GoPro Media Mod Review: A Must-Have Accessory For Content Creators

Gopro Media Mod review presented cropped

GoPro Media Mod Test: Turn your action camera into a YouTuber dream

"With its latest accessories, GoPro goes beyond extreme athletes to celebrate the vlogger."

  • Integrated microphone

  • Adds HDMI 3.5mm microphone ports

  • Two normal cold shoes

  • Easy to use

  • Still no headphone jack

  • The audio quality is not always better

The GoPro Hero8 Black is already the best action camera you can buy, but it should never reach its full potential. One of the key features promised when it was introduced was to support Mods, a collection of three official GoPro accessories that connect to Hero8 and expand its functionality.

Of these, the $ 79 Media Mod is by far the most important. It not only extends the input / output functions of the GoPro and adds a miniature shotgun microphone, but is also the centerpiece to which the Display Mod and the Light Mod are attached. While we had previously tested the Light Mod alone for our Hero8 Black test, we couldn't use it until we later received a Media Mod attached to the camera.

GoPro's goal with the Media Mod is to consolidate Hero8's position as a capable vlogging camera and break the stereotype that GoPros are only used for extreme sports.

Of course, people have been attaching microphones and lights to their GoPros for years, but there has never been a solution as elegant as the Media Mod. It feels like the most thoughtful accessory that GoPro has made, and one that many vloggers and YouTubers have should find a home.

Set up and use

The Media Mod is a frame that completely encloses the Hero8. You must first remove the Hero8's battery compartment, then the camera is simply slid into the frame and connected to the USB-C port. This single connection powers the Mod's shotgun microphone as well as the USB-C, Micro-HDMI and 3.5mm ports on the back of the Mod.

These exposed connectors mean you won't get GoPro's legendary waterproofing, but it should be able to deal with bad weather. It rained during our test and we found no problems.

The Mod's built-in microphone consists of two, one in the front and one in the back. You can select which one you want to use in the camera settings.

You can connect an external audio source via the 3.5 mm socket. You can choose the type of input from the menu, including activated microphone, deactivated microphone or line-in, as well as the option to add 20 decibels of gain. Note that connecting an external microphone overrides the other audio options.

The Media Mod also adds two cold shoes, one on the top and one on the right. Fortunately, these are standard size shoes, which means that they also work with non-GoPro accessories. This makes it easy to attach an external microphone, monitor, or light – you don't have to buy GoPro's light and display mods if you already have other options.

Audio quality

If you consider the Media Mod just as a means to improve the audio quality with its built-in microphone, you may be disappointed.

Compared to a bare Hero8 Black, the sound quality of the built-in microphone in the Media Mod appears to be more accurate and less subdued. Objectively, it is better and power users will probably prefer it.

However, many people will find the warmer, better processed sound of the Hero8's built-in microphones desirable. The voices are a bit lower and the background noise is reduced compared to what you can hear with the Media Mod, even if it sounds less natural.

Part of the problem is that the Media Mod microphone is not very long. In comparison to an external Rode VideoMic, the difference in direction is clear. The VideoMic was less sensitive to off-axis noise, while the Media Mod microphone had a sensitivity of almost 360 degrees and was only slightly biased towards the front sources.

The option to add an external microphone is part of what makes the Media Mod a worthwhile accessory. However, some GoPro owners would probably prefer a cheaper option that doesn't have a built-in microphone.

Worth the investment?

The Media Mod lays the foundation for making your Hero8 Black a powerful production tool, but there are a few entry barriers.

First, it only works with the new Hero8 Black. Hero7 and older owners are out of luck.

Second is the cost. While $ 79 is barely exorbitant for the Media Mod, fully equipping your Hero8 with all three mods would add $ 210. That is more than half the cost of the camera.

While some Hero8 owners might be hesitant to drop this kind of money to modify a camera that will no doubt be replaced this year, GoPro CEO Nick Woodman Digital Trends has hinted that future hero cameras will have the latest mods would remain compatible.

This is by no means a guarantee, but GoPro at least recognizes that introducing a redesigned, incompatible camera for the next generation would rub customers in the wrong direction.

Our opinion

The Media Mod was designed for a small subset of GoPro Hero8 owners, but this group of people will find it a welcome addition. It solves many of the problems inherent in an action camera in a way that minimizes handling.

As such, the Media Mod may not offer the leap in audio quality that some customers would expect. For those who already have external microphones and want the simplest solution to connect them to their GoPros, this is an obvious choice.

Is there a better alternative?

No. The Media Mod may not be the all-end all-audio solution for you. However, since it makes connecting an external microphone almost effortless, you still need it.

How long it will take?

It's hard to say, but we don't expect the Media Mod to be out of date for at least the next generation or two GoPro cameras. In terms of durability, it feels very good and should withstand wear and tear.

Should you buy it

Yes, if you want to use your Hero8 Black in any situation outside of extreme sports.

Editor's recommendations




Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch Review: The Best Mac in Years

MacBook Pro 16 inch (2019)

"Apple's MacBook Pro 16 is a much-needed return to the glory days of the MacBook."

  • The best keyboard on a Mac

  • Excellent performance for content creation

  • The 16 inch screen is beautiful

  • Incredible speakers

  • Touch bar is still not useful

  • Size can be unwieldy

This review was updated on January 24, 2020, with new competitors and rumors about an updated 13-inch MacBook Pro.

Complain. Emergency Repair Program. An infinite flood of online criticism. That's the last three years of the MacBook Pro, in short.

The PR nightmare had just started when I requested a Mac as a work laptop. The MacBook Pro was my standard choice at home and, despite its small size and long battery life, took care of music production and games. My 2015 MacBook Pro never let me down.

However, my experience with the MacBook Pro 2016 was very different. On my desk next to the stack of excellent Windows laptops, I found the keyboard frustrating. The design looked dated. Even his performance felt limited.

Mac fans, including myself, want Apple to bring the MacBook Pro back to its former glory. The MacBook Pro 16 offers the first glimmer of hope in years. Is this the laptop I've been waiting for?

The Mac Apology Tour

The new 16-inch MacBook Pro is not revolutionary. It wasn't presented at a glittering press event. It is not a leap forward in design and certainly not innovative. It is a patch.

At its core, the design of the MacBook Pro is retained. The unibody aluminum case is still a strength, and Apple didn't dare to touch it this time. The same applies to the Thunderbolt 3 port selection and the massive Force Touch trackpad.

However, once you've got the space gray behind you, small changes show the desire to please fans.

Even the thin frames around the new 16-inch screen show that Apple is hearing criticism. The chunky boundaries of other MacBooks have been looking dated for years. However, shrinking the bezels would have meant a smaller footprint, a smaller touchpad, and less space in the case for components.

Instead, Apple added an additional 0.6-inch display, which results in a resolution of 3,072 x 1,920. The massive screen provides a more complete view of your work, ideal for multitasking or working in a complex application like Adobe Premiere. It's not quite the 17-inch laptops it used to be, but it's close.

This is the best Mac keyboard ever released.

While the new display looks great, the keyboard is the most drastic change. Apple tried to corner itself in an attempt to modernize the keyboard. The company calls the new inputs a “magic keyboard” that matches the still popular iMac accessories. Its full millimeter of travel feels like an ocean compared to the previous design. The physical escape key and the inverted T arrow keys return.

This is the best Mac keyboard ever released. It's a step further than the 2015 model, with its larger keycaps and faster mechanism, and it's head and tail above the MacBook Pro 15's butterfly switch keyboard.

The touch bar remains and still feels useless. I accidentally mute my music and wonder why it's not more useful. On the other hand, it usually stayed out of my way. I will endure the touch bar as long as the keyboard sniffs.

When every millimeter counts

The new MacBook Pro offers more than a fixed keyboard. In fact, an additional thickness of 0.03 inches in the case has allowed Apple to add Significant quality improvements such as larger battery cells and a newly designed thermal system.

The larger battery is an important upgrade. Larger laptops with high-resolution screens often have battery life issues, as does the 15-inch MacBook Pro. The larger battery cells of the MacBook Pro 16 Increase total watts of juice from 83.6 to 100, the largest battery you can clog in a FAA approved laptop.

However, larger batteries do not always mean more time away from a socket. In the case of the 16-inch MacBook Pro, powering the extra pixels seems to steal the extra juice that the MacBook Pro 16 contains. The new model couldn't drive me through a whole working day.

Under my standard workload, which includes dozens of tabs, streaming music in Spotify and Slack, the 16-inch MacBook Pro lasted about five and a half hours. In other words, this 16% larger battery doesn't produce a 16% longer battery life.

If you sit under bright office lights all day, be careful. I kept the screen brightness constant above 75%, which explains why the overall performance dropped. It's not as long as I want, but it matches Windows options like the Dell XPS 15 with 4K display.

A video editor's best friend

Inflating the case doesn't mean better battery life, but it does contribute to performance. The ultra-thin design of the 15-inch MacBook Pro performed reasonably well in 2016. However, the first Core i9 processors were announced in 2018 and suddenly introduced new functions for laptops. Content creation. Video editing. Creative work. It has always been possible, but now it is much easier.

Apple threw them into the 15-inch MacBook Pro. The result was severe throttling. It was so bad that the Core i7 in a MacBook Pro 15 could often keep up with the Core i9. unless you have operated the Core i9 in a freezer.

The updated 2019 MacBook Pro 15 with a newer Core i9 that added two more cores to the mix improved the situation. Laptops like the Dell XPS 15 still handled the chip better.

With the 16-inch MacBook Pro, Apple returned to the drawing board to redesign the thermals for this new class of high-end processors. Thinner fan blades, larger heat sinks, additional ventilation slots. It's a complete makeover.

The difference is amazing. Although the 16-inch MacBook Pro uses the same processor with the same 32 GB of RAM, it leaves its predecessor in the dust in every benchmark and real-life test I've done.

I rendered a two-minute 4K clip in just 4 minutes and 41 seconds in Premiere Pro in ProRes 422. The same clip on the 15-inch MacBook Pro? It took twice as long. The MacBook Pro 16 is now as fast as the Dell XPS 15 as it should always be. I shudder when I think about how quickly this clip could be rendered in Mac-optimized software like Final Cut Pro.

The fantastic performance offers more than just increased airflow.

These fantastic results offer more than just increased airflow. The latest software optimizations from Adobe play a major role, as does the new onboard graphics.

As with all newer MacBook Pros, the 16-inch model uses a custom card from AMD. However, the Radeon Pro 5300M and 5500M are not an average update compared to last year's graphics. These are based on AMD's next generation Zen 2 7nm graphics architecture and help make the MacBook Pro 16 a powerful video editing device.

Who is it for again?

The sparkle of a new MacBook Pro can seduce you in a number of ways, even if it's not meant for you. IIf you don't have to run intensive applications in your everyday life, you can hardly use an 8-core (or even 6-core) laptop.

For example, the new graphics indicate better gaming performance. The MacBook Pro 16 does not meet these expectations.

The MacBook Pro 16 is fast, but not a gaming laptop.

Games like Fortnite and Rocket League are smoother than before and run consistently at frame rates of around 60 FPS in medium settings. You always have to pay attention to the graphics settings, especially due to the unusual resolutions that the 16-inch Pro can display natively.

Civilization VI had this problem because it refused to run in full screen mode and only achieved 53 FPS at medium settings. The Dell XPS 15 with its Nvidia GTX 1650 is always a better choice for gaming. It offers a more conventional resolution and enough power to improve the settings a bit. It can reach 50 FPS in Epic settings in Fortnite and 82 FPS in Civilization VI in Medium.

You can also consider it for simple everyday tasks, but again it is more powerful than you need. Unlike Dell or Microsoft, Apple doesn't offer a larger MacBook Pro without a six- or eight-core processor, discrete graphics and 16 GB of RAM.

The sheer size of the 16-inch MacBook Pro is also cause for concern. With a footprint of 14.09 x 9.68 inches, it's not a laptop you want to take on a plane, and it will take up most of the table at your local cafe.

However, there is a case for someone who wants to spend a high-end media experience on their laptop. Apple has tuned the speakers well and claims an additional half octave of bass. These are by far the best speakers you can find on a laptop, and you can feel it in the rumble of an explosion in The Mandalorian or in the kick drum in a song.

This display is also beautiful, although this is to be expected. It is bright, the colors are accurate and the contrast is high. The best displays from Dell and HP can keep up with the MacBook Pro 16, but this huge screen offers an impressive movie experience. However, the 16:10 aspect ratio means that you will always see mailboxes.

Our opinion

For the first time in years, I can breathe a sigh of relief and recommend a MacBook Pro. It does what Apple needed it to do and resolves all the complaints I've had against the MacBook Pro. That lifts it back to the top row of premium laptops.

Are there alternatives?

If you're not using your laptop for content creation or other tough tasks, you probably don't need a laptop that is that big or powerful. Choosing a 13-inch laptop like the Dell XPS 13, HP Specter x360 or Surface Laptop 3 will save you hundreds of dollars. If you have to choose a Mac, the 13-inch MacBook Pro should get an update in the first half of 2020.

However, the best real alternative to the 16-inch MacBook Pro is the Dell XPS 15. When configured with similar specifications, the XPS 15 is over a thousand dollars cheaper than the 16-inch MacBook Pro. That's a lot of savings with performance, an OLED 4K screen, and better port selection.

Another option for content creators is the Asus ZenBook Duo Pro. In addition to the unique second screen of this laptop, the Duo Pro has an OLED 4K screen and fantastic Core i9 performance. It is still one of the most powerful implementations of this chip for video editors and content creators.

How long it will take?

Reliability has become a problem for Apple. The new keyboard is unlikely to have many of the same problems as before, and the laptop is no longer part of the emergency repair program. Given how well these laptops are built and fully loaded, they should last for at least five years.

The MacBook Pro offers 90 days of technical support and a standard one-year warranty. Of course, you can extend coverage with AppleCare + and in-store repair to up to three years.

Should you buy it

Yes. If you've been waiting for a powerful MacBook you can rely on, this is the one.

Editor's recommendations




2020 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-e Review: This Classic Hybrid Is Now A Winter Warrior

2020 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-e front three quarters

"The Toyota Prius 2020 is a reliable hybrid, but the competition is catching up."

  • Great gasoline performance

  • Practical packaging

  • Surprisingly, have fun driving

  • Well-coordinated drive train

  • Inconspicuous technology

  • Fussy brake pedal

  • No Android car

The Toyota Prius is the Levi jeans for hybrid cars. Since its introduction in 1997, the Prius has contributed a lot to the spread of hybrids and is often the standard choice. But the Prius is far from the only hybrid that's on sale today.

The competition now offers Prius alternatives to maximize fuel economy. More conventional cars are also available with hybrid drives, including popular Toyota models like RAV4, Corolla, and Camry. Is the car that puts hybrids on the map is still the best choice?

To find out, we spent a week with a 2020 Toyota Prius. While the Prius of the current generation has been around since model year 2016, Toyota has made some significant changes since then, including upgrades to the infotainment system and the addition of additional driver assistance functions.

2020 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-eStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

Our test car also had the optional all-wheel drive system (called Toyota AWD-e) that was added for the 2019 model year. While a front-wheel drive Prius L Eco is available from $ 25,280, our fully loaded all-wheel drive XLE test car had a sticker price of $ 31,005.

design

The largely unchanged exterior of the Prius since model year 2016 is unusual to say the least. The sinister face, bulbous profile, and bizarre taillights may look like they were accidentally designed, but they're actually the result of a number of conflicting priorities.

Prius second and third generation models had an egg-shaped hatchback shape that was distinctive, aerodynamic, and well suited for interior packaging. But it was also cool. Toyota tried to spice things up a bit for this generation. The Prius is still a hatchback, but looks more like a sedan. In order to make the car appear slimmer, the designers lowered the front end. Unusually shaped headlights and taillights highlight the Prius.

Toyota achieved low drag without affecting the interior.

However, the Prius doesn't look elegant or futuristic, and that's because other factors had to be considered. The designers still had to make the Prius as aerodynamic as possible to maximize fuel consumption. They also had to pack the bulky hybrid powertrain while offering a reasonable amount of passenger and cargo space. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I think the Toyota design team has been pulled in too many different directions.

However, the design fulfills its functional goals. At 0.24, the Prius claims one of the lowest drag coefficients of any production car. That means it can slide through the air like a fish in the water and thus improve mileage.

2020 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-eStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

Toyota has achieved this without compromising the interior. The Prius has a comparable interior as other special hybrids such as Honda Insight, Hyundai Ioniq and Kia Niro. The Toyota even offers more cargo space than the Kia with a high roof. Behind the steering wheel, I appreciated the Prius' low beltline, which allows for a higher side glass. This improves the view to the outside and gives the cabin an open, airy feeling.

technology

Although Toyota is a leader in hybrid drives, Japan's largest automaker lags behind in other forms of automotive engineering.

At first glance, the interior looks futuristic and different. But once you get behind the wheel, you only get cheap plastic and an overwhelming infotainment system.

As with the Prius Prime plug-in hybrid, Toyota placed the status indicator for the speedometer and hybrid system in the center of the dashboard for no apparent reason. Beneath these displays is a 7.0-inch touchscreen that controls most vehicle functions. The Prime's 11.6-inch screen isn't available on the standard Prius, but that's fine as we didn't see the point of the larger screen while driving the Prime. Toyota can hardly get the 7.0-inch screen to work.

As soon as you get behind the wheel, you only get cheap plastic and an overwhelming infotainment system.

While many Toyota vehicles will receive both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for the 2020 model year, the Prius is only available with CarPlay. Android users get stuck with Toyota's own user interface, which looks dated and reacts slowly. The setup is more complicated than the reduced interfaces in the Hyundai Ioniq and Kia Niro and chunkier than the more complex interface in the Honda Insight. The screen is washed out in the sunlight.

Our test car had a head-up display (part of a $ 800 technology package). The display only shows the current speed, but was easy to read without distracting.

Gas mileage

The infotainment system may be a flop, but Toyota has done it where it matters: under the hood. The Prius not only achieves good mileage, but also offers a comfortable driving experience that does not scare hybrid drivers the first time. The availability of all-wheel drive is an important bonus for car buyers in snowy regions.

The Prius uses a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine that is connected to Toyota's well-known Hybrid Synergy Drive system. Typically, an electric motor helps the gasoline engine power the front wheels, but four-wheel drive models add a second motor in the rear. It sends power to the rear wheels without a physical connection to the front wheels.

Toyota has been using a similar setup for its hybrid crossovers for years. With the Prius, all-wheel drive is only used when the on-board computer determines that additional traction is required and only up to 60 km / h. We have not noticed a big difference to previous experiences with Priuses with front-wheel drive (Prii?), Which is not surprising since the all-wheel drive rarely drives normally.

The Prius offers a normal driving experience that doesn't frighten hybrid drivers the first time.

With our without four-wheel drive, the Prius has an output of 121 hp (Toyota does not specify any torque). While hybrid buyers are probably not looking for bragging rights, it's worth noting that the Hyundai Ioniq and Kia Niro both have 139 horsepower, while the Honda Insight has 151 horsepower. The acceleration felt reasonable and we were impressed with the seamless transition between gasoline and electrical energy.

2020 Toyota Prius XLE AWD-e badgeStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The Prius is based on the same TNGA (Toyota New Global Architecture) platform as many other Toyota models, including the Camry and Corolla. TNGA really pays off for the Prius and gives it a feeling of solidity that is normally not found in mass market hybrids.

Toyota also hit the chassis tuning. This car feels really nimble and fun, although numb steering and tires with low rolling resistance prevent it from being really sporty. The ride quality is good, although the suspension can cause unsettling bumps from the cab over broken roads. The brake pedal was also difficult to modulate, as the brakes only bite after the pedal has covered about three quarters of the way to the ground.

Gasoline Champion

The main reason to buy a hybrid is fuel consumption, and this is where the Prius lives up to the hype. Most front-wheel drive Prius models have a total output of 52 mpg (54 mpg city, 50 mpg highway), but the L Eco model together creates 56 mpg (58 mpg city, 53 mpg highway). These are impressive numbers. However, the competition is catching up.

The Hyundai Ioniq is rated at 58 mpg combined (57 mpg city, 59 mpg highway) in efficiency-oriented blue form and 55 mpg combined (55 mpg city, 54 mpg motorway) in other forms. The Honda Insight also comes close to the Prius, combined with 52 mpg (55 mpg city, 49 mpg highway). Even the Corolla Hybrid from Toyota has a total output of 52 mpg (53 mpg city, 52 mpg highway).

Four-wheel drive is associated with a petrol mile penalty. Our test car was rated at 50 mpg combined (52 mpg city, 48 mpg highway). We had an average of 44.5 mpg (according to the car's on-board computer) over most freeway journeys. Four-wheel drive typically reduces fuel efficiency because the additional hardware adds weight and energy is required to drive both sets of wheels.

Nevertheless, this is currently the best scenario for snow-capped fuel misers. The Prius is the only hybrid car in its price range with all-wheel drive. The only alternative is a larger, less aerodynamic Toyota RAV4 or Ford Escape – with much lower fuel consumption.

safety

The 2020 Prius comes standard with the Toyota Safety Sense P (TSS-P), a bundle of driver aids that includes autonomous emergency braking, a lane departure warning, a lane departure warning and adaptive cruise control.

We found the lane departure warning system a little too sensitive. It beeped when we even approached lane markings like a nervous backseat driver. Conversely, the high beam came on only slowly after being immersed in oncoming cars.

Adaptive cruise control worked well, but because Toyota used the control stick of a more basic cruise control system, it was unnecessarily difficult to adjust. The Honda Insight offers a similar level of standard driver assistance technology, and Toyota doesn't have an equivalent to Honda's clever LaneWatch camera system.

The Prius is a top safety pick from the Insurance Institute for Road Safety (IIHS). Due to the "average" score for his headlights and the passenger crash test with small overlaps at the front, he missed the highest rating for Top Safety Pick + plus, but received the best possible score in all other categories. The Prius also received a five-star overall rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

2020 Toyota Prius AWD-e digital displayStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

Toyota offers a three-year basic warranty of 36,000 miles and a five-year warranty of 60,000 miles for the powertrain. The battery and the components of the hybrid system are guaranteed for eight years and 100,000 miles.

Hyundai and Kia offer longer basic and powertrain warranties, but can't exceed Toyota's battery warranty. Both the Prius and Toyota generally have a reputation for reliability. Priuses have weathered hundreds of thousands of miles of exhausting taxi service in cities around the world, so this hybrid seems to be a pretty good choice when it comes to long-term reliability.

How DT would configure this car

My test car was a fully loaded XLE model, but if I were to spend my own money, I would choose the basic L Eco equipment. This version offers the best mileage of all Prius equipment variants and is also equipped with Apple CarPlay and the TSS-P package with driver aids. The XLE gets leather seats and is available with a head-up display, but I wasn't impressed enough with the execution of these subtleties to pay extra for it.

The L Eco isn't available with all-wheel drive, but the importance of this feature really depends on where you live. When brutal winters are the norm, all-wheel drive is a must. If you live somewhere with mild winters, it is better to drive with the more economical L Eco front-wheel drive.

A good choice, but not the best

The 2020 Toyota Prius is a good car. It is comfortable, practical and keeps the promise of excellent mileage. However, this is no longer the default selection.

With so many other hybrids on the market, the Prius compromises don't have to be accepted. The Honda Insight, Hyundai Ioniq and Kia Niro are all better to drive and not strange to be strange. The Toyota Corolla Hybrid delivers almost the same mileage as the Prius, but in a more conventional package.

Should you get one?

No – at least this is not our first or even second recommendation. The Prius is a trustworthy and reliable choice that is sure to be reliable. However, try the alternatives first.

Editor's recommendations




MacBook Pro 13-inch Review: Why We Can’t Recommend It

Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch review: why we don't recommend it

"The MacBook Pro 13 with touch bar is beautiful, but flawed."

  • Exquisite appearance

  • The screen is among the best we've tested

  • Loud, pleasant speakers

  • Spacious, responsive touchpad

  • Excellent hard drive performance

  • Adapters are required to connect most devices

  • The keyboard is below average

  • Touch bar has no obvious purpose

  • The battery life takes a step back

This review was updated on January 23, 2020 with the context of the 16-inch MacBook Pro and rumors of an updated 13-inch MacBook Pro.

The MacBook Pro 2016 redesign was, to put it lightly, disagreed. With its chic new touch bar, reduced connectivity, and sticky keyboard, the new model's reception wasn't as warm as Apple had hoped.

Many of these issues have been resolved with the new 16-inch model, which is the best Mac product in years. The problem? The 13-inch MacBook hasn't solved the problem yet, and not everyone needs the performance and size of this larger MacBook.

Fortunately, Apple lowered the price of the 13-inch MacBook Pro in mid-2019 and lowered the base model (which now includes the Touch Bar) to $ 1,299. These include an 8th generation Intel Core processor, 128 GB SSD storage and 8 GB RAM. Is the current 13-inch MacBook Pro worth your money with an update coming soon?

Still the most luxurious laptop

A look at the MacBook Pro 13 is enough to know that it is a Mac. Despite the many imitators, the MacBook Pro design still stands out. This was all the more impressive when Apple decided to avert attention from its branding and paint the bright white apple in favor of a sleek, subtle glossy logo that resembles that on the MacBook, iPhone, and iPad.

As always, the MacBook Pro 13 has an aluminum unibody design with no visible seams other than the bottom seams. It is sturdy like a stone without a hint of bend in one corner of the device. That remains true even though it's only 3.02 pounds and only 0.71 inches thick. It's not as extreme as in 2016, but the MacBook Pro remains a very portable laptop to travel with.

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpad

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpad

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpad

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpad

  • 1.
    Someone who wears the original Macbook like this

When this design was originally launched in 2016, the bezels looked slim and modern, although they weren't as aggressive as Dell. We noticed that users with the older Pro model appreciate the improvement.

The MacBook Pro is available in space gray or silver. The new MacBook Air also has the gold option in the mix. The color selection may seem petty, but it does add a touch of personality, and we hope Apple brings some of it to the MacBook Pro. Even Dell has expanded the XPS 13's conservative color scheme, and the HP Specter x360 also offers some fancy color options.

Regardless, there is no argument about the elegance of the MacBook Pro. The beauty of Apple design has always been subtle, which is why the company is sometimes accused of being safe or boring. The professional doesn't even try to avoid this criticism. It is neither the smallest 13-inch laptop nor the lightest. There's something to be said for design that works, even if it's not innovative, and the MacBook Pro remains the most luxurious laptop there is.

Although the MacBook Pro 13-inch has a headphone jack, it makes another connectivity option that is equally controversial and functionally more important. Apple has decided that USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 are the future, and has thrown every other port overboard.

Yes, USB-C is all you get. The MacBook Pro 13 with Touch Bar has four of these ports, two on each side. Even the card reader is missing. The decision has advantages. The ease of port selection is difficult to dispute, and each port is a charging port, so you can connect the wall adapter to any port. The ports are also fast, so you can connect multiple displays or use fast external SSDs without worrying about connectivity bandwidth.

You need adapters, and you may need many of them.

Now for the bad news: you need adapters, and you may need many of them. Are you using an external display? That is an adapter. External hard drive? Adapter. Any kind of wired input? Adapter. Ethernet? Adapter. SD card? Adapter. At best, you need to buy one or two dongles. In the worst case, you need a dock solution that can add another $ 100 to $ 200 to the price.

The greatest irony? Even Apple's iPhone cannot be connected to a MacBook Pro 13 without buying an adapter.

Thanks to Apple's lead, however, this has increasingly become the norm, whether good or bad. Laptops like the HP Specter 13, the XPS 13 and the Huawei MateBook X Pro now have similar connectivity options – and this will still only be the direction in which things are going.

At least it can communicate wirelessly. Speaking of which, the new Pro 13 has the usual 802.11ac WLAN adapter, which is now coupled with Bluetooth 5.0.

The keyboard of the future is not very good

The 12-inch MacBook released in 2015, which has since been discontinued, first introduced a brand new "butterfly" switch that is much thinner than any previously used in a laptop keyboard. Although Apple found it great, we complained that "(our fingers) were typed with a dull ache for more than an hour" because the keyboard feels stiff and can only be moved to a limited extent.

This keyboard is now also on the MacBook Pro. Well, not exactly the same thing. When launched, the Pro's keyboard was a "second generation butterfly mechanism" with slightly more travel than the first. And it is an improvement.

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpadBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

That doesn't mean that it will serve you well. While travel has improved, the keyboard continues to suffer from a stiff, abrupt ground movement that can tire long typing processes. To what extent this will bother you is a matter of preference. Some Digital Trends authors thought this was perfectly acceptable and most thought they could learn to live with it. Nobody said they preferred the older MacBook Pros.

And it is not clear why this sacrifice was made. The new MacBook Pro 13 is thin, but just as thick or thicker than many competitors with better keyboards like the HP Specter x360, the ThinkPad X1 Carbon and the Dell XPS 13. Whatever the reason, Apple had to compromise on size , Performance and keyboard quality, with the latter getting the bad end of business.

The increasing complaints (and complaints) about sticking keys doesn't help either. Even with Apple's latest keyboard update, the third-generation butterfly, it was clear that the problem with sticking the keyboard wasn't fixed. We expect Apple to use the new "Magic Keyboard" of the 16-inch MacBook Pro when the rumored 2020 update for the 13-inch model comes on the market.

The keyboard suffers from a stiff, abrupt movement of the ground, which can tire long typing processes.

A revised oversize touchpad is located under the keyboard. In contrast to the keyboard, this is an absolute plus. The spacious surface improves the usability of multi-touch gestures that work well throughout. While the new, larger surface means constant contact between it and your palms, we haven't noticed a single unintentional input during our tests. Windows touchpads have improved significantly in recent years, but are still not as luxurious as Apple's.

And don't forget Force Touch. The haptic feedback system, which uses vibrations to simulate a click, can emulate real motion so well that most users won't notice a difference. It is quieter than before without affecting the satisfactory clarity of the click. The touchpad also offers sensitivity to force, which can enable special interface functions – just like the iPhone. The feature isn't widely accepted even by Apple's own software, but is great when it is offered.

The touch bar searches for the purpose

If nothing else, the Touch Bar is great to look at. It has a retina-equivalent pixel density, which means that symbols are rendered with crisp, vivid graphics. And because it is OLED, black tones look so dark black that it is often difficult to find the limits of the touch bar.

So it stops as a conversation starter. As a functional tool? Fewer. Apple tries to integrate the Touch Bar in such a way that it is also relevant in everyday web browsers, when taking notes and when viewing photos. The display changes constantly when new apps are opened and old ones are closed. It works well and keeps pace, no matter how quickly apps are switched or how many are open.

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpadBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

However, it is rarely used a lot. At best, it offers a quick way to scroll through lists like your photo stream. This can also be useful if you want to scroll through a video. It's great for capturing such content and activating a scroll bar, even when you're surfing YouTube.

In other cases, however, it is clearly a solution that looks for a problem. Immediately take the input. As you type text in Safari, Word, and other apps, the touch bar keeps flashing suggested words. This feature works well on iPhone, where typing is often slow and cumbersome.

It's not that easy on a laptop. For example, type "office" and the touch bar will suggest alternatives. Did you mean "officers"? Or maybe "off season"? This happens regardless of whether a word is spelled correctly or not. Even if you make a typo, it is hard to imagine why a user would look for help on the touch bar when MacOS is already showing a correction on the screen and in most cases will automatically correct the spelling.

Since its release, more and more apps have been offering touch bar support – including Evernote, Microsoft Outlook and LastPass. But even with more developer support than at startup, the touch bar isn't quite as important to the MacBook user experience as Apple would like it to be.

If nothing else, the Touch Bar is great to look at.

Even though it could be useful, the size of the touch bar is limited. Automatically opened Safari tabs with thumbnail content previews appear, a feature that may prove helpful. However, the thumbnails are so small that it is often difficult to distinguish the tabs from each other, even if only three or four are open. If you open six, eight, or ten tabs, the previews get even smaller until they are so small that it is difficult to guess which one is right. Similar problems affect the photo preview and video preview functions.

In theory, you can scroll through photo collections. In practice, this is more difficult than with the touchpad. Asus has developed a competing idea with the ZenBook Pro 15's ScreenPad. While this is not perfect, it does offer an enticing insight into something better than the Touch Bar. In the future there will even be fully equipped dual-screen laptops like the Surface Neo or the ThinkPad X1 Fold.

In short, the touch bar is not great. However, transferring the function line to an OLED display offers an important advantage called Touch ID. Yes, you can now log in with your fingerprint and it works just as seamlessly as on the iPhone. Fast and secure login authentication methods are an excellent way to improve security for the average user. Windows users have been enjoying this for several years thanks to Microsoft's Hello functionality. Touch ID is built into Apple Pay, so you can securely shop online – in stores that accept Apple Pay.

The most powerful function of the MacBook Pro: the display

A quick glance at the technical data could give the impression that the new MacBook Pro 13 from Apple had an old display. It's still retina, which means that the resolution is still 2,560 × 1,600. That was breathtaking in 2012, but today it seems mediocre alongside QHD + (3,200 × 1,800) and 4K (3,840 × 2,160) screens.

But don't worry, loyal to Mac. You can remove all concerns about the display from your head. It's awesome.

We measured a maximum brightness of 548 lux. This is ridiculously brilliant and a complete overkill for indoor use, but it can help the screen, which is still very shiny, can be used in extreme situations. In comparison, the Dell XPS 13 with QHD + display only achieves 278 lux and the HP Specter x360 355 lux. Both systems can have a problem with glare in bright lighting conditions. However, Dell gives you the option to combat this with a matte display option.

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpadBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

Brightness is only important in a bright room. What will amaze you no matter where you use the MacBook Pro 13 is its color. The display can achieve 100 percent of the sRGB color space and 91 percent of the AdobeRGB. It also delivered an average color error of 0.72 (lower is better). Everything under one is generally imperceptible to the human eye, and this reading is among the lowest we have ever recorded on a laptop. Only the XPS 15 from Dell with its excellent 4K IGZO ID display had a better average error value of 0.6.

The contrast ratio of 1,200: 1 is also excellent. The Pro can easily deliver dark blacks alongside brilliant colors.

The only error we found is gamma, which occurred at a value of 2.3. The ideal curve is 2.2, and the MacBook Pro 13's result indicates that the content is displayed slightly darker than it should. However, this is a very slight fluctuation that many competitors miss.

The retina display may not be the title of this professional, but it remains the most attractive feature.

When the numbers are counted, the new Retina display wins. It defeats the Dell XPS 13, the HP Specter x360 and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon and surpasses them in terms of color gamut, color accuracy and contrast ratio.

But that doesn't mean that there is a lack of competition. Microsoft's Surface Book 2 can be used from head to toe in some categories. Our tests showed that the surface book had an even better contrast ratio of 1,460: 1 and that the gamma curve display was the correct 2.2. But they also don't quite match in terms of color accuracy and brightness.

There are also a small handful of Windows systems like the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga that are available with OLED displays. These affect the high contrast ratio of the MacBook Pro 13 and offer an even wider color gamut with precise gamma. However, they don't match the Mac's ready-to-use color accuracy.

Aside from the numbers, the MacBook Pro 13's display is excellent and looks like this in everyday use. Games and movies are crisp and vivid, and high-quality photos are rendered with such detail that you may think your screen has been replaced by a canvas print. The retina display may not be the title of this professional, but it remains the most attractive feature.

Sound quality is another important multimedia feature, and Apple has always shown an affinity for audio quality that is rarely found elsewhere. Simply put, the MacBook Pro is no exception. In fact, the speakers are the best we can remember in a 13-inch system. That says a lot, because some newer laptops in this category, like the Asus ZenBook 3, surprised us with their quality.

The MacBook Pro 13 offers a wide range of volumes and is at most much louder than most people need for normal use. It can fill a large room with music. The bass is there and is taken into account in minimal but noticeable amounts – the beat can be felt at higher volumes via the keyboard. The sound in the high and middle range remains clear and distortion-free.

External speakers are an improvement as always, but the audio quality here is surprising and can convince you that you don't have to connect anything to the headphone jack.

A fast processor that faces tough competition

Specifications have never been Apple's focus, but this was more of a marketing problem than an indication of the company's preference for hardware. However, this has changed in recent years. The MacBook Pro fell behind and took over new Intel processor lines late.

When it was updated in mid-2019, we were happy that the MacBook Pro 13-inch was updated to the 8th generation Intel processors. Intel now has 10th generation processors in most new laptops, which means the 13-inch MacBook Pro already looks out of date.

Drive performance is often overlooked by consumers, but is important to the overall performance of a system. Apple knows that and has been a leader in storage performance for years. The new MacBook Pro range is no exception. Read speeds of 3.1 gigabytes per second and write speeds of 2.2 gigabytes per second are specified.

We can't do an apple-to-apple comparison with Windows competitors here because the tools we normally use to test performance aren't compatible with MacOS. However, we tested two benchmarks that only run on Apple's operating system.

In the first place was Blackmagic, a test to inform experts whether a drive is suitable for processing content with certain frame rates and resolutions. A write speed result of 1,348 megabytes per second and a read result of two gigabytes per second were achieved (annoyingly, this seems to be the maximum result that the benchmark can show). This is a big improvement over the MacBook Pro 13 with Retina (2015). It achieved a write speed of 647 MB ​​/ s and a read speed of 1,056 MB / s.

It is clear that the MacBook Pro 13 with Touch Bar offers excellent drive performance and can handle all the workloads you want.

We also launched DiskMark. The sequential read performance was 1,826 MB / s and the sequential write performance 1,289 MB / s. We had never tested with this benchmark before. So take the numbers with a grain of salt. Still, they're good numbers and they pretty much match Blackmagic.

These benchmarks also do not run on Windows, so we cannot compare the hard drive performance from apple to apple. However, the numbers from CrystalDiskMark, our Windows test, indicate that Apple is at the top.

The Dell XPS 13 with 512 GB solid-state drive achieved a read speed of 1,893 MB / s and a write speed of 475 MB / s. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, on the other hand, could keep up better with 2,121 MB / s and 1,832 MB / s.

If all of this sounds confusing, don't worry. Although the numbers are excellent, you don't have to think about them. It is clear that the MacBook Pro 13-inch offers excellent drive performance and can handle any workload that you ask of it. This is possibly the most future-proof component in the entire system.

Mac games are still a bad idea

As in most previous incarnations, the Apple MacBook Pro 13 is based on integrated Intel graphics. If you want a more powerful discrete graphics solution, you have to accept the MacBook Pro 16's larger footprint.

We launched Civilization VI and tested it at 1440×900 resolution on the MacBook Pro 13 and at the same resolution on the HP Specter x360, with a minimum of detail and memory usage selected.

Apple MacBook 13-inch touchpadBill Roberson / Digital Trends

Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

The game was identical on both sides – and bad – and delivered 21 frames per second over the in-game benchmark. However, the HP was the better experience because the Mac had graphics errors that were not present on the HP Specter x360.

If you're curious as to why the game is performing poorly despite more technical skill, blame Apple's OpenGL support, which hasn't been updated significantly in years. Instead, the company prefers Metal, its own API that can be used on both iOS and MacOS devices. The problem? Porting a game from the popular Windows DirectX API to Metal is unknown. Windows PC game developers don't have a good option for porting to Mac. The result is often an accomplishment that is less impressive than expected.

With games ported from iOS, like CSR Racing Pro 3, Super Octagon and Limbo, you're lucky. There is a fair selection of such games in the Mac App Store. You can also play some games that are available in Apple Arcade, but the Mac doesn't get the full library.

A smaller battery leads to sufficient endurance

While the MacBook Pro 13 has significantly improved processor performance, it has also significantly improved battery capacity. The previous model had a 74.9-watt-hour battery, but the 2016 MacBook Pro 13-inch was launched with a 49.2-watt-hour battery (the model without a touch bar has a slightly larger 54.5-watt-hour -Battery pack). That was a capacity reduction of almost 35 percent. In the 2018 update, the battery was increased to 58 watt hours, although Apple's lifespan estimates have remained unchanged.

If you want excellent portability, you should choose the Dell XPS 13 with 1080p display and Core i5 processor, the Asus ZenBook 13 UX333 or the HP Specter Folio. The best of all battery life options is the Surface Book 2 13, which had an amazing 17 hour battery life in our video playback test. The MacBook Pro 13 used to be the last word in battery life, but the new model – or at least the Touch Bar version – has lost the crown.

Our opinion

Apple's new MacBook Pro 13-inch is a gorgeous device, but it has some flaws that make it difficult to recommend. It doesn't have the performance of the MacBook Pro 16-inch or the new keyboard. Despite the recent price cut, it's a little too expensive for what's on offer, especially if you consider the other alternatives.

Is there a better alternative?

Both of the other MacBook options offer better values ​​for what they are. The MacBook Air isn't that powerful, but it's great for students and affordable for just $ 999. The 16-inch MacBook Pro offers content creators fantastic multi-core performance.

If you are open to choosing between Windows 10 and MacOS, there are numerous competitors. The best is the Dell XPS 13, which is faster and cheaper, and includes an option for a 4K display. It also includes much better battery life as long as you stay at 1080p. The 13-inch Surface Laptop 3, the HP Specter x360 13 and the ThinkPad X1 Carbon are all good rivals.

How long it will take?

Apple has control over the life of each Mac by determining which systems receive MacOS updates. A new MacBook Pro 13-inch should last as long as any Mac currently available.

Especially with this MacBook, the real danger is in the keyboard, which has encountered significant reliability problems. There's no way around it.

Should you buy it

No. The MacBook Pro 13-inch isn't a bad laptop, but you'll be disappointed with the outdated design, faulty keyboard, and high price tag.

Editor's recommendations




2020 Hyundai Venue First Drive Review: All The Tech For Less

2020 Hyundai venue outside

2020 Hyundai Venue first ride review: All technology for less

"The Hyundai Venue 2020 offers a lot of technology at an affordable price."

  • Good technical value

  • High quality interior

  • Comfortable ride

  • Gutless motor

  • Driver aids work poorly

It is now a matter of course that American buyers prefer crossovers over normal cars. As a result, automakers are increasing the driving heights of small hatchbacks to develop new models that have the crossover look but not the utility or all-wheel drive. The trend started with the Toyota C-HR and Nissan Kicks, and now we have a new entry – the 2020 Hyundai Venue.

The venue follows the same recipe as the C-HR and Kicks. According to Hyundai, however, it is primarily aimed at used car buyers. Hyundai believes that a low base price combined with the latest technology and a new car guarantee will attract buyers of used car lots. Starting at $ 18,345, the venue offers a ton of technology for the money, including standard Apple CarPlay / Android Auto and a variety of driver aids.

But is the 2020 Hyundai Venue really cheap and cheerful or just cheap? At Hyundai's invitation, I drove a venue from Miami to the Florida Keys to find out.

Design and style

The venue differs from conventional small hatchback models in its design. It's a bit bigger, both because of an upright, boxy body shape and because of a higher ride height. The venue also carries the same grille as larger Hyundai crossovers to reaffirm the idea that it's not just a regular car.

2020 Hyunda venue profileStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

Like the Nissan Kicks, the Venue is available in a two-tone color scheme that gives the car a bit more personality. However, this option is only available in the upper denim trim. You have only one color combination to choose from – blue with a white roof.

Your mileage may vary depending on the design, but a box-shaped design should offer more passenger and cargo space than something leaner and more car-like. Despite its sloping roofline, the Toyota C-HR has more cargo space than the venue.

Meanwhile, the kicks has more cargo space and more passenger space than the Toyota or Hyundai. On paper, the venue has more headroom and legroom for the rear passengers than the kicks, but that's not much in the real world.

The venue differs from conventional small hatchback models in its design.

The back seats of the venue are narrow, especially if the front seats are designed for tall people. The hold is good for a small hatchback, but not impressive compared to real crossovers. Even the Hyundai Kona, a tiny vehicle, offers more.

When it comes to utility, the venue (and other similar vehicles) don't offer enough to justify the crossover label. If you buy the venue against used cars, as Hyundai believes, many buyers will likely find something with more space at the same price.

2020 Hyundai Venue touchscreenStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The front seats are at least a nice place. They are comfortable for a vehicle in this price range, although we prefer the more supportive chairs in the Nissan Kicks. Hyundai also has nothing to do with Nissan's optional Bose audio system, which has speakers in the front headrests.

However, the interior and overall design of the venue look more sophisticated than that of the Nissan, and both the kicks and venue look more inviting than the Toyota C-HR, which appears to be outdated in comparison.

technology

Hyundai has saved on interior space, but not on technology. The affordable venue is equipped with numerous technical functions as standard.

The standard infotainment system includes an 8-inch touchscreen as well as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Toyota offers the same screen in the C-HR and adds Android Auto in addition to Apple CarPlay for the 2020 model year.

Nissan requires you to upgrade the basic equipment of the Kicks S to the SV to get Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The largest touchscreen available is only 7 inches tall. Venue models equipped with navigation also receive real-time traffic information at no extra charge.

This is where Hyundai's strategy comes in to play the venue off against used cars. You are not guaranteed to find these connectivity features on every older vehicle.

The venue is an entry-level model, but it offers a lot of technology.

As with other Hyundai models, the infotainment system is simple but functional. The graphics on the screen are not complex, but are easy to read at a glance. Keyboard shortcuts for menus make it easier to use the system while driving.

Hyundai also offers several places, including a shelf on the passenger side of the dashboard, which looks like a good place to rest a phone. At least until you accelerate or brake hard and the phone flies.

The event location is equipped as standard with an autonomous emergency braking system, a lane departure warning system and an attention monitor for the driver. The SEL trim in the middle area offers monitoring of the blind spot and a warning of rear traffic.

As with infotainment technology, used cars with these features may not be available at the same price, so Hyundai's argument is correct. However, the event's new car competitors offer technologies similar to the standard equipment – as well as functions that the event location does not offer. The Toyota C-HR has adaptive cruise control, while the Nissan Kicks has autonomous reverse braking.

Stephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The driver's aids at the venue are mixed. The lane departure warning system was too sensitive, since every slight deviation from a straight line was a possible off-road excursion. It was also confused by highway exits. The lane departure warning system is not only shy, but also pulls aggressively on the steering wheel to bring the venue back into line.

I was impressed with the ability to monitor the blind spot to see cars far behind the line of sight, but the loud warning sound sounded like a bad television special. Instead of being helpful, it was a joke.

Experience behind the wheel

According to Hyundai, the venue was designed for young city dwellers, and my test drive began and ended in downtown Miami, with sections of the highway in between. Here Hyundai's Penny Pinching began to show itself.

The venue is only available with a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine that delivers 121 horsepower and 113 pound-feet of torque. If that doesn't sound enough to you, you're right. It's easy to assume that driving in the city is just about sitting in traffic, but that's not really the case. Maneuvers that would have been routine in most other cars became nerve-wracking.

This may be due in part to the transfer of the event location. Base SE models get a six-speed manual, but my two test cars (a SEL and a denim) had the optional continuously variable transmission (CVT), which Hyundai calls the IVT (for "intelligent variable transmission").

The manual would at least have given more control and helped keep the engine in its power range. The problem could also be poor coordination. Nissan's kicks also use a CVT and offer similar performance to the venue (122 hp and 114 lb-ft). But the kicks don't feel nearly as sluggish as the venue.

This little Hyundai was comfortable and quiet, but not fun.

Auto people like to say that driving a slow car fast is more fun than driving a fast car slowly, but the venue is the exception to this rule. This little Hyundai was comfortable and quiet, but not fun. It is small but not agile. The driving experience was so understated that we didn't mind being in Florida, a state notorious for its lack of good roads.

In order to keep the price of the venue low, Hyundai did not use all-wheel drive. The additional traction of the all-wheel drive is one of the reasons for choosing a crossover instead of a conventional car. However, the all-wheel drive would have increased $ 2,000 in manufacturing costs (which would have driven up the base price) and 200lbs in curb weight (which would have had an impact on fuel consumption), Derek Joyce, PR manager for Hyundai crossovers, told Digital Trends.

The venue is only front-wheel drive. Fortunately for Hyundai, it's the Nissan Kicks and the Toyota C-HR. The venue does have a "snow mode" for traction control that changes throttle response and CVT behavior for more grip, but I couldn't test that in sunny Florida.

Fuel consumption and security

The 2020 Hyundai Venue is rated at 32 mpg combined (30 mpg city, 34 mpg highway) with the CVT and 30 mpg combined (27 mpg city, 35 mpg highway) with the six-speed manual. This places the venue below the Nissan Kicks, which achieves a total of 33 mpg, and above the Toyota C-HR, which achieves a total of 29 mpg (both vehicles are only available with CVT).

2020 Hyundai Venue first rideStephen Edelstein / Digital Trends

The venue is a new model, so it is difficult to predict future reliability. Overall, Hyundai has a reputation for reliability and offers one of the longest guarantees in the business. The Korean automaker's 10-year drivetrain warranty of 100,000 miles and the 5-year drivetrain warranty of 60,000 miles far exceed Nissan and Toyota.

The venue is new, so crash test assessments by the Road Safety Insurance Institute (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are not yet available.

How DT would configure this car

My ideal 2020 Hyundai Venue is a denim model. The denim has optional technical functions such as monitoring the blind spot, warning of cross traffic at the rear and navigation from the SEL trim level, giving it a portion of style. The two-tone blue and white exterior and the blue interior of the denim make the venue feel special. At $ 23,045, the denim is a big step up from the base Venue SE starting price of $ 18,345 and still a good value.

Conclusion

The 2020 Hyundai Venue is a solid car, but whether it's the right car for you depends on your priorities. If you are looking for a real crossover with more interior space than a normal car and all-wheel drive, look elsewhere. The venue is more like a high hatchback than a real crossover.

This also applies to the Nissan Kicks and the Toyota C-HR, the two logical rivals of the venue. The Nissan and Toyota also have no four-wheel drive and are similar in size to the Hyundai. We were impressed by the quality of the material and the general sophistication of the venue, but it's not a clear victory. The kicks don't have a standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but more interior space and a bolder motor. The C-HR has a higher base price, but is equipped with an adaptive cruise control as standard, which is not available at the event location at any price.

What about the used cars that Hyundai said were the real rivals of the venue? Priorities are also important here. The venue offers the latest technology and a new car guarantee, but at the expense of the interior and acceleration. Hyundai offers more technology and security for the money, but it is possible to bring more cars to the used market.

Should you get one?

Yes. The 2020 Hyundai Venue may not be a true crossover, but it is a good car.

Editor's recommendations




Pascal’s Wager Review: Dark Souls Somehow Works on Mobile

Selected image for Pascal's bet evaluation

"Pascal's bet doesn't quite match the impressive standards of his inspiration, but Dark Souls fans should check it out."

  • Excellent level design

  • Characters offer unique play styles

  • Creative enemy design

  • Sanity System is a fun twist

  • Great bosses

  • Boss is too difficult

  • Requires controller for best experience

  • Messy story with bad acting

The developer FromSoftware developed Dark Souls, probably the most influential game of the past decade. This game and its sequels encountered waves of imitators, which we have collectively referred to as "soul likes", but so far they have been limited to consoles and PCs.

Creating such a challenging and complex game on a mobile platform seems like an impossible task, but TipsWorks tries Pascal's bet. It's not too original, but it does have a few tricks up its sleeve.

Story: Talk to me. Or not.

Dialogue in Pascal's bet

Contrary to the vague narrative that is often standard in FromSoftware games, TipsWorks in Pascals Wager offers more direct storytelling. It highlights the game's AAA-like production values, but also shows how effective the less direct approach can be.

In a world full of darkness after the disappearance of the creatures called "Colossi", the game is playing Terrence, a courier who is looking for his wife, who was apparently seduced by the darkness. During his trip, he is accompanied by a trio of other adventurers. the gunslinger Viola, the coffin-swinging Norwood and the nun Benita. All three have an ulterior motive, while Terrence is more direct and transparent.

There are a few clever twists in Pascal's bet, but almost every stroke is affected by terrible writing and speech. Characters sometimes don't seem to know what emotions to feel, alternately screaming and whispering loudly.

It can be strange. For example, people known as "Marcians" are often pronounced "Martians" and a few lines randomly display subtitles in Chinese. It would have been more compelling to let the players fill in the gaps and give them atmosphere and light contextual information.

Gameplay: Yes, it lasts.

Playing as a viola in Pascal's bet

Enough players have skipped the film sequences in Dark Souls over the years to know that the story in these games is secondary. If you take this view, you will be satisfied with Pascal's bet.

The fight is almost entirely like other games in the genre, with an arsenal of light and heavy attacks, evasive action, back stabbing, finishing moves and parades. Pascal's bet also has a "rage" measurement, which increases when you land a hit, and which can then be used to trigger special attacks. It adds a nuance and strategy to battles, especially when you're trying to reduce your enemy's stamina to get them to get rid of them.

What sets Pascal's bet apart from other soul likes is the character change system. With a few exceptions, you will be sent to battle with Terrence and a companion. You can swap whenever you are not in combat. If one dies, switch to the other instead of returning to the next checkpoint.

Due to their different fighting styles, this can mean that the techniques differ in the middle of the fighting. Terrence is a mediocre character with average defense, speed, and attack power, while Viola and Benita are both mushy but can do enormous damage. Meanwhile, Norwood can cause relatively high damage, but is slow, which makes him responsible for certain encounters.

If you prefer one of them to another, you can keep it in your squad forever. In my case, I found Benita most effective because it can heal itself without using restricted potions.

If you are familiar with the animation-based battle of Dark Souls or Bloodborne, Pascal's bet is the place for you. Once you launch an attack, this animation will play until you hit or damage an enemy. This means that you have to be extremely careful when hitting.

Enemies are unforgiving, especially in groups, and they often hide in unsuspecting places as you navigate through the game's open environments.

Don't play without a controller

If you face the game's tougher opponents, you'll understand one of the game's main suggestions: play with a controller.

By default, Pascals Wager uses a virtual stick and buttons to do everything. Even if this is possible in Fortnite, you will go crazy here. Fortunately, iOS 13 has added support for Xbox One and PS4 controllers. In combination with a controller mount, you can play with a more recognizable layout. If you request this, the purpose of putting the game on the phone first will be somewhat negated, but there is no better solution.

As is common in this genre, Pascals Wager offers numerous doors, lifts and gates that you have to unlock from one side before they can be used on the other. The game clearly mimics the design of FromSoftware and makes it absolutely clear.

Every time you explore an area, you feel that you have made significant progress.

Every time you explore an area and discover a link to a checkpoint, you feel that you have made significant progress. At this point you can redeem your "bones" for upgrades. This is both experience and currency. Unlike the Dark Souls games, you only lose a fraction of your bones when you die instead of all.

This can make death less frustrating and allow you to improve yourself in difficult areas. At the checkpoints – the game calls them altars – you can also equip special equipment that improves certain statistics, replenishes consumables, and distributes skill points to your current characters.

Difficulty: It's going to be insane

Fight a boss in Pascal's bet

One of the consumables is a reason elixir, which is vital for one of Pascal & # 39; s Wager's most unique mechanics. If you damage enemies, you will gradually lose your "sanity" that appears next to your health bar. If it falls into the "abnormal" area, you will get a slight health impairment, and if it is completely lowered, you will enter a "crazy" state.

This is bad. Enemies become much more difficult and even get new moves. It's annoying to deal with at first, but managing your sanity through potions becomes a crucial part of struggles.

Boss fights are by far the most dangerous time to lose your mind. Challenging, but (largely) fair, these are the best moments of the game and show an unexpected level of creativity. They range from horse magicians to Lovecraftian brain monsters with sprouted tentacles, all of which require their own strategy.

After a few tries, you will learn their movements and can better estimate when to attack. The battles in the late game offer a great mix of difficulty and spectacle. After death, you always have a short run back to the battlefield to try again so that you don't forget anything that happened in the last fight.

The jump in difficulty from the penultimate boss to the last fight is ridiculous.

The delicate balance between challenge and frustration is present in almost every fight except the final boss. Yes. I couldn't beat it.

Despite hours of trying, the game's somewhat tricky camera and three-phase format of combat make it almost impossible. Yes, the final boss should always be the hardest, but the jump in difficulty from the penultimate boss to the final fight is ridiculous and slows down the breakneck pace of the game.

At the beginning of the game there is the possibility to reduce the level of difficulty with an Easter egg. However, if only one boss is the problem, this is not a good solution.

Our opinion

Although Pascals Wager goes overboard his boss and is a ridiculous story, he's an impressive action game. Translating this hardcore genre to phones and tablets is not easy. The reasoning system and several playable characters make the game of TipsWorks worthwhile even for those who normally do not like mobile gaming.

Is there a better alternative?

Not on mobile devices. Dark Souls games are undoubtedly superior on console and PC.

Do you want more iOS options? Check out our favorite iPhone games.

How long it will take?

According to TipsWorks, the game lasts between 10 and 20 hours. We found it closer to the latter.

Should you buy it

Yes, provided you have a controller and holder for your phone.

Editor's recommendations




Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 Review

emporio armani smartwatch 3 review ea front

Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3

"The few positive aspects of the Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 cannot convince us to pay the high price."

  • Ideal for casual fitness tracking

  • Decent EA watch face collection

  • Heart rate tracking, GPS and NFC on board

  • Mundanes design

  • Tired WearOS software

  • Price higher than the competition

  • Uncomfortable rubber strap

There was a time when wearing an Armani suit was pretty much all you needed to make the right impression. Intelligent, refined and noble quality has never been a problem. Unfortunately, since Emporio Armani published his name on Touchscreen-Wear OS smartwatches, he has not been able to capture the same cache. I've worn the latest Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3, and although there's nothing fundamentally wrong with it, I've never loved wearing it the way I would with an Armani suit and in a world full of designer wear OS -Watches with similar mediocre performance, that's a problem.

design

Before we look at the look and materials of the watch, its name is the beginning of the problem. If you want to buy this model, you should look for the Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 or ART5024 as shown in our pictures. This number three and the generic name are the only things that differentiate it from previous EA smartwatches. Just give it a real name, for heaven's sake. It could only make it more memorable, something that it is not currently.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

We come to the topic of design to be unforgettable. It's a bit of "Smartwatch 101". The round body has some studs, a crown, two buttons, and a circular touchscreen, all of which are placed in the areas you expect. There is nothing that says as sophisticated as you can expect from the brand. There is no stylistic boom that will get someone to take a second look. The hard-wearing rubber strap is very long and very easy to grip, and the zookeeper often caught my wrist hair when I tried to move it over the wristband because it grips like an overzealous limpet. I would recommend choosing one of the metal or leather alternatives over this annoying rubber strap.

On a positive note, there are some pretty colors that breathe life into it, with the burnt orange of my device and an option for metallic blue, both of which look great. Replace the strap or buy the model with the stainless steel bracelet first, and the look will improve but not significantly. The aluminum case is slim and light, making it easy to carry regardless of your outfit. The 44mm case is quite large; It was clearly designed for men. On my test device, an annoying scratch appeared on the edge of the screen, which affected its appearance.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

Let me be clear. The Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 is not ugly at all, it is only understated to boredom and has no identity. The bracelet consists of two straight pieces of rubber, the buttons have no texture and the bezel is a black, slightly angled edge – and nobody looks at it twice. There's nothing obvious that connects it to the desirable brand Emporio Armani unless you look closely at the crown to see the engraved logo. In a few months, ask me to remember what the watch looked like and I will respond. "What watch?"

Software and performance

The Smartwatch 3 has Google's built-in Wear operating system, which is supported by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 3100 platform, as well as a heart rate sensor, NFC and a microphone / speaker combination for making calls on the watch. The Wear OS has not changed significantly in recent years and feels tired while the control system is bleak and out of date. This is why the design of a Wear OS smartwatch is so important. It is really the only thing that can distinguish it. Wear OS is not particularly good. So buying decisions depend on how good a watch looks and with options like Diesel On Fadelite and On Axial (or Misfit Vapor X, Michael Kors Access, Fossil Gen 5 – the list goes on, really) Emporio Armani's efforts are easy to ignore.

The only Armani-specific software feature is the collection of dials that are diverse and well designed. There's an option for everyone here, with classic styles, modern digital options, and some EA-centered versions. Even if you don't like them, there are many more in the Google Play Store. Third-party apps are also running on the watch, but too many are installed at your own risk, as this noticeably slows performance. Oddly enough, you have to install Google Maps and Google Play Music yourself as they are not preinstalled, although they are useful parts of the smartwatch experience.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

Initial setup is also a tedious process, with multiple updates and far too many passwords and conditions to apply. It's a 30 minute session to make it work. The navigation takes place with swiping and tapping. The response time is average, but never nearly as fast as with the Apple Watch. At least the 1.3-inch AMOLED screen is attractive and pleasant to look at. The EA Smartwatch 3 has a rotating crown that makes life a little easier, especially when scrolling through the notification screen or when adjusting the music volume.

Notifications are displayed in a long list. They are interactive, meaning you can reply to messages, emails and tweets, either with predefined replies or with your voice. However, sometimes I got the same email notifications over and over again, which was frustrating and detracting from the usefulness of the watch. This additional burden of notifications is in direct contradiction to one of the main reasons that smartwatches try to minimize. Unfortunately, I have had the same experience with many other Wear OS smartwatches. So it's more of a software problem than a problem that only occurs with this model.

It's not all bad. The cards that are swiped to the left and that show Google Fit, the weather, and your calendar are useful. Sometimes it is convenient to respond to notifications on the watch. Google Pay is also on board for contactless payments. The special surrounding dials increase the usefulness and aesthetics of the watch as you can always see the time on the screen. The performance is sufficient for pre-installed apps and general use. Overall, it's significantly better than older Wear OS watches, with only occasional slowdowns that are irritating. But fairly average for the current generation of Wear OS devices, and still miles away from the standard fluidity and support seen on the Apple Watch.

Fitness tracking

Google Fit is the proprietary platform for health and fitness tracking. However, since Wear OS can run other apps, you can add Strava, Runkeeper, Endomundo and some others for certain sports. However, Google Fit is a great workout companion for my needs. It shows all the metrics I want – steps, heart rate, calorie consumption and intensity – in a clear and precise way. It is also easy to use and accessible. In conjunction with the lower button on the Armani watch, you can use the menu that appears to measure your heart rate or start a workout. Google Fit also has a guided breathing feature that lasts two minutes and is based on mindfulness and even breathing techniques.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

Smartwatches are useful as a fitness tracker and training partner. The design of the Smartwatch 3 still looks at home in the gym, it hasn't been excessively sweaty under the strap, and the slim body means the risk of bumping into devices is low. Google Fit is great software that works smoothly and effectively on the Smartwatch 3, but is still best suited for the occasional fitness fan.

Battery life

The latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 3100 platform is more efficient than the old Snapdragon 2100 platform. Unfortunately, this doesn't mean that you can reach two days on a single charge without drastically reducing functionality. A single day is appropriate with moderate use. This includes about an hour of fitness and heart rate measurement. The charging process takes place via a plastic magnetic base. It takes an hour to fully charge the battery.

Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

The Smartwatch 3 has a choice of battery extension modes with certain features disabled to ensure the battery lasts longer. Advanced mode turns off the permanently on display, sound, WiFi, heart rate tracking, tilt and touch to wake up the screen, and voice control, and limits the Bluetooth connection between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. If these measures are taken, the watch will last for approximately 48 hours when fully charged. A time-only mode does exactly what it says – no notifications or anything – but it will stretch the battery for about a week.

But of course, such modes reduce the sense of a smartwatch, especially the way it works. I was only able to see the time in advanced mode when I pressed the side button, and can only see the time in time mode. If you want both "intelligent" and "observing" functions, they must be put into normal mode and charged daily. What I like is that the watch automatically goes into a power saving mode when the battery is empty, so I can see the time even when the smart functions are turned off. Practically at the end of a long day.

Price and availability

The Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 or ART5024 in this color scheme is now available for $ 395 or £ 370 – the same price as an entry-level Apple Watch. It's also more than $ 100 more than several other WearOS smartwatches with the same specs and features.

Our opinion

The Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 is as general as the name suggests. Although it bears the name Armani, it lacks flair and stylistic attention and is just too expensive. While there are aspects that are good – fitness tracking, contactless payments, quick charging and an attractive screen – the reserved design doesn't make us want to pick it up and put it on – an important selling point for the flooded Wear OS watch market , Emporio Armani has to develop a design that is recognizable as his own, instead of being content with something so ordinary.

What are the alternatives?

We'll say it aloud for those in the background: if you own an iPhone, buy an Apple Watch! Don't buy a smart watch with Wear OS if you don't have to, as the ownership experience is subpar when using an iPhone. Apple's WatchOS software is light years ahead, there are many customization options, and Apple has traditionally supported the software for several years. Health tracking is also second to none. Prices start at $ 400 – the same price as the Armani Smartwatch 3.

If you have an Android phone, we recommend the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 for $ 280, which contains the optimized Tizen software instead of Wear OS. It is more fluid, easier to use and more attractive at the same time. It's not perfect, but better than Wear OS. However, the Watch Active 2's design isn't particularly good, and that's where the better Wear OS watch options come in.

The Diesel On Axial looks great, and we'll put up with the Wear OS software for it, while the $ 295 Fossil Gen 5 smartwatch does everything the Armani watch does for less. Misfits' minimalist design also gets it right with the $ 280 Vapor X. Finally, consider the $ 275 Huawei Watch GT2 if you prefer simplicity and solid design over endless apps and features.

How long it will take?

The battery is always the weak link of a smartwatch. It will deteriorate over time and may affect daily use after a few years. However, people keep smartwatches longer than smartphones, so owning three or four years is quite possible. Google has ignored Wear OS for years. So don't expect any major changes in the near future based on your current track record.

The watch itself will be relatively durable with a water resistance of up to 50 meters, but in the short amount of time it's attached to the wrist, the case or screen (it's hard to tell which exactly) was scratched on the edge, which leaves an obvious consequence of marking and raising concerns about build quality. The strap is attached with quick release pins so that it can easily be exchanged for another.

Should you buy one?

No. While a smartwatch is a great accessory for your phone, you have to buy the right one to ensure a good user experience. Unfortunately, the Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 is far superior to the better Wear OS smartwatches without having a real reason to buy.

Editor's recommendations




2020 Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster Review: Listen To That V12 Sing

Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster

2020 Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster Review: Listen to this V12 vocals

"Track-focused roadsters are often a contradiction, but the SVJ makes it easy to ignore mismatches."

  • Breathtaking looks

  • Incredible handling

  • The dashboard display looks good

  • The V12 engine is a technical masterpiece

  • Unrefined transmission

  • Infotainment is out of date

When Lamborghini took me to Libson, Portugal, to put the new Aventador SVJ coupe through its paces on a former F1 race track, I went into great detail about the technology required to put the Aventador into a world-class super sports car to transform. The SVJ coupe had recently claimed the coveted place as the fastest production car around the famous Nürburgring, and the Lamborghini people were proud of their performance.

Of course, the standard Aventador S with 730 hp is not a gap on the route. A lot has changed in the field of super sports cars since the debut of the Aventador in 2011. With competent submissions from McLaren and Porsche, Lamborghini knew that it would take more than an increase in performance to top the list of the most challenging street circuit in the world. Therefore, the engineers developed a multi-layered strategy to improve all key elements of the Aventador's performance. This led to a track-oriented iteration, which became the Super Veloce Jota Coupé.

Nowadays, the debut of a drop-top variant of a car manufacturer's super sports car is a matter of course not long after the coupé has hit the road. But given the SVJ coupe's hardcore focus, it's still a bit surprising. Dynamic compromises can arise if the roof is chopped. Will the SVJ's full appeal in pursuing open-air thrills be dampened?

Inside and outside

The Aventador SVJ Roadster is limited to just 800 units worldwide and costs from $ 573,966. It is a showcase of the latest and greatest Lamborghini street technology.

Like its hardtop counterpart, the SVJ Roadster is moved by a modified version of the 6.5-liter V12 of the Aventador, which now features reworked cylinder heads, new titanium valves and torque of 759 hp and 531 pound-feet of torque, and revised intake ports. Power is delivered to all four bends through a fourth-generation Haldex all-wheel drive system, and gears continue to be replaced through Lamborghini's automated seven-speed single clutch manual transmission. It is said to be good for a sprint from 0 to 60 mph in 2.9 seconds on the way to the roadster's top speed of 217 mph.

If a model in Lamborghini's range currently embodies the heart and soul of the brand, it is this.

That's just a tenth slower than the Coupé's straight-line sprint while matching at the top. Most of this additional mass is due to the additional structural stiffening required to keep the chassis rigid without a roof. The removable top is a two-piece carbon fiber design that weighs 26 pounds and fits in the frunk.

The SVJ Roadster was developed to cope with curves as well as to devour asphalt. As with the coupé, it benefits from the second generation of the Aerodinamica Lamborghini Attiva, Lamborghini's patented active aerodynamic system.

Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster

ALA 2.0 takes active aerodynamics to a higher level than its rivals and not only increases downforce and drag, but can also direct airflow to the inner wheels while cornering at high speeds for more downforce on the unladen side of the Vehicle and the steering angle required to keep the car through a bend where you want.

As with all Aventador models, the SVJ Roadster benefits from a rear axle steering system that was first introduced on the Aventador S. It rotates the rear wheels in the opposite direction of the front wheels at lower speeds to improve agility and responsiveness. At higher speeds, both the front and rear wheels move in the same direction to improve stability at high speeds.

When it comes to setting the pace, you can fall back on the standard carbon-ceramic brake system, which consists of six-piston brake calipers and 15.7-inch discs at the front, as well as four-piston units and 15-inch rotors behind there.

Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster

Inside, the roadster is not far from the SVJ coupe. As with the rest of the Aventador range, the cockpit-like design is divided by a large, raised center console, which houses the standard HVAC and infotainment controls, the Jet Fighter-like ignition button and the driving mode selector switch and consist of four options – Strada, Sport, Corsa and user configurable ego mode.

The digital instrument cluster offers beautiful graphics and nice model-specific details such as ALA system information in real time, which help to give the procedure a reason. The infotainment system in the middle stack looks outdated. The utility is greatly improved by a recent update that bought Apple CarPlay. However, using it is a bit more cumbersome than it should be because it doesn't offer touch support.

Steering

The Aventador SVJ Roadster is a car that demands the attention of everyone nearby – from eye-catching colors to wild aero elements. And if the look doesn't make people turn their heads, the motor will certainly do it.

While all competitors from Ferrari, McLaren and Porsche switched to turbocharging and hybridization, Lamborghini held on to its weapons with the large twelve-cylinder power plant of the Aventador. Although this makes a significant contribution to the Lambo's miserable 11 mpg fuel consumption, the SVJ delivers more linearity – and sounds much better – than boosted power plants.

It sounds absolutely incredible, a property that is becoming increasingly rare in the age of forced induction.

Like the SVJ Coupé, the Roadster is also equipped with a light exhaust system with a central exit. With the top down and the rear window down, it's easy to understand why Lamborghini resisted the trend. The mill howls to its redline at 8,500 rpm, echoes its song from the canyon's walls, and announces every off-throttle maneuver with a lively crack, crackle and pop from these fiery pipes. It sounds absolutely incredible, a property that is becoming increasingly rare in the age of forced induction.

It should come as no surprise that the Roadster, since it is basically the SVJ Coupé with a removable roof, behaves similarly to its hardtop counterpart that is tailored to the racetrack. As such, the car feels most at home when driven hard, and only comes into play when you have ventured into three-digit speeds.

Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster

In the city, the single clutch transmission is not in its element at the typical commuter pace, with slow gear changes that occur early and often. There are pronounced gaps in power output when the drive mode is set to Strada, the Aventador's quietest option.

On a positive note, the suspension is surprisingly compliant given the SVJ's mission. I found that setting the dampers to Strada, the drivetrain to Corsa (including manually controlled paddle shifting) and steering to sport resulted in the most comfortable behavior in daily driving.

The SVJ Roadster was a pleasure on the winding asphalt around the San Bernardino National Forest, where I was able to repeat my experience on the route with the coupe more precisely. Even the gearbox makes sense out there and provides almost instant upshift at full throttle with the kick of a repeating rifle.

All the effort that Lamborghini puts into the chassis is noticeable. Although the active Aero is only used at speeds that go far beyond the legally permissible limit, the Aventador SVJ Roadster is a pleasure to drive meaty Pirelli PZero Corsa tires thanks to its fast rack, the well-coordinated all-wheel steering system and the speed who wears it.

In the right circumstances, it's an exciting, visceral thing for the pilot, and digging the roof adds to the intensity.

How DT would configure this car

I take mine please with Verde scandal paint, sports seats, black calipers and bronze wheels.

Should you get one?

For better and for worse, the Lamborghini has refused to follow many industry trends with Aventador. With its successor expected to be announced next year and electrification almost certainly part of its platform, the SVJ Roadster could prove to be not just swan song for this era of the brand, but also for this untamed approach to modern supercar design.

You won't find such an experience for sale anywhere else at the moment. If you appreciate the bliss of a high-revving V12 with full chat and have the opportunity to participate, you should definitely get one.

Do you want more options? Check out our favorite cars from 2020.

Editor's recommendations




Wahoo Kickr BIKE Review: Cycle The Alps Without Leaving Home

Kickr

"The ability of the Wahoo Kickr BIKE to simulate a real ride by tipping, shifting and dragging is amazing."

  • Customization

  • Easy to use

  • Integration with external apps

  • construction quality

  • future-proof

The fitness world is constantly looking for innovative ways to make you look and feel good. From hula hoop to shake weight, the fitness industry is a constantly changing animal that clones itself year after year, with minor changes pretending to be "game changers" for your health. Take the exercise bike. Since the word "fitness" became ubiquitous with personal health, the exercise bike is the same as it has been since its introduction. Well, until now.

The Wahoo Kickr BIKE is something new. With an abundance of technologies in its compact frame, the Kickr BIKE offers the most impressive indoor cycling experience available to the public today, both for those who want to improve their cycling game and for those who want to lose a few pounds.

The Kickr BIKE was developed to emulate how a bicycle works in the real world. Conventional exercise bikes have a flywheel that you can manually adjust to increase resistance. On the Kickr BIKE, resistance is changed by magnets and an electric motor that change as you push through the gears, as well as changes in incline. The feeling is similar to driving a real bike.

Get ready for rock and roll

How does a stationary bike change the grade?

The Kickr BIKE is intelligent and can therefore be combined with virtual training programs such as Zwift, in which you can take a virtual ride. The Kickr BIKE either reacts with increased resistance when you drive up a hill or rolls your wheels when you drive down a slope. As you change gear to cope with the hill your avatar is climbing, the Kickr BIKE leans back to match the slope and puts you in a position on the bike that's exactly what you're up against would experience the street.

Before you get to Hill Tackling and avatars, however, you need to set up the Kickr BIKE. First, download the Wahoo app, which you can use to connect to the Kickr BIKE via Bluetooth. It contains numerous instructions for assembly and general FAQs. Once everything is assembled (which took about 20 minutes), all you have to do is plug the Kickr BIKE into a standard outlet and start pedaling.

Kickr bike

With the Kickr BIKE and the free Wahoo app, you can turn yourself and perform simple workouts. This includes adding wind resistance to a trip or using ERG mode. These are independent, advanced functions, but they do not use the full potential of the Kickr BIKE.

Since the Kickr BIKE does not contain a touchscreen and the training programs in the Wahoo app are slightly restricted, the inclusion of training programs from third-party providers such as Zwift is of crucial importance. When you can see a hill rise and the resistance gradually increases naturally, you can focus on your workout. In the meantime, your miles can be logged regardless of the training route chosen by Strava, Apple Health and a number of other fitness apps.

I've never been one for gimmicks, but the Kickr BIKE's ability to simulate a real ride through tipping, shifting, and drag is mind-boggling. Not only because you can concentrate on the task at hand (destroying half a mileage for a new PR), but also because you learn how to be a better cyclist.

The Kickr BIKE is much more fun.

Maybe being a better cyclist isn't on your priority list. If I have to decide whether I want to pay for spin courses or ride the Kickr BIKE in Zwift, the choice is easy. The Kickr BIKE is much more fun.

Addressing cycling enthusiasts

If you are a serious cyclist, there is no comparison. With the adjustability of the Kickr BIKE you can imitate your real bike exactly. There is even a "Bike Fit Wizard" that allows you to take a photo of your personal bike to get accurate numbers for the setup in terms of size. The Kickr BIKE uses standard parts so that you can put on the handlebars, saddle and pedals and even adjust the crank length if necessary.

You can also adapt the Kickr BIKE to your outdoor bike by adapting the gearbox with different drives. It can handle one to three chainrings and 9 to 12 speeds, creating an experience like it is in the real world. It even simulates the small bumps in resistance when changing gears – but with the Kickr BIKE, you never have to worry about losing a chain.

You can adapt the Kickr BIKE to your outdoor bike by adapting the gearbox with different drives.

In addition to adapting the fit and powertrain, the Kickr BIKE can mimic the various shifter configurations from Shimano, Sram and Campagnolo. Whatever you're doing, the Kickr BIKE can keep up.

Technically, yet charming

That was a lot of jargon for the bike nerds, but that's the secret charm of the Kickr BIKE. The marketing of this device makes you believe that only serious cyclists can sort out the intricacies of the Kickr BIKE. Wahoo's incredibly easy-to-use app makes setup and use a breeze.

If you have all the information right in front of you and try out different formats by changing gear or choosing the desired crank length, a beginner can get to know cycling. If you are not interested, the Kickr BIKE has a function called ERG mode, which, in conjunction with a training app, takes over all resistance tasks completely and lets you step on a given power output for interval training or general exercises.

In short, it doesn't matter if you are a cyclist. This is a great exercise bike. Period.

What would keep you from buying a Wahoo Kickr BIKE? The price. At $ 3,499.99, it's certainly not cheap. You also need to sign up for a training program like Zwift to get the most out of all the bike's features. That costs $ 14.99 a month.

In short, it doesn't matter if you are a cyclist. This is a great exercise bike. Period.

If you're just looking for a fitness aid, these prices make a peloton look pretty reasonable, and other exercise bikes are a bargain. Measuring the Kickr on these less intelligent training devices is like comparing your old Nokia 5110 with the iPhone 11.

warranty information

One year material and processing guarantee.

Our opinion

The Wahoo Kickr BIKE has completely changed my view of indoor training. The over 200 miles I covered with the Kickr BIKE was the greatest fun I had indoors with my bike. By bringing the most positive aspects of a real ride to the safety of my home, I don't know how to return to a regular trainer.

Is there a better alternative?

The closest competitor is Tacx & # 39; NEO Bike. It is an intelligent trainer, so it has some similar functions. Instead of tipping the bike to adjust it to the current incline, the Tacx gives a simulated road feeling that essentially mimics the bumpy nature of gravel, cobblestone or slippery roads. At $ 3,200, the Tacx is a little cheaper, but in our estimation, and without driving the Tacx, the Wahoo is the obvious choice due to the ease of use and adaptability of all components.

How long it will take?

The Kickr BIKE feels durable. It is robust and has never creaked or complained about the efforts I have made. Even more impressive is the inclusion of additional, currently unused buttons for future functions by Wahoo. This type of preparation convinced me that the Kickr BIKE only gets better with additional firmware upgrades.

Should you buy it

Yes. The Kickr BIKE revolutionizes indoor cycling from "just one more workout" to a comprehensive experience for anyone who wants to jump on it.

Editor's recommendations




Puma Smartwatch Review: This Smartwatch Isn’t As Atheltic As It Looks

Puma smartwatch

"The Puma smartwatch looks good, but it doesn't work."

  • Slim and sporty design

  • built-in GPS

  • Sharp, bright screen

  • Slow and sluggish

  • Bad battery life

  • Uncomfortable

  • Too expensive

As the third largest sporting goods manufacturer in the world, Puma is a big brand, but the simply named Puma Smartwatch is the company's first foray into the world of smartwatches. The Puma Smartwatch is manufactured by the Fossil Group and has familiar specifications and the Google Wear OS.

Puma has monitored the sporty design and offers its own app with some deeper fitness features than typical Wear OS watches, but it's also one of the slowest and flawed ones we've tested – a high price for fitness.

Design and comfort

The Puma smartwatch definitely looks like this. It is slim and very light with a striking paint job that contrasts black with daylight yellow. This is a smart watch that is hard to ignore. It is reminiscent of the Fossil Sport, but there is only a single crown and the flanking buttons that you would normally find on Fossil smartwatches are missing.

Puma smartwatchSimon Hill / Digital Trends

A smooth, perfectly round, beveled aluminum dial is held from black plastic that extends from the tabs and has cut-off parts to achieve the eye-catching two-tone look. The crown is also yellow with the Puma logo.

The Puma Smartwatch has a silicone strap with a black latch and the Puma logo is embossed at the end. Because the Puma Smartwatch is light and slim, it slips easily under the cuff and rarely gets stuck – which can be a problem with an oversized watch like the Diesel On Axial.

However, the daylight yellow prevents it from fitting in. The Puma Smartwatch looks out of place with a buttoned shirt in an office environment or even with a casual outfit in a bar. This is a smartwatch that wants to go to the gym or run.

I was expecting the silicone wristband and light weight to result in a smartwatch that's comfortable and easy to forget you're wearing, but in fact I found the Puma smartwatch a little uncomfortable. The structured silicone band is a little stiffer than other silicone bands I've worn.

On the positive side, it grips your wrist and the oversized end of the strap ensures that it never comes loose even during a hectic workout. Although you can easily change the band, it can be difficult to find an alternative that fits your body. There are four dials designed by Puma, all of which are a bit boring. Aside from the ubiquitous Puma logo, they don't really match the rest of the design in terms of color or appearance.

The 1.19-inch AMOLED display looks good in a 44 mm case and is sharp, bright and legible in most lighting conditions.

Puma smartwatchSimon Hill / Digital Trends

The Puma smartwatch has a distinctive look that fits the brand, but it feels a little cheap and looks bad in non-athletic environments. In some markets, there are less eye-catching color options for white and rose gold or black and gray, which may offer a bit more stylistic versatility.

Software and performance

Wear OS looks good, but it doesn't work well. This is a complaint I had with the Michael Kors Access Lexington 2 and it's a complaint my colleague had with the Fossil Gen 5, but it's worse with the Puma Smartwatch. There were many random freezes when using this smartwatch, which were often left behind when the screen was swiped, and loading apps was consistently slow.

The Puma smartwatch is equipped with the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor, but unfortunately someone made the wrong decision to use 512 MB RAM instead of 1 GB. The difference in daily use compared to Wear OS smartwatches, which I recently tested and which have 1 GB RAM, is pronounced. Using the Puma smartwatch is frustrating. It is slow and has to be reset far too often.

Puma smartwatchSimon Hill / Digital Trends

The rotating crown works well and is the best way to get close control when trying to swipe up or down a list. You can also install a number of apps from the Play Store, from shopping lists to music controls to all kinds of fitness options. Although there are more choices than ever, the overall level of polish and functionality isn't very impressive and still fades compared to the Apple Watch's special app store.

The Puma Smartwatch has a microphone, so you can use Google Assistant from your wrist. However, there is no speaker, so the answers are in text form. There is also support for Google Pay so you can pay from your wrist, which is sometimes convenient.

Internally, the Puma Smartwatch has 4 GB of storage space for music and apps. Most other current versions of Fossil have 8 GB.

GPS and app compatibility

As an outrageously sporty device, the Puma smartwatch has to shine in the fitness department, and I think it does too. You’ve integrated Google Fit for basic tracking. There's also a heart rate monitor, built-in GPS, and water resistance from 5 ATMs that you can swim with.

While Google Fit is enough for casual coaches to track their progress every day, more serious athletes may want to try the PUMATRAC app installed on the Puma smartwatch. However, you also need to install the companion app (for Android or iOS). on your smartphone. With PUMATRAC, you can leave your phone at home and track your heart rate, distance, pace, altitude and calories with the Puma Smartwatch. It's also packed with workouts, allows you to create a fitness workout plan, and even offers coaching.

Puma smartwatchSimon Hill / Digital Trends

I found that the Puma smartwatch was generally good for fitness tracking, but in some cases it had trouble getting a GPS fix and sometimes it couldn't sync with the Google Fit app on my phone become. There was no obvious reason for it. Heart rate, pace, and distance data all seem to be pretty accurate.

Battery life

Puma is optimistic that the smartwatch will offer a 24-hour battery life, but I've never come close to that. It got me through an average day, but only by switching to battery saver in the evening. If you are a very light user, you may be taken to bedtime. If you want to track your heart rate and get lots of notifications or use other apps, you can expect the steam to go out in the early evening.

The charging cradle has a magnetic contact and stays nicely in place. Charging only takes about an hour, but you will likely still have it charged overnight.

Puma smartwatchSimon Hill / Digital Trends

Price, availability and guarantee

The Puma smartwatch costs $ 275 (or £ 249) and can be purchased directly from the Puma website or from various retailers. It comes with a standard two-year warranty that covers defects in material and workmanship under normal use for the period from the date of purchase and lasts for two years.

Our opinion

The Puma Smartwatch is a well-known Fossil Wear-OS device, which is disappointed by its low RAM and offers even more faulty performance than your usual Wear-OS device. Poor battery life is also not an advantage. It looks sporty and has a good range of fitness tracking features, but is too expensive for what you get.

Are there alternatives?

If it's primarily a fitness tracking watch you're looking for, the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 is the best choice. Depending on the size chosen, the price is almost exactly the same at $ 280 or $ 300. It has better software, more comprehensive training tracking, and better battery life.

For iPhone owners, the latest Apple Watch is the obvious choice. Starting at $ 400, it's much more expensive, but superior in every way. If that's too much, consider Apple Watch Series 3, which costs $ 200 or $ 230 depending on the size you choose. It's still a better option than the Puma smartwatch.

How long it will take?

It offers water resistance up to 50 meters, but the Puma smartwatch has an aluminum case and plastic eyelets. It is therefore difficult to say how well the shocks can withstand. It should take a couple of years.

Should you buy one?

No. There are better options for the same money or less.

Editor's recommendations