9 minutes. However, at the highest resolution settings (25 micron layer thickness), printing the same cube takes well over an hour.

Formlabs Form 1+ 3D printerBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

Based on these tests, it is clear that Form 1+ is not much faster or slower than an average FDM printer. At the standard resolution, it chugs at about the same pace as the other printers. However, if you reduce the layer thickness and use the printer's potential for full resolution, it will take a little longer. Even with SLA technology, the compromise between resolution and speed is about the same as with FDM.

That said, other print statistics are really impressive. Form 1+ absolutely shredded the test object “STRG V” printed by us, with which, for example, minimum wall thickness, maximum unsupported span, maximum overhang angle and more are to be tested. The piece was definitely not perfect, but it was much cleaner and more complete than what we normally see from FDM printers.

After a few weeks, it's pretty clear that Formlabs isn't just blowing smoke with all the claims about professional print quality. The Form 1+ indeed offers more detailed, higher quality prints than many other consumer-oriented 3D printers currently available. It's not much faster, but there are only a handful of competing machines that can do what this thing does. Oh, and not to mention that Form 1+ can also print flexible materials, which is pretty cool.

Maintenance, repairability, upgradeability

If there is an area where Form 1+ has problems, it is maintenance. The photopolymer resin that SLA printers use is an absolute pain in the ass. We can't knock on the Form 1+ specifically for that, as it's definitely not the only printer that works this way – but handling resin is definitely a nightmare – at least compared to a spool of plastic filament.

Resin requires drastically more attention to detail than ABS or PLA filaments. Before printing, you need to make sure there are no large bubbles in the resin tray as they may create a hole in your print. Sometimes a small hole is not a big deal, but sometimes it can ruin your entire model. The resin is also more viscous than water, so bubbles do not always rise very quickly to allow for easy bursting. So sometimes you have to wait for them to dissolve.

Formlabs Form 1+ 3D printerBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

And that's just step one. The real fun starts after your print is done. In this case, you'll need to put on rubber gloves (trust me, don't do it with your bare hands), pry the sticky model off the build plate, and wipe it around in a bath with isopropyl alcohol. This will dissolve uncured resin that may adhere to your model.

But you're still not out of the forest! Before you start printing again, you have to do one step. To make sure there are no cured parts lurking in the resin shell (which would block the laser and screw up your pressure), you'll need to rake a comb through the Goop pool to catch stragglers. Then you need to remove the tool used, wait for the bubbles to dissolve, and then start printing again. It's pretty tiring to be honest.

The photopolymer resin that SLA printers use is an absolute pain in the ass.

Repairability is also a difficult task for the printer. Formlabs has tried to keep moving parts as small as possible so that errors occur less frequently. That's nice – but if there is a chance that something will go wrong, getting into this machine and repairing it yourself is probably a difficult task. Everything about this printer is inherently more complicated than the technology that powers an FDM printer.

Smaller problems can be fixed easily enough – for example, a dusty mirror can be cleaned with a can of compressed air in just a minute – but bigger problems (an engine stops working, the mirror loses alignment, the laser breaks out, or you if you do If you drop some resin in the lower chamber, you will almost certainly need to contact customer service or send your printer in for repair.

The DT accessory package

Improve your game and get the most out of your equipment with the following extras selected by our editors:

Isopropyl alcohol ($ 25)

Canned air ($ 5.84)

flexible resin ($ 99)

However, we haven't found any of these issues during our testing, so we have every reason to believe that these issues are extremely rare. But still – if you ever have an accident, it's probably not going to be a DIY repair, which is annoying.

You can now simply forget that it can be updated. You get what you see with this machine. You can buy new types of resin and some spare parts, but as far as we can tell, the machine is not designed for upgrades or extensions.

Conclusion

Comparing an SLA printer to an FDM printer is similar to comparing apples to oranges: they are certainly different, but ultimately they are both fruits. Anyone who says you can't compare the two is a fool.

The Form 1+ is arguably one of the best consumer-oriented SLA printers currently available – but within the broader category of 3D printers, it is not necessarily the leader – at least in the opinion of this reviewer. The print resolution this device offers is excellent and, thanks to several quality measurements, far ahead of most FDM printers.

But not all of them. The Ultimaker 2 offers the same specifications for maximum resolution (only 25 microns) and can produce comparable prints without worrying about photopolymer resin (which is not only messy, but costs $ 150 per bottle). It's also $ 800 cheaper than the $ 3,300 Form 1+.

Simply put, we would only recommend this printer if your only concern is print quality. If you want the best prints you can possibly get from a printer in this price range, look no further.

However, if you're interested in things like price, convenience, and repairability, you should consider other options. There are tons of traditional FDM printers that offer slightly poorer print quality but also require far less maintenance and are sold at a much cheaper price.

While Form 1+ is definitely at the top of the list in terms of printing performance, you can get a lot more for your money elsewhere.

Heights

  • Outstanding print quality
  • Attractive design
  • Supports multiple materials

Lows

  • Expensive
  • Maintenance intensive
  • Too complex for DIY repairs

Editor's recommendations




06 Mar
Blog

Cake Kalk OR Review: Radical, Responsible Electric Dirt Bike

Cake lime OR

  • Outstanding workmanship

  • So much strength

  • Light

  • Environmentally friendly

  • Expensive

  • No app

  • Limited tire selection

If Ikea and Tesla had a baby, it would be the Cake Kalk OR. Simple, but equipped with the latest technology and flush with design elements.

Aside from the analogies, I had the opportunity to rip the Cake Kalk OR through an humid Oregon landscape for an afternoon, and found that this little electric dirt bike had its own personality.

Cake may not be a name you've heard of. Cake comes from Sweden and entered the motorcycle scene with a completely different ethos. It wants to accelerate the path to an emission-free society with excitement and responsibility.

Excitement is a must for everything related to motorsport, but responsibility? In addition to Cakes, four bikes with Kalk OR, Kalk & and the upcoming Osa + and Osa Lite offer Cake Solar panels by working with Solar power. Offering solar panels is certainly responsible, but most of all it's different. Building a new category of super-light electric motorcycles is one thing, but the logistics of offering a fuel source is a completely different can that is reminiscent of another fully electric brand, Tesla.

design

The off-road bike that Cake launched onto the market, the Kalk OR, is a cross between a downhill mountain bike and a motocross dirt bike. It defines a new motorcycle segment, the Cake Light Electric Offroad or L.E.O.s.

It attracts a lot of attention. Within minutes of putting my butt on the bike, passers-by stopped to chat about specs and take a closer look at a bike that is so obviously different.

Cake lime OR

Cake has thought about every element of the Calk OR. It would have been easier to get a tire that's already in production, but Cake wanted the only part of that bike that touches the earth to be one of the most thoughtful. Cake has designed the Trail Saver tires so that they offer grip in the dirt and the trail remains intact.

My first impression was that these eco tires wouldn't cut it in the muddy winter in Oregon that I wanted to put them on. After massaging the air pressure lightly and getting used to the enormous torque, I found that the tires were suitable in very slippery conditions.

The tires are supported by the minimal weight of the Kalk OR. With aluminum wheels, swingarm and frame, and carbon fiber body parts, the Kalk OR has a hair of over 152 pounds. To put this into context, a 250cc dirt bike usually weighs between 240 and 270 pounds, while most downhill mountain bikes weigh 30 to 40 pounds.

performance

The Kalk OR feels like a dirt bike that should be thrown around like a rag doll. Even when I pounded this Swedish fish through mud, the stakes never felt too high. Even if you swing the rear end around and try to achieve your longest drift so far, thanks to the low weight and lack of swing of the bike, you can build muscle through a typical high-side misstep.

That said, finding problems and the fun associated with them is still easy when you have so much strength. The Kalk OR contains an 11 kW electric motor. This corresponds to approximately 14 hp, which is not much compared to 250 cc motocross machines with around 45 to 50 hp.

However, electric motors are not about performance. It's about torque. The Kalk OR engine has a dazzling torque of 280 Nm, which is 206 lb-ft. A typical 250cc bike offers 30-35 lb-ft. The Kalk OR makes optimum use of its 14 hp and brings you to a maximum speed of 50 miles per hour with torque.

With all the mud and slipping on my trip, I would have been overwhelmed if the different power and braking modes of the Kalk OR had not existed. The control panel in front of the driver is more accessible and easier to understand.

The Kalk OR has three performance modes:

  1. Explore mode, which limits the top speed to 45 km / h, dampens throttle response and limits overall performance.
  2. Excite mode that removes the speed limiter while increasing throttle response and performance.
  3. Excel mode, which offers you everything that the lime surgery can distribute.

These modes give you very different experiences, almost like getting three bikes in one. However, if you increase the performance, the range of your battery will inevitably decrease from 3-4 hours in Explore to 1 hour in Excel.

Fortunately, these numbers seem to be conservative estimates. I saw over 3 hours when I switched between Excite and Excel modes. However, keep in mind that the range will vary based on driver weight, driving style and terrain.

The bike's three braking modes may not be as intuitive for an inexperienced rider. This is because they have nothing to do with the physical brakes that work great and deserve an honorable mention, but rather how much the engine slows you down when you depress the throttle.

Level three offers the highest level of motor-assisted braking, while level one completely eliminates it, making the Kalk OR feel more like a mountain bike. Motor brake modes 2 and 3 also help extend battery life. It's like a two-on-one deal for helpful engine management.

When you stop charging the Kalk OR, charging from a standard outlet is surprisingly quick. 0-80% take 1.5 hours and 0-100% take 2.5 hours. That means a good trail run in the morning, a relaxed lunch, and another 4-6 hours of riding in a day, which should be enough to keep even the most hearty enthusiasts thin.

When I saw that the lime surgery was only delivered with a complete Öhlins setup, my jaw dropped. Öhlins, known for its first-class components, is usually reserved for the highest quality fairings of the highest quality motorcycles.

As expected, the suspension is smooth and fully adjustable, so you can choose any ride you want to throw on it. This is an aspect of lime OR OR I am absolutely confident that if you are not a professional driver you will never miss it.

It's great, but it's expensive

The Kalk OR is a movement in a very friendly direction for the two-wheeled world. The ability to slow down performance makes the Kalk OR viable for riders with different abilities, and while the lack of weight makes it easier for experienced riders to throw around, it's much less intimidating for newbies.

So is the Kalk OR dirt bike perfect? Not quite, although my problems are minor.

Cake built a 24-inch wheel for the Calk OR, an unusual size in the motorcycle world. This means that you won't get ahead with Cake's proprietary Trail Saver tire, whether you like it or not. At $ 90 a piece, they're not the cheapest options and are only available from the manufacturer.

The custom components are not cheap either. At $ 13,000, the cost of the ride is quite high due to the cute Swedish technology and premium parts. On the other hand, you can think of Kalk OR as three motorcycles in one – and maybe that's enough to make the difference for you.

My final problem is the lack of an app. I want telemetry and statistics and I want it now. The Cake people have assured me that this is planned, but at the moment your battery life is limited to four small LED indicators, and firmware upgrades must be done via a wired connection.

Warranty information

The Cake Kalk OR is covered by two years parts and labor, except normal wear and tear.

Our opinion

The Kalk OR is a super light bike with melting amounts of fully electric torque and the highest quality parts. All from a company that underpins its claims to be environmentally conscious with actionable steps you can take to make a difference. Is this the most guilt-free off-road fun you can have? Possibly.

Is there a better alternative?

The first alternative is lime &. The & is the OP's street sibling, which has a slightly smaller sprocket, a standard 19-inch wheel, lights, and a dashboard.

Another option is the newly announced Ubco FRX1which will be available later this year. The FRX1 costs $ 3,000 less than the OR and might be as fast, but doesn't have the incredible suspension of the Cake Kalk OR. I will know more about the FRX1 when I get the chance to drive one later this year.

Because I know that if I don't mention Zero Motorcycles, someone will be angry, None of the Zero models apply to this category of super-light electric trail bikes. Cake's lineup, compared to Zero's, is made up of apples and oranges. End of the story.

How long it will take?

The quality of this bike is top notch. Even the ridiculously white seat got cleaned with minimal effort after being whipped with mud all day. I assume that you can work with such a well-designed and simple machine without any problems in the coming years. The solid build is then secured by the ability of the Kalk OR to update the firmware and replace the batteries.

Should you buy it

Yes. For my money, however, I would spend the additional $ 1,000 and upgrade to Lime & Street. The Cake Kalk OR is a fun bike on and off the trail.

Editor's recommendations




06 Mar
Blog

Kwikset Halo Review: A Tough Smart Lock That’s Hard To Love

kwikset halo

"You won't find a more stable Smart Lock, but the functionality is questionable."

  • Durable construction

  • Versatile entry

  • Must replace your latch

  • Bad installation experience

  • Touchpad is an annoyance

The Halo from Kwikset is an intelligent lock that can be controlled with an app, codes or an old-fashioned set of keys. This versatility, paired with super hard hardware, seems to be a winning combination. But while the halo has a lot to offer, there are some shortcomings that make it less practical than it looked at first glance.

installation

The halo is more difficult to install than some locks because you have to take out your current latch and install a new one. Other door locks like the August Smart Lock or the Wyze Lock fit over your existing bolt and make the transition easier. If you're not mechanically inclined (like me), getting the old latch out and inserting the new one can be frustrating.

If you don't need to install a new latch, why should you do that?

Kwikset's instructions even say that you may need a wooden chisel during installation. I'm not sure how many households have a wooden chisel on hand, but I tend to estimate few.

Halo before installation

However, my biggest frustration with the installation was due to the app. The quick start guide will ask you to download the app. You will then need to follow the on-screen instructions to install the lock. Paper instructions are not included.

However, I had to switch screens to answer a text. When I got back to the app, she insisted that I go through a long, lengthy account login process. When that was done, I never returned to the installation process. I had to find it again and then try to find the installation screen I was on before the interruption. That seems to me to be a usability error.

durability

Most of the characteristic of this intelligent lock is its toughness. The halo is shockproof, fireproof for up to 20 minutes, pickproof and hardened against drills or saws. Even the connecting wires inside are reinforced. This is a stable lock. You can only tell by its weight that it is made to last.

Keyboard and access

Halo app and lock

The Halo has a keyboard that lights up for easy viewing, but doesn't miss the problems with touchpads.

The big problem is sensitivity. You need to touch the pad to activate it and then enter your key code. I found that if I didn't enter my code quickly enough within seconds, the pad would fall asleep and wouldn't wake up again. I stood around, tapping the screen impatiently, trying to bring him back to life for a minute or two. If you're in a hurry to get in, this is a no-go.

In addition, the keyboard clearly shows fingerprints. This means that a potential crook can look at the pattern of fingerprints on the touchpad and find your code easily. I tried wiping the touchpad after use, but who will really clean the lock every time they use it?

One feature I like is that you can use the app to turn off the keyboard completely. You can then use your keys or the app to control the locking and unlocking of your door. It undermines the sense of an intelligent lock with a keyboard, but that shows you how much I don't like the Halo keyboard.

Too bad, because this lock can store up to 250 user codes, including time limits and expiration dates, which you can control via the app. I can see where that would be useful.

The alarm didn't work

One of the features I liked when I first heard about the Halo is that an alarm sounds when the code is entered incorrectly three times. This would let you know immediately if someone tried to find out your code and break into your home.

Kwikset Halo code options

So I tried it in the interest of science. I entered three random codes and nothing happened to my dismay. There was no alarm. No notification appeared on my phone. Other attempts have also not triggered an alarm.

I contacted the company's support team and they were informed that the batteries may be weak or the connection may become loose. Neither seemed to be the cause. As far as I can tell, the function just doesn't work as an advertisement.

Our opinion

The Kwikset Halo is disappointing. The keyboard is tedious and installing a new latch is a big problem. At $ 229, other smart locks are cheaper and work better.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes. The August Smart Lock Pro only costs $ 85 and works with your current latch. If you want a smart lock with a keyboard, choose the Nest X Yale or the Schlage Encode. They cost roughly the same, but these locks work better overall.

Will it take?

Absolutely. It is a beast. A lifetime warranty is also provided.

Should you buy it

The halo has no match when it comes to strength and toughness, but the technology isn't great. Pass this on.

Editor's recommendations




06 Mar
Blog

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Review: Best Travel Camera?

Olympus OMD E M1

"The Olympus E-M1 Mark III makes previously impossible recordings easy."

  • Excellent stabilization

  • Starry sky auto focus

  • Fast performance

  • High-resolution handheld mode

  • Weatherproof

  • EVF could be better

  • The measurement was somewhat unpredictable

  • Same sensor as Mark II

Some photographers are pixel peepers. They reach for the largest sensors with the highest resolution and are only looking for the sharpest optics in order to reproduce a test card perfectly. The $ 1,800 Olympus OMD E-M1 Mark III won't please these photographers. in fact, it completely ignores them.

This is the camera for everyone else, especially for those who value a compact, adventurous system. Photographers who want long zoom and short size lenses; and photographers looking for a camera that makes even the most difficult shots fun.

Olympus suspends the full-frame race, sticks to the smaller Micro Four Thirds format that it developed, and focuses on usability with features that no other brand offers. For the most part, it works.

This includes brand new features like Starry Sky AF, an autofocus mode specifically designed to focus on the stars (those in the sky; this is not a paparazzi mode). This includes a stabilizing system with 7.5 apertures and built-in ND filters (neutral density), with which you can leave the tripod and the screw-on filter (mostly anyway) at home.

We tested the limits of the E-M1 Mark III on the beaches and jungles of Costa Rica for four days and then put the camera through its paces in a northeastern winter for a few weeks. While the E-M1 Mark III isn't the best camera you can buy for $ 1,800, it's the best interchangeable camera on the go.

Design and build quality

The E-M1 Mark III offers similar functions to the E-M1X, but in a smaller form without the built-in battery handle. With the 12-45mm 1: 4 PRO, the smallest weatherproof combination that Olympus offers. I was able to put the camera, four lenses, two teleconverters – enough for a range of 600 mm – and an iPad in a backpack. I even had enough space to put my tripod in my backpack instead of strapping it out. A difference that allowed me to pack everything in hand luggage for a four-day international photo tour.

Despite the smaller size and weight – around 20.5 ounces – the handle of the E-M1 Mark III is comfortable and there is still plenty of room for physical controls, including dual controls and an auto focus joystick. Olympus was also able to use two SD card slots, although only slot is UHS-II compatible.

The control layout is solid, if not perfect. I love the programmable mode switch that can be used to quickly switch between two camera settings. Although it can do much more, I used it to quickly switch from simple to continuous autofocus when photographing wildlife.

A joystick, two steering wheels and an ISO button near the thumb provide easy focus and exposure settings. The key combinations for focus modes, measurement, burst, timer and flash are located in the top left.

On the less positive side, the record button and exposure compensation are right next to each other on the top of the camera near the trigger. With the same size and shape, I accidentally started recording several times when I wanted to adjust the exposure. These two controls take a little more time to use the camera comfortably without having to pull the viewfinder away from my eye.

For more controls, a quick menu contains less frequently used options. The full menu is known to anyone who has previously shot Olympus, but it takes a bit of a hunt to find options for less known people.

The E-M1 III uses a 3-inch, 1.037 million dot touchscreen that is tilted to the side of the camera, so you can rotate the screen in selfie orientation without being blocked by a tripod.

As with the E-M1X, however, I was not impressed by the electronic viewfinder. The refresh rate was solid, but the images had less contrast than the LCD screen. With 2.36 million points, there are several EVFs on the market that offer a higher resolution.

The magnesium alloy case is sealed against dust and splashes and feels firm in the hands, which is no surprise to anyone who previously used a high-end Olympus camera. It even survived my accidental durability test when the tide came in a little faster than expected while the camera was on the beach. Although it is more of a partial immersion than a simple splash, both the E-M1 and the new 12-45mm kit lens were no worse to carry. A small amount of beach sand penetrated directly into the battery compartment, but if the camera survives being hit by a sea wave, it should be able to survive the announced splash and dust without any problems.

The E-M1 Mark III does not have the double batteries of the E-M1X, but the battery life of a mirrorless camera is solid. I didn't have to replace the battery until the end of the day, about 800 shots later. (My preference for burst mode usually allows me to achieve more than the specified battery life – the CIPA rating is 420 shots or 900 in quick sleep mode).

Features and performance

Shot with Starry Sky AF and a tripod, edited in Adobe Lightroom

Compared to larger cameras, taking pictures with the E-M1 Mark III is liberating. While most mirrorless cameras are easy to carry, the E-M1 can leave both the tripod and the ND filters in most cases. With a 7-stage stabilization system (7.5 with the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 mm f / 4.0 PRO lens) and the built-in NDs, I took several long-term exposures of ocean waves during the day without removing my tripod from the take backpack.

Olympus has the best stabilization system of any manufacturer, and says that most people can take 6-second wide-angle shots without a tripod. This is impressive. But with a firm grip it is possible to get even more out. Although I love long exposures, I hate taking my tripod anywhere and I took long exposures much more often because I could hold them in my hand.

Starry Sky AF is a new feature that is unknown to other brands. It worked surprisingly well.

Long-term handheld exposures aren't new to the E-M1 Mark III, but a handheld photo of the night sky without a tripod – or manual focus – is definitely. The camera's new Starry Sky AF mode does not use contrast detection, phase detection, or even a hybrid of the two systems. Instead, the luminance is used to look for the points of light that create stars against a black sky.

The system has two modes: speed priority for hand shooting and accuracy priority when working on a tripod. The mode is also set up to use the focus with the back button instead of focusing with half a press on the shutter button, so the focus remains locked when you re-formulate the shot.

Photographing stars is one of the more difficult types of photography, since a tripod is usually required and the sweet spot must be found on the manual focus ring, which can take multiple test shots before it is just right. The combination of stabilization and starry AF of the E-M1 III simplifies the shooting of stars, makes it easier for advanced photographers and is accessible for beginners. I would still prefer a tripod to get the best results, but the fact that one isn't required is very impressive.

Starry Sky AF is a new feature that is unknown to other brands. It worked surprisingly well. While not as fast as the camera's usual autofocus, it surpasses manual focus. And because the system is based on luminance, it also works with other types of light sources that are surrounded by darkness, such as night cityscapes.

While the Starry Sky AF is the star of the show, the 121-point on-chip phase detection autofocus system on the E-M1 Mark III – a system almost identical to the E-M1X – performs well. The focusing speed is not record-breaking, but has kept pace with everything from surfers to birds in flight. The auto focus in low light is also respectable, if not the best in its class, with a sensitivity of up to -3.5 EV.

Eye AF is comparable to other mirrorless systems from competitors.

Face and eye AF also worked well and quickly recognized and fixed the eyes. While probably not fast enough for sports, eye AF is comparable to other mirrorless systems from competitors. Some systems, such as the Nikon Z 6 and Z 7, require the use of an automatic AF area for eye AF to work. The E-M1 Mark III can use eye AF in group AF mode, which means you don't have to switch between focus modes as much as your subjects change. Eye AF for animals, a function that is becoming increasingly common with other brands, is also missing.

Tracking autofocus worked just as well as any camera I've shot with – which means it sometimes works and sometimes it's junk. I managed to take a few sharp shots, but with group mode and simple continuous autofocus, I got better results. However, I don't really count this as a negative because I haven't yet met a tracking autofocus camera that is good enough for quick actions (newer Sony models like the A6600 might be an exception).

The E-M1 Mark III also didn't inherit the E-M1X's motorsport focus mode (which actually works quite well for tracking). The niche function requires two processors to function and therefore remains exclusive to the high-end flagship model. However, the single processor of the E-M1 upgraded to TruPic IX still manages to achieve the most performance.

The E-M1 III is fast enough for most photographers. It can shoot with the mechanics at 10 frames per second or with the quiet electronic shutter at 18 frames per second. If you don't need continuous autofocus, You can increase this speed up to 15 or 60 fps. The frame buffer limits approximately 76 RAW shots when shooting at 18 frames per second. However, we have found that this is sufficient to accommodate everything from birds to surfers.

The TruPic IX processor also enables a new high-resolution handheld mode that uses the image stabilization system and the tiny movements of your hands to merge 16 photos into a 50 megapixel file. The mode is only suitable for perfectly calm subjects, but offers the possibility of achieving a higher resolution if the 20.4 megapixels of the sensor are not sufficient.

picture quality

The E-M1 Mark III has the same sensor as the Mark II with the same resolution of 20 MP. Given the small size of the sensor, increasing the resolution will eventually reduce the return, so 20 MP is fine. However, there is no way around the fact that this sensor, which is now many years old, has limitations compared to larger, more modern sensors. The E-M1 Mark III is still good enough for most photographers, but don't expect a jump in image quality over older models.

However, this smaller sensor has advantages. One of the biggest advantages of the 2X crop factor makes it easier to achieve a longer focal length. 600 mm equivalent range, a groundbreaking focal length in full screen mode, can be easily taken along.

The excellent image stabilization is also of great help with these long lenses. Even with relatively slow shutter speeds, the details remained sharp when shooting with a 600 mm handheld.

And while the sensor remains unchanged, a new detail priority mode processes high ISO images twice, slowing the camera down but increasing the level of detail. When processing with speed priority, the noise creeps in around ISO 800, and details and sharpness tend to go down around ISO 3,200. Fortunately, the excellent stabilization for still subjects can help keep the ISO low.

The camera's metering system felt less predictable than most of the others even in spot metering mode, and I was regularly on the exposure compensation dial to get the picture right in aperture priority and shutter priority mode.

This gator was polite enough for high-resolution mode, though it took a few tries.

If you need additional resolution, the high-resolution handheld mode can be of great help. The photo above was taken in this mode and even cropped in the mail. The subject must remain still, and the camera takes a few extra seconds to put everything together, but provides detail for some subjects.

The video follows a similar pattern with good color and excellent stabilization. Taking even wide-angle shots without a tripod was easy, with just a little movement in the video. The detail is excellent thanks to the 4K resolution of the cinema.

Price and availability

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is $ 1,800 and was released on February 24th.

Our opinion

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is a small camera, but it is also a camera that works in a way that other cameras cannot. Features like Starry Sky AF and high-resolution handheld mode are unique advantages. Because you pack a weatherproof camera and smaller lenses, leave the tripod and the ND filters at home and still get solid images, the E-M1 Mark III is an ideal camera on the go.

But it is not perfect. The viewfinder resolution is a few generations out of date, the measuring system feels inconsistent and many other basic systems such as the 121-point autofocus and the 20MP Four Thirds sensor are adopted by the Mark II.

Is there a better alternative?

For $ 1,800, you get a lot of camera, including the recently announced Fujifilm X-T4, which has a larger APS-C sensor but is similar in size to the E-M1. Even the Sony A7 III in full screen mode is the better choice for photographers who are more concerned with the highest image quality than with large zoom and a lot of stabilization.

However, no competing camera has 7-stage image stabilization (the Fuji comes close to 6.5, but only with selected lenses). No other camera can focus on the stars or take astrophotography without a tripod. And no other format can pack a 600 mm range in a 300 mm lens.

So whether there is a "better" camera depends on your definition of "better". Is there a camera with better picture quality for the price? Absolutely. But is there a better alternative for travel photography? Probably not.

How long it will take?

The weather seal makes the E-M1 Mark III a tough machine. With 400,000 operations, the updated shutter is one of the best from Olympus. My test device survived being partially submerged in sea water. Aside from more extreme disasters, the camera should last for many years and even longer if Olympus chose the Mark IV.

Should you buy it

Yes, if you want a great interchangeable lens camera on the go or are obsessed with long exposure, but hate to carry a tripod around. Image stabilization, built-in NDs and Starry Sky AF are all great.

The smaller sensor is less suitable for genres such as portraits, weddings and fashion, where you can spend a similar amount of money on a full frame body and where the advanced features of the E-M1 III just don't work.

Editor's recommendations




06 Mar
Blog

Jabra Elite Active 75t review: Fully waterproof wonders

Jabra Elite Active 75t

"For $ 20 more than the Elite 75t, you get complete water protection and a super secure fit."

  • Safe and comfortable fit

  • Great sound quality

  • Waterproof

  • Good call quality

  • No wireless charging

  • Average battery life

When Jabra released its latest real wireless earbuds, the Elite 75t, we knew it wouldn't be long before the Elite Active 75t came out. After all, the same pattern occurred in 2018 when the company first launched the Elite 65t and then the Elite Active 65t.

Yes, history has repeated itself, and the Elite Active 75t can now be pre-ordered for $ 200-20 more than the Elite 75t. Although the new models are more expensive than their predecessors, the price difference between active and inactive versions remains the same.

Unlike the Elite Active 65t, which offers better water protection than the Elite 65t and built-in accelerometers for basic tracking of in-app activities, the Elite Active 75t offers only two small improvements. Complete sealing thanks to protection class IP57 and a slightly grippier outer surface. Are they worth the upgrade? Let's find out.

Design and comfort

Jabra Elite Active 75tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

We just come out and say it. The Jabra Elite 75t are the best fitting real wireless earbuds we've tried here at Digital Trends, and the Elite Active 75t are identical. They have the same ergonomic shape that feels like it was specially shaped for my ears. I know they don't fit everybody like a glove, but your chances of getting a good fit are better with these buds than with many other options.

Rest assured, the Elite Active 75t will not be released unintentionally.

The Elite Active 75t doubles this ergonomics with a slightly rubber-like outer surface. It is barely noticeable until you insert it in your ear, and it immediately becomes clear that if you don't pluck them freely, they won't go anywhere.

This is true when you use it for the first time, and it's still true an hour after your workout, as sweat has turned from a trickle to a current. Most people will find that the Elite 75t is completely safe, but if you want an extra level of safety, the Elite Actives offer just that.

If you've ever shied away from the Jabra Elites because they lack the ear hooks of a Powerbeats Pro or JLab Epic Air Sport, you can be sure that the Elite Active 75t won't be released unintentionally.

I found the standard medium tips to fit perfectly, but Jabra also includes a small and a large set.

Audio quality

Jabra Elite Active 75t just in caseSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

The Elite Active 75t sounds great. Some real wireless earbuds, especially at cheaper prices, feel like a compromise. You have the convenience of being completely wireless, but at the expense of decent sound. This is not the case here.

The Elite Actives do what good earphones should do: bring your music closer and discover nuances that you may not have heard through speakers or even headphones. With low, medium, and high frequencies, all of which are fully rendered, the Elite Active 75t is cheap compared to medium-range wired earbuds and the similar prices, but not completely wireless Bowers and Wilkins PI3.

To get a much better sound, you need to upgrade to the $ 300 master and Dynamic MW07 Plus.

They bring your music closer and let you discover nuances that you may not have heard before.

Although Jabra hasn't discussed the acoustic differences between the Elite 75t and the Elite Active 75t, I can tell you that they have unique sound signatures. The Elite 75t are large and bombastic with a bass forward sound that some may find overwhelming. The Elite Active 75t are much more balanced in comparison. With the free Jabra Sound + app for Android and iOS, you can customize the EQ to your heart's content. However, the default setting is very pleasantly neutral and suitable for most music genres.

You won't find active noise cancellation on the Elites, like more expensive buds like Apple's AirPods Pro or Sony's WF-1000XM3, but passive noise isolation through the silicone earplugs reduces most outside noise to the point where it doesn't occur more. t compete with your music. I guarantee that you will need to use Jabra's HearThrough system to have a personal conversation with the Elite Active 75t in your ears.

Controls and app

Jabra Elite Active 75tSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

We see more and more real wireless earbuds opting for touch controls instead of physical buttons. That's not a bad thing, especially when these touch controls are responsive and easy to use. Some, like Apple's AirPods Pro, are excellent. Others, well, not so much.

That's why I appreciate Jabra's only physical button on every Elite Active 75t earphone. They're easy to find with your fingers (whether you're wearing gloves or naked), easy to use (a light press is all that's needed), and can control almost all of the important functions, including volume and voice assistant access.

At the moment, you need to remember what the individual key and button combinations are responsible for, even if they don't feel intuitive. However, with an update to the Sound + app that will be released later this year, you can customize the way the buttons work.

Portability and ports

Jabra Elite Active 75t charging caseSimon Cohen / Digital Trends

Even if your real wireless earbuds like the amazing Samsung Galaxy Buds + can hold all day, you probably won't be wearing them all day, so a good charging case is important. The charging case of the Elite Active 75t is very small, so it can easily be put in your pocket. The hinged lid can also be easily opened with one hand, but closes with a satisfactory click thanks to a tiny magnet.

A second set of stronger magnets will keep the earbuds docked in their sockets until you are ready to remove them. The overall construction and materials of the case are both superb, and a tiny LED on the back gives you a color-based battery status when you open or close the lid.

The USB-C connection is handy for charging (assuming you're a USB-C person), but there's no wireless charging – a bit of a disappointment considering the price.

Battery life

Jabra claims that the Elite Active 75t has a life of 7.5 hours before it needs to be returned to the charging case. I just reached this number when I played music between 50% and 75% volume. In today's world, this performance is good – certainly better than anything Apple's products can do (the AirPods and AirPods Pro each last about 5 hours) – but it's still far from the top of the charts.

Is this a problem? Let's be honest. Very few of us will ever want or need to listen to their buds for more than 7 hours. Still, it's a competitive world out there, and if Samsung can deliver 11 hours in one set of earphones that cost $ 50 less, it tells us what to expect from other real wireless buds.

With a total of 28 hours (including charging case) and a quick charging time of 15 minutes for 60 minutes of playing time, the Elite Active 75t doesn't have to apologize on this front.

durability

The Elite Active 75t isn't the first true wireless earbud to offer the waterproof protection that IP57 provides, but it's hard for us to find a set that doesn't compromise.

This is the real reason why you should consider the extra $ 20 when choosing between the elites and the elite activists. It's like an insurance policy. They pay a little more in advance to make sure that these buds, even if they choose an unintentional Kerplunk, will survive to play another day.

Does this insurance policy last? I carried her in the gym, in the shower after the gym, and let her sit in a sink for 10 minutes without a problem.

Technically speaking, IP57 means you can let them swim, but I would advise against it. For one thing, water and Bluetooth are bad companions. Connection problems are likely to occur. Second, as safe as the Elite Actives are, you will be a sad puppy if one or both of you can break free in the sea. In a pool, I guess the chances of recovery are a little better.

Too close to call

I found the call quality of the Elite 75t very good in almost all situations, and the Elite Active 75t performed equally well. The ability to use the correct earbuds alone is useful for calls, as is the side-tone feature for calls with two earbuds. It works just like HearThrough mode, so you can hear as much of your own voice as you want.

Warranty information

The Jabra Elite Active 75t comes with a two-year manufacturer's warranty against dust and sweat.

Our opinion

The Jabra Elite Active 75t is identical in almost every respect to the excellent Elite 75t and offers a more secure fit and better protection from water for an additional investment of $ 20. They have a flatter EQ that reduces the strong bass signature of the Elite 75t, which can seduce those who don't need additional robustness, but simply want a more neutral sound.

Is there a better alternative?

No. If you want a set of completely waterproof, wireless earbuds that sound fantastic and fit like a glove, you won't find a better product than the Jabra Elite Active 75t – at all costs. If you mainly focus on water resistance and want to save some money, you'll get $ 150 JBL Reflect Flows They offer the same protection from water and a longer battery life, but they don't sound as good as the Jabras and they lack some functions like volume control.

How long it will take?

Jabra products are solidly made from high quality materials. The Elite Active 75t are no exception. We expect them to last for many years as long as they are not misused.

Should you buy them

Yes. The secure and comfortable fit of the Jabra Elite Active 75t as well as the excellent sound quality and protection from dust and water make it a perfect companion for everything from daily commuting to the most strenuous workout. As long as you are not looking for active noise cancellation or long battery life, they are a good choice.

Editor's recommendations




«‹8687888990›»